Loading…
How hyperbolic discounting preference affects Chinese consumers’ consumption choice between conventional and electric vehicles
This paper presents a theoretical model and addresses several issues related to life cycle cost analysis to illustrate how time-inconsistent preferences affect consumer choice. The particular case study selects involved consumer choice between a vehicle with high initial acquisition cost but low own...
Saved in:
Published in: | Energy policy 2016-10, Vol.97, p.400-413 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c520t-62b665474f571a7b6ddfa254633f41d1a536aa267980c475995af9fd4ccc12643 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c520t-62b665474f571a7b6ddfa254633f41d1a536aa267980c475995af9fd4ccc12643 |
container_end_page | 413 |
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 400 |
container_title | Energy policy |
container_volume | 97 |
creator | Wu, Tian Shang, Zhe Tian, Xin Wang, Shouyang |
description | This paper presents a theoretical model and addresses several issues related to life cycle cost analysis to illustrate how time-inconsistent preferences affect consumer choice. The particular case study selects involved consumer choice between a vehicle with high initial acquisition cost but low ownership cost (e.g., an Electric Vehicle, EV) and one with a low initial acquisition cost but high ownership cost (e.g., a conventional Internal Combustion Engine Vehicle, ICEV). To test our theoretical analysis, we conduct an empirical study on how time discounting rates affect consumer choice between ICEVs and EVs with different initial cost ratios. From the survey results, we find that individuals with higher present bias showed irrational purchase behavior even when controlling for wealth level. Specifically, people making some “stronger bias to present” decisions chose higher total cost ICEVs with lower initial cost but higher ownership cost over lower total cost EVs with higher initial cost and lower ownership cost. However, people’s long-term discount is not correlated with irrational vehicle purchase behavior. Furthermore, we study the present bias and long-term discount rate in one scenario and found present bias to be correlated with irrational behavior.
•Theoretical model and survey based on psychological experiment are used for study.•Time inconsistency preferences may affect consumers' rational purchasing choice.•Present bias is correlated with irrational behavior, but long-term discount is not. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.enpol.2016.07.004 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1835028295</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0301421516303573</els_id><sourcerecordid>4199463171</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c520t-62b665474f571a7b6ddfa254633f41d1a536aa267980c475995af9fd4ccc12643</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kc9O3DAQxi3USmyhT8DFUi-9JNiO_ySHHqpVW5CQuMDZ8jpj1qusndrJIm68Bq_Hk9TpcuLAyRrN7xvP9w1CF5TUlFB5uashjHGoWSlqompC-Ala0VY1lVRKfUIr0hBacUbFKfqS844Uou34Cj1fxUe8fRohbeLgLe59tnEOkw8PeEzgIEGwgI1zYKeM11sfIAO2MeR5Dym_Pr-8FePkY8B2G33hNzA9AoSldYCwdMyATegxDGVOKh8dYOvtAPkcfXZmyPD17T1D979_3a2vqpvbP9frnzeVFYxMlWQbKQVX3AlFjdrIvneGCS6bxnHaUyMaaQyTqmuJ5Up0nTCucz231lImeXOGvh_njin-nSFPel-swjCYAHHOmraNIKxlnSjot3foLs6pOFgoxssWQtJCNUfKpphziUqPye9NetKU6OUqeqf_X0UvV9FE6ZJ5Uf04qqB4PXhIOlu_RNz7VJLRffQf6v8BNYWaHg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1824547561</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>How hyperbolic discounting preference affects Chinese consumers’ consumption choice between conventional and electric vehicles</title><source>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</source><source>ScienceDirect Freedom Collection</source><source>PAIS Index</source><creator>Wu, Tian ; Shang, Zhe ; Tian, Xin ; Wang, Shouyang</creator><creatorcontrib>Wu, Tian ; Shang, Zhe ; Tian, Xin ; Wang, Shouyang</creatorcontrib><description>This paper presents a theoretical model and addresses several issues related to life cycle cost analysis to illustrate how time-inconsistent preferences affect consumer choice. The particular case study selects involved consumer choice between a vehicle with high initial acquisition cost but low ownership cost (e.g., an Electric Vehicle, EV) and one with a low initial acquisition cost but high ownership cost (e.g., a conventional Internal Combustion Engine Vehicle, ICEV). To test our theoretical analysis, we conduct an empirical study on how time discounting rates affect consumer choice between ICEVs and EVs with different initial cost ratios. From the survey results, we find that individuals with higher present bias showed irrational purchase behavior even when controlling for wealth level. Specifically, people making some “stronger bias to present” decisions chose higher total cost ICEVs with lower initial cost but higher ownership cost over lower total cost EVs with higher initial cost and lower ownership cost. However, people’s long-term discount is not correlated with irrational vehicle purchase behavior. Furthermore, we study the present bias and long-term discount rate in one scenario and found present bias to be correlated with irrational behavior.
