Loading…

Studying long-term, large-scale grassland restoration outcomes to improve seeding methods and reveal knowledge gaps

1. Studies are increasingly investigating effects of large-scale management activities on grassland restoration outcomes. These studies are providing useful comparisons among currently used management strategies, but not the novel strategies needed to rapidly improve restoration efforts. Here we ill...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:The Journal of applied ecology 2016-10, Vol.53 (5), p.1565-1574
Main Authors: Rinella, Matthew J., Espeland, Erin K., Moffatt, Bruce J.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4392-7a5e5438492f27d5d76cc3dcaf5e929e9d0feb55cf2711d2f652281d411ae07e3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4392-7a5e5438492f27d5d76cc3dcaf5e929e9d0feb55cf2711d2f652281d411ae07e3
container_end_page 1574
container_issue 5
container_start_page 1565
container_title The Journal of applied ecology
container_volume 53
creator Rinella, Matthew J.
Espeland, Erin K.
Moffatt, Bruce J.
description 1. Studies are increasingly investigating effects of large-scale management activities on grassland restoration outcomes. These studies are providing useful comparisons among currently used management strategies, but not the novel strategies needed to rapidly improve restoration efforts. Here we illustrate how managing restoration projects adaptively can allow promising management innovations to be identified and tested. 2. We studied 327 Great Plains fields seeded after coal mining. We modelled plant responses to management strategies to identify the most effective previously used strategies for constraining weeds and establishing desired plants. Then, we used the model to predict responses to new strategies our analysis identified as potentially more effective. 3. Where established, the weed crested wheatgrass (Agropyron cristatum L.) increased through time, indicating a need to manage establishment of this grass. Seeding particular grasses reduced annual weed cover, and because these grasses appeared to become similarly abundant whether sown at low or high rates, low rates could likely be safely used to reduce seeding costs. More importantly, lower than average grass seed rates increased cover of shrubs, the plants most difficult to restore to many grassland ecosystems. After identifying grass seed rates as a driver, we formulated model predictions for rates below the range managers typically use. These predictions require testing but indicated atypically low grass seed rates would further increase shrubs without hindering long-term grass stand development. 4. Synthesis and applications. Designing management around empirically based predictions is a logical next step towards improving ecological restoration efforts. Our predictions are that reducing grass seed rates to atypically low levels will boost shrubs without compromising grasses. Because these predictions derive from the fitted model, they represent quantitative hypotheses based on current understanding of the system. Generating data needed to test and update these hypotheses will require monitoring responses to shifts in management, specifically shifts to lower grass seed rates. A paucity of data for confronting hypotheses has been a major sticking point hindering adaptive management of most natural resources, but this need not be the case with degraded grasslands, because ongoing restoration efforts around the globe are providing continuous opportunities to monitor and manage processes regulat
doi_str_mv 10.1111/1365-2664.12722
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1827920632</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>44133910</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>44133910</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4392-7a5e5438492f27d5d76cc3dcaf5e929e9d0feb55cf2711d2f652281d411ae07e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkU1v1DAURS1EJYYpa1ZIltiwIK2fHSfxElWlH6rUSsDaMvZLyODEg520mn9fh9AuWIA3luxznu7TJeQtsBPI5xREJQteVeUJ8JrzF2Tz_PKSbBjjUDSKwSvyOqUdY0xJITYkfZlmd-jHjvowdsWEcfhIvYkdFskaj7SLJiVvRkcjpilEM_VhpGGebBgw0SnQftjHcI80Ibpl0IDTj-ASXZ17NJ7-HMODR9flcWafjslRa3zCN3_uLfn2-fzr2WVxc3txdfbpprClULyojURZiqZUvOW1k66urBXOmlai4gqVYy1-l9LmXwDH20py3oArAQyyGsWWfFjn5ny_5pxeD32y6PM2GOakoeG14qwSPKPv_0J3YY5jTqczAHUO0ah_UdCAAqjqHHhLTlfKxpBSxFbvYz-YeNDA9FKVXorRSzH6d1XZkKvx0Hs8_A_X13fnT9671dstzTx7ZQlCKGDiEV50n2c</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1819116754</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Studying long-term, large-scale grassland restoration outcomes to improve seeding methods and reveal knowledge gaps</title><source>JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection</source><source>Wiley-Blackwell Read &amp; Publish Collection</source><creator>Rinella, Matthew J. ; Espeland, Erin K. ; Moffatt, Bruce J.