Loading…
Medical specialty certification in the United States—a false idol?
Purpose Recent changes to medical specialty certification in the USA have prompted the process to come under intense scrutiny. Methods We review the history of board certification and the changes made to the process. As part of this review, we examine both literature and public record to examine the...
Saved in:
Published in: | Journal of interventional cardiac electrophysiology 2016-10, Vol.47 (1), p.37-43 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c448t-126add1fcee7862ab78196c1c7dea917a88a02350b2753aa278c579277e0ba2b3 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c448t-126add1fcee7862ab78196c1c7dea917a88a02350b2753aa278c579277e0ba2b3 |
container_end_page | 43 |
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 37 |
container_title | Journal of interventional cardiac electrophysiology |
container_volume | 47 |
creator | Fisher, Westby G. Schloss, Edward J. |
description | Purpose
Recent changes to medical specialty certification in the USA have prompted the process to come under intense scrutiny.
Methods
We review the history of board certification and the changes made to the process. As part of this review, we examine both literature and public record to examine the motives behind the changes made. We then review the legal challenges and changes under way to modify the current ABMS board re-certification process.
Results
In 1917, the first board certification was a lifetime designation, voluntary, and managed by unpaid board members with a focus to enhance quality for patients. Corresponding to the implementation of time-limited certification, $55 million of physician testing fees were transferred from the American Board of Internal Medicine to its Foundation between 1989 and 1999. From 2000 through 2007, and additional $20.66 million were transferred from the ABIM to its Foundation culminating in the purchase of a $2.3 million luxury condominium in December 2007.
Conclusions
Significant financial conflicts of interest for the implementation of time-limited specialty certification exited and continue to plague the medical profession. The specialty boards and the organizations that created them should remove all requirements for time-limited board certification and resort to conventional self-selected ACGME-approved CME programs for ongoing education. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s10840-016-0119-4 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1827926455</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1827926455</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c448t-126add1fcee7862ab78196c1c7dea917a88a02350b2753aa278c579277e0ba2b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkc1KAzEQx4MotlYfwIssePGymmQ3XyeR-gkVD1rwFrLZqaZsd-sme-jNh_AJfRJTW0UEwcOQmcxv_iHzR2if4GOCsTjxBMscp5jwGESl-QbqEyZoKplimzHPZJZKwR57aMf7KcZYYcq3UY9yxbiSvI_Ob6F01lSJn4N1pgqLxEIb3CReBtfUiauT8AzJuHYByuQ-mAD-_fXNJBNTeUhc2VSnu2jrs9pbnwM0vrx4GF6no7urm-HZKLV5LkNKKDdlSSYWQEhOTSEkUdwSK0owiggjpcE0Y7iggmXGUCEtE4oKAbgwtMgG6GilO2-blw580DPnLVSVqaHpvCaSRpznjP0H5ZxxLlRED3-h06Zr6_iRJZVLQnO2pMiKsm3jfQsTPW_dzLQLTbBeuqFXbujohl66ofM4c7BW7ooZlN8TX-uPAF0BPrbqJ2h_PP2n6geRlZO3</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1824812459</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Medical specialty certification in the United States—a false idol?</title><source>Springer Link</source><creator>Fisher, Westby G. ; Schloss, Edward J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Fisher, Westby G. ; Schloss, Edward J.</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose
Recent changes to medical specialty certification in the USA have prompted the process to come under intense scrutiny.
Methods
We review the history of board certification and the changes made to the process. As part of this review, we examine both literature and public record to examine the motives behind the changes made. We then review the legal challenges and changes under way to modify the current ABMS board re-certification process.
Results
In 1917, the first board certification was a lifetime designation, voluntary, and managed by unpaid board members with a focus to enhance quality for patients. Corresponding to the implementation of time-limited certification, $55 million of physician testing fees were transferred from the American Board of Internal Medicine to its Foundation between 1989 and 1999. From 2000 through 2007, and additional $20.66 million were transferred from the ABIM to its Foundation culminating in the purchase of a $2.3 million luxury condominium in December 2007.
