Loading…
Standardization of allergen products: 3. Validation of candidate European Pharmacopoeia standard methods for quantification of major birch allergen Bet v 1
Background The BSP090 project aims at establishing European Pharmacopoeia Reference Substances in combination with the corresponding ELISA methods for the quantification of major allergens in allergen products. Two sandwich ELISAs proved suitable for quantification of Bet v 1, the major birch pollen...
Saved in:
Published in: | Allergy (Copenhagen) 2016-10, Vol.71 (10), p.1414-1424 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4148-a939e8c1e4d4504f89ff2be12533b7dd849aa5b9a1507ac4fedae1126951d0ca3 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4148-a939e8c1e4d4504f89ff2be12533b7dd849aa5b9a1507ac4fedae1126951d0ca3 |
container_end_page | 1424 |
container_issue | 10 |
container_start_page | 1414 |
container_title | Allergy (Copenhagen) |
container_volume | 71 |
creator | Kaul, S. Zimmer, J. Dehus, O. Costanzo, A. Daas, A. Buchheit, K. H. Asturias, J. A. Barber, D. Carnés, J. Chapman, M. Dayan‐Kenigsberg, J. Döring, S. Führer, F. Hanschmann, K. M. Holzhauser, T. Ledesma, A. Moingeon, P. Nony, E. Pini, C. Plunkett, G. Reese, G. Sandberg, E. Sander, I. Strecker, D. Valerio, C. Ree, R. Vieths, S. |
description | Background
The BSP090 project aims at establishing European Pharmacopoeia Reference Substances in combination with the corresponding ELISA methods for the quantification of major allergens in allergen products. Two sandwich ELISAs proved suitable for quantification of Bet v 1, the major birch pollen allergen, in preceding phases of BSP090.
Methods
Two Bet v 1‐specific ELISA systems were compared with respect to accuracy and precision in a ring trial including 13 laboratories. Model samples containing recombinant rBet v 1.0101 as well as native birch pollen extracts were measured independently at least three times in each facility. The assessment was completed with a comparative quantification of Bet v 1 in 30 marketed birch allergen products in one laboratory, simulating the future use as reference method.
Results
In the collaborative study, both candidate ELISAs confirmed their suitability to quantify recombinant and native Bet v 1. ELISA‐A showed higher precision and lower interlaboratory variability, yet ELISA‐B exhibited slightly higher accuracy. Subsequent parallel measurement of Bet v 1 in a panel of ‘real‐life’ birch allergen products indicated better repeatability of ELISA‐B. Both systems detected substantial differences in Bet v 1 content between allergen products, but the effect was more pronounced using ELISA‐B due to persistently higher values compared to ELISA‐A.
Conclusions
In the collaborative study, no deciding differences were observed between the two candidate ELISAs. Further comparison under conditions simulating the intended use combined with the criterion of long‐term availability enabled the selection of one Bet v 1‐specific ELISA for proposal as European Pharmacopoeia standard method. