Loading…

Standardization of allergen products: 3. Validation of candidate European Pharmacopoeia standard methods for quantification of major birch allergen Bet v 1

Background The BSP090 project aims at establishing European Pharmacopoeia Reference Substances in combination with the corresponding ELISA methods for the quantification of major allergens in allergen products. Two sandwich ELISAs proved suitable for quantification of Bet v 1, the major birch pollen...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Allergy (Copenhagen) 2016-10, Vol.71 (10), p.1414-1424
Main Authors: Kaul, S., Zimmer, J., Dehus, O., Costanzo, A., Daas, A., Buchheit, K. H., Asturias, J. A., Barber, D., Carnés, J., Chapman, M., Dayan‐Kenigsberg, J., Döring, S., Führer, F., Hanschmann, K. M., Holzhauser, T., Ledesma, A., Moingeon, P., Nony, E., Pini, C., Plunkett, G., Reese, G., Sandberg, E., Sander, I., Strecker, D., Valerio, C., Ree, R., Vieths, S.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4148-a939e8c1e4d4504f89ff2be12533b7dd849aa5b9a1507ac4fedae1126951d0ca3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4148-a939e8c1e4d4504f89ff2be12533b7dd849aa5b9a1507ac4fedae1126951d0ca3
container_end_page 1424
container_issue 10
container_start_page 1414
container_title Allergy (Copenhagen)
container_volume 71
creator Kaul, S.
Zimmer, J.
Dehus, O.
Costanzo, A.
Daas, A.
Buchheit, K. H.
Asturias, J. A.
Barber, D.
Carnés, J.
Chapman, M.
Dayan‐Kenigsberg, J.
Döring, S.
Führer, F.
Hanschmann, K. M.
Holzhauser, T.
Ledesma, A.
Moingeon, P.
Nony, E.
Pini, C.
Plunkett, G.
Reese, G.
Sandberg, E.
Sander, I.
Strecker, D.
Valerio, C.
Ree, R.
Vieths, S.
description Background The BSP090 project aims at establishing European Pharmacopoeia Reference Substances in combination with the corresponding ELISA methods for the quantification of major allergens in allergen products. Two sandwich ELISAs proved suitable for quantification of Bet v 1, the major birch pollen allergen, in preceding phases of BSP090. Methods Two Bet v 1‐specific ELISA systems were compared with respect to accuracy and precision in a ring trial including 13 laboratories. Model samples containing recombinant rBet v 1.0101 as well as native birch pollen extracts were measured independently at least three times in each facility. The assessment was completed with a comparative quantification of Bet v 1 in 30 marketed birch allergen products in one laboratory, simulating the future use as reference method. Results In the collaborative study, both candidate ELISAs confirmed their suitability to quantify recombinant and native Bet v 1. ELISA‐A showed higher precision and lower interlaboratory variability, yet ELISA‐B exhibited slightly higher accuracy. Subsequent parallel measurement of Bet v 1 in a panel of ‘real‐life’ birch allergen products indicated better repeatability of ELISA‐B. Both systems detected substantial differences in Bet v 1 content between allergen products, but the effect was more pronounced using ELISA‐B due to persistently higher values compared to ELISA‐A. Conclusions In the collaborative study, no deciding differences were observed between the two candidate ELISAs. Further comparison under conditions simulating the intended use combined with the criterion of long‐term availability enabled the selection of one Bet v 1‐specific ELISA for proposal as European Pharmacopoeia standard method.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/all.12898
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1827906831</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1906332849</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4148-a939e8c1e4d4504f89ff2be12533b7dd849aa5b9a1507ac4fedae1126951d0ca3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkl2L1DAUhoMo7rh64R-QgDd60dmcpt0m3u0u6wcMKPhxG06TUydD28wmrbL-Ff-sGWccQVDMTUh48py8yWHsMYgl5HGGfb-EUml1hy1AalVoreu7bCFA1EVVS3XCHqS0EUI0pRb32UnZCFCNKhfs-_sJR4fR-W84-TDy0PGso_iZRr6Nwc12Si-4XPJP2Ht3ZGw-tVsSv55j2BKO_N0a44A2bAN55Ong5QNN6-AS70LkNzOOk--8PXoG3OT91ke7_l33kib-hcNDdq_DPtGjw3zKPr68_nD1uli9ffXm6mJV2AoqVaCWmpQFqlxVi6pTuuvKlqCspWwb51SlEetWI9SiQVt15JAAynNdgxMW5Sl7tvfmvDczpckMPlnqexwpzMmAKhstzpWE_0BBayEqWWf06R_oJsxxzEEMZJuUZb7YP6nsEipH3Lme7ykbQ0qROrONfsB4a0CYXQuY_HbmZwtk9snBOLcDuSP5688zcLYHvvqebv9uMher1V75A2pvuzc</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1819084145</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Standardization of allergen products: 3. Validation of candidate European Pharmacopoeia standard methods for quantification of major birch allergen Bet v 1</title><source>Wiley-Blackwell Read &amp; Publish Collection</source><creator>Kaul, S. ; Zimmer, J. ; Dehus, O. ; Costanzo, A. ; Daas, A. ; Buchheit, K. H. ; Asturias, J. A. ; Barber, D. ; Carnés, J. ; Chapman, M. ; Dayan‐Kenigsberg, J. ; Döring, S. ; Führer, F. ; Hanschmann, K. M. ; Holzhauser, T. ; Ledesma, A. ; Moingeon, P. ; Nony, E. ; Pini, C. ; Plunkett, G. ; Reese, G. ; Sandberg, E. ; Sander, I. ; Strecker, D. ; Valerio, C. ; Ree, R. ; Vieths, S.