Treatment with the Self-Discovery Camp (SDiC) Improves Internet Gaming Disorder

• Published in: Addictive behaviors 2017-01, Vol.64, p.357-362
• Main Authors: Sakuma, Hiroshi, Mihara, Satoko, Nakayama, Hideki, Miura, Kumiko, Kitayuguchi, Takashi, Maezono, Masaki, Hashimoto, Takuma, Higuchi, Susumu
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Addictions; Addictive behaviors; Adolescent; Age; Behavior, Addictive - psychology; Behavior, Addictive - therapy; Behavioral addiction; Cognitive ability; Cognitive behavioral therapy; Cognitive Therapy - methods; Computer & video games; Correlation analysis; End users; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Immunoglobulin D; Internet; Japan; Male; Measurement methods; Motivation; Onset; Patients; Psychiatry; Psychotherapy; Residential Treatment - methods; Self; Social factors; Treatment Outcome; User behavior; Video game; Video Games - psychology
• ISSN: 0306-4603; 1873-6327
• DOI: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2016.06.013

Abstract Introduction Internet gaming disorder (IGD) is a novel behavioral addiction that influences the physical, mental, and social aspects of health due to excessive Internet gaming. One type of intensive treatment for IGD is the therapeutic residential camp (TRC), which comprises many types of therapies, including psychotherapy, psychoeducational therapy, and cognitive behavioral therapy. The TRC was developed in South Korea and has been administered to many patients with IGD; however, its efficacy in other countries remains unknown. We investigated the efficacy of the Self-Discovery Camp (SDiC), a Japanese version of a TRC, and the correlations between individual characteristics and outcome measures. Methods We recruited 10 patients with IGD (all male, mean age = 16.2 years, diagnosed using the DSM-5) to spend 8 nights and 9 days at the SDiC. We measured gaming time as well as self-efficacy (using the Stages of Change Readiness and Treatment Eagerness Scale, a measure of therapeutic motivation and problem recognition). Results Total gaming time was significantly lower 3 months after the SDiC. Problem recognition and self-efficacy towards positive change also improved. Furthermore, there was a correlation between age of onset and problem recognition score. Conclusions Our results demonstrate the effectiveness of the SDiC for IGD, especially regarding gaming time and self-efficacy. Additionally, age of onset may be a useful predictor of IGD prognosis. Further studies with larger sample sizes and control groups, and that target long-term outcomes, are needed to extend our understanding of SDiC efficacy.