Loading…
People look at the object they fear: oculomotor capture by stimuli that signal threat
It is known that people covertly attend to threatening stimuli even when it is not beneficial for the task. In the current study we examined whether overt selection is affected by the presence of an object that signals threat. We demonstrate that stimuli that signal the possibility of receiving an e...
Saved in:
Published in: | Cognition and emotion 2017-12, Vol.31 (8), p.1707-1714 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c384t-802eb56de1cbd5a37825a4a78e236d10892b5f1d34b984456e2bd430919ebe853 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c384t-802eb56de1cbd5a37825a4a78e236d10892b5f1d34b984456e2bd430919ebe853 |
container_end_page | 1714 |
container_issue | 8 |
container_start_page | 1707 |
container_title | Cognition and emotion |
container_volume | 31 |
creator | Nissens, Tom Failing, Michel Theeuwes, Jan |
description | It is known that people covertly attend to threatening stimuli even when it is not beneficial for the task. In the current study we examined whether overt selection is affected by the presence of an object that signals threat. We demonstrate that stimuli that signal the possibility of receiving an electric shock capture the eyes more often than stimuli signalling no shock. Capture occurred even though the threat-signalling stimulus was neither physically salient nor task relevant at any point during the experiment. Crucially, even though fixating the threat-related stimulus made it more likely to receive a shock, results indicate that participants could not help but doing it. Our findings indicate that the presence of a stimulus merely signalling the possibility of receiving a shock is prioritised in selection, and exogenously captures the eyes even when this ultimately results in the execution of the threat (i.e. receiving a shock). Oculomotor capture was particularly pronounced for the fastest saccades which is consistent with the idea that threat influences visual selection at an early stage of processing, when selection is mainly involuntarily. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1080/02699931.2016.1248905 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1834998733</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1834998733</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c384t-802eb56de1cbd5a37825a4a78e236d10892b5f1d34b984456e2bd430919ebe853</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkD1PwzAQhi0EoqXwE0CWWFhSzh9JbDZU8SVVgoHOkZ1cISWpi50M_fc4tGVguhue99XdQ8glgykDBbfAM621YFMOLJsyLpWG9IiMmcxkAhnAMRkPTDJAI3IWwgoApJBwSkY8z3XONR-TxRu6TYO0ce6Lmo52n0idXWH5u27pEo2_o67sG9e6znlamk3Xe6R2S0NXt31TRzAGQ_2xNk3cPZrunJwsTRPwYj8nZPH48D57TuavTy-z-3lSCiW7RAFHm2YVstJWqRG54qmRJlfIRVbFNzW36ZJVQlqtpEwz5LaSAjTTaFGlYkJudr0b7757DF3R1qHEpjFrdH0omBJSa5ULEdHrf-jK9T6eHCmdaYDIDYXpjiq9C8Hjstj4ujV-WzAoBu_FwXsxeC_23mPuat_e2xarv9RBtPgBBWZ8kQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1969009985</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>People look at the object they fear: oculomotor capture by stimuli that signal threat</title><source>EBSCOhost Business Source Ultimate</source><source>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>Taylor and Francis Social Sciences and Humanities Collection</source><creator>Nissens, Tom ; Failing, Michel ; Theeuwes, Jan</creator><creatorcontrib>Nissens, Tom ; Failing, Michel ; Theeuwes, Jan</creatorcontrib><description>It is known that people covertly attend to threatening stimuli even when it is not beneficial for the task. In the current study we examined whether overt selection is affected by the presence of an object that signals threat. We demonstrate that stimuli that signal the possibility of receiving an electric shock capture the eyes more often than stimuli signalling no shock. Capture occurred even though the threat-signalling stimulus was neither physically salient nor task relevant at any point during the experiment. Crucially, even though fixating the threat-related stimulus made it more likely to receive a shock, results indicate that participants could not help but doing it. Our findings indicate that the presence of a stimulus merely signalling the possibility of receiving a shock is prioritised in selection, and exogenously captures the eyes even when this ultimately results in the execution of the threat (i.e. receiving a shock). Oculomotor capture was particularly pronounced for the fastest saccades which is consistent with the idea that threat influences visual selection at an early stage of processing, when selection is mainly involuntarily.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0269-9931</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1464-0600</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/02699931.2016.1248905</identifier><identifier>PMID: 27797292</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Taylor & Francis Ltd</publisher><subject>Attention - physiology ; Electric shock ; Eye Movements - physiology ; Fear & phobias ; Fear - physiology ; Female ; Humans ; Male ; Photic Stimulation ; Shock ; Stimulus ; Threats ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>Cognition and emotion, 2017-12, Vol.31 (8), p.1707-1714</ispartof><rights>2016 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c384t-802eb56de1cbd5a37825a4a78e236d10892b5f1d34b984456e2bd430919ebe853</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c384t-802eb56de1cbd5a37825a4a78e236d10892b5f1d34b984456e2bd430919ebe853</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27797292$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Nissens, Tom</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Failing, Michel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Theeuwes, Jan</creatorcontrib><title>People look at the object they fear: oculomotor capture by stimuli that signal threat</title><title>Cognition and emotion</title><addtitle>Cogn Emot</addtitle><description>It is known that people covertly attend to threatening stimuli even when it is not beneficial for the task. In the current study we examined whether overt selection is affected by the presence of an object that signals threat. We demonstrate that stimuli that signal the possibility of receiving an electric shock capture the eyes more often than stimuli signalling no shock. Capture occurred even though the threat-signalling stimulus was neither physically salient nor task relevant at any point during the experiment. Crucially, even though fixating the threat-related stimulus made it more likely to receive a shock, results indicate that participants could not help but doing it. Our findings indicate that the presence of a stimulus merely signalling the possibility of receiving a shock is prioritised in selection, and exogenously captures the eyes even when this ultimately results in the execution of the threat (i.e. receiving a shock). Oculomotor capture was particularly pronounced for the fastest saccades which is consistent with the idea that threat influences visual selection at an early stage of processing, when selection is mainly involuntarily.