A history of the treatment of appendicitis in children: lessons learned

• Published in: ANZ journal of surgery 2016-10, Vol.86 (10), p.762-767
• Main Authors: Hamill, James K., Hill, Andrew G.
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Anti-Bacterial Agents - history; Anti-Bacterial Agents - therapeutic use; Appendectomy; Appendectomy - history; Appendectomy - methods; Appendectomy - mortality; Appendicitis; Appendicitis - drug therapy; Appendicitis - history; Appendicitis - mortality; Appendicitis - surgery; appendix; Canada - epidemiology; Child; convalescence; history; History of medicine; History, 19th Century; History, 20th Century; History, 21st Century; Humans; Mortality; Pediatrics; Treatment Outcome; United Kingdom - epidemiology
• ISSN: 1445-1433; 1445-2197
• DOI: 10.1111/ans.13627

During the latter half of the 19th century, surgeons increasingly reported performing appendicectomies. Fitz from Harvard, Groves from Canada and Tait from Britain all recorded successful removal of the appendix. McBurney described the point of maximal tenderness in classic appendicitis and also the muscle‐splitting incision centred on this point. Priority is given to McArthur in describing the lateral muscle‐splitting incision. The direction of the cutaneous incision was later modified by Elliott and Lanz. Incisions that healed well were essential to recovery. Appendicectomy became a ‘fashionable’ operation after the London surgeon, Treves, removed the appendix of King Edward VII. Through the 20th century, the mortality from appendicitis fell notably with the advent of sulphonamide and penicillin, improvements in fluid therapy and safer anaesthesia. By 1990, diagnostic delay was the main cause of death. Semm performed the first laparoscopic appendicectomy in 1990, roundly criticized at the time for what is now a routine procedure. We view contemporary debates on the indications for appendicectomy, the best approach and how to optimize recovery in the light of the history of this intriguing disease.