Alternatives to the fixed-set model: A review of appraisal models of emotion

Over several decades, appraisal theory has emerged as a prominent theoretical framework explaining the elicitation and differentiation of emotions, and has stimulated a great deal of theorising and empirical research. Despite the large amount of research in this area, there are many aspects of appra...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Cognition and emotion 2017-01, Vol.31 (1), p.19-32
Main Authors: Fernando, Julian W., Kashima, Yoshihisa, Laham, Simon M.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Appraisal
appraisal theory
categorisation
Cognitive appraisal
Differentiation
Elicitation
emotional responses
Emotions
Humans
Psychological Theory
Theorists
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Over several decades, appraisal theory has emerged as a prominent theoretical framework explaining the elicitation and differentiation of emotions, and has stimulated a great deal of theorising and empirical research. Despite the large amount of research in this area, there are many aspects of appraisal theory and research that remain unclear or problematic. In this review, we identify a common assumption of many appraisal theories-the fixed appraisal set-and argue that this assumption, combined with a lack of explicit theorising about the predicted relationship between appraisals and emotions, leads to a lack of clarity in both appraisal models and the empirical testing of those models. We recommend that appraisal theorists move in a direction already taken by a small number of theorists, and adopt the starting assumption of a variable appraisal set. We further suggest that theories of concepts and categorisation may inform theorising about appraisal-emotion relationships.
ISSN:0269-9931
1464-0600
DOI:10.1080/02699931.2015.1074548