Loading…

Medical specialty certification in the United States—a false idol?

Purpose Recent changes to medical specialty certification in the USA have prompted the process to come under intense scrutiny. Methods We review the history of board certification and the changes made to the process. As part of this review, we examine both literature and public record to examine the...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of interventional cardiac electrophysiology 2016-10, Vol.47 (1), p.37-43
Main Authors: Fisher, Westby G., Schloss, Edward J.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c448t-126add1fcee7862ab78196c1c7dea917a88a02350b2753aa278c579277e0ba2b3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c448t-126add1fcee7862ab78196c1c7dea917a88a02350b2753aa278c579277e0ba2b3
container_end_page 43
container_issue 1
container_start_page 37
container_title Journal of interventional cardiac electrophysiology
container_volume 47
creator Fisher, Westby G.
Schloss, Edward J.
description Purpose Recent changes to medical specialty certification in the USA have prompted the process to come under intense scrutiny. Methods We review the history of board certification and the changes made to the process. As part of this review, we examine both literature and public record to examine the motives behind the changes made. We then review the legal challenges and changes under way to modify the current ABMS board re-certification process. Results In 1917, the first board certification was a lifetime designation, voluntary, and managed by unpaid board members with a focus to enhance quality for patients. Corresponding to the implementation of time-limited certification, $55 million of physician testing fees were transferred from the American Board of Internal Medicine to its Foundation between 1989 and 1999. From 2000 through 2007, and additional $20.66 million were transferred from the ABIM to its Foundation culminating in the purchase of a $2.3 million luxury condominium in December 2007. Conclusions Significant financial conflicts of interest for the implementation of time-limited specialty certification exited and continue to plague the medical profession. The specialty boards and the organizations that created them should remove all requirements for time-limited board certification and resort to conventional self-selected ACGME-approved CME programs for ongoing education.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s10840-016-0119-4
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1827926455</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1827926455</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c448t-126add1fcee7862ab78196c1c7dea917a88a02350b2753aa278c579277e0ba2b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkc1KAzEQx4MotlYfwIssePGymmQ3XyeR-gkVD1rwFrLZqaZsd-sme-jNh_AJfRJTW0UEwcOQmcxv_iHzR2if4GOCsTjxBMscp5jwGESl-QbqEyZoKplimzHPZJZKwR57aMf7KcZYYcq3UY9yxbiSvI_Ob6F01lSJn4N1pgqLxEIb3CReBtfUiauT8AzJuHYByuQ-mAD-_fXNJBNTeUhc2VSnu2jrs9pbnwM0vrx4GF6no7urm-HZKLV5LkNKKDdlSSYWQEhOTSEkUdwSK0owiggjpcE0Y7iggmXGUCEtE4oKAbgwtMgG6GilO2-blw580DPnLVSVqaHpvCaSRpznjP0H5ZxxLlRED3-h06Zr6_iRJZVLQnO2pMiKsm3jfQsTPW_dzLQLTbBeuqFXbujohl66ofM4c7BW7ooZlN8TX-uPAF0BPrbqJ2h_PP2n6geRlZO3</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1824812459</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Medical specialty certification in the United States—a false idol?</title><source>Springer Link</source><creator>Fisher, Westby G. ; Schloss, Edward J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Fisher, Westby G. ; Schloss, Edward J.</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose Recent changes to medical specialty certification in the USA have prompted the process to come under intense scrutiny. Methods We review the history of board certification and the changes made to the process. As part of this review, we examine both literature and public record to examine the motives behind the changes made. We then review the legal challenges and changes under way to modify the current ABMS board re-certification process. Results In 1917, the first board certification was a lifetime designation, voluntary, and managed by unpaid board members with a focus to enhance quality for patients. Corresponding to the implementation of time-limited certification, $55 million of physician testing fees were transferred from the American Board of Internal Medicine to its Foundation between 1989 and 1999. From 2000 through 2007, and additional $20.66 million were transferred from the ABIM to its Foundation culminating in the purchase of a $2.3 million luxury condominium in December 2007. Conclusions Significant financial conflicts of interest for the implementation of time-limited specialty certification exited and continue to plague the medical profession. The specialty boards and the organizations that created them should remove all requirements for time-limited board certification and resort to conventional self-selected ACGME-approved CME programs for ongoing education.