Conclusions
Significant financial conflicts of interest for the implementation of time-limited specialty certification exited and continue to plague the medical profession. The specialty boards and the organizations that created them should remove all requirements for time-limited board certification and resort to conventional self-selected ACGME-approved CME programs for ongoing education.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1383-875X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1572-8595</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10840-016-0119-4</identifier><identifier>PMID: 26956986</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Springer US</publisher><subject>Cardiology ; Certification - standards ; Clinical Competence - standards ; Committee Membership ; Educational Measurement - standards ; Guidelines as Topic ; Medicine ; Medicine & Public Health ; Medicine - standards ; Specialty Boards - standards ; United States</subject><ispartof>Journal of interventional cardiac electrophysiology, 2016-10, Vol.47 (1), p.37-43</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2016</rights><rights>Springer Science+Business Media New York 2016</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c448t-126add1fcee7862ab78196c1c7dea917a88a02350b2753aa278c579277e0ba2b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c448t-126add1fcee7862ab78196c1c7dea917a88a02350b2753aa278c579277e0ba2b3</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-7391-3407</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27923,27924</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26956986$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Fisher, Westby G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schloss, Edward J.</creatorcontrib><title>Medical specialty certification in the United States—a false idol?</title><title>Journal of interventional cardiac electrophysiology</title><addtitle>J Interv Card Electrophysiol</addtitle><addtitle>J Interv Card Electrophysiol</addtitle><description>Purpose
Recent changes to medical specialty certification in the USA have prompted the process to come under intense scrutiny.
Methods
We review the history of board certification and the changes made to the process. As part of this review, we examine both literature and public record to examine the motives behind the changes made. We then review the legal challenges and changes under way to modify the current ABMS board re-certification process.
Results
In 1917, the first board certification was a lifetime designation, voluntary, and managed by unpaid board members with a focus to enhance quality for patients. Corresponding to the implementation of time-limited certification, $55 million of physician testing fees were transferred from the American Board of Internal Medicine to its Foundation between 1989 and 1999. From 2000 through 2007, and additional $20.66 million were transferred from the ABIM to its Foundation culminating in the purchase of a $2.3 million luxury condominium in December 2007.
Conclusions
Significant financial conflicts of interest for the implementation of time-limited specialty certification exited and continue to plague the medical profession. The specialty boards and the organizations that created them should remove all requirements for time-limited board certification and resort to conventional self-selected ACGME-approved CME programs for ongoing education.</description><subject>Cardiology</subject><subject>Certification - standards</subject><subject>Clinical Competence - standards</subject><subject>Committee Membership</subject><subject>Educational Measurement - standards</subject><subject>Guidelines as Topic</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine & Public Health</subject><subject>Medicine - standards</subject><subject>Specialty Boards - standards</subject><subject>United States</subject><issn>1383-875X</issn><issn>1572-8595</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNkc1KAzEQx4MotlYfwIssePGymmQ3XyeR-gkVD1rwFrLZqaZsd-sme-jNh_AJfRJTW0UEwcOQmcxv_iHzR2if4GOCsTjxBMscp5jwGESl-QbqEyZoKplimzHPZJZKwR57aMf7KcZYYcq3UY9yxbiSvI_Ob6F01lSJn4N1pgqLxEIb3CReBtfUiauT8AzJuHYByuQ-mAD-_fXNJBNTeUhc2VSnu2jrs9pbnwM0vrx4GF6no7urm-HZKLV5LkNKKDdlSSYWQEhOTSEkUdwSK0owiggjpcE0Y7iggmXGUCEtE4oKAbgwtMgG6GilO2-blw580DPnLVSVqaHpvCaSRpznjP0H5ZxxLlRED3-h06Zr6_iRJZVLQnO2pMiKsm3jfQsTPW_dzLQLTbBeuqFXbujohl66ofM4c7BW7ooZlN8TX-uPAF0BPrbqJ2h_PP2n6geRlZO3</recordid><startdate>20161001</startdate><enddate>20161001</enddate><creator>Fisher, Westby G.</creator><creator>Schloss, Edward J.</creator><general>Springer US</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>C6C</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7391-3407</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20161001</creationdate><title>Medical specialty certification in the United States—a false idol?