</creator><contributor>James, Jeremy</contributor><creatorcontrib>Rinella, Matthew J. ; Espeland, Erin K. ; Moffatt, Bruce J. ; James, Jeremy</creatorcontrib><description>1. Studies are increasingly investigating effects of large-scale management activities on grassland restoration outcomes. These studies are providing useful comparisons among currently used management strategies, but not the novel strategies needed to rapidly improve restoration efforts. Here we illustrate how managing restoration projects adaptively can allow promising management innovations to be identified and tested. 2. We studied 327 Great Plains fields seeded after coal mining. We modelled plant responses to management strategies to identify the most effective previously used strategies for constraining weeds and establishing desired plants. Then, we used the model to predict responses to new strategies our analysis identified as potentially more effective. 3. Where established, the weed crested wheatgrass (Agropyron cristatum L.) increased through time, indicating a need to manage establishment of this grass. Seeding particular grasses reduced annual weed cover, and because these grasses appeared to become similarly abundant whether sown at low or high rates, low rates could likely be safely used to reduce seeding costs. More importantly, lower than average grass seed rates increased cover of shrubs, the plants most difficult to restore to many grassland ecosystems. After identifying grass seed rates as a driver, we formulated model predictions for rates below the range managers typically use. These predictions require testing but indicated atypically low grass seed rates would further increase shrubs without hindering long-term grass stand development. 4. Synthesis and applications. Designing management around empirically based predictions is a logical next step towards improving ecological restoration efforts. Our predictions are that reducing grass seed rates to atypically low levels will boost shrubs without compromising grasses. Because these predictions derive from the fitted model, they represent quantitative hypotheses based on current understanding of the system. Generating data needed to test and update these hypotheses will require monitoring responses to shifts in management, specifically shifts to lower grass seed rates. A paucity of data for confronting hypotheses has been a major sticking point hindering adaptive management of most natural resources, but this need not be the case with degraded grasslands, because ongoing restoration efforts around the globe are providing continuous opportunities to monitor and manage processes regulating grassland restoration outcomes.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0021-8901</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1365-2664</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/1365-2664.12722</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JAPEAI</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd</publisher><subject>Adaptive management ; Agropyron cristatum ; Bromus tectorum ; Coal mines ; Coal mining ; compositional data analysis ; crested wheatgrass ; Environmental restoration ; Grasses ; Grassland management ; Grasslands ; Great Plains ; Hypotheses ; Lawns ; Mathematical models ; Natural resources ; Range management ; rangeland ; reclamation ; Resource management ; Restoration ; seed rate ; Seeding ; Seeds ; Shrubs ; Weeds</subject><ispartof>The Journal of applied ecology, 2016-10, Vol.53 (5), p.1565-1574</ispartof><rights>2016 British Ecological Society</rights><rights>2016 The Authors. Journal of Applied Ecology © 2016 British Ecological Society</rights><rights>Journal of Applied Ecology © 2016 British Ecological Society</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4392-7a5e5438492f27d5d76cc3dcaf5e929e9d0feb55cf2711d2f652281d411ae07e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4392-7a5e5438492f27d5d76cc3dcaf5e929e9d0feb55cf2711d2f652281d411ae07e3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/44133910$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/44133910$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,58238,58471</link.rule.ids></links><search><contributor>James, Jeremy</contributor><creatorcontrib>Rinella, Matthew J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Espeland, Erin K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moffatt, Bruce J.</creatorcontrib><title>Studying long-term, large-scale grassland restoration outcomes to improve seeding methods and reveal knowledge gaps</title><title>The Journal of applied ecology</title><description>1. Studies are increasingly investigating effects of large-scale management activities on grassland restoration outcomes. These studies are providing useful comparisons among currently used management strategies, but not the novel strategies needed to rapidly improve restoration efforts. Here we illustrate how managing restoration projects adaptively can allow promising management innovations to be identified and tested. 2. We studied 327 Great Plains fields seeded after coal mining. We modelled plant responses to management strategies to identify the most effective previously used strategies for constraining weeds and establishing desired plants. Then, we used the model to predict responses to new strategies our analysis identified as potentially more effective. 