•Theoretical model and survey based on psychological experiment are used for study.•Time inconsistency preferences may affect consumers' rational purchasing choice.•Present bias is correlated with irrational behavior, but long-term discount is not.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0301-4215</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-6777</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2016.07.004</identifier><identifier>CODEN: ENPYAC</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Kidlington: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Alternative fuel vehicles ; Bias ; Case studies ; China transport ; Consumer behavior ; Consumer behaviour ; Consumers ; Consumption ; Cost analysis ; Discount rates ; Electric vehicles ; Empirical analysis ; Human behavior ; Hyperbolic discounting ; Internal combustion engines ; Irrational vehicle consumption choice ; Life cycle analysis ; Life cycle costs ; Life cycle engineering ; Life cycles ; Life-cycle private cost ; Ownership ; Polls & surveys ; Preferences ; Studies ; Theoretical analysis ; Time ; Time discounting ; Wealth</subject><ispartof>Energy policy, 2016-10, Vol.97, p.400-413</ispartof><rights>2016 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Science Ltd. Oct 2016</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c520t-62b665474f571a7b6ddfa254633f41d1a536aa267980c475995af9fd4ccc12643</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c520t-62b665474f571a7b6ddfa254633f41d1a536aa267980c475995af9fd4ccc12643</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27843,27901,27902,33200,33201</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Wu, Tian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shang, Zhe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tian, Xin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Shouyang</creatorcontrib><title>How hyperbolic discounting preference affects Chinese consumers’ consumption choice between conventional and electric vehicles</title><title>Energy policy</title><description>This paper presents a theoretical model and addresses several issues related to life cycle cost analysis to illustrate how time-inconsistent preferences affect consumer choice. The particular case study selects involved consumer choice between a vehicle with high initial acquisition cost but low ownership cost (e.g., an Electric Vehicle, EV) and one with a low initial acquisition cost but high ownership cost (e.g., a conventional Internal Combustion Engine Vehicle, ICEV). To test our theoretical analysis, we conduct an empirical study on how time discounting rates affect consumer choice between ICEVs and EVs with different initial cost ratios. From the survey results, we find that individuals with higher present bias showed irrational purchase behavior even when controlling for wealth level. Specifically, people making some “stronger bias to present” decisions chose higher total cost ICEVs with lower initial cost but higher ownership cost over lower total cost EVs with higher initial cost and lower ownership cost. However, people’s long-term discount is not correlated with irrational vehicle purchase behavior. Furthermore, we study the present bias and long-term discount rate in one scenario and found present bias to be correlated with irrational behavior.
•Theoretical model and survey based on psychological experiment are used for study.•Time inconsistency preferences may affect consumers' rational purchasing choice.•Present bias is correlated with irrational behavior, but long-term discount is not.</description><subject>Alternative fuel vehicles</subject><subject>Bias</subject><subject>Case studies</subject><subject>China transport</subject><subject>Consumer behavior</subject><subject>Consumer behaviour</subject><subject>Consumers</subject><subject>Consumption</subject><subject>Cost analysis</subject><subject>Discount rates</subject><subject>Electric vehicles</subject><subject>Empirical analysis</subject><subject>Human behavior</subject><subject>Hyperbolic discounting</subject><subject>Internal combustion engines</subject><subject>Irrational vehicle consumption choice</subject><subject>Life cycle analysis</subject><subject>Life cycle costs</subject><subject>Life cycle engineering</subject><subject>Life cycles</subject><subject>Life-cycle private cost</subject><subject>Ownership</subject><subject>Polls & surveys</subject><subject>Preferences</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Theoretical analysis</subject><subject>Time</subject><subject>Time discounting</subject><subject>Wealth</subject><issn>0301-4215</issn><issn>1873-6777</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><sourceid>8BJ</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kc9O3DAQxi3USmyhT8DFUi-9JNiO_ySHHqpVW5CQuMDZ8jpj1qusndrJIm68Bq_Hk9TpcuLAyRrN7xvP9w1CF5TUlFB5uashjHGoWSlqompC-Ala0VY1lVRKfUIr0hBacUbFKfqS844Uou34Cj1fxUe8fRohbeLgLe59tnEOkw8PeEzgIEGwgI1zYKeM11sfIAO2MeR5Dym_Pr-8FePkY8B2G33hNzA9AoSldYCwdMyATegxDGVOKh8dYOvtAPkcfXZmyPD17T1D979_3a2vqpvbP9frnzeVFYxMlWQbKQVX3AlFjdrIvneGCS6bxnHaUyMaaQyTqmuJ5Up0nTCucz231lImeXOGvh_njin-nSFPel-swjCYAHHOmraNIKxlnSjot3foLs6pOFgoxssWQtJCNUfKpphziUqPye9NetKU6OUqeqf_X0UvV9FE6ZJ5Uf04qqB4PXhIOlu_RNz7VJLRffQf6v8BNYWaHg</recordid><startdate>20161001</startdate><enddate>20161001</enddate><creator>Wu, Tian</creator><creator>Shang, Zhe</creator><creator>Tian, Xin</creator><creator>Wang, Shouyang</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier Science Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SP</scope><scope>7TA</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>F28</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L7M</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20161001</creationdate><title>How hyperbolic discounting preference affects