New methods for the assessment of Parkinson's disease (2005 to 2015): A systematic review

ABSTRACT Background The past decade has witnessed a highly dynamic and growing expansion of novel methods aimed at improving the assessment of Parkinson's disease with technology (NAM‐PD) in laboratory, clinical, and home environments. However, the current state of NAM‐PD regarding their maturi...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Movement disorders 2016-09, Vol.31 (9), p.1283-1292
Main Authors: Sánchez-Ferro, Álvaro, Elshehabi, Morad, Godinho, Catarina, Salkovic, Dina, Hobert, Markus A., Domingos, Josefa, van Uem, Janet MT, Ferreira, Joaquim J., Maetzler, Walter
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
biomedical
Biomedical Technology - standards
diagnosis
Diagnostic Techniques and Procedures - standards
Humans
inventions
Movement disorders
Parkinson disease
Parkinson Disease - diagnosis
technology assessment
Citations: Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5203-be04f8283e2348cfa56167063307c4478c83f266749c3adad14f41250b7587703
cites
container_end_page 1292
container_issue 9
container_start_page 1283
container_title Movement disorders
container_volume 31
creator Sánchez-Ferro, Álvaro
Elshehabi, Morad
Godinho, Catarina
Salkovic, Dina
Hobert, Markus A.
Domingos, Josefa
van Uem, Janet MT
Ferreira, Joaquim J.
Maetzler, Walter
description ABSTRACT Background The past decade has witnessed a highly dynamic and growing expansion of novel methods aimed at improving the assessment of Parkinson's disease with technology (NAM‐PD) in laboratory, clinical, and home environments. However, the current state of NAM‐PD regarding their maturity, feasibility, and usefulness in assessing the main PD features has not been systematically evaluated. Methods A systematic review of articles published in the field from 2005 to 2015 was performed. Of 9,503 publications identified in PubMed and the Web of Science, 848 full papers were evaluated, and 588 original articles were assessed to evaluate the technological, demographic, clinimetric, and technology transfer readiness parameters of NAM‐PD. Results Of the studies, 65% included fewer than 30 patients, 
doi_str_mv 10.1002/mds.26723
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1827907897</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1827907897</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5203-be04f8283e2348cfa56167063307c4478c83f266749c3adad14f41250b7587703</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkU1v1EAMhkcIRLeFA38AjcSBckjr-fSEW1W6pWpZKgECTqPZxFFTNkmJs2z33zfdLT1w4mRLfl5L9iPEKwUHCkAfNiUfaI_aPBET5YzKgnb4VEwgBJcZFdyO2GW-BlDKKf9c7Gi0BnKfT8TPGa1kQ8NVV7Ksul4OVyQTMzE31A6yq-Rl6n_VLXftW5ZlzZSY5L4GcHLopAbl3r2XR5LXPFCThrqQPf2pafVCPKvSgunlQ90T36YnX48_ZhefT8-Ojy6ywmkw2ZzAVkEHQ9rYUFTJeeURvDGAhbUYimAq7T3avDCpTKWylVXawRxdQASzJ_a3e2_67veSeIhNzQUtFqmlbslRBY05YMjxP1CFwalc36Nv_kGvu2XfjodsKLABczNSrx-o5byhMt70dZP6dfz73xE43AKrekHrx7mCeC8ujuLiRlz89OHLphkT2TZRj_-8fUyMDqJHgy5-n51G_UPNpnh-GafmDqxglEo</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1817048793</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>New methods for the assessment of Parkinson's disease (2005 to 2015): A systematic review</title><source>Wiley</source><creator>Sánchez-Ferro, Álvaro ; Elshehabi, Morad ; Godinho, Catarina ; Salkovic, Dina ; Hobert, Markus A. ; Domingos, Josefa ; van Uem, Janet MT ; Ferreira, Joaquim J. ; Maetzler, Walter</creator><creatorcontrib>Sánchez-Ferro, Álvaro ; Elshehabi, Morad ; Godinho, Catarina ; Salkovic, Dina ; Hobert, Markus A. ; Domingos, Josefa ; van Uem, Janet MT ; Ferreira, Joaquim J. ; Maetzler, Walter</creatorcontrib><description>ABSTRACT Background The past decade has witnessed a highly dynamic and growing expansion of novel methods aimed at improving the assessment of Parkinson's disease with technology (NAM‐PD) in laboratory, clinical, and home environments. However, the current state of NAM‐PD regarding their maturity, feasibility, and usefulness in assessing the main PD features has not been systematically evaluated. Methods A systematic review of articles published in the field from 2005 to 2015 was performed. Of 9,503 publications identified in PubMed and the Web of Science, 848 full papers were evaluated, and 588 original articles were assessed to evaluate the technological, demographic, clinimetric, and technology transfer readiness parameters of NAM‐PD. Results Of the studies, 65% included fewer than 30 patients, &lt; 50% employed a standard methodology to validate diagnostic tests, 8% confirmed their results in a different dataset, and 87% occurred in a clinic or lab. The axial features domain was the most frequently studied, followed by bradykinesia. Rigidity and nonmotor domains were rarely investigated. Only 6% of the systems reached a technology level that justified the hope of being included in clinical assessments in a useful time period. Conclusions This systematic evaluation provides an overview of the current options for quantitative assessment of PD and what can be expected in the near future. There is a particular need for standardized and collaborative studies to confirm the results of preliminary initiatives, assess domains that are currently