Loading…
Sporadic inclusion-body myositis: Recent advances and the state of the art in 2016
Sporadic inclusion-body myositis (sIBM) is the most frequent myopathy after 50 years of age. As the clinical presentation may often be typical, pathological confirmation by muscle biopsy appears necessary, but sometimes difficult. Further delineation of the framework of this particular disease, espe...
Saved in:
Published in: | Revue neurologique 2016-10, Vol.172 (10), p.581-586 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c428t-e2adc2e24ff5ae3a2fab865d5e2e1467cd89272eaf38a902795687ce342b30823 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c428t-e2adc2e24ff5ae3a2fab865d5e2e1467cd89272eaf38a902795687ce342b30823 |
container_end_page | 586 |
container_issue | 10 |
container_start_page | 581 |
container_title | Revue neurologique |
container_volume | 172 |
creator | Gallay, L. Petiot, P. |
description | Sporadic inclusion-body myositis (sIBM) is the most frequent myopathy after 50 years of age. As the clinical presentation may often be typical, pathological confirmation by muscle biopsy appears necessary, but sometimes difficult. Further delineation of the framework of this particular disease, especially during its early-onset stage, appears to be challenging. New classification of diagnostic criteria as well as the identification of new diagnostic hallmarks appear to be the two main tools towards to achieve this purpose. sIBM pathophysiology has long been discussed and remains yet controversial. Since its initial description, there have been two major pathogenic hypotheses: inflammatory and degenerative. To date, the debate is still ongoing, as recent works support both pathophysiological mechanisms, although the inflammatory process seems to be slightly more preeminent in the recent literature. Treatment remains the most disappointing aspect of the disease as, despite various therapeutic attempts, no significant efficacy has been reported thus far. Nevertheless, advances in our pathophysiological understanding of the disease are paving the way for further therapeutic perspectives that might arise in the years to come. The objective of the present work was to summarize the most significant data published on sIBM during the past 2 years. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.neurol.2016.07.016 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1835387848</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0035378716301308</els_id><sourcerecordid>1835387848</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c428t-e2adc2e24ff5ae3a2fab865d5e2e1467cd89272eaf38a902795687ce342b30823</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9UM1LwzAczUFxc_ofiOTopTVN2ibzIIj4BQNh6jmkya-Y0TYzSQf7783c9Ojp8eB98B5CFwXJC1LU16t8gNG7LqeJ5YTnCY7QlBBWZYwLPkGnIawIoQUn7ARNKK-LuhR8ipZva-eVsRrbQXdjsG7IGme2uN-6YKMNN3gJGoaIldmoQUPAajA4fgIOUUXArv0hyseUgHf9Z-i4VV2A8wPO0Mfjw_v9c7Z4fXq5v1tkuqQiZkCV0RRo2baVAqZoqxpRV6YCCkVZc23EnHIKqmVCzQnl86oWXAMracOIoGyGrva5a---RghR9jZo6Do1gBuDLASrmOCiFEla7qXauxA8tHLtba_8VhZE7h6UK7l_UO4WSMJlgmS7PDSMTQ_mz_R7XxLc7gWQdm4seBm0hfSSsR50lMbZ_xu-ARTahVY</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1835387848</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Sporadic inclusion-body myositis: Recent advances and the state of the art in 2016</title><source>ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Gallay, L. ; Petiot, P.</creator><creatorcontrib>Gallay, L. ; Petiot, P.</creatorcontrib><description>Sporadic inclusion-body myositis (sIBM) is the most frequent myopathy after 50 years of age. As the clinical presentation may often be typical, pathological confirmation by muscle biopsy appears necessary, but sometimes difficult. Further delineation of the framework of this particular disease, especially during its early-onset stage, appears to be challenging. New classification of diagnostic criteria as well as the identification of new diagnostic hallmarks appear to be the two main tools towards to achieve this purpose. sIBM pathophysiology has long been discussed and remains yet controversial. Since its initial description, there have been two major pathogenic hypotheses: inflammatory and degenerative. To date, the debate is still ongoing, as recent works support both pathophysiological mechanisms, although the inflammatory process seems to be slightly more preeminent in the recent literature. Treatment remains the most disappointing aspect of the disease as, despite various therapeutic attempts, no significant efficacy has been reported thus far. Nevertheless, advances in our pathophysiological understanding of the disease are paving the way for further therapeutic perspectives that might arise in the years to come. The objective of the present work was to summarize the most significant data published on sIBM during the past 2 years.