</creator><creatorcontrib>Kaul, S. ; Zimmer, J. ; Dehus, O. ; Costanzo, A. ; Daas, A. ; Buchheit, K. H. ; Asturias, J. A. ; Barber, D. ; Carnés, J. ; Chapman, M. ; Dayan‐Kenigsberg, J. ; Döring, S. ; Führer, F. ; Hanschmann, K. M. ; Holzhauser, T. ; Ledesma, A. ; Moingeon, P. ; Nony, E. ; Pini, C. ; Plunkett, G. ; Reese, G. ; Sandberg, E. ; Sander, I. ; Strecker, D. ; Valerio, C. ; Ree, R. ; Vieths, S.</creatorcontrib><description>Background The BSP090 project aims at establishing European Pharmacopoeia Reference Substances in combination with the corresponding ELISA methods for the quantification of major allergens in allergen products. Two sandwich ELISAs proved suitable for quantification of Bet v 1, the major birch pollen allergen, in preceding phases of BSP090. Methods Two Bet v 1‐specific ELISA systems were compared with respect to accuracy and precision in a ring trial including 13 laboratories. Model samples containing recombinant rBet v 1.0101 as well as native birch pollen extracts were measured independently at least three times in each facility. The assessment was completed with a comparative quantification of Bet v 1 in 30 marketed birch allergen products in one laboratory, simulating the future use as reference method. Results In the collaborative study, both candidate ELISAs confirmed their suitability to quantify recombinant and native Bet v 1. ELISA‐A showed higher precision and lower interlaboratory variability, yet ELISA‐B exhibited slightly higher accuracy. Subsequent parallel measurement of Bet v 1 in a panel of ‘real‐life’ birch allergen products indicated better repeatability of ELISA‐B. Both systems detected substantial differences in Bet v 1 content between allergen products, but the effect was more pronounced using ELISA‐B due to persistently higher values compared to ELISA‐A. Conclusions In the collaborative study, no deciding differences were observed between the two candidate ELISAs. Further comparison under conditions simulating the intended use combined with the criterion of long‐term availability enabled the selection of one Bet v 1‐specific ELISA for proposal as European Pharmacopoeia standard method.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0105-4538</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1398-9995</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/all.12898</identifier><identifier>PMID: 27018782</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Denmark: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Allergens ; Allergens - immunology ; Antigens, Plant - immunology ; Bet v 1 ; Bet v 1 antigen ; Betula - immunology ; Biological Products - standards ; biological standardisation ; Collaboration ; Computer simulation ; Criteria ; ELISA ; Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay ; European Pharmacopoeia ; Humans ; Laboratories ; major allergen ; Methods ; Pollen ; Reproducibility of Results ; Standardization ; Variability</subject><ispartof>Allergy (Copenhagen), 2016-10, Vol.71 (10), p.1414-1424</ispartof><rights>2016 John Wiley &amp; Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd</rights><rights>2016 John Wiley &amp; Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2016 John Wiley &amp; Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4148-a939e8c1e4d4504f89ff2be12533b7dd849aa5b9a1507ac4fedae1126951d0ca3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4148-a939e8c1e4d4504f89ff2be12533b7dd849aa5b9a1507ac4fedae1126951d0ca3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27923,27924</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27018782$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kaul, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zimmer, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dehus, O.