Loading…

Intrinsic and reflex stiffness in normal and spastic, spinal cord injured subjects

Mechanical changes underlying spastic hypertonia were explored using a parallel cascade system identification technique to evaluate the relative contributions of intrinsic and reflex mechanisms to dynamic ankle stiffness in healthy subjects (controls) and spastic, spinal cord injured (SCI) patients....

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Experimental brain research 2001-12, Vol.141 (4), p.446-459
Main Authors: MIRBAGHERI, M. M, BARBEAU, H, LADOUCEUR, M, KEARNEY, R. E
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c421t-63108559b95ea7a06f0230fcc5731db4cb7d272c9486b22870b8b3bb0486e9153
cites
container_end_page 459
container_issue 4
container_start_page 446
container_title Experimental brain research
container_volume 141
creator MIRBAGHERI, M. M
BARBEAU, H
LADOUCEUR, M
KEARNEY, R. E
description Mechanical changes underlying spastic hypertonia were explored using a parallel cascade system identification technique to evaluate the relative contributions of intrinsic and reflex mechanisms to dynamic ankle stiffness in healthy subjects (controls) and spastic, spinal cord injured (SCI) patients. We examined the modulation of the gain and dynamics of these components with ankle angle for both passive and active conditions. Four main findings emerged. First, intrinsic and reflex stiffness dynamics were qualitatively similar in SCI patients and controls. Intrinsic stiffness dynamics were well modeled by a linear second-order model relating intrinsic torque to joint position, while reflex stiffness dynamics were accurately described by a linear, third-order system relating half-wave rectified velocity to reflex torque. Differences between the two groups were evident in the values of four parameters, the elastic and viscous parameters for intrinsic stiffness and the gain and first-order cut-off frequency for reflex stiffness. Second, reflex stiffness was substantially increased in SCI patients, where it generated as much as 40% of the total torque variance, compared with controls, where reflex contributions never exceeded 7%. Third, differences between SCI patients and controls depended strongly on joint position, becoming larger as the ankle was dorsiflexed. At full plantarflexion, there was no difference between SCI and control subjects; in the mid-range, reflex stiffness was abnormally high in SCI patients; at full dorsiflexion, both reflex and intrinsic stiffness were larger than normal. Fourth, differences between SCI and control subjects were smaller during the active than the passive condition, because intrinsic stiffness increased more in controls than SCI subjects; nevertheless, reflex gain remained abnormally high in SCI patients. These results elucidate the nature and origins of the mechanical abnormalities associated with hypertonia and provide a better understanding of its functional and clinical implications.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s00221-001-0901-z
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_18351981</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>18351981</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c421t-63108559b95ea7a06f0230fcc5731db4cb7d272c9486b22870b8b3bb0486e9153</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkF1L5DAUhsOirOPHD9ibpSB6ZfWcpG2SSxG_QBBEr0OSptChk87mtKD-ejM7A4IX-Th5n3MID2N_EC4RQF4RAOdYAuSl8_b5iy2wErxEhGaPLXJQlZVCfcAOiZabUkj4zQ4QFQIKvWAvj3FKfaTeFza2RQrdEN4Lmvqui4Go6GMRx7Syw_-Y1jZH_iJf-pjf_JjajCznFHI4u2XwEx2z_c4OFE525xF7u7t9vXkon57vH2-un0pfcZzKRiCoutZO18FKC00HXEDnfS0Ftq7yTrZccq8r1TjOlQSnnHAOch001uKInW_nrtP4bw40mVVPPgyDjWGcyaASNWqFGTz9AS7HOeX_k-ESJSothM4UbimfRqIswqxTv7LpwyCYjW6z1W2yRrPRbT5zz9_d5NmtQvvdsfObgbMdYMnboUs2-p6-uQqxkXUlvgCW04aB</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2717189339</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Intrinsic and reflex stiffness in normal and spastic, spinal cord injured subjects</title><source>Springer Nature</source><source>Social Science Premium Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</source><creator>MIRBAGHERI, M. M ; BARBEAU, H ; LADOUCEUR, M ; KEARNEY, R. E</creator><creatorcontrib>MIRBAGHERI, M. M ; BARBEAU, H ; LADOUCEUR, M ; KEARNEY, R. E</creatorcontrib><description>Mechanical changes underlying spastic hypertonia were explored using a parallel cascade system identification technique to evaluate the relative contributions of intrinsic and reflex mechanisms to dynamic ankle stiffness in healthy subjects (controls) and spastic, spinal cord injured (SCI) patients. We examined the modulation of the gain and dynamics of these components with ankle angle for both passive and active conditions. Four main findings emerged. First, intrinsic and reflex stiffness dynamics were qualitatively similar in SCI patients and controls. Intrinsic