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1383-875X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1572-8595</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10840-016-0119-4</identifier><identifier>PMID: 26956986</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Springer US</publisher><subject>Cardiology ; Certification - standards ; Clinical Competence - standards ; Committee Membership ; Educational Measurement - standards ; Guidelines as Topic ; Medicine ; Medicine &amp; Public Health ; Medicine - standards ; Specialty Boards - standards ; United States</subject><ispartof>Journal of interventional cardiac electrophysiology, 2016-10, Vol.47 (1), p.37-43</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2016</rights><rights>Springer Science+Business Media New York 2016</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c448t-126add1fcee7862ab78196c1c7dea917a88a02350b2753aa278c579277e0ba2b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c448t-126add1fcee7862ab78196c1c7dea917a88a02350b2753aa278c579277e0ba2b3</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-7391-3407</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27923,27924</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26956986$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Fisher, Westby G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schloss, Edward J.</creatorcontrib><title>Medical specialty certification in the United States—a false idol?</title><title>Journal of interventional cardiac electrophysiology</title><addtitle>J Interv Card Electrophysiol</addtitle><addtitle>J Interv Card Electrophysiol</addtitle><description>Purpose Recent changes to medical specialty certification in the USA have prompted the process to come under intense scrutiny. Methods We review the history of board certification and the changes made to the process. As part of this review, we examine both literature and public record to examine the motives behind the changes made. We then review the legal challenges and changes under way to modify the current ABMS board re-certification process. Results In 1917, the first board certification was a lifetime designation, voluntary, and managed by unpaid board members with a focus to enhance quality for patients. Corresponding to the implementation of time-limited certification, $55 million of physician testing fees were transferred from the American Board of Internal Medicine to its Foundation between 1989 and 1999. From 2000 through 2007, and additional $20.66 million were transferred from the ABIM to its Foundation culminating in the purchase of a $2.3 million luxury condominium in December 2007. Conclusions Significant financial conflicts of interest for the implementation of time-limited specialty certification exited and continue to plague the medical profession. The specialty boards and the organizations that created them should remove all requirements for time-limited board certification and resort to conventional self-selected ACGME-approved CME programs for ongoing education.</description><subject>Cardiology</subject><subject>Certification - standards</subject><subject>Clinical Competence - standards</subject><subject>Committee Membership</subject><subject>Educational Measurement - standards</subject><subject>Guidelines as Topic</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine &amp; Public Health</subject><subject>Medicine - standards</subject><subject>Specialty Boards - standards</subject><subject>United States</subject><issn>1383-875X</issn><issn>1572-8595</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNkc1KAzEQx4MotlYfwIssePGymmQ3XyeR-gkVD1rwFrLZqaZsd-sme-jNh_AJfRJTW0UEwcOQmcxv_iHzR2if4GOCsTjxBMscp5jwGESl-QbqEyZoKplimzHPZJZKwR57aMf7KcZYYcq3UY9yxbiSvI_Ob6F01lSJn4N1pgqLxEIb3CReBtfUiauT8AzJuHYByuQ-mAD-_fXNJBNTeUhc2VSnu2jrs9pbnwM0vrx4GF6no7urm-HZKLV5LkNKKDdlSSYWQEhOTSEkUdwSK0owiggjpcE0Y7iggmXGUCEtE4oKAbgwtMgG6GilO2-blw580DPnLVSVqaHpvCaSRpznjP0H5ZxxLlRED3-h06Zr6_iRJZVLQnO2pMiKsm3jfQsTPW_dzLQLTbBeuqFXbujohl66ofM4c7BW7ooZlN8TX-uPAF0BPrbqJ2h_PP2n6geRlZO3</recordid><startdate>20161001</startdate><enddate>20161001</enddate><creator>Fisher, Westby G.</creator><creator>Schloss, Edward J.</creator><general>Springer US</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>C6C</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7391-3407</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20161001</creationdate><title>Medical specialty certification in the United States—a false idol?