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Costanzo, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Daas, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Buchheit, K. H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Asturias, J. A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barber, D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carnés, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chapman, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dayan‐Kenigsberg, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Döring, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Führer, F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hanschmann, K. M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Holzhauser, T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ledesma, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moingeon, P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nony, E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pini, C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Plunkett, G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reese, G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sandberg, E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sander, I.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Strecker, D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Valerio, C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ree, R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vieths, S.</creatorcontrib><title>Standardization of allergen products: 3. Validation of candidate European Pharmacopoeia standard methods for quantification of major birch allergen Bet v 1</title><title>Allergy (Copenhagen)</title><addtitle>Allergy</addtitle><description>Background The BSP090 project aims at establishing European Pharmacopoeia Reference Substances in combination with the corresponding ELISA methods for the quantification of major allergens in allergen products. Two sandwich ELISAs proved suitable for quantification of Bet v 1, the major birch pollen allergen, in preceding phases of BSP090. Methods Two Bet v 1‐specific ELISA systems were compared with respect to accuracy and precision in a ring trial including 13 laboratories. Model samples containing recombinant rBet v 1.0101 as well as native birch pollen extracts were measured independently at least three times in each facility. The assessment was completed with a comparative quantification of Bet v 1 in 30 marketed birch allergen products in one laboratory, simulating the future use as reference method. Results In the collaborative study, both candidate ELISAs confirmed their suitability to quantify recombinant and native Bet v 1. ELISA‐A showed higher precision and lower interlaboratory variability, yet ELISA‐B exhibited slightly higher accuracy. Subsequent parallel measurement of Bet v 1 in a panel of ‘real‐life’ birch allergen products indicated better repeatability of ELISA‐B. Both systems detected substantial differences in Bet v 1 content between allergen products, but the effect was more pronounced using ELISA‐B due to persistently higher values compared to ELISA‐A. Conclusions In the collaborative study, no deciding differences were observed between the two candidate ELISAs. Further comparison under conditions simulating the intended use combined with the criterion of long‐term availability enabled the selection of one Bet v 1‐specific ELISA for proposal as European Pharmacopoeia standard method.</description><subject>Allergens</subject><subject>Allergens - immunology</subject><subject>Antigens, Plant - immunology</subject><subject>Bet v 1</subject><subject>Bet v 1 antigen</subject><subject>Betula - immunology</subject><subject>Biological Products - standards</subject><subject>biological standardisation</subject><subject>Collaboration</subject><subject>Computer simulation</subject><subject>Criteria</subject><subject>ELISA</subject><subject>Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay</subject><subject>European Pharmacopoeia</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Laboratories</subject><subject>major allergen</subject><subject>Methods</subject><subject>Pollen</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>Standardization</subject><subject>Variability</subject><issn>0105-4538</issn><issn>1398-9995</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNkl2L1DAUhoMo7rh64R-QgDd60dmcpt0m3u0u6wcMKPhxG06TUydD28wmrbL-Ff-sGWccQVDMTUh48py8yWHsMYgl5HGGfb-EUml1hy1AalVoreu7bCFA1EVVS3XCHqS0EUI0pRb32UnZCFCNKhfs-_sJR4fR-W84-TDy0PGso_iZRr6Nwc12Si-4XPJP2Ht3ZGw-tVsSv55j2BKO_N0a44A2bAN55Ong5QNN6-AS70LkNzOOk--8PXoG3OT91ke7_l33kib-hcNDdq_DPtGjw3zKPr68_nD1uli9ffXm6mJV2AoqVaCWmpQFqlxVi6pTuuvKlqCspWwb51SlEetWI9SiQVt15JAAynNdgxMW5Sl7tvfmvDczpckMPlnqexwpzMmAKhstzpWE_0BBayEqWWf06R_oJsxxzEEMZJuUZb7YP6nsEipH3Lme7ykbQ0qROrONfsB4a0CYXQuY_HbmZwtk9snBOLcDuSP5688zcLYHvvqebv9uMher1V75A2pvuzc</recordid><startdate>201610</startdate><enddate>201610</enddate><creator>Kaul, S.