Chinese consumers’ consumption choice between conventional and electric vehicles</title><author>Wu, Tian ; Shang, Zhe ; Tian, Xin ; Wang, Shouyang</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c520t-62b665474f571a7b6ddfa254633f41d1a536aa267980c475995af9fd4ccc12643</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Alternative fuel vehicles</topic><topic>Bias</topic><topic>Case studies</topic><topic>China transport</topic><topic>Consumer behavior</topic><topic>Consumer behaviour</topic><topic>Consumers</topic><topic>Consumption</topic><topic>Cost analysis</topic><topic>Discount rates</topic><topic>Electric vehicles</topic><topic>Empirical analysis</topic><topic>Human behavior</topic><topic>Hyperbolic discounting</topic><topic>Internal combustion engines</topic><topic>Irrational vehicle consumption choice</topic><topic>Life cycle analysis</topic><topic>Life cycle costs</topic><topic>Life cycle engineering</topic><topic>Life cycles</topic><topic>Life-cycle private cost</topic><topic>Ownership</topic><topic>Polls & surveys</topic><topic>Preferences</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Theoretical analysis</topic><topic>Time</topic><topic>Time discounting</topic><topic>Wealth</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Wu, Tian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shang, Zhe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tian, Xin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Shouyang</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Electronics & Communications Abstracts</collection><collection>Materials Business File</collection><collection>Mechanical & Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>ANTE: Abstracts in New Technology & Engineering</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><jtitle>Energy policy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Wu, Tian</au><au>Shang, Zhe</au><au>Tian, Xin</au><au>Wang, Shouyang</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>How hyperbolic discounting preference affects Chinese consumers’ consumption choice between conventional and electric vehicles</atitle><jtitle>Energy policy</jtitle><date>2016-10-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>97</volume><spage>400</spage><epage>413</epage><pages>400-413</pages><issn>0301-4215</issn><eissn>1873-6777</eissn><coden>ENPYAC</coden><abstract>This paper presents a theoretical model and addresses several issues related to life cycle cost analysis to illustrate how time-inconsistent preferences affect consumer choice. The particular case study selects involved consumer choice between a vehicle with high initial acquisition cost but low ownership cost (e.g., an Electric Vehicle, EV) and one with a low initial acquisition cost but high ownership cost (e.g., a conventional Internal Combustion Engine Vehicle, ICEV). To test our theoretical analysis, we conduct an empirical study on how time discounting rates affect consumer choice between ICEVs and EVs with different initial cost ratios. From the survey results, we find that individuals with higher present bias showed irrational purchase behavior even when controlling for wealth level. Specifically, people making some “stronger bias to present” decisions chose higher total cost ICEVs with lower initial cost but higher ownership cost over lower total cost EVs with higher initial cost and lower ownership cost. However, people’s long-term discount is not correlated with irrational vehicle purchase behavior. Furthermore, we study the present bias and long-term discount rate in one scenario and found present bias to be correlated with irrational behavior.
•Theoretical model and survey based on psychological experiment are used for study.•Time inconsistency preferences may affect consumers' rational purchasing choice.•Present bias is correlated with irrational behavior, but long-term discount is not.</abstract><cop>Kidlington</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.enpol.2016.07.004</doi><tpages>14</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0301-4215 |
ispartof | Energy policy, 2016-10, Vol.97, p.400-413 |
issn | 0301-4215 1873-6777 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1835028295 |
source | International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS); ScienceDirect Freedom Collection; PAIS Index |
subjects | Alternative fuel vehicles Bias Case studies China transport Consumer behavior Consumer behaviour Consumers Consumption Cost analysis Discount rates Electric vehicles Empirical analysis Human behavior Hyperbolic discounting Internal combustion engines Irrational vehicle consumption choice Life cycle analysis Life cycle costs Life cycle engineering Life cycles Life-cycle private cost Ownership Polls & surveys Preferences Studies Theoretical analysis Time Time discounting Wealth |
title | How hyperbolic discounting preference affects Chinese consumers’ consumption choice between conventional and electric vehicles |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-13T06%3A28%3A23IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=How%20hyperbolic%20discounting%20preference%20affects%20Chinese%20consumers%E2%80%99%20consumption%20choice%20between%20conventional%20and%20electric%20vehicles&rft.jtitle=Energy%20policy&rft.au=Wu,%20Tian&rft.date=2016-10-01&rft.volume=97&rft.spage=400&rft.epage=413&rft.pages=400-413&rft.issn=0301-4215&rft.eissn=1873-6777&rft.coden=ENPYAC&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.enpol.2016.07.004&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E4199463171%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c520t-62b665474f571a7b6ddfa254633f41d1a536aa267980c475995af9fd4ccc12643%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1824547561&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |