Comparative release of growth factors from PRP, PRF, and advanced-PRF

• Published in: Clinical oral investigations 2016-12, Vol.20 (9), p.2353-2360
• Main Authors: Kobayashi, Eizaburo, Flückiger, Laura, Fujioka-Kobayashi, Masako, Sawada, Kosaku, Sculean, Anton, Schaller, Benoit, Miron, Richard J.
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Adult; Blood Platelets - metabolism; Dentistry; Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay; Fibrin - metabolism; Humans; Intercellular Signaling Peptides and Proteins - blood; Intercellular Signaling Peptides and Proteins - metabolism; Medicine; Middle Aged; Original Article; Platelet-Rich Plasma - metabolism
• ISSN: 1432-6981; 1436-3771
• DOI: 10.1007/s00784-016-1719-1

Objectives The use of platelet concentrates has gained increasing awareness in recent years for regenerative procedures in modern dentistry. The aim of the present study was to compare growth factor release over time from platelet-rich plasma (PRP), platelet-rich fibrin (PRF), and a modernized protocol for PRF, advanced-PRF (A-PRF). Materials and methods Eighteen blood samples were collected from six donors (3 samples each for PRP, PRF, and A-PRF). Following preparation, samples were incubated in a plate shaker and assessed for growth factor release at 15 min, 60 min, 8 h, 1 day, 3 days, and 10 days. Thereafter, growth factor release of PDGF-AA, PDGF-AB, PDGF-BB, TGFB1, VEGF, EGF, and IGF was quantified using ELISA. Results The highest reported growth factor released from platelet concentrates was PDGF-AA followed by PDGF-BB, TGFB1, VEGF, and PDGF-AB. In general, following 15–60 min incubation, PRP released significantly higher growth factors when compared to PRF and A-PRF. At later time points up to 10 days, it was routinely found that A-PRF released the highest total growth factors. Furthermore, A-PRF released significantly higher total protein accumulated over a 10-day period when compared to PRP or PRF. Conclusion The results from the present study indicate that the various platelet concentrates have quite different release kinetics. The advantage of PRP is the release of significantly higher proteins at earlier time points whereas PRF displayed a continual and steady release of growth factors over a 10-day period. Furthermore, in general, it was observed that the new formulation of PRF (A-PRF) released significantly higher total quantities of growth factors when compared to traditional PRF. Clinical relevance Based on these findings, PRP can be recommended for fast delivery of growth factors whereas A-PRF is better-suited for long-term release.