Loading…

Investigating Storage and Retrieval Processes of Directed Forgetting: A Model-Based Approach

Intentional forgetting of previously learned information is an adaptive cognitive capability of humans but its cognitive underpinnings are not yet well understood. It has been argued that it strongly depends on the presentation method whether forgetting instructions alter storage or retrieval stages...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition memory, and cognition, 2016-10, Vol.42 (10), p.1526-1543
Main Authors: Rummel, Jan, Marevic, Ivan, Kuhlmann, Beatrice G
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a403t-9b4df07c81898ac82e8bb50be8abe583f5c1dfc8cca034267f27cd3a06b691633
cites
container_end_page 1543
container_issue 10
container_start_page 1526
container_title Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition
container_volume 42
creator Rummel, Jan
Marevic, Ivan
Kuhlmann, Beatrice G
description Intentional forgetting of previously learned information is an adaptive cognitive capability of humans but its cognitive underpinnings are not yet well understood. It has been argued that it strongly depends on the presentation method whether forgetting instructions alter storage or retrieval stages (Basden, Basden, & Gargano, 1993). In Experiment 1, we compared the processes underlying the directed-forgetting effect in 2 mosts widely used presentation methods, namely the list-method and the item-method, and also differentiated between costs (i.e., poorer memory for to-be-forgotten information) and benefits (i.e., better memory for to-be-remembered information) of directed forgetting within both methods. Using a multinomial modeling approach (Riefer & Rouder, 1992; Rouder & Batchelder, 1998), our results showed that directed-forgetting benefits were due to better storage of to-be-remembered information in both methods. In line with current theorizing, list-method directed-forgetting costs occurred due to reduced retrieval of to-be-forgotten information. Item-method costs, however, occurred not only due to reduced storage, which is the dominant current view, but also due to reduced retrieval. In Experiment 2, we replicated the novel finding that retrieval processes contribute to item-method directed forgetting independent of recall-output order. Implications of these findings for current directed-forgetting theories are discussed.
doi_str_mv 10.1037/xlm0000266
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1826665834</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ1115987</ericid><sourcerecordid>1826665834</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a403t-9b4df07c81898ac82e8bb50be8abe583f5c1dfc8cca034267f27cd3a06b691633</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kUtv1DAUhS1ERaeFTfdFlthUSAE_4he7ofSFWrUqsKsUOc7NkCoTB9up6L_H6ZRWYoE3XpzvnmPfg9AeJR8o4erj735N8mFSvkALargpKNPiJVoQpnShuOHbaCfG2xkiXL9C20waQUpDF-jmbLiDmLqVTd2wwt-SD3YF2A4NvoYUOrizPb4K3kGMELFv8ZcugEvQ4GMfVpDmsU94iS98A33x2casLMcxeOt-vkZbre0jvHm8d9GP46Pvh6fF-eXJ2eHyvLAl4akwddm0RDlNtdHWaQa6rgWpQdsahOatcLRpnXbOEl4yqVqmXMMtkbU0VHK-iw42vjn215S_U6276KDv7QB-ihXVeTcyO5UZffcPeuunMOTXzZSWSnAj_kspRUshmJm93m8oF3yMAdpqDN3ahvuKkmpupnpuJsNvHy2neg3NE_q3igzsbwAInXuSj75SSoXRKuvFRrejrcZ472xIneshuikEGNIcVpXsIVswyf8AG9-hDw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1771455294</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Investigating Storage and Retrieval Processes of Directed Forgetting: A Model-Based Approach</title><source>PsycArticles (EBSCO)</source><source>ERIC</source><creator>Rummel, Jan ; Marevic, Ivan ; Kuhlmann, Beatrice G</creator><contributor>Greene, Robert L</contributor><creatorcontrib>Rummel, Jan ; Marevic, Ivan ; Kuhlmann, Beatrice G ; Greene, Robert L</creatorcontrib><description>Intentional forgetting of previously learned information is an adaptive cognitive capability of humans but its cognitive underpinnings are not yet well understood. It has been argued that it strongly depends on the presentation method whether forgetting instructions alter storage or retrieval stages (Basden, Basden, &amp; Gargano, 1993). In Experiment 1, we compared the processes underlying the directed-forgetting effect in 2 mosts widely used presentation methods, namely the list-method and the item-method, and also differentiated between costs (i.e., poorer memory for to-be-forgotten information) and benefits (i.e., better memory for to-be-remembered information) of directed forgetting within both methods. Using a multinomial modeling approach (Riefer &amp; Rouder, 1992; Rouder &amp; Batchelder, 1998), our results showed that directed-forgetting benefits were due to better storage of to-be-remembered information in both methods. In line with current theorizing, list-method directed-forgetting costs occurred due to reduced retrieval of to-be-forgotten information. Item-method costs, however, occurred not only due to reduced storage, which is the dominant current view, but also due to reduced retrieval. In Experiment 2, we replicated the novel finding that retrieval processes contribute to item-method directed forgetting independent of recall-output order. Implications of these findings for current directed-forgetting theories are discussed.