Loading…
Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy in Thin Cutaneous Melanoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Background Most patients with melanoma have a thin (≤1.00 mm) lesion. There is uncertainty as to which patients with thin melanoma should undergo sentinel lymph node (SN) biopsy. We sought to quantify the proportion of SN metastases in patients with thin melanoma and to determine the pooled effect o...
Saved in:
Published in: | Annals of surgical oncology 2016-12, Vol.23 (13), p.4178-4188 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-68e530a4cdfe5406130f2fd8b87d56512a787f268b0953ae59460c1ab834c23e3 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-68e530a4cdfe5406130f2fd8b87d56512a787f268b0953ae59460c1ab834c23e3 |
container_end_page | 4188 |
container_issue | 13 |
container_start_page | 4178 |
container_title | Annals of surgical oncology |
container_volume | 23 |
creator | Cordeiro, Erin Gervais, Mai-Kim Shah, Prakesh S. Look Hong, Nicole J. Wright, Frances C. |
description | Background
Most patients with melanoma have a thin (≤1.00 mm) lesion. There is uncertainty as to which patients with thin melanoma should undergo sentinel lymph node (SN) biopsy. We sought to quantify the proportion of SN metastases in patients with thin melanoma and to determine the pooled effect of high-risk features of the primary lesion on SN positivity.
Methods
Published literature between 1980 and 2015 was searched and critically appraised. Primary outcome was the proportion of SN metastases in patients with thin cutaneous melanoma. Secondary outcomes included the effect of high-risk pathological features of the primary lesion on the proportion of SN metastases. Summary measures were estimated by Mantel–Haenszel method using random effects meta-analyses.
Results
Sixty studies (10,928 patients) met the criteria for inclusion. Pooled SN positivity was 4.5 % [95 % confidence interval (CI) 3.8–5.2 %]. Predictors of a positive SN were: thickness ≥0.75 mm [adjusted odds ratio (AOR) 1.90 (95 % CI 1.08–3.34); with a likelihood of SN metastases of 8.8 % (95 % CI 6.4–11.2 %)]; Clark level IV/V [AOR 2.24 (95 % CI 1.23–4.08); with a likelihood of 7.3 % (95 % CI 6.2–8.4 %)]; ≥1 mitoses/mm
2
[AOR 6.64 (95 % CI 2.77–15.88); pooled likelihood 8.8 % (95 % CI 6.2–11.4 %)]; and the presence of microsatellites [unadjusted OR 6.94 (95 % CI 2.13–22.60); likelihood 26.6 % (95 % CI 4.3–48.9 %)].
Conclusions
The pooled proportion of SN metastases in thin melanoma is 4.5 %. Thickness ≥0.75 mm, Clark level IV/V, mitoses, and microsatellites significantly increased the odds of SN positivity and should prompt strong consideration of SN biopsy. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1245/s10434-016-5137-z |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1826664502</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>4235492791</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-68e530a4cdfe5406130f2fd8b87d56512a787f268b0953ae59460c1ab834c23e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kF1LwzAUhoMobk5_gDcS8Mabar6beTeHXzAV3LwTQtaeuo5-zKZVul9vRqeI4E1OyHnOm8OD0DEl55QJeeEoEVwEhKpAUh4G6x3Up9K_CKXprr8TpYMhU7KHDpxbEkJDTuQ-6jE15CykpI9ep1DUaQEZnrT5aoEfyxjwVVquXIvTAs8W_hg3tS2gbBx-gMwWZW4v8QhPW1dDbus0ws_wkcIntkXsidoGo8JmrUvdIdpLbObgaFsH6OXmeja-CyZPt_fj0SSIeMjqQGmQnFgRxQlIQRTlJGFJrOc6jKWSlNlQhwlTek6GkluQQ6FIRO1ccxExDnyAzrrcVVW-N-Bqk6cugizr1jZUM6WUkIR59PQPuiybyu-7obgIpaZyQ9GOiqrSuQoSs6rS3FatocRs1JtOvfHqzUa9WfuZk21yM88h_pn4du0B1gHOt4o3qH59_W_qF93QjTM</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1834758152</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy in Thin Cutaneous Melanoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis</title><source>Springer Nature</source><creator>Cordeiro, Erin ; Gervais, Mai-Kim ; Shah, Prakesh S. ; Look Hong, Nicole J. ; Wright, Frances C.</creator><creatorcontrib>Cordeiro, Erin ; Gervais, Mai-Kim ; Shah, Prakesh S. ; Look Hong, Nicole J. ; Wright, Frances C.</creatorcontrib><description>Background
Most patients with melanoma have a thin (≤1.00 mm) lesion. There is uncertainty as to which patients with thin melanoma should undergo sentinel lymph node (SN) biopsy. We sought to quantify the proportion of SN metastases in patients with thin melanoma and to determine the pooled effect of high-risk features of the primary lesion on SN positivity.