</creator><creator>Zimmer, J.</creator><creator>Dehus, O.</creator><creator>Costanzo, A.</creator><creator>Daas, A.</creator><creator>Buchheit, K. H.</creator><creator>Asturias, J. A.</creator><creator>Barber, D.</creator><creator>Carnés, J.</creator><creator>Chapman, M.</creator><creator>Dayan‐Kenigsberg, J.</creator><creator>Döring, S.</creator><creator>Führer, F.</creator><creator>Hanschmann, K. M.</creator><creator>Holzhauser, T.</creator><creator>Ledesma, A.</creator><creator>Moingeon, P.</creator><creator>Nony, E.</creator><creator>Pini, C.</creator><creator>Plunkett, G.</creator><creator>Reese, G.</creator><creator>Sandberg, E.</creator><creator>Sander, I.</creator><creator>Strecker, D.</creator><creator>Valerio, C.</creator><creator>Ree, R.</creator><creator>Vieths, S.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201610</creationdate><title>Standardization of allergen products: 3. Validation of candidate European Pharmacopoeia standard methods for quantification of major birch allergen Bet v 1</title><author>Kaul, S. ; Zimmer, J. ; Dehus, O. ; Costanzo, A. ; Daas, A. ; Buchheit, K. H. ; Asturias, J. A. ; Barber, D. ; Carnés, J. ; Chapman, M. ; Dayan‐Kenigsberg, J. ; Döring, S. ; Führer, F. ; Hanschmann, K. M. ; Holzhauser, T. ; Ledesma, A. ; Moingeon, P. ; Nony, E. ; Pini, C. ; Plunkett, G. ; Reese, G. ; Sandberg, E. ; Sander, I. ; Strecker, D. ; Valerio, C. ; Ree, R. ; Vieths, S.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4148-a939e8c1e4d4504f89ff2be12533b7dd849aa5b9a1507ac4fedae1126951d0ca3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Allergens</topic><topic>Allergens - immunology</topic><topic>Antigens, Plant - immunology</topic><topic>Bet v 1</topic><topic>Bet v 1 antigen</topic><topic>Betula - immunology</topic><topic>Biological Products - standards</topic><topic>biological standardisation</topic><topic>Collaboration</topic><topic>Computer simulation</topic><topic>Criteria</topic><topic>ELISA</topic><topic>Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay</topic><topic>European Pharmacopoeia</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Laboratories</topic><topic>major allergen</topic><topic>Methods</topic><topic>Pollen</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>Standardization</topic><topic>Variability</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kaul, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zimmer, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dehus, O.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Costanzo, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Daas, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Buchheit, K. H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Asturias, J. A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barber, D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carnés, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chapman, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dayan‐Kenigsberg, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Döring, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Führer, F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hanschmann, K. M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Holzhauser, T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ledesma, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moingeon, P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nony, E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pini, C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Plunkett, G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reese, G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sandberg, E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sander, I.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Strecker, D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Valerio, C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ree, R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vieths, S.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Allergy (Copenhagen)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kaul, S.</au><au>Zimmer, J.</au><au>Dehus, O.</au><au>Costanzo, A.</au><au>Daas, A.</au><au>Buchheit, K. H.</au><au>Asturias, J. A.</au><au>Barber, D.