Loading…

Prospective memory while driving: comparison of time- and event-based intentions

Prospective memories can divert attentional resources from ongoing activities. However, it is unclear whether these effects and the theoretical accounts that seek to explain them will generalise to a complex real-world task such as driving. Twenty-four participants drove two simulated routes while m...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Ergonomics 2017-06, Vol.60 (6), p.780-790
Main Authors: Trawley, Steven L., Stephens, Amanda N., Rendell, Peter G., Groeger, John A.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c465t-7188331cc1d190b37e4e7c43bfc9a278e1abb6ad8792ca1714044b1ca6f74c743
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c465t-7188331cc1d190b37e4e7c43bfc9a278e1abb6ad8792ca1714044b1ca6f74c743
container_end_page 790
container_issue 6
container_start_page 780
container_title Ergonomics
container_volume 60
creator Trawley, Steven L.
Stephens, Amanda N.
Rendell, Peter G.
Groeger, John A.
description Prospective memories can divert attentional resources from ongoing activities. However, it is unclear whether these effects and the theoretical accounts that seek to explain them will generalise to a complex real-world task such as driving. Twenty-four participants drove two simulated routes while maintaining a fixed headway with a lead vehicle. Drivers were given either event-based (e.g. arriving at a filling station) or time-based errands (e.g. on-board clock shows 3:30). In contrast to the predominant view in the literature which suggests time-based tasks are more demanding, drivers given event-based errands showed greater difficulty in mirroring lead vehicle speed changes compared to the time-based group. Results suggest that common everyday secondary tasks, such as scouting the roadside for a bank, may have a detrimental impact on driving performance. The additional finding that this cost was only evident with the event-based task highlights a potential area of both theoretical and practical interest. Practitioner Summary: Drivers were given either time- or event-based errands whilst engaged in a simulated drive. We examined the effect of errands on an ongoing vehicle follow task. In contrast to previous non-driving studies, event-based errands are more disruptive. Common everyday errands may have a detrimental impact on driving performance.
doi_str_mv 10.1080/00140139.2016.1214288
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1826724749</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1900989382</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c465t-7188331cc1d190b37e4e7c43bfc9a278e1abb6ad8792ca1714044b1ca6f74c743</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kEtrGzEURkVpaJy0P6FB0E034-hK8kiTVUrIo2CoF8laaDR3GoUZyZXGDv73lbHTRRZdXT4493UI-QpsDkyzS8ZAMhDNnDOo58BBcq0_kBmIuq4WWqqPZLZnqj10Ss5yfilRQMM_kVOuJFeCyRlZrVLMa3ST3yIdcYxpR1-f_YC0S37rw-8r6uK4tsnnGGjs6eRHrKgNHcUthqlqbcaO-jCV4GPIn8lJb4eMX471nDzd3T7ePFTLX_c_b34sKyfrxVQp0FoIcA46aFgrFEpUToq2d43lSiPYtq1tp1XDnQVVnpWyBWfrXkmnpDgn3w9z1yn-2WCezOizw2GwAeMmG9C8Vlwq2RT02zv0JW5SKNeZsps1uhGaF2pxoFwxkhP2Zp38aNPOADN75eZNudkrN0flpe_iOH3Tjtj963pzXIDrA-BDH9NoX2MaOjPZ3RBTn2xwPhvx_x1_Acixjxs</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1900989382</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Prospective memory while driving: comparison of time- and event-based intentions</title><source>Taylor and Francis:Jisc Collections:Taylor and Francis Read and Publish Agreement 2024-2025:Science and Technology Collection (Reading list)</source><creator>Trawley, Steven L. ; Stephens, Amanda N. ; Rendell, Peter G. ; Groeger, John A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Trawley, Steven L. ; Stephens, Amanda N. ; Rendell, Peter G. ; Groeger, John A.</creatorcontrib><description>Prospective memories can divert attentional resources from ongoing activities. However, it is unclear whether these effects and the theoretical accounts that seek to explain them will generalise to a complex real-world task such as driving. Twenty-four participants drove two simulated routes while maintaining a fixed headway with a lead vehicle. Drivers were given either event-based (e.g. arriving at a filling station) or time-based errands (e.g. on-board clock shows 3:30). In contrast to the predominant view in the literature which suggests time-based tasks are more demanding, drivers given event-based errands showed greater difficulty in mirroring lead vehicle speed changes compared to the time-based group. Results suggest that common everyday secondary tasks, such as scouting the roadside for a bank, may have a detrimental impact on driving performance. The additional finding that this cost was only evident with the event-based task highlights a potential area of both theoretical and practical interest. Practitioner Summary: Drivers were given either time- or event-based errands whilst engaged in a simulated drive. We examined the effect of errands on an ongoing vehicle follow task. In contrast to previous non-driving studies, event-based errands are more disruptive. Common everyday errands may have a detrimental impact on driving performance.