Loading…
First‐trimester intervention in twin reversed arterial perfusion sequence: does size matter?
ABSTRACT Objective To evaluate the outcome of first‐trimester intervention (12 + 0 to 14 + 0 weeks of gestation) in pregnancies complicated by twin reversed arterial perfusion (TRAP) sequence. Methods All monochorionic diamniotic twin pregnancies diagnosed with TRAP sequence that underwent intrafeta...
Saved in:
Published in: | Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology 2017-07, Vol.50 (1), p.40-44 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | ABSTRACT
Objective
To evaluate the outcome of first‐trimester intervention (12 + 0 to 14 + 0 weeks of gestation) in pregnancies complicated by twin reversed arterial perfusion (TRAP) sequence.
Methods
All monochorionic diamniotic twin pregnancies diagnosed with TRAP sequence that underwent intrafetal laser ablation (IFL) of the feeding vessels before 14 + 0 weeks of gestation at the University of Bonn between 2010 and 2015 were analyzed retrospectively for intrauterine course and outcome.
Results
In the study period, 12 pregnancies with TRAP sequence were treated by IFL. Median gestational age at intervention was 13.2 (interquartile range (IQR), 12.6–13.6) weeks. In all cases, one intervention sufficed to disrupt the perfusion of the TRAP twin. There was no case of miscarriage, preterm prelabor rupture of membranes or hemorrhage. In five (41.7%) pregnancies, intrauterine death of the pump twin occurred at a median of 72.0 (IQR, 54.0–90.0; range, 48–96) h after intervention. The remaining seven pregnancies continued uneventfully resulting in birth of a healthy infant at term. A comparison of survivors and non‐survivors identified a significant difference in median discordance between crown–rump length (CRL) of the pump twin and upper pole–rump length (URL) of the TRAP twin ((CRL − URL)/CRL ratio, 0.56 vs 0.31; P |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0960-7692 1469-0705 |
DOI: | 10.1002/uog.16013 |