Loading…

Quality guidelines for oral drug candidates: dose, solubility and lipophilicity

[Display omitted] •Experimental properties of GSK's oral portfolio were compared with marketed drugs.•Properties were dose, solubility and the property forecast index (chromatographic Log D + aromatic ring count).•A model combining property cutoffs differentiated GSK's candidates from oral...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Drug discovery today 2016-10, Vol.21 (10), p.1719-1727
Main Authors: Bayliss, Martin K., Butler, James, Feldman, Paul L., Green, Darren V.S., Leeson, Paul D., Palovich, Michael R., Taylor, Anthony J.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:[Display omitted] •Experimental properties of GSK's oral portfolio were compared with marketed drugs.•Properties were dose, solubility and the property forecast index (chromatographic Log D + aromatic ring count).•A model combining property cutoffs differentiated GSK's candidates from oral drugs.•The model provides guidance for seeking and selecting oral clinical candidates. In an attempt to seek increased understanding of compound attributes that influence successful drug pipeline progression, GlaxoSmithKline's portfolio of oral candidates was compared with reference sets of marketed oral drugs. The approach differs from other attrition studies by explicitly focusing on choosing ‘the right compound’ by applying relevant, experimentally derived properties. The analysis led to four proposed compound quality categories, created by combining specific criteria for three measures: dose, solubility and the property forecast index, a composite measure of lipophilicity using chromatographically determined LogD and aromaticity. The ‘three properties’ provide benchmarked guidelines for project teams to use when seeking and selecting clinical candidates, because they reflect the property distribution of marketed oral drugs.
ISSN:1359-6446
1878-5832
DOI:10.1016/j.drudis.2016.07.007