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/all.12898 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1827906831</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1906332849</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4148-a939e8c1e4d4504f89ff2be12533b7dd849aa5b9a1507ac4fedae1126951d0ca3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkl2L1DAUhoMo7rh64R-QgDd60dmcpt0m3u0u6wcMKPhxG06TUydD28wmrbL-Ff-sGWccQVDMTUh48py8yWHsMYgl5HGGfb-EUml1hy1AalVoreu7bCFA1EVVS3XCHqS0EUI0pRb32UnZCFCNKhfs-_sJR4fR-W84-TDy0PGso_iZRr6Nwc12Si-4XPJP2Ht3ZGw-tVsSv55j2BKO_N0a44A2bAN55Ong5QNN6-AS70LkNzOOk--8PXoG3OT91ke7_l33kib-hcNDdq_DPtGjw3zKPr68_nD1uli9ffXm6mJV2AoqVaCWmpQFqlxVi6pTuuvKlqCspWwb51SlEetWI9SiQVt15JAAynNdgxMW5Sl7tvfmvDczpckMPlnqexwpzMmAKhstzpWE_0BBayEqWWf06R_oJsxxzEEMZJuUZb7YP6nsEipH3Lme7ykbQ0qROrONfsB4a0CYXQuY_HbmZwtk9snBOLcDuSP5688zcLYHvvqebv9uMher1V75A2pvuzc</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1819084145</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Standardization of allergen products: 3. Validation of candidate European Pharmacopoeia standard methods for quantification of major birch allergen Bet v 1</title><source>Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection</source><creator>Kaul, S. ; Zimmer, J. ; Dehus, O. ; Costanzo, A. ; Daas, A. ; Buchheit, K. H. ; Asturias, J. A. ; Barber, D. ; Carnés, J. ; Chapman, M. ; Dayan‐Kenigsberg, J. ; Döring, S. ; Führer, F. ; Hanschmann, K. M. ; Holzhauser, T. ; Ledesma, A. ; Moingeon, P. ; Nony, E. ; Pini, C. ; Plunkett, G. ; Reese, G. ; Sandberg, E. ; Sander, I. ; Strecker, D. ; Valerio, C. ; Ree, R. ; Vieths, S.</creator><creatorcontrib>Kaul, S. ; Zimmer, J. ; Dehus, O. ; Costanzo, A. ; Daas, A. ; Buchheit, K. H. ; Asturias, J. A. ; Barber, D. ; Carnés, J. ; Chapman, M. ; Dayan‐Kenigsberg, J. ; Döring, S. ; Führer, F. ; Hanschmann, K. M. ; Holzhauser, T. ; Ledesma, A. ; Moingeon, P. ; Nony, E. ; Pini, C. ; Plunkett, G. ; Reese, G. ; Sandberg, E. ; Sander, I. ; Strecker, D. ; Valerio, C. ; Ree, R. ; Vieths, S.</creatorcontrib><description>Background
The BSP090 project aims at establishing European Pharmacopoeia Reference Substances in combination with the corresponding ELISA methods for the quantification of major allergens in allergen products. Two sandwich ELISAs proved suitable for quantification of Bet v 1, the major birch pollen allergen, in preceding phases of BSP090.
Methods
Two Bet v 1‐specific ELISA systems were compared with respect to accuracy and precision in a ring trial including 13 laboratories. Model samples containing recombinant rBet v 1.0101 as well as native birch pollen extracts were measured independently at least three times in each facility. The assessment was completed with a comparative quantification of Bet v 1 in 30 marketed birch allergen products in one laboratory, simulating the future use as reference method.
Results
In the collaborative study, both candidate ELISAs confirmed their suitability to quantify recombinant and native Bet v 1. ELISA‐A showed higher precision and lower interlaboratory variability, yet ELISA‐B exhibited slightly higher accuracy. Subsequent parallel measurement of Bet v 1 in a panel of ‘real‐life’ birch allergen products indicated better repeatability of ELISA‐B. Both systems detected substantial differences in Bet v 1 content between allergen products, but the effect was more pronounced using ELISA‐B due to persistently higher values compared to ELISA‐A.