underinvestigated, and better validate the existing and upcoming NAM‐PD. © 2016 International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society</description><identifier>ISSN: 0885-3185</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1531-8257</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/mds.26723</identifier><identifier>PMID: 27430969</identifier><identifier>CODEN: MOVDEA</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>biomedical ; Biomedical Technology - standards ; diagnosis ; Diagnostic Techniques and Procedures - standards ; Humans ; inventions ; Movement disorders ; Parkinson disease ; Parkinson Disease - diagnosis ; technology assessment</subject><ispartof>Movement disorders, 2016-09, Vol.31 (9), p.1283-1292</ispartof><rights>2016 International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society</rights><rights>2016 International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5203-be04f8283e2348cfa56167063307c4478c83f266749c3adad14f41250b7587703</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27430969$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Sánchez-Ferro, Álvaro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Elshehabi, Morad</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Godinho, Catarina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Salkovic, Dina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hobert, Markus A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Domingos, Josefa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van Uem, Janet MT</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ferreira, Joaquim J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maetzler, Walter</creatorcontrib><title>New methods for the assessment of Parkinson's disease (2005 to 2015): A systematic review</title><title>Movement disorders</title><addtitle>Mov Disord</addtitle><description>ABSTRACT Background The past decade has witnessed a highly dynamic and growing expansion of novel methods aimed at improving the assessment of Parkinson's disease with technology (NAM‐PD) in laboratory, clinical, and home environments. However, the current state of NAM‐PD regarding their maturity, feasibility, and usefulness in assessing the main PD features has not been systematically evaluated. Methods A systematic review of articles published in the field from 2005 to 2015 was performed. Of 9,503 publications identified in PubMed and the Web of Science, 848 full papers were evaluated, and 588 original articles were assessed to evaluate the technological, demographic, clinimetric, and technology transfer readiness parameters of NAM‐PD. Results Of the studies, 65% included fewer than 30 patients, &lt; 50% employed a standard methodology to validate diagnostic tests, 8% confirmed their results in a different dataset, and 87% occurred in a clinic or lab. The axial features domain was the most frequently studied, followed by bradykinesia. Rigidity and nonmotor domains were rarely investigated. Only 6% of the systems reached a technology level that justified the hope of being included in clinical assessments in a useful time period. Conclusions This systematic evaluation provides an overview of the current options for quantitative assessment of PD and what can be expected in the near future. There is a particular need for standardized and collaborative studies to confirm the results of preliminary initiatives, assess domains that are currently underinvestigated, and better validate the existing and upcoming NAM‐PD. © 2016 International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society</description><subject>biomedical</subject><subject>Biomedical Technology - standards</subject><subject>diagnosis</subject><subject>Diagnostic Techniques and Procedures - standards</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>inventions</subject><subject>Movement disorders</subject><subject>Parkinson disease</subject><subject>Parkinson Disease - diagnosis</subject><subject>technology assessment</subject><issn>0885-3185</issn><issn>1531-8257</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNkU1v1EAMhkcIRLeFA38AjcSBckjr-fSEW1W6pWpZKgECTqPZxFFTNkmJs2z33zfdLT1w4mRLfl5L9iPEKwUHCkAfNiUfaI_aPBET5YzKgnb4VEwgBJcZFdyO2GW-BlDKKf9c7Gi0BnKfT8TPGa1kQ8NVV7Ksul4OVyQTMzE31A6yq-Rl6n_VLXftW5ZlzZSY5L4GcHLopAbl3r2XR5LXPFCThrqQPf2pafVCPKvSgunlQ90T36YnX48_ZhefT8-Ojy6ywmkw2ZzAVkEHQ9rYUFTJeeURvDGAhbUYimAq7T3avDCpTKWylVXawRxdQASzJ_a3e2_67veSeIhNzQUtFqmlbslRBY05YMjxP1CFwalc36Nv_kGvu2XfjodsKLABczNSrx-o5byhMt70dZP6dfz73xE43AKrekHrx7mCeC8ujuLiRlz89OHLphkT2TZRj_-8fUyMDqJHgy5-n51G_UPNpnh-GafmDqxglEo</recordid><startdate>201609</startdate><enddate>201609</enddate><creator>Sánchez-Ferro, Álvaro</creator><creator>Elshehabi, Morad</creator><creator>Godinho, Catarina</creator><creator>Salkovic, Dina</creator><creator>Hobert, Markus A.</creator><creator>Domingos, Josefa</creator><creator>van Uem, Janet MT</creator><creator>Ferreira, Joaquim J.