Methods
Published literature between 1980 and 2015 was searched and critically appraised. Primary outcome was the proportion of SN metastases in patients with thin cutaneous melanoma. Secondary outcomes included the effect of high-risk pathological features of the primary lesion on the proportion of SN metastases. Summary measures were estimated by Mantel–Haenszel method using random effects meta-analyses.
Results
Sixty studies (10,928 patients) met the criteria for inclusion. Pooled SN positivity was 4.5 % [95 % confidence interval (CI) 3.8–5.2 %]. Predictors of a positive SN were: thickness ≥0.75 mm [adjusted odds ratio (AOR) 1.90 (95 % CI 1.08–3.34); with a likelihood of SN metastases of 8.8 % (95 % CI 6.4–11.2 %)]; Clark level IV/V [AOR 2.24 (95 % CI 1.23–4.08); with a likelihood of 7.3 % (95 % CI 6.2–8.4 %)]; ≥1 mitoses/mm
2
[AOR 6.64 (95 % CI 2.77–15.88); pooled likelihood 8.8 % (95 % CI 6.2–11.4 %)]; and the presence of microsatellites [unadjusted OR 6.94 (95 % CI 2.13–22.60); likelihood 26.6 % (95 % CI 4.3–48.9 %)].
Conclusions
The pooled proportion of SN metastases in thin melanoma is 4.5 %. Thickness ≥0.75 mm, Clark level IV/V, mitoses, and microsatellites significantly increased the odds of SN positivity and should prompt strong consideration of SN biopsy.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1068-9265</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1534-4681</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1245/s10434-016-5137-z</identifier><identifier>PMID: 26932710</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cham: Springer International Publishing</publisher><subject>Humans ; Lymph Nodes - pathology ; Lymphatic Metastasis ; Medicine ; Medicine & Public Health ; Melanoma - pathology ; Melanoma - secondary ; Melanomas ; Mitotic Index ; Oncology ; Patient Selection ; Risk Factors ; Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy ; Skin Neoplasms - pathology ; Surgery ; Surgical Oncology ; Tumor Burden</subject><ispartof>Annals of surgical oncology, 2016-12, Vol.23 (13), p.4178-4188</ispartof><rights>Society of Surgical Oncology 2016</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-68e530a4cdfe5406130f2fd8b87d56512a787f268b0953ae59460c1ab834c23e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-68e530a4cdfe5406130f2fd8b87d56512a787f268b0953ae59460c1ab834c23e3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26932710$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Cordeiro, Erin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gervais, Mai-Kim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shah, Prakesh S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Look Hong, Nicole J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wright, Frances C.</creatorcontrib><title>Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy in Thin Cutaneous Melanoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis</title><title>Annals of surgical oncology</title><addtitle>Ann Surg Oncol</addtitle><addtitle>Ann Surg Oncol</addtitle><description>Background
Most patients with melanoma have a thin (≤1.00 mm) lesion. There is uncertainty as to which patients with thin melanoma should undergo sentinel lymph node (SN) biopsy. We sought to quantify the proportion of SN metastases in patients with thin melanoma and to determine the pooled effect of high-risk features of the primary lesion on SN positivity.
Methods
Published literature between 1980 and 2015 was searched and critically appraised. Primary outcome was the proportion of SN metastases in patients with thin cutaneous melanoma. Secondary outcomes included the effect of high-risk pathological features of the primary lesion on the proportion of SN metastases. Summary measures were estimated by Mantel–Haenszel method using random effects meta-analyses.