Conclusions
In the collaborative study, no deciding differences were observed between the two candidate ELISAs. Further comparison under conditions simulating the intended use combined with the criterion of long‐term availability enabled the selection of one Bet v 1‐specific ELISA for proposal as European Pharmacopoeia standard method.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0105-4538</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1398-9995</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/all.12898</identifier><identifier>PMID: 27018782</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Denmark: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Allergens ; Allergens - immunology ; Antigens, Plant - immunology ; Bet v 1 ; Bet v 1 antigen ; Betula - immunology ; Biological Products - standards ; biological standardisation ; Collaboration ; Computer simulation ; Criteria ; ELISA ; Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay ; European Pharmacopoeia ; Humans ; Laboratories ; major allergen ; Methods ; Pollen ; Reproducibility of Results ; Standardization ; Variability</subject><ispartof>Allergy (Copenhagen), 2016-10, Vol.71 (10), p.1414-1424</ispartof><rights>2016 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd</rights><rights>2016 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2016 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4148-a939e8c1e4d4504f89ff2be12533b7dd849aa5b9a1507ac4fedae1126951d0ca3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4148-a939e8c1e4d4504f89ff2be12533b7dd849aa5b9a1507ac4fedae1126951d0ca3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27923,27924</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27018782$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kaul, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zimmer, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dehus, O.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Costanzo, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Daas, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Buchheit, K. H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Asturias, J. A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barber, D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carnés, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chapman, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dayan‐Kenigsberg, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Döring, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Führer, F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hanschmann, K. M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Holzhauser, T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ledesma, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moingeon, P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nony, E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pini, C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Plunkett, G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reese, G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sandberg, E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sander, I.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Strecker, D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Valerio, C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ree, R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vieths, S.</creatorcontrib><title>Standardization of allergen products: 3. Validation of candidate European Pharmacopoeia standard methods for quantification of major birch allergen Bet v 1</title><title>Allergy (Copenhagen)</title><addtitle>Allergy</addtitle><description>Background
The BSP090 project aims at establishing European Pharmacopoeia Reference Substances in combination with the corresponding ELISA methods for the quantification of major allergens in allergen products. Two sandwich ELISAs proved suitable for quantification of Bet v 1, the major birch pollen allergen, in preceding phases of BSP090.
Methods
Two Bet v 1‐specific ELISA systems were compared with respect to accuracy and precision in a ring trial including 13 laboratories. Model samples containing recombinant rBet v 1.0101 as well as native birch pollen extracts were measured independently at least three times in each facility. The assessment was completed with a comparative quantification of Bet v 1 in 30 marketed birch allergen products in one laboratory, simulating the future use as reference method.
Results
In the collaborative study, both candidate ELISAs confirmed their suitability to quantify recombinant and native Bet v 1. ELISA‐A showed higher precision and lower interlaboratory variability, yet ELISA‐B exhibited slightly higher accuracy. Subsequent parallel measurement of Bet v 1 in a panel of ‘real‐life’ birch allergen products indicated better repeatability of ELISA‐B. Both systems detected substantial differences in Bet v 1 content between allergen products, but the effect was more pronounced using ELISA‐B due to persistently higher values compared to ELISA‐A.
Conclusions