</title><author>Fisher, Westby G. ; Schloss, Edward J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c448t-126add1fcee7862ab78196c1c7dea917a88a02350b2753aa278c579277e0ba2b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Cardiology</topic><topic>Certification - standards</topic><topic>Clinical Competence - standards</topic><topic>Committee Membership</topic><topic>Educational Measurement - standards</topic><topic>Guidelines as Topic</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine & Public Health</topic><topic>Medicine - standards</topic><topic>Specialty Boards - standards</topic><topic>United States</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Fisher, Westby G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schloss, Edward J.</creatorcontrib><collection>SpringerOpen</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest - Health & Medical Complete保健、医学与药学数据库</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of interventional cardiac electrophysiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Fisher, Westby G.</au><au>Schloss, Edward J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Medical specialty certification in the United States—a false idol?</atitle><jtitle>Journal of interventional cardiac electrophysiology</jtitle><stitle>J Interv Card Electrophysiol</stitle><addtitle>J Interv Card Electrophysiol</addtitle><date>2016-10-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>47</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>37</spage><epage>43</epage><pages>37-43</pages><issn>1383-875X</issn><eissn>1572-8595</eissn><abstract>Purpose
Recent changes to medical specialty certification in the USA have prompted the process to come under intense scrutiny.
Methods
We review the history of board certification and the changes made to the process. As part of this review, we examine both literature and public record to examine the motives behind the changes made. We then review the legal challenges and changes under way to modify the current ABMS board re-certification process.
Results
In 1917, the first board certification was a lifetime designation, voluntary, and managed by unpaid board members with a focus to enhance quality for patients. Corresponding to the implementation of time-limited certification, $55 million of physician testing fees were transferred from the American Board of Internal Medicine to its Foundation between 1989 and 1999. From 2000 through 2007, and additional $20.66 million were transferred from the ABIM to its Foundation culminating in the purchase of a $2.3 million luxury condominium in December 2007.
Conclusions
Significant financial conflicts of interest for the implementation of time-limited specialty certification exited and continue to plague the medical profession. The specialty boards and the organizations that created them should remove all requirements for time-limited board certification and resort to conventional self-selected ACGME-approved CME programs for ongoing education.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Springer US</pub><pmid>26956986</pmid><doi>10.1007/s10840-016-0119-4</doi><tpages>7</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7391-3407</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1383-875X |
ispartof | Journal of interventional cardiac electrophysiology, 2016-10, Vol.47 (1), p.37-43 |
issn | 1383-875X 1572-8595 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1827926455 |
source | Springer Link |
subjects | Cardiology Certification - standards Clinical Competence - standards Committee Membership Educational Measurement - standards Guidelines as Topic Medicine Medicine & Public Health Medicine - standards Specialty Boards - standards United States |
title | Medical specialty certification in the United States—a false idol? |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T12%3A47%3A43IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Medical%20specialty%20certification%20in%20the%20United%20States%E2%80%94a%20false%20idol?&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20interventional%20cardiac%20electrophysiology&rft.au=Fisher,%20Westby%20G.&rft.date=2016-10-01&rft.volume=47&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=37&rft.epage=43&rft.pages=37-43&rft.issn=1383-875X&rft.eissn=1572-8595&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10840-016-0119-4&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1827926455%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c448t-126add1fcee7862ab78196c1c7dea917a88a02350b2753aa278c579277e0ba2b3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1824812459&rft_id=info:pmid/26956986&rfr_iscdi=true |