</title><author>Fisher, Westby G. ; Schloss, Edward J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c448t-126add1fcee7862ab78196c1c7dea917a88a02350b2753aa278c579277e0ba2b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Cardiology</topic><topic>Certification - standards</topic><topic>Clinical Competence - standards</topic><topic>Committee Membership</topic><topic>Educational Measurement - standards</topic><topic>Guidelines as Topic</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine &amp; Public Health</topic><topic>Medicine - standards</topic><topic>Specialty Boards - standards</topic><topic>United States</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Fisher, Westby G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schloss, Edward J.</creatorcontrib><collection>SpringerOpen</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest - Health &amp; Medical Complete保健、医学与药学数据库</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of interventional cardiac electrophysiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Fisher, Westby G.</au><au>Schloss, Edward J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Medical specialty certification in the United States—a false idol?</atitle><jtitle>Journal of interventional cardiac electrophysiology</jtitle><stitle>J Interv Card Electrophysiol</stitle><addtitle>J Interv Card Electrophysiol</addtitle><date>2016-10-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>47</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>37</spage><epage>43</epage><pages>37-43</pages><issn>1383-875X</issn><eissn>1572-8595</eissn><abstract>Purpose Recent changes to medical specialty certification in the USA have prompted the process to come under intense scrutiny. Methods We review the history of board certification and the changes made to the process. As part of this review, we examine both literature and public record to examine the motives behind the changes made. We then review the legal challenges and changes under way to modify the current ABMS board re-certification process. Results In 1917, the first board certification was a lifetime designation, voluntary, and managed by unpaid board members with a focus to enhance quality for patients. Corresponding to the implementation of time-limited certification, $55 million of physician testing fees were transferred from the American Board of Internal Medicine to its Foundation between 1989 and 1999. From 2000 through 2007, and additional $20.66 million were transferred from the ABIM to its Foundation culminating in the purchase of a $2.3 million luxury condominium in December 2007. Conclusions Significant financial conflicts of interest for the implementation of time-limited specialty certification exited and continue to plague the medical profession. The specialty boards and the organizations that created them should remove all requirements for time-limited board certification and resort to conventional self-selected ACGME-approved CME programs for ongoing education.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Springer US</pub><pmid>26956986</pmid><doi>10.1007/s10840-016-0119-4</doi><tpages>7</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7391-3407</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1383-875X
ispartof Journal of interventional cardiac electrophysiology, 2016-10, Vol.47 (1), p.37-43
issn 1383-875X
1572-8595
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1827926455
source Springer Link
subjects Cardiology
Certification - standards
Clinical Competence - standards
Committee Membership
Educational Measurement - standards
Guidelines as Topic
Medicine
Medicine & Public Health
Medicine - standards
Specialty Boards - standards
United States
title Medical specialty certification in the United States—a false idol?
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T12%3A47%3A43IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Medical%20specialty%20certification%20in%20the%20United%20States%E2%80%94a%20false%20idol?&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20interventional%20cardiac%20electrophysiology&rft.au=Fisher,%20Westby%20G.&rft.date=2016-10-01&rft.volume=47&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=37&rft.epage=43&rft.pages=37-43&rft.issn=1383-875X&rft.eissn=1572-8595&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10840-016-0119-4&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1827926455%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c448t-126add1fcee7862ab78196c1c7dea917a88a02350b2753aa278c579277e0ba2b3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1824812459&rft_id=info:pmid/26956986&rfr_iscdi=true