In the collaborative study, no deciding differences were observed between the two candidate ELISAs. Further comparison under conditions simulating the intended use combined with the criterion of long‐term availability enabled the selection of one Bet v 1‐specific ELISA for proposal as European Pharmacopoeia standard method.</description><subject>Allergens</subject><subject>Allergens - immunology</subject><subject>Antigens, Plant - immunology</subject><subject>Bet v 1</subject><subject>Bet v 1 antigen</subject><subject>Betula - immunology</subject><subject>Biological Products - standards</subject><subject>biological standardisation</subject><subject>Collaboration</subject><subject>Computer simulation</subject><subject>Criteria</subject><subject>ELISA</subject><subject>Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay</subject><subject>European Pharmacopoeia</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Laboratories</subject><subject>major allergen</subject><subject>Methods</subject><subject>Pollen</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>Standardization</subject><subject>Variability</subject><issn>0105-4538</issn><issn>1398-9995</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNkl2L1DAUhoMo7rh64R-QgDd60dmcpt0m3u0u6wcMKPhxG06TUydD28wmrbL-Ff-sGWccQVDMTUh48py8yWHsMYgl5HGGfb-EUml1hy1AalVoreu7bCFA1EVVS3XCHqS0EUI0pRb32UnZCFCNKhfs-_sJR4fR-W84-TDy0PGso_iZRr6Nwc12Si-4XPJP2Ht3ZGw-tVsSv55j2BKO_N0a44A2bAN55Ong5QNN6-AS70LkNzOOk--8PXoG3OT91ke7_l33kib-hcNDdq_DPtGjw3zKPr68_nD1uli9ffXm6mJV2AoqVaCWmpQFqlxVi6pTuuvKlqCspWwb51SlEetWI9SiQVt15JAAynNdgxMW5Sl7tvfmvDczpckMPlnqexwpzMmAKhstzpWE_0BBayEqWWf06R_oJsxxzEEMZJuUZb7YP6nsEipH3Lme7ykbQ0qROrONfsB4a0CYXQuY_HbmZwtk9snBOLcDuSP5688zcLYHvvqebv9uMher1V75A2pvuzc</recordid><startdate>201610</startdate><enddate>201610</enddate><creator>Kaul, S.</creator><creator>Zimmer, J.</creator><creator>Dehus, O.</creator><creator>Costanzo, A.</creator><creator>Daas, A.</creator><creator>Buchheit, K. H.</creator><creator>Asturias, J. A.</creator><creator>Barber, D.</creator><creator>Carnés, J.</creator><creator>Chapman, M.</creator><creator>Dayan‐Kenigsberg, J.</creator><creator>Döring, S.</creator><creator>Führer, F.</creator><creator>Hanschmann, K. M.</creator><creator>Holzhauser, T.</creator><creator>Ledesma, A.</creator><creator>Moingeon, P.</creator><creator>Nony, E.</creator><creator>Pini, C.</creator><creator>Plunkett, G.</creator><creator>Reese, G.</creator><creator>Sandberg, E.</creator><creator>Sander, I.</creator><creator>Strecker, D.</creator><creator>Valerio, C.</creator><creator>Ree, R.</creator><creator>Vieths, S.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201610</creationdate><title>Standardization of allergen products: 3. Validation of candidate European Pharmacopoeia standard methods for quantification of major birch allergen Bet v 1</title><author>Kaul, S. ; Zimmer, J. ; Dehus, O. ; Costanzo, A. ; Daas, A. ; Buchheit, K. H. ; Asturias, J. A. ; Barber, D. ; Carnés, J. ; Chapman, M. ; Dayan‐Kenigsberg, J. ; Döring, S. ; Führer, F. ; Hanschmann, K. M. ; Holzhauser, T. ; Ledesma, A. ; Moingeon, P. ; Nony, E. ; Pini, C. ; Plunkett, G. ; Reese, G. ; Sandberg, E. ; Sander, I. ; Strecker, D. ; Valerio, C. ; Ree, R. ; Vieths, S.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4148-a939e8c1e4d4504f89ff2be12533b7dd849aa5b9a1507ac4fedae1126951d0ca3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Allergens</topic><topic>Allergens - immunology</topic><topic>Antigens, Plant - immunology</topic><topic>Bet v 1</topic><topic>Bet v 1 antigen</topic><topic>Betula - immunology</topic><topic>Biological Products - standards</topic><topic>biological standardisation</topic><topic>Collaboration</topic><topic>Computer simulation</topic><topic>Criteria</topic><topic>ELISA</topic><topic>Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay</topic><topic>European Pharmacopoeia</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Laboratories</topic><topic>major allergen</topic><topic>Methods</topic><topic>Pollen</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>Standardization</topic><topic>Variability</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kaul, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zimmer, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dehus, O.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Costanzo, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Daas, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Buchheit, K. H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Asturias, J. A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barber, D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carnés, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chapman, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dayan‐Kenigsberg, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Döring, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Führer, F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hanschmann, K. M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Holzhauser, T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ledesma, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moingeon, P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nony, E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pini, C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Plunkett, G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reese, G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sandberg, E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sander, I.