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0035-3787</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.neurol.2016.07.016</identifier><identifier>PMID: 27616487</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>France: Elsevier Masson SAS</publisher><subject>Biopsy ; Classification ; Humans ; Inclusion-body myositis ; Myositis, Inclusion Body - diagnosis ; Myositis, Inclusion Body - genetics ; Myositis, Inclusion Body - physiopathology ; Myositis, Inclusion Body - therapy ; Pathogenesis ; Review ; Therapeutic management</subject><ispartof>Revue neurologique, 2016-10, Vol.172 (10), p.581-586</ispartof><rights>2016</rights><rights>Copyright © 2016. Published by Elsevier Masson SAS.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c428t-e2adc2e24ff5ae3a2fab865d5e2e1467cd89272eaf38a902795687ce342b30823</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c428t-e2adc2e24ff5ae3a2fab865d5e2e1467cd89272eaf38a902795687ce342b30823</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27616487$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Gallay, L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Petiot, P.</creatorcontrib><title>Sporadic inclusion-body myositis: Recent advances and the state of the art in 2016</title><title>Revue neurologique</title><addtitle>Rev Neurol (Paris)</addtitle><description>Sporadic inclusion-body myositis (sIBM) is the most frequent myopathy after 50 years of age. As the clinical presentation may often be typical, pathological confirmation by muscle biopsy appears necessary, but sometimes difficult. Further delineation of the framework of this particular disease, especially during its early-onset stage, appears to be challenging. New classification of diagnostic criteria as well as the identification of new diagnostic hallmarks appear to be the two main tools towards to achieve this purpose. sIBM pathophysiology has long been discussed and remains yet controversial. Since its initial description, there have been two major pathogenic hypotheses: inflammatory and degenerative. To date, the debate is still ongoing, as recent works support both pathophysiological mechanisms, although the inflammatory process seems to be slightly more preeminent in the recent literature. Treatment remains the most disappointing aspect of the disease as, despite various therapeutic attempts, no significant efficacy has been reported thus far. Nevertheless, advances in our pathophysiological understanding of the disease are paving the way for further therapeutic perspectives that might arise in the years to come. The objective of the present work was to summarize the most significant data published on sIBM during the past 2 years.</description><subject>Biopsy</subject><subject>Classification</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Inclusion-body myositis</subject><subject>Myositis, Inclusion Body - diagnosis</subject><subject>Myositis, Inclusion Body - genetics</subject><subject>Myositis, Inclusion Body - physiopathology</subject><subject>Myositis, Inclusion Body - therapy</subject><subject>Pathogenesis</subject><subject>Review</subject><subject>Therapeutic management</subject><issn>0035-3787</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9UM1LwzAczUFxc_ofiOTopTVN2ibzIIj4BQNh6jmkya-Y0TYzSQf7783c9Ojp8eB98B5CFwXJC1LU16t8gNG7LqeJ5YTnCY7QlBBWZYwLPkGnIawIoQUn7ARNKK-LuhR8ipZva-eVsRrbQXdjsG7IGme2uN-6YKMNN3gJGoaIldmoQUPAajA4fgIOUUXArv0hyseUgHf9Z-i4VV2A8wPO0Mfjw_v9c7Z4fXq5v1tkuqQiZkCV0RRo2baVAqZoqxpRV6YCCkVZc23EnHIKqmVCzQnl86oWXAMracOIoGyGrva5a---RghR9jZo6Do1gBuDLASrmOCiFEla7qXauxA8tHLtba_8VhZE7h6UK7l_UO4WSMJlgmS7PDSMTQ_mz_R7XxLc7gWQdm4seBm0hfSSsR50lMbZ_xu-ARTahVY</recordid><startdate>201610</startdate><enddate>201610</enddate><creator>Gallay, L.</creator><creator>Petiot, P.