Results
Sixty studies (10,928 patients) met the criteria for inclusion. Pooled SN positivity was 4.5 % [95 % confidence interval (CI) 3.8–5.2 %]. Predictors of a positive SN were: thickness ≥0.75 mm [adjusted odds ratio (AOR) 1.90 (95 % CI 1.08–3.34); with a likelihood of SN metastases of 8.8 % (95 % CI 6.4–11.2 %)]; Clark level IV/V [AOR 2.24 (95 % CI 1.23–4.08); with a likelihood of 7.3 % (95 % CI 6.2–8.4 %)]; ≥1 mitoses/mm
2
[AOR 6.64 (95 % CI 2.77–15.88); pooled likelihood 8.8 % (95 % CI 6.2–11.4 %)]; and the presence of microsatellites [unadjusted OR 6.94 (95 % CI 2.13–22.60); likelihood 26.6 % (95 % CI 4.3–48.9 %)].
Conclusions
The pooled proportion of SN metastases in thin melanoma is 4.5 %. Thickness ≥0.75 mm, Clark level IV/V, mitoses, and microsatellites significantly increased the odds of SN positivity and should prompt strong consideration of SN biopsy.</description><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Lymph Nodes - pathology</subject><subject>Lymphatic Metastasis</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine & Public Health</subject><subject>Melanoma - pathology</subject><subject>Melanoma - secondary</subject><subject>Melanomas</subject><subject>Mitotic Index</subject><subject>Oncology</subject><subject>Patient Selection</subject><subject>Risk Factors</subject><subject>Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy</subject><subject>Skin Neoplasms - pathology</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>Surgical Oncology</subject><subject>Tumor Burden</subject><issn>1068-9265</issn><issn>1534-4681</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kF1LwzAUhoMobk5_gDcS8Mabar6beTeHXzAV3LwTQtaeuo5-zKZVul9vRqeI4E1OyHnOm8OD0DEl55QJeeEoEVwEhKpAUh4G6x3Up9K_CKXprr8TpYMhU7KHDpxbEkJDTuQ-6jE15CykpI9ep1DUaQEZnrT5aoEfyxjwVVquXIvTAs8W_hg3tS2gbBx-gMwWZW4v8QhPW1dDbus0ws_wkcIntkXsidoGo8JmrUvdIdpLbObgaFsH6OXmeja-CyZPt_fj0SSIeMjqQGmQnFgRxQlIQRTlJGFJrOc6jKWSlNlQhwlTek6GkluQQ6FIRO1ccxExDnyAzrrcVVW-N-Bqk6cugizr1jZUM6WUkIR59PQPuiybyu-7obgIpaZyQ9GOiqrSuQoSs6rS3FatocRs1JtOvfHqzUa9WfuZk21yM88h_pn4du0B1gHOt4o3qH59_W_qF93QjTM</recordid><startdate>20161201</startdate><enddate>20161201</enddate><creator>Cordeiro, Erin</creator><creator>Gervais, Mai-Kim</creator><creator>Shah, Prakesh S.</creator><creator>Look Hong, Nicole J.</creator><creator>Wright, Frances C.</creator><general>Springer International Publishing</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7TO</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20161201</creationdate><title>Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy in Thin Cutaneous Melanoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis</title><author>Cordeiro, Erin ; Gervais, Mai-Kim ; Shah, Prakesh S. ; Look Hong, Nicole J. ; Wright, Frances C.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-68e530a4cdfe5406130f2fd8b87d56512a787f268b0953ae59460c1ab834c23e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Lymph Nodes - pathology</topic><topic>Lymphatic Metastasis</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine & Public Health</topic><topic>Melanoma - pathology</topic><topic>Melanoma - secondary</topic><topic>Melanomas</topic><topic>Mitotic Index</topic><topic>Oncology</topic><topic>Patient Selection</topic><topic>Risk Factors</topic><topic>Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy</topic><topic>Skin Neoplasms - pathology</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>Surgical Oncology</topic><topic>Tumor Burden</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Cordeiro, Erin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gervais, Mai-Kim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shah, Prakesh S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Look Hong, Nicole J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wright, Frances C.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Oncogenes and Growth Factors Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Annals of surgical oncology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Cordeiro, Erin</au><au>Gervais, Mai-Kim</au><au>Shah, Prakesh S.</au><au>Look Hong, Nicole J.</au><au>Wright, Frances C.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy in Thin Cutaneous Melanoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis</atitle><jtitle>Annals of surgical oncology</jtitle><stitle>Ann Surg Oncol</stitle><addtitle>Ann Surg Oncol</addtitle><date>2016-12-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>23</volume><issue>13</issue><spage>4178</spage><epage>4188</epage><pages>4178-4188</pages><issn>1068-9265</issn><eissn>1534-4681</eissn><abstract>Background
Most patients with melanoma have a thin (≤1.00 mm) lesion. There is uncertainty as to which patients with thin melanoma should undergo sentinel lymph node (SN) biopsy. We sought to quantify the proportion of SN metastases in patients with thin melanoma and to determine the pooled effect of high-risk features of the primary lesion on SN positivity.