</creator><creator>Maetzler, Walter</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201609</creationdate><title>New methods for the assessment of Parkinson's disease (2005 to 2015): A systematic review</title><author>Sánchez-Ferro, Álvaro ; Elshehabi, Morad ; Godinho, Catarina ; Salkovic, Dina ; Hobert, Markus A. ; Domingos, Josefa ; van Uem, Janet MT ; Ferreira, Joaquim J. ; Maetzler, Walter</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5203-be04f8283e2348cfa56167063307c4478c83f266749c3adad14f41250b7587703</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>biomedical</topic><topic>Biomedical Technology - standards</topic><topic>diagnosis</topic><topic>Diagnostic Techniques and Procedures - standards</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>inventions</topic><topic>Movement disorders</topic><topic>Parkinson disease</topic><topic>Parkinson Disease - diagnosis</topic><topic>technology assessment</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sánchez-Ferro, Álvaro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Elshehabi, Morad</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Godinho, Catarina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Salkovic, Dina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hobert, Markus A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Domingos, Josefa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van Uem, Janet MT</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ferreira, Joaquim J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maetzler, Walter</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Movement disorders</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sánchez-Ferro, Álvaro</au><au>Elshehabi, Morad</au><au>Godinho, Catarina</au><au>Salkovic, Dina</au><au>Hobert, Markus A.</au><au>Domingos, Josefa</au><au>van Uem, Janet MT</au><au>Ferreira, Joaquim J.</au><au>Maetzler, Walter</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>New methods for the assessment of Parkinson's disease (2005 to 2015): A systematic review</atitle><jtitle>Movement disorders</jtitle><addtitle>Mov Disord</addtitle><date>2016-09</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>31</volume><issue>9</issue><spage>1283</spage><epage>1292</epage><pages>1283-1292</pages><issn>0885-3185</issn><eissn>1531-8257</eissn><coden>MOVDEA</coden><abstract>ABSTRACT Background The past decade has witnessed a highly dynamic and growing expansion of novel methods aimed at improving the assessment of Parkinson's disease with technology (NAM‐PD) in laboratory, clinical, and home environments. However, the current state of NAM‐PD regarding their maturity, feasibility, and usefulness in assessing the main PD features has not been systematically evaluated. Methods A systematic review of articles published in the field from 2005 to 2015 was performed. Of 9,503 publications identified in PubMed and the Web of Science, 848 full papers were evaluated, and 588 original articles were assessed to evaluate the technological, demographic, clinimetric, and technology transfer readiness parameters of NAM‐PD. Results Of the studies, 65% included fewer than 30 patients, &lt; 50% employed a standard methodology to validate diagnostic tests, 8% confirmed their results in a different dataset, and 87% occurred in a clinic or lab. The axial features domain was the most frequently studied, followed by bradykinesia. Rigidity and nonmotor domains were rarely investigated. Only 6% of the systems reached a technology level that justified the hope of being included in clinical assessments in a useful time period. Conclusions This systematic evaluation provides an overview of the current options for quantitative assessment of PD and what can be expected in the near future. There is a particular need for standardized and collaborative studies to confirm the results of preliminary initiatives, assess domains that are currently underinvestigated, and better validate the existing and upcoming NAM‐PD. © 2016 International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>27430969</pmid><doi>10.1002/mds.26723</doi><tpages>10</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0885-3185
ispartof Movement disorders, 2016-09, Vol.31 (9), p.1283-1292
issn 0885-3185
1531-8257
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1827907897
source Wiley
subjects biomedical
Biomedical Technology - standards
diagnosis
Diagnostic Techniques and Procedures - standards
Humans
inventions
Movement disorders
Parkinson disease
Parkinson Disease - diagnosis
technology assessment
title New methods for the assessment of Parkinson's disease (2005 to 2015): A systematic review
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-20T18%3A16%3A54IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=New%20methods%20for%20the%20assessment%20of%20Parkinson's%20disease%20(2005%20to%202015):%20A%20systematic%20review&rft.jtitle=Movement%20disorders&rft.au=S%C3%A1nchez-Ferro,%20%C3%81lvaro&rft.date=2016-09&rft.volume=31&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=1283&rft.epage=1292&rft.pages=1283-1292&rft.issn=0885-3185&rft.eissn=1531-8257&rft.coden=MOVDEA&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/mds.26723&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E1827907897%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5203-be04f8283e2348cfa56167063307c4478c83f266749c3adad14f41250b7587703%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1817048793&rft_id=info:pmid/27430969&rfr_iscdi=true