Loading…

People look at the object they fear: oculomotor capture by stimuli that signal threat

It is known that people covertly attend to threatening stimuli even when it is not beneficial for the task. In the current study we examined whether overt selection is affected by the presence of an object that signals threat. We demonstrate that stimuli that signal the possibility of receiving an e...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Cognition and emotion 2017-12, Vol.31 (8), p.1707-1714
Main Authors: Nissens, Tom, Failing, Michel, Theeuwes, Jan
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c384t-802eb56de1cbd5a37825a4a78e236d10892b5f1d34b984456e2bd430919ebe853
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c384t-802eb56de1cbd5a37825a4a78e236d10892b5f1d34b984456e2bd430919ebe853
container_end_page 1714
container_issue 8
container_start_page 1707
container_title Cognition and emotion
container_volume 31
creator Nissens, Tom
Failing, Michel
Theeuwes, Jan
description It is known that people covertly attend to threatening stimuli even when it is not beneficial for the task. In the current study we examined whether overt selection is affected by the presence of an object that signals threat. We demonstrate that stimuli that signal the possibility of receiving an electric shock capture the eyes more often than stimuli signalling no shock. Capture occurred even though the threat-signalling stimulus was neither physically salient nor task relevant at any point during the experiment. Crucially, even though fixating the threat-related stimulus made it more likely to receive a shock, results indicate that participants could not help but doing it. Our findings indicate that the presence of a stimulus merely signalling the possibility of receiving a shock is prioritised in selection, and exogenously captures the eyes even when this ultimately results in the execution of the threat (i.e. receiving a shock). Oculomotor capture was particularly pronounced for the fastest saccades which is consistent with the idea that threat influences visual selection at an early stage of processing, when selection is mainly involuntarily.
doi_str_mv 10.1080/02699931.2016.1248905
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1834998733</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1834998733</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c384t-802eb56de1cbd5a37825a4a78e236d10892b5f1d34b984456e2bd430919ebe853</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkD1PwzAQhi0EoqXwE0CWWFhSzh9JbDZU8SVVgoHOkZ1cISWpi50M_fc4tGVguhue99XdQ8glgykDBbfAM621YFMOLJsyLpWG9IiMmcxkAhnAMRkPTDJAI3IWwgoApJBwSkY8z3XONR-TxRu6TYO0ce6Lmo52n0idXWH5u27pEo2_o67sG9e6znlamk3Xe6R2S0NXt31TRzAGQ_2xNk3cPZrunJwsTRPwYj8nZPH48D57TuavTy-z-3lSCiW7RAFHm2YVstJWqRG54qmRJlfIRVbFNzW36ZJVQlqtpEwz5LaSAjTTaFGlYkJudr0b7757DF3R1qHEpjFrdH0omBJSa5ULEdHrf-jK9T6eHCmdaYDIDYXpjiq9C8Hjstj4ujV-WzAoBu_FwXsxeC_23mPuat_e2xarv9RBtPgBBWZ8kQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1969009985</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>People look at the object they fear: oculomotor capture by stimuli that signal threat</title><source>EBSCOhost Business Source Ultimate</source><source>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>Taylor and Francis Social Sciences and Humanities Collection</source><creator>Nissens, Tom ; Failing, Michel ; Theeuwes, Jan</creator><creatorcontrib>Nissens, Tom ; Failing, Michel ; Theeuwes, Jan</creatorcontrib><description>It is known that people covertly attend to threatening stimuli even when it is not beneficial for the task. In the current study we examined whether overt selection is affected by the presence of an object that signals threat. We demonstrate that stimuli that signal the possibility of receiving an electric shock capture the eyes more often than stimuli signalling no shock. Capture occurred even though the threat-signalling stimulus was neither physically salient nor task relevant at any point during the experiment. Crucially, even though fixating the threat-related stimulus made it more likely to receive a shock, results indicate that participants could not help but doing it. Our findings indicate that the presence of a stimulus merely signalling the possibility of receiving a shock is prioritised in selection, and exogenously captures the eyes even when this ultimately results in the execution of the threat (i.e. receiving a shock). Oculomotor capture was particularly pronounced for the fastest saccades which is consistent with the idea that threat influences visual selection at an early stage of processing, when selection is mainly involuntarily.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0269-9931</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1464-0600</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/02699931.2016.1248905</identifier><identifier>PMID: 27797292</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Taylor &amp; Francis Ltd</publisher><subject>Attention - physiology ; Electric shock ; Eye Movements - physiology ; Fear &amp; phobias ; Fear - physiology ; Female ; Humans ; Male ; Photic Stimulation ; Shock ; Stimulus ; Threats ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>Cognition and emotion, 2017-12, Vol.31 (8), p.1707-1714</ispartof><rights>2016 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor &amp; Francis Group.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c384t-802eb56de1cbd5a37825a4a78e236d10892b5f1d34b984456e2bd430919ebe853</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c384t-802eb56de1cbd5a37825a4a78e236d10892b5f1d34b984456e2bd430919ebe853</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27797292$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Nissens, Tom</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Failing, Michel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Theeuwes, Jan</creatorcontrib><title>People look at the object they fear: oculomotor capture by stimuli that signal threat</title><title>Cognition and emotion</title><addtitle>Cogn Emot</addtitle><description>It is known that people covertly attend to threatening stimuli even when it is not beneficial for the task. In the current study we examined whether overt selection is affected by the presence of an object that signals threat. We demonstrate that stimuli that signal the possibility of receiving an electric shock capture the eyes more often than stimuli signalling no shock. Capture occurred even though the threat-signalling stimulus was neither physically salient nor task relevant at any point during the experiment. Crucially, even though fixating the threat-related stimulus made it more likely to receive a shock, results indicate that participants could not help but doing it. Our findings indicate that the presence of a stimulus merely signalling the possibility of receiving a shock is prioritised in selection, and exogenously captures the eyes even when this ultimately results in the execution of the threat (i.e. receiving a shock). Oculomotor capture was particularly pronounced for the fastest saccades which is consistent with the idea that threat influences visual selection at an early stage of processing, when selection is mainly involuntarily.