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Strecker, D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Valerio, C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ree, R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vieths, S.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Allergy (Copenhagen)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kaul, S.</au><au>Zimmer, J.</au><au>Dehus, O.</au><au>Costanzo, A.</au><au>Daas, A.</au><au>Buchheit, K. H.</au><au>Asturias, J. A.</au><au>Barber, D.</au><au>Carnés, J.</au><au>Chapman, M.</au><au>Dayan‐Kenigsberg, J.</au><au>Döring, S.</au><au>Führer, F.</au><au>Hanschmann, K. M.</au><au>Holzhauser, T.</au><au>Ledesma, A.</au><au>Moingeon, P.</au><au>Nony, E.</au><au>Pini, C.</au><au>Plunkett, G.</au><au>Reese, G.</au><au>Sandberg, E.</au><au>Sander, I.</au><au>Strecker, D.</au><au>Valerio, C.</au><au>Ree, R.</au><au>Vieths, S.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Standardization of allergen products: 3. Validation of candidate European Pharmacopoeia standard methods for quantification of major birch allergen Bet v 1</atitle><jtitle>Allergy (Copenhagen)</jtitle><addtitle>Allergy</addtitle><date>2016-10</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>71</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>1414</spage><epage>1424</epage><pages>1414-1424</pages><issn>0105-4538</issn><eissn>1398-9995</eissn><abstract>Background
The BSP090 project aims at establishing European Pharmacopoeia Reference Substances in combination with the corresponding ELISA methods for the quantification of major allergens in allergen products. Two sandwich ELISAs proved suitable for quantification of Bet v 1, the major birch pollen allergen, in preceding phases of BSP090.
Methods
Two Bet v 1‐specific ELISA systems were compared with respect to accuracy and precision in a ring trial including 13 laboratories. Model samples containing recombinant rBet v 1.0101 as well as native birch pollen extracts were measured independently at least three times in each facility. The assessment was completed with a comparative quantification of Bet v 1 in 30 marketed birch allergen products in one laboratory, simulating the future use as reference method.
Results
In the collaborative study, both candidate ELISAs confirmed their suitability to quantify recombinant and native Bet v 1. ELISA‐A showed higher precision and lower interlaboratory variability, yet ELISA‐B exhibited slightly higher accuracy. Subsequent parallel measurement of Bet v 1 in a panel of ‘real‐life’ birch allergen products indicated better repeatability of ELISA‐B. Both systems detected substantial differences in Bet v 1 content between allergen products, but the effect was more pronounced using ELISA‐B due to persistently higher values compared to ELISA‐A.
Conclusions
In the collaborative study, no deciding differences were observed between the two candidate ELISAs. Further comparison under conditions simulating the intended use combined with the criterion of long‐term availability enabled the selection of one Bet v 1‐specific ELISA for proposal as European Pharmacopoeia standard method.</abstract><cop>Denmark</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>27018782</pmid><doi>10.1111/all.12898</doi><tpages>11</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0105-4538 |
ispartof | Allergy (Copenhagen), 2016-10, Vol.71 (10), p.1414-1424 |
issn | 0105-4538 1398-9995 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1827906831 |
source | Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection |
subjects | Allergens Allergens - immunology Antigens, Plant - immunology Bet v 1 Bet v 1 antigen Betula - immunology Biological Products - standards biological standardisation Collaboration Computer simulation Criteria ELISA Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay European Pharmacopoeia Humans Laboratories major allergen Methods Pollen Reproducibility of Results Standardization Variability |
title | Standardization of allergen products: 3. Validation of candidate European Pharmacopoeia standard methods for quantification of major birch allergen Bet v 1 |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-11T03%3A33%3A10IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Standardization%20of%20allergen%20products:%203.%20Validation%20of%20candidate%20European%20Pharmacopoeia%20standard%20methods%20for%20quantification%20of%20major%20birch%20allergen%20Bet%20v%201&rft.jtitle=Allergy%20(Copenhagen)&rft.au=Kaul,%20S.&rft.date=2016-10&rft.volume=71&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=1414&rft.epage=1424&rft.pages=1414-1424&rft.issn=0105-4538&rft.eissn=1398-9995&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/all.12898&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1906332849%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4148-a939e8c1e4d4504f89ff2be12533b7dd849aa5b9a1507ac4fedae1126951d0ca3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1819084145&rft_id=info:pmid/27018782&rfr_iscdi=true |