stiffness dynamics were well modeled by a linear second-order model relating intrinsic torque to joint position, while reflex stiffness dynamics were accurately described by a linear, third-order system relating half-wave rectified velocity to reflex torque. Differences between the two groups were evident in the values of four parameters, the elastic and viscous parameters for intrinsic stiffness and the gain and first-order cut-off frequency for reflex stiffness. Second, reflex stiffness was substantially increased in SCI patients, where it generated as much as 40% of the total torque variance, compared with controls, where reflex contributions never exceeded 7%. Third, differences between SCI patients and controls depended strongly on joint position, becoming larger as the ankle was dorsiflexed. At full plantarflexion, there was no difference between SCI and control subjects; in the mid-range, reflex stiffness was abnormally high in SCI patients; at full dorsiflexion, both reflex and intrinsic stiffness were larger than normal. Fourth, differences between SCI and control subjects were smaller during the active than the passive condition, because intrinsic stiffness increased more in controls than SCI subjects; nevertheless, reflex gain remained abnormally high in SCI patients. These results elucidate the nature and origins of the mechanical abnormalities associated with hypertonia and provide a better understanding of its functional and clinical implications.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0014-4819</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1432-1106</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00221-001-0901-z</identifier><identifier>PMID: 11810139</identifier><identifier>CODEN: EXBRAP</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin: Springer</publisher><subject>Adult ; Ankle ; Ankle Joint - physiopathology ; Biological and medical sciences ; Diseases of striated muscles. Neuromuscular diseases ; Female ; Humans ; hypertonia ; Linear Models ; Male ; Medical sciences ; Middle Aged ; Movement - physiology ; Muscle Contraction - physiology ; Muscle Spasticity - pathology ; Muscle Spasticity - physiopathology ; Muscle Tonus - physiology ; Muscle, Skeletal - innervation ; Muscle, Skeletal - physiology ; Neurology ; Patients ; Posture - physiology ; Range of Motion, Articular - physiology ; Reference Values ; Reflex - physiology ; Spinal cord ; Spinal cord injuries ; Spinal Cord Injuries - physiopathology ; Torque</subject><ispartof>Experimental brain research, 2001-12, Vol.141 (4), p.446-459</ispartof><rights>2002 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Springer-Verlag 2001.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c421t-63108559b95ea7a06f0230fcc5731db4cb7d272c9486b22870b8b3bb0486e9153</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2717189339/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2717189339?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,21394,27924,27925,33611,33612,43733,74221</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=14116754$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11810139$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>MIRBAGHERI, M. M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>BARBEAU, H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>LADOUCEUR, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>KEARNEY, R. E</creatorcontrib><title>Intrinsic and reflex stiffness in normal and spastic, spinal cord injured subjects</title><title>Experimental brain research</title><addtitle>Exp Brain Res</addtitle><description>Mechanical changes underlying spastic hypertonia were explored using a parallel cascade system identification technique to evaluate the relative contributions of intrinsic and reflex mechanisms to dynamic ankle stiffness in healthy subjects (controls) and spastic, spinal cord injured (SCI) patients. We examined the modulation of the gain and dynamics of these components with ankle angle for both passive and active conditions. Four main findings emerged. First, intrinsic and reflex stiffness dynamics were qualitatively similar in SCI patients and controls. Intrinsic stiffness dynamics were well modeled by a linear second-order model relating intrinsic torque to joint position, while reflex stiffness dynamics were accurately described by a linear, third-order system relating half-wave rectified velocity to reflex torque. Differences between the two groups were evident in the values of four parameters, the elastic and viscous parameters for intrinsic stiffness and the gain and first-order cut-off frequency for reflex stiffness. Second, reflex stiffness was substantially increased in SCI patients, where it generated as much as 40% of the total torque variance, compared with controls, where reflex contributions never exceeded 7%. Third, differences