</description><subject>Attention - physiology</subject><subject>Electric shock</subject><subject>Eye Movements - physiology</subject><subject>Fear & phobias</subject><subject>Fear - physiology</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Photic Stimulation</subject><subject>Shock</subject><subject>Stimulus</subject><subject>Threats</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>0269-9931</issn><issn>1464-0600</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkD1PwzAQhi0EoqXwE0CWWFhSzh9JbDZU8SVVgoHOkZ1cISWpi50M_fc4tGVguhue99XdQ8glgykDBbfAM621YFMOLJsyLpWG9IiMmcxkAhnAMRkPTDJAI3IWwgoApJBwSkY8z3XONR-TxRu6TYO0ce6Lmo52n0idXWH5u27pEo2_o67sG9e6znlamk3Xe6R2S0NXt31TRzAGQ_2xNk3cPZrunJwsTRPwYj8nZPH48D57TuavTy-z-3lSCiW7RAFHm2YVstJWqRG54qmRJlfIRVbFNzW36ZJVQlqtpEwz5LaSAjTTaFGlYkJudr0b7757DF3R1qHEpjFrdH0omBJSa5ULEdHrf-jK9T6eHCmdaYDIDYXpjiq9C8Hjstj4ujV-WzAoBu_FwXsxeC_23mPuat_e2xarv9RBtPgBBWZ8kQ</recordid><startdate>201712</startdate><enddate>201712</enddate><creator>Nissens, Tom</creator><creator>Failing, Michel</creator><creator>Theeuwes, Jan</creator><general>Taylor & Francis Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201712</creationdate><title>People look at the object they fear: oculomotor capture by stimuli that signal threat</title><author>Nissens, Tom ; Failing, Michel ; Theeuwes, Jan</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c384t-802eb56de1cbd5a37825a4a78e236d10892b5f1d34b984456e2bd430919ebe853</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Attention - physiology</topic><topic>Electric shock</topic><topic>Eye Movements - physiology</topic><topic>Fear & phobias</topic><topic>Fear - physiology</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Photic Stimulation</topic><topic>Shock</topic><topic>Stimulus</topic><topic>Threats</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Nissens, Tom</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Failing, Michel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Theeuwes, Jan</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Cognition and emotion</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Nissens, Tom</au><au>Failing, Michel</au><au>Theeuwes, Jan</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>People look at the object they fear: oculomotor capture by stimuli that signal threat</atitle><jtitle>Cognition and emotion</jtitle><addtitle>Cogn Emot</addtitle><date>2017-12</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>31</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>1707</spage><epage>1714</epage><pages>1707-1714</pages><issn>0269-9931</issn><eissn>1464-0600</eissn><abstract>It is known that people covertly attend to threatening stimuli even when it is not beneficial for the task. In the current study we examined whether overt selection is affected by the presence of an object that signals threat. We demonstrate that stimuli that signal the possibility of receiving an electric shock capture the eyes more often than stimuli signalling no shock. Capture occurred even though the threat-signalling stimulus was neither physically salient nor task relevant at any point during the experiment. Crucially, even though fixating the threat-related stimulus made it more likely to receive a shock, results indicate that participants could not help but doing it. Our findings indicate that the presence of a stimulus merely signalling the possibility of receiving a shock is prioritised in selection, and exogenously captures the eyes even when this ultimately results in the execution of the threat (i.e. receiving a shock). Oculomotor capture was particularly pronounced for the fastest saccades which is consistent with the idea that threat influences visual selection at an early stage of processing, when selection is mainly involuntarily.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Taylor & Francis Ltd</pub><pmid>27797292</pmid><doi>10.1080/02699931.2016.1248905</doi><tpages>8</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0269-9931 |
ispartof | Cognition and emotion, 2017-12, Vol.31 (8), p.1707-1714 |
issn | 0269-9931 1464-0600 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1834998733 |
source | EBSCOhost Business Source Ultimate; Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); Taylor and Francis Social Sciences and Humanities Collection |
subjects | Attention - physiology Electric shock Eye Movements - physiology Fear & phobias Fear - physiology Female Humans Male Photic Stimulation Shock Stimulus Threats Young Adult |
title | People look at the object they fear: oculomotor capture by stimuli that signal threat |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-03-09T17%3A20%3A33IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=People%20look%20at%20the%20object%20they%20fear:%20oculomotor%20capture%20by%20stimuli%20that%20signal%20threat&rft.jtitle=Cognition%20and%20emotion&rft.au=Nissens,%20Tom&rft.date=2017-12&rft.volume=31&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=1707&rft.epage=1714&rft.pages=1707-1714&rft.issn=0269-9931&rft.eissn=1464-0600&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/02699931.2016.1248905&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1834998733%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c384t-802eb56de1cbd5a37825a4a78e236d10892b5f1d34b984456e2bd430919ebe853%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1969009985&rft_id=info:pmid/27797292&rfr_iscdi=true |