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0278-7393</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1939-1285</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1037/xlm0000266</identifier><identifier>PMID: 26950491</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: American Psychological Association</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Adult ; Analysis of Variance ; Cognitive ability ; Cognitive Processes ; College Students ; Comparative Analysis ; Control Groups ; Cues ; Experimental Groups ; Experimental psychology ; Female ; Foreign Countries ; Forgetting ; Germany ; Human ; Human Information Storage ; Humans ; Information Retrieval ; Information Storage ; Intentional Learning ; Interference (Learning) ; Language ; Male ; Memory ; Models, Psychological ; Probability ; Psychological Tests ; Recall ; Recall (Psychology) ; Recognition (Psychology) ; Retention ; Statistical Analysis ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition, 2016-10, Vol.42 (10), p.1526-1543</ispartof><rights>2016 American Psychological Association</rights><rights>(c) 2016 APA, all rights reserved).</rights><rights>2016, American Psychological Association</rights><rights>Copyright American Psychological Association Oct 2016</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a403t-9b4df07c81898ac82e8bb50be8abe583f5c1dfc8cca034267f27cd3a06b691633</citedby><orcidid>0000-0002-0443-1743 ; 0000-0002-3235-5717</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ1115987$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26950491$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Greene, Robert L</contributor><creatorcontrib>Rummel, Jan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marevic, Ivan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kuhlmann, Beatrice G</creatorcontrib><title>Investigating Storage and Retrieval Processes of Directed Forgetting: A Model-Based Approach</title><title>Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition</title><addtitle>J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn</addtitle><description>Intentional forgetting of previously learned information is an adaptive cognitive capability of humans but its cognitive underpinnings are not yet well understood. It has been argued that it strongly depends on the presentation method whether forgetting instructions alter storage or retrieval stages (Basden, Basden, &amp; Gargano, 1993). In Experiment 1, we compared the processes underlying the directed-forgetting effect in 2 mosts widely used presentation methods, namely the list-method and the item-method, and also differentiated between costs (i.e., poorer memory for to-be-forgotten information) and benefits (i.e., better memory for to-be-remembered information) of directed forgetting within both methods. Using a multinomial modeling approach (Riefer &amp; Rouder, 1992; Rouder &amp; Batchelder, 1998), our results showed that directed-forgetting benefits were due to better storage of to-be-remembered information in both methods. In line with current theorizing, list-method directed-forgetting costs occurred due to reduced retrieval of to-be-forgotten information. Item-method costs, however, occurred not only due to reduced storage, which is the dominant current view, but also due to reduced retrieval. In Experiment 2, we replicated the novel finding that retrieval processes contribute to item-method directed forgetting independent of recall-output order. Implications of these findings for current directed-forgetting theories are discussed.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Analysis of Variance</subject><subject>Cognitive ability</subject><subject>Cognitive Processes</subject><subject>College Students</subject><subject>Comparative Analysis</subject><subject>Control Groups</subject><subject>Cues</subject><subject>Experimental Groups</subject><subject>Experimental psychology</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Foreign Countries</subject><subject>Forgetting</subject><subject>Germany</subject><subject>Human</subject><subject>Human Information Storage</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Information Retrieval</subject><subject>Information Storage</subject><subject>Intentional Learning</subject><subject>Interference (Learning)</subject><subject>Language</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Memory</subject><subject>Models, Psychological</subject><subject>Probability</subject><subject>Psychological Tests</subject><subject>Recall</subject><subject>Recall (Psychology)</subject><subject>Recognition (Psychology)</subject><subject>Retention</subject><subject>Statistical Analysis</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>0278-7393</issn><issn>1939-1285</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7SW</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kUtv1DAUhS1ERaeFTfdFlthUSAE_4he7ofSFWrUqsKsUOc7NkCoTB9up6L_H6ZRWYoE3XpzvnmPfg9AeJR8o4erj735N8mFSvkALargpKNPiJVoQpnShuOHbaCfG2xkiXL9C20waQUpDF-jmbLiDmLqVTd2wwt-SD3YF2A4NvoYUOrizPb4K3kGMELFv8ZcugEvQ4GMfVpDmsU94iS98A33x2casLMcxeOt-vkZbre0jvHm8d9GP46Pvh6fF-eXJ2eHyvLAl4akwddm0RDlNtdHWaQa6rgWpQdsahOatcLRpnXbOEl4yqVqmXMMtkbU0VHK-iw42vjn215S_U6276KDv7QB-ihXVeTcyO5UZffcPeuunMOTXzZSWSnAj_kspRUshmJm93m8oF3yMAdpqDN3ahvuKkmpupnpuJsNvHy2neg3NE_q3igzsbwAInXuSj75SSoXRKuvFRrejrcZ472xIneshuikEGNIcVpXsIVswyf8AG9-hDw</recordid><startdate>201610</startdate><enddate>201610</enddate><creator>Rummel, Jan</creator><creator>Marevic, Ivan</creator><creator>Kuhlmann, Beatrice G</creator><general>American Psychological Association</general><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7RZ</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0443-1743</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3235-5717</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201610</creationdate><title>Investigating Storage and Retrieval Processes of Directed Forgetting: A Model-Based Approach</title><author>Rummel, Jan ; Marevic, Ivan ; Kuhlmann, Beatrice