</creator><general>Elsevier Masson SAS</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201610</creationdate><title>Sporadic inclusion-body myositis: Recent advances and the state of the art in 2016</title><author>Gallay, L. ; Petiot, P.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c428t-e2adc2e24ff5ae3a2fab865d5e2e1467cd89272eaf38a902795687ce342b30823</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Biopsy</topic><topic>Classification</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Inclusion-body myositis</topic><topic>Myositis, Inclusion Body - diagnosis</topic><topic>Myositis, Inclusion Body - genetics</topic><topic>Myositis, Inclusion Body - physiopathology</topic><topic>Myositis, Inclusion Body - therapy</topic><topic>Pathogenesis</topic><topic>Review</topic><topic>Therapeutic management</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Gallay, L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Petiot, P.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Revue neurologique</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Gallay, L.</au><au>Petiot, P.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Sporadic inclusion-body myositis: Recent advances and the state of the art in 2016</atitle><jtitle>Revue neurologique</jtitle><addtitle>Rev Neurol (Paris)</addtitle><date>2016-10</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>172</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>581</spage><epage>586</epage><pages>581-586</pages><issn>0035-3787</issn><abstract>Sporadic inclusion-body myositis (sIBM) is the most frequent myopathy after 50 years of age. As the clinical presentation may often be typical, pathological confirmation by muscle biopsy appears necessary, but sometimes difficult. Further delineation of the framework of this particular disease, especially during its early-onset stage, appears to be challenging. New classification of diagnostic criteria as well as the identification of new diagnostic hallmarks appear to be the two main tools towards to achieve this purpose. sIBM pathophysiology has long been discussed and remains yet controversial. Since its initial description, there have been two major pathogenic hypotheses: inflammatory and degenerative. To date, the debate is still ongoing, as recent works support both pathophysiological mechanisms, although the inflammatory process seems to be slightly more preeminent in the recent literature. Treatment remains the most disappointing aspect of the disease as, despite various therapeutic attempts, no significant efficacy has been reported thus far. Nevertheless, advances in our pathophysiological understanding of the disease are paving the way for further therapeutic perspectives that might arise in the years to come. The objective of the present work was to summarize the most significant data published on sIBM during the past 2 years.</abstract><cop>France</cop><pub>Elsevier Masson SAS</pub><pmid>27616487</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.neurol.2016.07.016</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0035-3787 |
ispartof | Revue neurologique, 2016-10, Vol.172 (10), p.581-586 |
issn | 0035-3787 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1835387848 |
source | ScienceDirect Journals |
subjects | Biopsy Classification Humans Inclusion-body myositis Myositis, Inclusion Body - diagnosis Myositis, Inclusion Body - genetics Myositis, Inclusion Body - physiopathology Myositis, Inclusion Body - therapy Pathogenesis Review Therapeutic management |
title | Sporadic inclusion-body myositis: Recent advances and the state of the art in 2016 |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T08%3A05%3A22IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Sporadic%20inclusion-body%20myositis:%20Recent%20advances%20and%20the%20state%20of%20the%20art%20in%202016&rft.jtitle=Revue%20neurologique&rft.au=Gallay,%20L.&rft.date=2016-10&rft.volume=172&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=581&rft.epage=586&rft.pages=581-586&rft.issn=0035-3787&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.neurol.2016.07.016&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1835387848%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c428t-e2adc2e24ff5ae3a2fab865d5e2e1467cd89272eaf38a902795687ce342b30823%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1835387848&rft_id=info:pmid/27616487&rfr_iscdi=true |