Methods
Published literature between 1980 and 2015 was searched and critically appraised. Primary outcome was the proportion of SN metastases in patients with thin cutaneous melanoma. Secondary outcomes included the effect of high-risk pathological features of the primary lesion on the proportion of SN metastases. Summary measures were estimated by Mantel–Haenszel method using random effects meta-analyses.
Results
Sixty studies (10,928 patients) met the criteria for inclusion. Pooled SN positivity was 4.5 % [95 % confidence interval (CI) 3.8–5.2 %]. Predictors of a positive SN were: thickness ≥0.75 mm [adjusted odds ratio (AOR) 1.90 (95 % CI 1.08–3.34); with a likelihood of SN metastases of 8.8 % (95 % CI 6.4–11.2 %)]; Clark level IV/V [AOR 2.24 (95 % CI 1.23–4.08); with a likelihood of 7.3 % (95 % CI 6.2–8.4 %)]; ≥1 mitoses/mm
2
[AOR 6.64 (95 % CI 2.77–15.88); pooled likelihood 8.8 % (95 % CI 6.2–11.4 %)]; and the presence of microsatellites [unadjusted OR 6.94 (95 % CI 2.13–22.60); likelihood 26.6 % (95 % CI 4.3–48.9 %)].
Conclusions
The pooled proportion of SN metastases in thin melanoma is 4.5 %. Thickness ≥0.75 mm, Clark level IV/V, mitoses, and microsatellites significantly increased the odds of SN positivity and should prompt strong consideration of SN biopsy.</abstract><cop>Cham</cop><pub>Springer International Publishing</pub><pmid>26932710</pmid><doi>10.1245/s10434-016-5137-z</doi><tpages>11</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1068-9265 |
ispartof | Annals of surgical oncology, 2016-12, Vol.23 (13), p.4178-4188 |
issn | 1068-9265 1534-4681 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1826664502 |
source | Springer Nature |
subjects | Humans Lymph Nodes - pathology Lymphatic Metastasis Medicine Medicine & Public Health Melanoma - pathology Melanoma - secondary Melanomas Mitotic Index Oncology Patient Selection Risk Factors Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy Skin Neoplasms - pathology Surgery Surgical Oncology Tumor Burden |
title | Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy in Thin Cutaneous Melanoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T22%3A23%3A37IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Sentinel%20Lymph%20Node%20Biopsy%20in%20Thin%20Cutaneous%20Melanoma:%20A%20Systematic%20Review%20and%20Meta-Analysis&rft.jtitle=Annals%20of%20surgical%20oncology&rft.au=Cordeiro,%20Erin&rft.date=2016-12-01&rft.volume=23&rft.issue=13&rft.spage=4178&rft.epage=4188&rft.pages=4178-4188&rft.issn=1068-9265&rft.eissn=1534-4681&rft_id=info:doi/10.1245/s10434-016-5137-z&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E4235492791%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-68e530a4cdfe5406130f2fd8b87d56512a787f268b0953ae59460c1ab834c23e3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1834758152&rft_id=info:pmid/26932710&rfr_iscdi=true |