</description><subject>Attention - physiology</subject><subject>Electric shock</subject><subject>Eye Movements - physiology</subject><subject>Fear &amp; phobias</subject><subject>Fear - physiology</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Photic Stimulation</subject><subject>Shock</subject><subject>Stimulus</subject><subject>Threats</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>0269-9931</issn><issn>1464-0600</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkD1PwzAQhi0EoqXwE0CWWFhSzh9JbDZU8SVVgoHOkZ1cISWpi50M_fc4tGVguhue99XdQ8glgykDBbfAM621YFMOLJsyLpWG9IiMmcxkAhnAMRkPTDJAI3IWwgoApJBwSkY8z3XONR-TxRu6TYO0ce6Lmo52n0idXWH5u27pEo2_o67sG9e6znlamk3Xe6R2S0NXt31TRzAGQ_2xNk3cPZrunJwsTRPwYj8nZPH48D57TuavTy-z-3lSCiW7RAFHm2YVstJWqRG54qmRJlfIRVbFNzW36ZJVQlqtpEwz5LaSAjTTaFGlYkJudr0b7757DF3R1qHEpjFrdH0omBJSa5ULEdHrf-jK9T6eHCmdaYDIDYXpjiq9C8Hjstj4ujV-WzAoBu_FwXsxeC_23mPuat_e2xarv9RBtPgBBWZ8kQ</recordid><startdate>201712</startdate><enddate>201712</enddate><creator>Nissens, Tom</creator><creator>Failing, Michel</creator><creator>Theeuwes, Jan</creator><general>Taylor &amp; Francis Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201712</creationdate><title>People look at the object they fear: oculomotor capture by stimuli that signal threat</title><author>Nissens, Tom ; Failing, Michel ; Theeuwes, Jan</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c384t-802eb56de1cbd5a37825a4a78e236d10892b5f1d34b984456e2bd430919ebe853</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Attention - physiology</topic><topic>Electric shock</topic><topic>Eye Movements - physiology</topic><topic>Fear &amp; phobias</topic><topic>Fear - physiology</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Photic Stimulation</topic><topic>Shock</topic><topic>Stimulus</topic><topic>Threats</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Nissens, Tom</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Failing, Michel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Theeuwes, Jan</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Cognition and emotion</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Nissens, Tom</au><au>Failing, Michel</au><au>Theeuwes, Jan</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>People look at the object they fear: oculomotor capture by stimuli that signal threat</atitle><jtitle>Cognition and emotion</jtitle><addtitle>Cogn Emot</addtitle><date>2017-12</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>31</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>1707</spage><epage>1714</epage><pages>1707-1714</pages><issn>0269-9931</issn><eissn>1464-0600</eissn><abstract>It is known that people covertly attend to threatening stimuli even when it is not beneficial for the task. In the current study we examined whether overt selection is affected by the presence of an object that signals threat. We demonstrate that stimuli that signal the possibility of receiving an electric shock capture the eyes more often than stimuli signalling no shock. Capture occurred even though the threat-signalling stimulus was neither physically salient nor task relevant at any point during the experiment. Crucially, even though fixating the threat-related stimulus made it more likely to receive a shock, results indicate that participants could not help but doing it. Our findings indicate that the presence of a stimulus merely signalling the possibility of receiving a shock is prioritised in selection, and exogenously captures the eyes even when this ultimately results in the execution of the threat (i.e. receiving a shock). Oculomotor capture was particularly pronounced for the fastest saccades which is consistent with the idea that threat influences visual selection at an early stage of processing, when selection is mainly involuntarily.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Taylor &amp; Francis Ltd</pub><pmid>27797292</pmid><doi>10.1080/02699931.2016.1248905</doi><tpages>8</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0269-9931
ispartof Cognition and emotion, 2017-12, Vol.31 (8), p.1707-1714
issn 0269-9931
1464-0600
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1834998733
source EBSCOhost Business Source Ultimate; Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); Taylor and Francis Social Sciences and Humanities Collection
subjects Attention - physiology
Electric shock
Eye Movements - physiology
Fear & phobias
Fear - physiology
Female
Humans
Male
Photic Stimulation
Shock
Stimulus
Threats
Young Adult
title People look at the object they fear: oculomotor capture by stimuli that signal threat
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-03-09T17%3A20%3A33IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=People%20look%20at%20the%20object%20they%20fear:%20oculomotor%20capture%20by%20stimuli%20that%20signal%20threat&rft.jtitle=Cognition%20and%20emotion&rft.au=Nissens,%20Tom&rft.date=2017-12&rft.volume=31&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=1707&rft.epage=1714&rft.pages=1707-1714&rft.issn=0269-9931&rft.eissn=1464-0600&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/02699931.2016.1248905&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1834998733%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c384t-802eb56de1cbd5a37825a4a78e236d10892b5f1d34b984456e2bd430919ebe853%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1969009985&rft_id=info:pmid/27797292&rfr_iscdi=true