Effect of Different Firing Temperatures on Structural Changes in Porcelain

• Published in: Journal of prosthodontics 2018-03, Vol.27 (3), p.290-298
• Main Authors: Tripathi, Arvind, Bagchi, Soumyojeet, Singh, Juhi, Gaurav, Vivek, Pal Singh Negi, Mahendra
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Abrasion; Aluminum; Calcium oxide; ceramic mass; Chromium; Dental Porcelain; Dental restorative materials; Dentistry; firing cycle; firing temperature; Hot Temperature; Materials Testing; Oxides; Porcelain; porosity; Scanning electron microscopy; Spectroscopy; temperature gradient
• ISSN: 1059-941X; 1532-849X
• DOI: 10.1111/jopr.12484

Purpose To study the structural changes occurring in the dental porcelain mass fired at various firing temperatures using scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and X‐ray diffraction (XRD) spectroscopy. Also, additional tests, namely compressive strength, abrasion resistance analysis, and the amount of oxides released, were conducted at different firing temperatures. Materials and Methods Six groups (40 specimens in each group) of porcelain mass were prepared. The dimensions and weight of all the specimens were kept constant. The specimens were then heat treated at different firing temperatures (660°C, 760°C, 860°C, 900°C, 960°C, 990°C). Half of the specimens of each group were subjected to a compressive strength test on a universal testing machine and then finely ground using an electrochemical grinder to prepare for XRD analysis. The other half of the specimens was weighed to analyze the amount of oxides released after each firing cycle. Following this, the specimens underwent an abrasion resistance test on a Nanovea Tribometer. The unaltered surface was scanned using SEM. The data (numerical and graphical) for all the tests were recorded and analyzed using one‐way ANOVA and post hoc Tukey test. Results The specimens fired at 900°C exhibited superior compressive strength and abrasion resistance. The quantity of oxides released by the specimens fired at 900°C was the least compared to specimens heat treated at the other firing temperatures. XRD analysis proved that the oxide released by the porcelain mass was calcium aluminum chromium oxide. Also, the fewer peaks obtained in the XRD graphs of specimens fired at 900°C signified lesser porosities in the porcelain specimens. SEM analysis depicted a homogeneous mass of porcelain at 900°C. Conclusion All the above findings validate the objective of studying the physical and internal structural changes of dental porcelain when subjected to an increasing firing temperature gradient. The specimens fired at 900°C exhibited superior strength and abrasion resistance. SEM analysis depicted a homogeneous mass of dental porcelain, implying that firing was complete at 900°C.