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0014-0139</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1366-5847</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/00140139.2016.1214288</identifier><identifier>PMID: 27427304</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Taylor &amp; Francis</publisher><subject>Adult ; Attention ; Automobile driving ; Automobile Driving - psychology ; Computer Simulation ; delayed intentions ; distractions ; Driver behavior ; Drivers ; Driving ; Driving ability ; driving simulator ; Ergonomics ; Female ; Humans ; Intention ; Lead ; Male ; Memory ; Memory, Episodic ; Middle Aged ; Prospective memory ; Space life sciences ; Task Performance and Analysis ; Time Factors ; Traffic accidents &amp; safety ; Velocity ; virtual environment</subject><ispartof>Ergonomics, 2017-06, Vol.60 (6), p.780-790</ispartof><rights>2016 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor &amp; Francis Group 2016</rights><rights>2016 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor &amp; Francis Group</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c465t-7188331cc1d190b37e4e7c43bfc9a278e1abb6ad8792ca1714044b1ca6f74c743</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c465t-7188331cc1d190b37e4e7c43bfc9a278e1abb6ad8792ca1714044b1ca6f74c743</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-0917-730X ; 0000-0002-4118-4972 ; 0000-0002-4829-4322</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27427304$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Trawley, Steven L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stephens, Amanda N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rendell, Peter G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Groeger, John A.</creatorcontrib><title>Prospective memory while driving: comparison of time- and event-based intentions</title><title>Ergonomics</title><addtitle>Ergonomics</addtitle><description>Prospective memories can divert attentional resources from ongoing activities. However, it is unclear whether these effects and the theoretical accounts that seek to explain them will generalise to a complex real-world task such as driving. Twenty-four participants drove two simulated routes while maintaining a fixed headway with a lead vehicle. Drivers were given either event-based (e.g. arriving at a filling station) or time-based errands (e.g. on-board clock shows 3:30). In contrast to the predominant view in the literature which suggests time-based tasks are more demanding, drivers given event-based errands showed greater difficulty in mirroring lead vehicle speed changes compared to the time-based group. Results suggest that common everyday secondary tasks, such as scouting the roadside for a bank, may have a detrimental impact on driving performance. The additional finding that this cost was only evident with the event-based task highlights a potential area of both theoretical and practical interest. Practitioner Summary: Drivers were given either time- or event-based errands whilst engaged in a simulated drive. We examined the effect of errands on an ongoing vehicle follow task. In contrast to previous non-driving studies, event-based errands are more disruptive. Common everyday errands may have a detrimental impact on driving performance.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Attention</subject><subject>Automobile driving</subject><subject>Automobile Driving - psychology</subject><subject>Computer Simulation</subject><subject>delayed intentions</subject><subject>distractions</subject><subject>Driver behavior</subject><subject>Drivers</subject><subject>Driving</subject><subject>Driving ability</subject><subject>driving simulator</subject><subject>Ergonomics</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Intention</subject><subject>Lead</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Memory</subject><subject>Memory, Episodic</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Prospective memory</subject><subject>Space life sciences</subject><subject>Task Performance and Analysis</subject><subject>Time Factors</subject><subject>Traffic accidents &amp; safety</subject><subject>Velocity</subject><subject>virtual environment</subject><issn>0014-0139</issn><issn>1366-5847</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kEtrGzEURkVpaJy0P6FB0E034-hK8kiTVUrIo2CoF8laaDR3GoUZyZXGDv73lbHTRRZdXT4493UI-QpsDkyzS8ZAMhDNnDOo58BBcq0_kBmIuq4WWqqPZLZnqj10Ss5yfilRQMM_kVOuJFeCyRlZrVLMa3ST3yIdcYxpR1-f_YC0S37rw-8r6uK4tsnnGGjs6eRHrKgNHcUthqlqbcaO-jCV4GPIn8lJb4eMX471nDzd3T7ePFTLX_c_b34sKyfrxVQp0FoIcA46aFgrFEpUToq2d43lSiPYtq1tp1XDnQVVnpWyBWfrXkmnpDgn3w9z1yn-2WCezOizw2GwAeMmG9C8Vlwq2RT02zv0JW5SKNeZsps1uhGaF2pxoFwxkhP2Zp38aNPOADN75eZNudkrN0flpe_iOH3Tjtj963pzXIDrA-BDH9NoX2MaOjPZ3RBTn2xwPhvx_x1_Acixjxs</recordid><startdate>201706</startdate><enddate>201706</enddate><creator>Trawley, Steven L.</creator><creator>Stephens, Amanda N.</creator><creator>Rendell, Peter G.</creator><creator>Groeger, John A.</creator><general>Taylor &amp; Francis</general><general>Taylor &amp; Francis LLC</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QF</scope><scope>7QQ</scope><scope>7SC</scope><scope>7SE</scope><scope>7SP</scope><scope>7SR</scope><scope>7T2</scope><scope>7TA</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>7TS</scope><scope>7U5</scope><scope>8BQ</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F28</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>H8G</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>L~C</scope><scope>L~D</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0917-730X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4118-4972</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4829-4322</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201706</creationdate><title>Prospective memory while driving: comparison of time- and event-based intentions</title><author>Trawley, Steven L. ; Stephens, Amanda N. ; Rendell, Peter G. ; Groeger, John A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c465t-7188331cc1d190b37e4e7c43bfc9a278e1abb6ad8792ca1714044b1ca6f74c743</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Attention</topic><topic>Automobile driving</topic><topic>Automobile Driving - psychology</topic><topic>Computer Simulation</topic><topic>delayed intentions</topic><topic>distractions</topic><topic>Driver behavior</topic><topic>Drivers</topic><topic>Driving</topic><topic>Driving ability</topic><topic>driving simulator</topic><topic>Ergonomics</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Intention</topic><topic>Lead</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Memory</topic><topic>Memory, Episodic</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Prospective memory</topic><topic>Space life sciences</topic><topic>Task Performance and Analysis</topic><topic>Time Factors</topic><topic>Traffic accidents &amp; safety</topic><topic>Velocity</topic><topic>virtual environment</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Trawley, Steven L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stephens, Amanda N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rendell, Peter G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Groeger, John A.