between SCI patients and controls depended strongly on joint position, becoming larger as the ankle was dorsiflexed. At full plantarflexion, there was no difference between SCI and control subjects; in the mid-range, reflex stiffness was abnormally high in SCI patients; at full dorsiflexion, both reflex and intrinsic stiffness were larger than normal. Fourth, differences between SCI and control subjects were smaller during the active than the passive condition, because intrinsic stiffness increased more in controls than SCI subjects; nevertheless, reflex gain remained abnormally high in SCI patients. These results elucidate the nature and origins of the mechanical abnormalities associated with hypertonia and provide a better understanding of its functional and clinical implications.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Ankle</subject><subject>Ankle Joint - physiopathology</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Diseases of striated muscles. Neuromuscular diseases</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>hypertonia</subject><subject>Linear Models</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Movement - physiology</subject><subject>Muscle Contraction - physiology</subject><subject>Muscle Spasticity - pathology</subject><subject>Muscle Spasticity - physiopathology</subject><subject>Muscle Tonus - physiology</subject><subject>Muscle, Skeletal - innervation</subject><subject>Muscle, Skeletal - physiology</subject><subject>Neurology</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Posture - physiology</subject><subject>Range of Motion, Articular - physiology</subject><subject>Reference Values</subject><subject>Reflex - physiology</subject><subject>Spinal cord</subject><subject>Spinal cord injuries</subject><subject>Spinal Cord Injuries - physiopathology</subject><subject>Torque</subject><issn>0014-4819</issn><issn>1432-1106</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2001</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ALSLI</sourceid><sourceid>M2R</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkF1L5DAUhsOirOPHD9ibpSB6ZfWcpG2SSxG_QBBEr0OSptChk87mtKD-ejM7A4IX-Th5n3MID2N_EC4RQF4RAOdYAuSl8_b5iy2wErxEhGaPLXJQlZVCfcAOiZabUkj4zQ4QFQIKvWAvj3FKfaTeFza2RQrdEN4Lmvqui4Go6GMRx7Syw_-Y1jZH_iJf-pjf_JjajCznFHI4u2XwEx2z_c4OFE525xF7u7t9vXkon57vH2-un0pfcZzKRiCoutZO18FKC00HXEDnfS0Ftq7yTrZccq8r1TjOlQSnnHAOch001uKInW_nrtP4bw40mVVPPgyDjWGcyaASNWqFGTz9AS7HOeX_k-ESJSothM4UbimfRqIswqxTv7LpwyCYjW6z1W2yRrPRbT5zz9_d5NmtQvvdsfObgbMdYMnboUs2-p6-uQqxkXUlvgCW04aB</recordid><startdate>20011201</startdate><enddate>20011201</enddate><creator>MIRBAGHERI, M. M</creator><creator>BARBEAU, H</creator><creator>LADOUCEUR, M</creator><creator>KEARNEY, R. E</creator><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7QR</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>RC3</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20011201</creationdate><title>Intrinsic and reflex stiffness in normal and spastic, spinal cord injured subjects</title><author>MIRBAGHERI, M. M ; BARBEAU, H ; LADOUCEUR, M ; KEARNEY, R. E</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c421t-63108559b95ea7a06f0230fcc5731db4cb7d272c9486b22870b8b3bb0486e9153</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2001</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Ankle</topic><topic>Ankle Joint - physiopathology</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Diseases of striated muscles. Neuromuscular diseases</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>hypertonia</topic><topic>Linear Models</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Movement - physiology</topic><topic>Muscle Contraction - physiology</topic><topic>Muscle Spasticity - pathology</topic><topic>Muscle Spasticity - physiopathology</topic><topic>Muscle Tonus - physiology</topic><topic>Muscle, Skeletal - innervation</topic><topic>Muscle, Skeletal - physiology</topic><topic>Neurology</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Posture - physiology</topic><topic>Range of Motion, Articular - physiology</topic><topic>Reference Values</topic><topic>Reflex - physiology</topic><topic>Spinal cord</topic><topic>Spinal cord injuries</topic><topic>Spinal Cord Injuries - physiopathology</topic><topic>Torque</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>MIRBAGHERI, M. M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>BARBEAU, H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>LADOUCEUR, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>KEARNEY, R. E</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection【Remote access available】</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Calcium &amp; Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Chemoreception Abstracts</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest - Health &amp; Medical