Loading…

Comparison of recovery parameters for xenon versus other inhalation anesthetics: systematic review and meta-analysis

Abstract Study objective To summarize and evaluate the available data describing the recovery parameters of xenon anesthesia. Design Systematic review and meta-analysis. Setting Anesthesia for elective surgeries. Patients Systematic review of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) from databases includ...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of clinical anesthesia 2016-03, Vol.29, p.65-74
Main Authors: Hou, Bingzong, MD, Li, Fujing, MS, Ou, Shanshan, MS, Yang, Lukun, MS, Zhou, Shaopeng, MD
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Abstract Study objective To summarize and evaluate the available data describing the recovery parameters of xenon anesthesia. Design Systematic review and meta-analysis. Setting Anesthesia for elective surgeries. Patients Systematic review of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) from databases including Medline (1964-2013), the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL, 1990-2012), and Google Scholar (1966-2013). Interventions Inhalation of xenon or other anesthetics was administered in elective surgery. Measurements Recovery parameters (time to recovery, alertness/sedation scale scores at “eye opening,” bispectral index at “reaction on demand,” time to extubation, and time to orientation). Main results Eleven RCTs (N = 661 patients) met the inclusion criteria. Recovery from xenon anesthesia was significantly faster in terms of the time to eye opening (mean difference [MD], − 4.18 minutes; 95% confidence interval [CI], − 5.03 to − 3.32 minutes; P < .00001), the time to reaction on demand (MD, − 5.35 minutes; 95% CI, − 6.59 to − 4.11 minutes; P < .00001), the time to extubation (MD, − 4.49 minutes; 95% CI, − 5.40 to − 3.58 minutes; P < .00001), and the time to orientation (MD, − 4.99 minutes; 95% CI, − 6.45 to − 3.52 minutes; P < .00001). Conclusions This meta-analysis confirmed that recovery from xenon anesthesia is faster than other inhalation anesthesia.
ISSN:0952-8180
1873-4529
DOI:10.1016/j.jclinane.2015.10.018