G</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a403t-9b4df07c81898ac82e8bb50be8abe583f5c1dfc8cca034267f27cd3a06b691633</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Analysis of Variance</topic><topic>Cognitive ability</topic><topic>Cognitive Processes</topic><topic>College Students</topic><topic>Comparative Analysis</topic><topic>Control Groups</topic><topic>Cues</topic><topic>Experimental Groups</topic><topic>Experimental psychology</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Foreign Countries</topic><topic>Forgetting</topic><topic>Germany</topic><topic>Human</topic><topic>Human Information Storage</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Information Retrieval</topic><topic>Information Storage</topic><topic>Intentional Learning</topic><topic>Interference (Learning)</topic><topic>Language</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Memory</topic><topic>Models, Psychological</topic><topic>Probability</topic><topic>Psychological Tests</topic><topic>Recall</topic><topic>Recall (Psychology)</topic><topic>Recognition (Psychology)</topic><topic>Retention</topic><topic>Statistical Analysis</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Rummel, Jan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marevic, Ivan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kuhlmann, Beatrice G</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>APA PsycArticles®</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Rummel, Jan</au><au>Marevic, Ivan</au><au>Kuhlmann, Beatrice G</au><au>Greene, Robert L</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ1115987</ericid><atitle>Investigating Storage and Retrieval Processes of Directed Forgetting: A Model-Based Approach</atitle><jtitle>Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition</jtitle><addtitle>J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn</addtitle><date>2016-10</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>42</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>1526</spage><epage>1543</epage><pages>1526-1543</pages><issn>0278-7393</issn><eissn>1939-1285</eissn><abstract>Intentional forgetting of previously learned information is an adaptive cognitive capability of humans but its cognitive underpinnings are not yet well understood. It has been argued that it strongly depends on the presentation method whether forgetting instructions alter storage or retrieval stages (Basden, Basden, &amp; Gargano, 1993). In Experiment 1, we compared the processes underlying the directed-forgetting effect in 2 mosts widely used presentation methods, namely the list-method and the item-method, and also differentiated between costs (i.e., poorer memory for to-be-forgotten information) and benefits (i.e., better memory for to-be-remembered information) of directed forgetting within both methods. Using a multinomial modeling approach (Riefer &amp; Rouder, 1992; Rouder &amp; Batchelder, 1998), our results showed that directed-forgetting benefits were due to better storage of to-be-remembered information in both methods. In line with current theorizing, list-method directed-forgetting costs occurred due to reduced retrieval of to-be-forgotten information. Item-method costs, however, occurred not only due to reduced storage, which is the dominant current view, but also due to reduced retrieval. In Experiment 2, we replicated the novel finding that retrieval processes contribute to item-method directed forgetting independent of recall-output order. Implications of these findings for current directed-forgetting theories are discussed.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>American Psychological Association</pub><pmid>26950491</pmid><doi>10.1037/xlm0000266</doi><tpages>18</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0443-1743</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3235-5717</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0278-7393
ispartof Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition, 2016-10, Vol.42 (10), p.1526-1543
issn 0278-7393
1939-1285
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1826665834
source PsycArticles (EBSCO); ERIC
subjects Adolescent
Adult
Analysis of Variance
Cognitive ability
Cognitive Processes
College Students
Comparative Analysis
Control Groups
Cues
Experimental Groups
Experimental psychology
Female
Foreign Countries
Forgetting
Germany
Human
Human Information Storage
Humans
Information Retrieval
Information Storage
Intentional Learning
Interference (Learning)
Language
Male
Memory
Models, Psychological
Probability
Psychological Tests
Recall
Recall (Psychology)
Recognition (Psychology)
Retention
Statistical Analysis
Young Adult
title Investigating Storage and Retrieval Processes of Directed Forgetting: A Model-Based Approach
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-28T18%3A07%3A38IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Investigating%20Storage%20and%20Retrieval%20Processes%20of%20Directed%20Forgetting:%20A%20Model-Based%20Approach&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20experimental%20psychology.%20Learning,%20memory,%20and%20cognition&rft.au=Rummel,%20Jan&rft.date=2016-10&rft.volume=42&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=1526&rft.epage=1543&rft.pages=1526-1543&rft.issn=0278-7393&rft.eissn=1939-1285&rft_id=info:doi/10.1037/xlm0000266&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1826665834%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a403t-9b4df07c81898ac82e8bb50be8abe583f5c1dfc8cca034267f27cd3a06b691633%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1771455294&rft_id=info:pmid/26950491&rft_ericid=EJ1115987&rfr_iscdi=true