3. Where established, the weed crested wheatgrass (Agropyron cristatum L.) increased through time, indicating a need to manage establishment of this grass. Seeding particular grasses reduced annual weed cover, and because these grasses appeared to become similarly abundant whether sown at low or high rates, low rates could likely be safely used to reduce seeding costs. More importantly, lower than average grass seed rates increased cover of shrubs, the plants most difficult to restore to many grassland ecosystems. After identifying grass seed rates as a driver, we formulated model predictions for rates below the range managers typically use. These predictions require testing but indicated atypically low grass seed rates would further increase shrubs without hindering long-term grass stand development. 4. Synthesis and applications. Designing management around empirically based predictions is a logical next step towards improving ecological restoration efforts. Our predictions are that reducing grass seed rates to atypically low levels will boost shrubs without compromising grasses. Because these predictions derive from the fitted model, they represent quantitative hypotheses based on current understanding of the system. Generating data needed to test and update these hypotheses will require monitoring responses to shifts in management, specifically shifts to lower grass seed rates. A paucity of data for confronting hypotheses has been a major sticking point hindering adaptive management of most natural resources, but this need not be the case with degraded grasslands, because ongoing restoration efforts around the globe are providing continuous opportunities to monitor and manage processes regulating grassland restoration outcomes.</description><subject>Adaptive management</subject><subject>Agropyron cristatum</subject><subject>Bromus tectorum</subject><subject>Coal mines</subject><subject>Coal mining</subject><subject>compositional data analysis</subject><subject>crested wheatgrass</subject><subject>Environmental restoration</subject><subject>Grasses</subject><subject>Grassland management</subject><subject>Grasslands</subject><subject>Great Plains</subject><subject>Hypotheses</subject><subject>Lawns</subject><subject>Mathematical models</subject><subject>Natural resources</subject><subject>Range management</subject><subject>rangeland</subject><subject>reclamation</subject><subject>Resource management</subject><subject>Restoration</subject><subject>seed rate</subject><subject>Seeding</subject><subject>Seeds</subject><subject>Shrubs</subject><subject>Weeds</subject><issn>0021-8901</issn><issn>1365-2664</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkU1v1DAURS1EJYYpa1ZIltiwIK2fHSfxElWlH6rUSsDaMvZLyODEg520mn9fh9AuWIA3luxznu7TJeQtsBPI5xREJQteVeUJ8JrzF2Tz_PKSbBjjUDSKwSvyOqUdY0xJITYkfZlmd-jHjvowdsWEcfhIvYkdFskaj7SLJiVvRkcjpilEM_VhpGGebBgw0SnQftjHcI80Ibpl0IDTj-ASXZ17NJ7-HMODR9flcWafjslRa3zCN3_uLfn2-fzr2WVxc3txdfbpprClULyojURZiqZUvOW1k66urBXOmlai4gqVYy1-l9LmXwDH20py3oArAQyyGsWWfFjn5ny_5pxeD32y6PM2GOakoeG14qwSPKPv_0J3YY5jTqczAHUO0ah_UdCAAqjqHHhLTlfKxpBSxFbvYz-YeNDA9FKVXorRSzH6d1XZkKvx0Hs8_A_X13fnT9671dstzTx7ZQlCKGDiEV50n2c</recordid><startdate>20161001</startdate><enddate>20161001</enddate><creator>Rinella, Matthew J.</creator><creator>Espeland, Erin K.</creator><creator>Moffatt, Bruce J.</creator><general>John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd</general><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>RC3</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20161001</creationdate><title>Studying long-term, large-scale grassland restoration outcomes to improve seeding methods and reveal knowledge gaps</title><author>Rinella, Matthew J. ; Espeland, Erin K. ; Moffatt, Bruce J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4392-7a5e5438492f27d5d76cc3dcaf5e929e9d0feb55cf2711d2f652281d411ae07e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Adaptive management</topic><topic>Agropyron cristatum</topic><topic>Bromus tectorum</topic><topic>Coal mines</topic><topic>Coal mining</topic><topic>compositional data analysis</topic><topic>crested wheatgrass</topic><topic>Environmental restoration</topic><topic>Grasses</topic><topic>Grassland management</topic><topic>Grasslands</topic><topic>Great Plains</topic><topic>Hypotheses</topic><topic>Lawns</topic><topic>Mathematical models</topic><topic>Natural resources</topic><topic>Range management</topic><topic>rangeland</topic><topic>reclamation</topic><topic>Resource management</topic><topic>Restoration</topic><topic>seed rate</topic><topic>Seeding</topic><topic>Seeds</topic><topic>Shrubs</topic><topic>Weeds</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Rinella, Matthew J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Espeland, Erin K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moffatt, Bruce J.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><jtitle>The Journal of applied ecology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Rinella, Matthew J.