Exploring Repressive Suffering Construal as a Function of Collectivism and Social Morality

Prior research demonstrated that an experimentally primed collectivist orientation increased repressive suffering construal (RSC): interpretation of suffering as being caused by deviance and having the purpose of maintaining social order. Furthermore, the effect of collectivism on RSC was mediated b...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of cross-cultural psychology 2016-08, Vol.47 (7), p.903-917
Main Authors: Sullivan, Daniel, Stewart, Sheridan A., Landau, Mark J., Liu, Shi, Yang, Qian, Diefendorf, Joseph
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
China
Collectivism
Culture
Deviance
Endorsements
Individualism
Individualism-Collectivism
Mennonites
Morality
Religion
Religion & psychology
Religious communities
Social order
Suffering
Undergraduate students
United States
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Prior research demonstrated that an experimentally primed collectivist orientation increased repressive suffering construal (RSC): interpretation of suffering as being caused by deviance and having the purpose of maintaining social order. Furthermore, the effect of collectivism on RSC was mediated by social morality: the belief that society dictates morality. The current research provides the first cross-cultural empirical evidence for the links between RSC, collectivism, and social morality. In an investigation of religious subcultures, collectivist Mennonites endorsed RSC to a greater degree than individualist Unitarian Universalists and undergraduates, and this difference was mediated by collectivism. Examining the RSC construct in greater detail, two additional studies compared participants from China and the United States. Chinese participants scored higher on RSC’s teleological component—the belief that suffering upholds society—but not its causal component—the belief that suffering is caused by deviance. This difference was mediated by social morality endorsement.
ISSN:0022-0221
1552-5422
DOI:10.1177/0022022116655963