</au><au>Carnés, J.</au><au>Chapman, M.</au><au>Dayan‐Kenigsberg, J.</au><au>Döring, S.</au><au>Führer, F.</au><au>Hanschmann, K. M.</au><au>Holzhauser, T.</au><au>Ledesma, A.</au><au>Moingeon, P.</au><au>Nony, E.</au><au>Pini, C.</au><au>Plunkett, G.</au><au>Reese, G.</au><au>Sandberg, E.</au><au>Sander, I.</au><au>Strecker, D.</au><au>Valerio, C.</au><au>Ree, R.</au><au>Vieths, S.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Standardization of allergen products: 3. Validation of candidate European Pharmacopoeia standard methods for quantification of major birch allergen Bet v 1</atitle><jtitle>Allergy (Copenhagen)</jtitle><addtitle>Allergy</addtitle><date>2016-10</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>71</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>1414</spage><epage>1424</epage><pages>1414-1424</pages><issn>0105-4538</issn><eissn>1398-9995</eissn><abstract>Background The BSP090 project aims at establishing European Pharmacopoeia Reference Substances in combination with the corresponding ELISA methods for the quantification of major allergens in allergen products. Two sandwich ELISAs proved suitable for quantification of Bet v 1, the major birch pollen allergen, in preceding phases of BSP090. Methods Two Bet v 1‐specific ELISA systems were compared with respect to accuracy and precision in a ring trial including 13 laboratories. Model samples containing recombinant rBet v 1.0101 as well as native birch pollen extracts were measured independently at least three times in each facility. The assessment was completed with a comparative quantification of Bet v 1 in 30 marketed birch allergen products in one laboratory, simulating the future use as reference method. Results In the collaborative study, both candidate ELISAs confirmed their suitability to quantify recombinant and native Bet v 1. ELISA‐A showed higher precision and lower interlaboratory variability, yet ELISA‐B exhibited slightly higher accuracy. Subsequent parallel measurement of Bet v 1 in a panel of ‘real‐life’ birch allergen products indicated better repeatability of ELISA‐B. Both systems detected substantial differences in Bet v 1 content between allergen products, but the effect was more pronounced using ELISA‐B due to persistently higher values compared to ELISA‐A. Conclusions In the collaborative study, no deciding differences were observed between the two candidate ELISAs. Further comparison under conditions simulating the intended use combined with the criterion of long‐term availability enabled the selection of one Bet v 1‐specific ELISA for proposal as European Pharmacopoeia standard method.</abstract><cop>Denmark</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>27018782</pmid><doi>10.1111/all.12898</doi><tpages>11</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0105-4538
ispartof Allergy (Copenhagen), 2016-10, Vol.71 (10), p.1414-1424
issn 0105-4538
1398-9995
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1827906831
source Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection
subjects Allergens
Allergens - immunology
Antigens, Plant - immunology
Bet v 1
Bet v 1 antigen
Betula - immunology
Biological Products - standards
biological standardisation
Collaboration
Computer simulation
Criteria
ELISA
Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay
European Pharmacopoeia
Humans
Laboratories
major allergen
Methods
Pollen
Reproducibility of Results
Standardization
Variability
title Standardization of allergen products: 3. Validation of candidate European Pharmacopoeia standard methods for quantification of major birch allergen Bet v 1
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-11T03%3A33%3A10IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Standardization%20of%20allergen%20products:%203.%20Validation%20of%20candidate%20European%20Pharmacopoeia%20standard%20methods%20for%20quantification%20of%20major%20birch%20allergen%20Bet%20v%201&rft.jtitle=Allergy%20(Copenhagen)&rft.au=Kaul,%20S.&rft.date=2016-10&rft.volume=71&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=1414&rft.epage=1424&rft.pages=1414-1424&rft.issn=0105-4538&rft.eissn=1398-9995&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/all.12898&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1906332849%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4148-a939e8c1e4d4504f89ff2be12533b7dd849aa5b9a1507ac4fedae1126951d0ca3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1819084145&rft_id=info:pmid/27018782&rfr_iscdi=true