Loading…

Endoscopic Features and Eosinophil Density Are Associated with Food Impaction in Adults with Esophageal Eosinophilia

Background and Aims Food impaction has been described in both eosinophilic esophagitis and proton pump inhibitor-responsive esophageal eosinophilia. The association between endoscopic/histologic features of esophageal eosinophilia and food impaction remains unclear. We aimed to identify clinical, en...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Digestive diseases and sciences 2016-09, Vol.61 (9), p.2578-2584
Main Authors: Mangla, Shikha, Goldin, Alison H., Singal, Gaurav, Hornick, Jason L., Hsu Blatman, Karen S., Burakoff, Robert, Chan, Walter W.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Background and Aims Food impaction has been described in both eosinophilic esophagitis and proton pump inhibitor-responsive esophageal eosinophilia. The association between endoscopic/histologic features of esophageal eosinophilia and food impaction remains unclear. We aimed to identify clinical, endoscopic, and histologic findings associated with a history of food impaction in esophageal eosinophilia. Methods This was a retrospective cohort study of adult esophageal eosinophilia patients at a tertiary center in 6/2005–10/2014. Only patients with ≥15 eosinophils/high-power field on mucosal biopsies were included. Demographics, comorbidities, symptoms, endoscopic/histologic findings on initial endoscopy, and history of food impaction were reviewed. Statistical analyses were performed using Fisher’s exact test (univariate) and forward stepwise logistic regression (multivariate). Results 400 patients (42 ± 14 years, 61 % male) were included, with 78 (20 %) having food impaction history. On univariate analyses, rings (62 vs 42 %, p  = 0.003), erosions (12 vs 5 %, p  = 0.03), eosinophil density on biopsy (40 [IQR = 30–50] vs 30 [IQR = 15–50], p  = 0.004), and dysphagia (88 vs 62 %, p  
ISSN:0163-2116
1573-2568
DOI:10.1007/s10620-016-4190-6