</au><au>Espeland, Erin K.</au><au>Moffatt, Bruce J.</au><au>James, Jeremy</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Studying long-term, large-scale grassland restoration outcomes to improve seeding methods and reveal knowledge gaps</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of applied ecology</jtitle><date>2016-10-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>53</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>1565</spage><epage>1574</epage><pages>1565-1574</pages><issn>0021-8901</issn><eissn>1365-2664</eissn><coden>JAPEAI</coden><abstract>1. Studies are increasingly investigating effects of large-scale management activities on grassland restoration outcomes. These studies are providing useful comparisons among currently used management strategies, but not the novel strategies needed to rapidly improve restoration efforts. Here we illustrate how managing restoration projects adaptively can allow promising management innovations to be identified and tested. 2. We studied 327 Great Plains fields seeded after coal mining. We modelled plant responses to management strategies to identify the most effective previously used strategies for constraining weeds and establishing desired plants. Then, we used the model to predict responses to new strategies our analysis identified as potentially more effective. 3. Where established, the weed crested wheatgrass (Agropyron cristatum L.) increased through time, indicating a need to manage establishment of this grass. Seeding particular grasses reduced annual weed cover, and because these grasses appeared to become similarly abundant whether sown at low or high rates, low rates could likely be safely used to reduce seeding costs. More importantly, lower than average grass seed rates increased cover of shrubs, the plants most difficult to restore to many grassland ecosystems. After identifying grass seed rates as a driver, we formulated model predictions for rates below the range managers typically use. These predictions require testing but indicated atypically low grass seed rates would further increase shrubs without hindering long-term grass stand development. 4. Synthesis and applications. Designing management around empirically based predictions is a logical next step towards improving ecological restoration efforts. Our predictions are that reducing grass seed rates to atypically low levels will boost shrubs without compromising grasses. Because these predictions derive from the fitted model, they represent quantitative hypotheses based on current understanding of the system. Generating data needed to test and update these hypotheses will require monitoring responses to shifts in management, specifically shifts to lower grass seed rates. A paucity of data for confronting hypotheses has been a major sticking point hindering adaptive management of most natural resources, but this need not be the case with degraded grasslands, because ongoing restoration efforts around the globe are providing continuous opportunities to monitor and manage processes regulating grassland restoration outcomes.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd</pub><doi>10.1111/1365-2664.12722</doi><tpages>10</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0021-8901
ispartof The Journal of applied ecology, 2016-10, Vol.53 (5), p.1565-1574
issn 0021-8901
1365-2664
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1827920632
source JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection; Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection
subjects Adaptive management
Agropyron cristatum
Bromus tectorum
Coal mines
Coal mining
compositional data analysis
crested wheatgrass
Environmental restoration
Grasses
Grassland management
Grasslands
Great Plains
Hypotheses
Lawns
Mathematical models
Natural resources
Range management
rangeland
reclamation
Resource management
Restoration
seed rate
Seeding
Seeds
Shrubs
Weeds
title Studying long-term, large-scale grassland restoration outcomes to improve seeding methods and reveal knowledge gaps
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-26T15%3A14%3A04IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Studying%20long-term,%20large-scale%20grassland%20restoration%20outcomes%20to%20improve%20seeding%20methods%20and%20reveal%20knowledge%20gaps&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20applied%20ecology&rft.au=Rinella,%20Matthew%20J.&rft.date=2016-10-01&rft.volume=53&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=1565&rft.epage=1574&rft.pages=1565-1574&rft.issn=0021-8901&rft.eissn=1365-2664&rft.coden=JAPEAI&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/1365-2664.12722&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E44133910%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4392-7a5e5438492f27d5d76cc3dcaf5e929e9d0feb55cf2711d2f652281d411ae07e3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1819116754&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=44133910&rfr_iscdi=true