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Aluminium Industry Abstracts</collection><collection>Ceramic Abstracts</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts</collection><collection>Corrosion Abstracts</collection><collection>Electronics &amp; Communications Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineered Materials Abstracts</collection><collection>Health and Safety Science Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Materials Business File</collection><collection>Mechanical &amp; Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Physical Education Index</collection><collection>Solid State and Superconductivity Abstracts</collection><collection>METADEX</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ANTE: Abstracts in New Technology &amp; Engineering</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Copper Technical Reference Library</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts – Academic</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Ergonomics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Trawley, Steven L.</au><au>Stephens, Amanda N.</au><au>Rendell, Peter G.</au><au>Groeger, John A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Prospective memory while driving: comparison of time- and event-based intentions</atitle><jtitle>Ergonomics</jtitle><addtitle>Ergonomics</addtitle><date>2017-06</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>60</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>780</spage><epage>790</epage><pages>780-790</pages><issn>0014-0139</issn><eissn>1366-5847</eissn><abstract>Prospective memories can divert attentional resources from ongoing activities. However, it is unclear whether these effects and the theoretical accounts that seek to explain them will generalise to a complex real-world task such as driving. Twenty-four participants drove two simulated routes while maintaining a fixed headway with a lead vehicle. Drivers were given either event-based (e.g. arriving at a filling station) or time-based errands (e.g. on-board clock shows 3:30). In contrast to the predominant view in the literature which suggests time-based tasks are more demanding, drivers given event-based errands showed greater difficulty in mirroring lead vehicle speed changes compared to the time-based group. Results suggest that common everyday secondary tasks, such as scouting the roadside for a bank, may have a detrimental impact on driving performance. The additional finding that this cost was only evident with the event-based task highlights a potential area of both theoretical and practical interest. Practitioner Summary: Drivers were given either time- or event-based errands whilst engaged in a simulated drive. We examined the effect of errands on an ongoing vehicle follow task. In contrast to previous non-driving studies, event-based errands are more disruptive. Common everyday errands may have a detrimental impact on driving performance.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Taylor &amp; Francis</pub><pmid>27427304</pmid><doi>10.1080/00140139.2016.1214288</doi><tpages>11</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0917-730X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4118-4972</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4829-4322</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0014-0139
ispartof Ergonomics, 2017-06, Vol.60 (6), p.780-790
issn 0014-0139
1366-5847
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1826724749
source Taylor and Francis:Jisc Collections:Taylor and Francis Read and Publish Agreement 2024-2025:Science and Technology Collection (Reading list)
subjects Adult
Attention
Automobile driving
Automobile Driving - psychology
Computer Simulation
delayed intentions
distractions
Driver behavior
Drivers
Driving
Driving ability
driving simulator
Ergonomics
Female
Humans
Intention
Lead
Male
Memory
Memory, Episodic
Middle Aged
Prospective memory
Space life sciences
Task Performance and Analysis
Time Factors
Traffic accidents & safety
Velocity
virtual environment
title Prospective memory while driving: comparison of time- and event-based intentions
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-26T14%3A36%3A41IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Prospective%20memory%20while%20driving:%20comparison%20of%20time-%20and%20event-based%20intentions&rft.jtitle=Ergonomics&rft.au=Trawley,%20Steven%20L.&rft.date=2017-06&rft.volume=60&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=780&rft.epage=790&rft.pages=780-790&rft.issn=0014-0139&rft.eissn=1366-5847&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/00140139.2016.1214288&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1900989382%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c465t-7188331cc1d190b37e4e7c43bfc9a278e1abb6ad8792ca1714044b1ca6f74c743%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1900989382&rft_id=info:pmid/27427304&rfr_iscdi=true