Complete保健、医学与药学数据库</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>PML(ProQuest Medical Library)</collection><collection>Psychology Database</collection><collection>Social Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Experimental brain research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>MIRBAGHERI, M. M</au><au>BARBEAU, H</au><au>LADOUCEUR, M</au><au>KEARNEY, R. E</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Intrinsic and reflex stiffness in normal and spastic, spinal cord injured subjects</atitle><jtitle>Experimental brain research</jtitle><addtitle>Exp Brain Res</addtitle><date>2001-12-01</date><risdate>2001</risdate><volume>141</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>446</spage><epage>459</epage><pages>446-459</pages><issn>0014-4819</issn><eissn>1432-1106</eissn><coden>EXBRAP</coden><abstract>Mechanical changes underlying spastic hypertonia were explored using a parallel cascade system identification technique to evaluate the relative contributions of intrinsic and reflex mechanisms to dynamic ankle stiffness in healthy subjects (controls) and spastic, spinal cord injured (SCI) patients. We examined the modulation of the gain and dynamics of these components with ankle angle for both passive and active conditions. Four main findings emerged. First, intrinsic and reflex stiffness dynamics were qualitatively similar in SCI patients and controls. Intrinsic stiffness dynamics were well modeled by a linear second-order model relating intrinsic torque to joint position, while reflex stiffness dynamics were accurately described by a linear, third-order system relating half-wave rectified velocity to reflex torque. Differences between the two groups were evident in the values of four parameters, the elastic and viscous parameters for intrinsic stiffness and the gain and first-order cut-off frequency for reflex stiffness. Second, reflex stiffness was substantially increased in SCI patients, where it generated as much as 40% of the total torque variance, compared with controls, where reflex contributions never exceeded 7%. Third, differences between SCI patients and controls depended strongly on joint position, becoming larger as the ankle was dorsiflexed. At full plantarflexion, there was no difference between SCI and control subjects; in the mid-range, reflex stiffness was abnormally high in SCI patients; at full dorsiflexion, both reflex and intrinsic stiffness were larger than normal. Fourth, differences between SCI and control subjects were smaller during the active than the passive condition, because intrinsic stiffness increased more in controls than SCI subjects; nevertheless, reflex gain remained abnormally high in SCI patients. These results elucidate the nature and origins of the mechanical abnormalities associated with hypertonia and provide a better understanding of its functional and clinical implications.</abstract><cop>Berlin</cop><pub>Springer</pub><pmid>11810139</pmid><doi>10.1007/s00221-001-0901-z</doi><tpages>14</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0014-4819
ispartof Experimental brain research, 2001-12, Vol.141 (4), p.446-459
issn 0014-4819
1432-1106
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_18351981
source Springer Nature; Social Science Premium Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)
subjects Adult
Ankle
Ankle Joint - physiopathology
Biological and medical sciences
Diseases of striated muscles. Neuromuscular diseases
Female
Humans
hypertonia
Linear Models
Male
Medical sciences
Middle Aged
Movement - physiology
Muscle Contraction - physiology
Muscle Spasticity - pathology
Muscle Spasticity - physiopathology
Muscle Tonus - physiology
Muscle, Skeletal - innervation
Muscle, Skeletal - physiology
Neurology
Patients
Posture - physiology
Range of Motion, Articular - physiology
Reference Values
Reflex - physiology
Spinal cord
Spinal cord injuries
Spinal Cord Injuries - physiopathology
Torque
title Intrinsic and reflex stiffness in normal and spastic, spinal cord injured subjects
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-02T04%3A15%3A11IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Intrinsic%20and%20reflex%20stiffness%20in%20normal%20and%20spastic,%20spinal%20cord%20injured%20subjects&rft.jtitle=Experimental%20brain%20research&rft.au=MIRBAGHERI,%20M.%20M&rft.date=2001-12-01&rft.volume=141&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=446&rft.epage=459&rft.pages=446-459&rft.issn=0014-4819&rft.eissn=1432-1106&rft.coden=EXBRAP&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00221-001-0901-z&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E18351981%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c421t-63108559b95ea7a06f0230fcc5731db4cb7d272c9486b22870b8b3bb0486e9153%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2717189339&rft_id=info:pmid/11810139&rfr_iscdi=true