Loading…

Sporadic inclusion-body myositis: Recent advances and the state of the art in 2016

Sporadic inclusion-body myositis (sIBM) is the most frequent myopathy after 50 years of age. As the clinical presentation may often be typical, pathological confirmation by muscle biopsy appears necessary, but sometimes difficult. Further delineation of the framework of this particular disease, espe...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Revue neurologique 2016-10, Vol.172 (10), p.581-586
Main Authors: Gallay, L., Petiot, P.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c428t-e2adc2e24ff5ae3a2fab865d5e2e1467cd89272eaf38a902795687ce342b30823
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c428t-e2adc2e24ff5ae3a2fab865d5e2e1467cd89272eaf38a902795687ce342b30823
container_end_page 586
container_issue 10
container_start_page 581
container_title Revue neurologique
container_volume 172
creator Gallay, L.
Petiot, P.
description Sporadic inclusion-body myositis (sIBM) is the most frequent myopathy after 50 years of age. As the clinical presentation may often be typical, pathological confirmation by muscle biopsy appears necessary, but sometimes difficult. Further delineation of the framework of this particular disease, especially during its early-onset stage, appears to be challenging. New classification of diagnostic criteria as well as the identification of new diagnostic hallmarks appear to be the two main tools towards to achieve this purpose. sIBM pathophysiology has long been discussed and remains yet controversial. Since its initial description, there have been two major pathogenic hypotheses: inflammatory and degenerative. To date, the debate is still ongoing, as recent works support both pathophysiological mechanisms, although the inflammatory process seems to be slightly more preeminent in the recent literature. Treatment remains the most disappointing aspect of the disease as, despite various therapeutic attempts, no significant efficacy has been reported thus far. Nevertheless, advances in our pathophysiological understanding of the disease are paving the way for further therapeutic perspectives that might arise in the years to come. The objective of the present work was to summarize the most significant data published on sIBM during the past 2 years.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.neurol.2016.07.016
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1835387848</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0035378716301308</els_id><sourcerecordid>1835387848</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c428t-e2adc2e24ff5ae3a2fab865d5e2e1467cd89272eaf38a902795687ce342b30823</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9UM1LwzAczUFxc_ofiOTopTVN2ibzIIj4BQNh6jmkya-Y0TYzSQf7783c9Ojp8eB98B5CFwXJC1LU16t8gNG7LqeJ5YTnCY7QlBBWZYwLPkGnIawIoQUn7ARNKK-LuhR8ipZva-eVsRrbQXdjsG7IGme2uN-6YKMNN3gJGoaIldmoQUPAajA4fgIOUUXArv0hyseUgHf9Z-i4VV2A8wPO0Mfjw_v9c7Z4fXq5v1tkuqQiZkCV0RRo2baVAqZoqxpRV6YCCkVZc23EnHIKqmVCzQnl86oWXAMracOIoGyGrva5a---RghR9jZo6Do1gBuDLASrmOCiFEla7qXauxA8tHLtba_8VhZE7h6UK7l_UO4WSMJlgmS7PDSMTQ_mz_R7XxLc7gWQdm4seBm0hfSSsR50lMbZ_xu-ARTahVY</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1835387848</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Sporadic inclusion-body myositis: Recent advances and the state of the art in 2016</title><source>ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Gallay, L. ; Petiot, P.</creator><creatorcontrib>Gallay, L. ; Petiot, P.</creatorcontrib><description>Sporadic inclusion-body myositis (sIBM) is the most frequent myopathy after 50 years of age. As the clinical presentation may often be typical, pathological confirmation by muscle biopsy appears necessary, but sometimes difficult. Further delineation of the framework of this particular disease, especially during its early-onset stage, appears to be challenging. New classification of diagnostic criteria as well as the identification of new diagnostic hallmarks appear to be the two main tools towards to achieve this purpose. sIBM pathophysiology has long been discussed and remains yet controversial. Since its initial description, there have been two major pathogenic hypotheses: inflammatory and degenerative. To date, the debate is still ongoing, as recent works support both pathophysiological mechanisms, although the inflammatory process seems to be slightly more preeminent in the recent literature. Treatment remains the most disappointing aspect of the disease as, despite various therapeutic attempts, no significant efficacy has been reported thus far. Nevertheless, advances in our pathophysiological understanding of the disease are paving the way for further therapeutic perspectives that might arise in the years to come. The objective of the present work was to summarize the most significant data published on sIBM during the past 2 years.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0035-3787</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.neurol.2016.07.016</identifier><identifier>PMID: 27616487</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>France: Elsevier Masson SAS</publisher><subject>Biopsy ; Classification ; Humans ; Inclusion-body myositis ; Myositis, Inclusion Body - diagnosis ; Myositis, Inclusion Body - genetics ; Myositis, Inclusion Body - physiopathology ; Myositis, Inclusion Body - therapy ; Pathogenesis ; Review ; Therapeutic management</subject><ispartof>Revue neurologique, 2016-10, Vol.172 (10), p.581-586</ispartof><rights>2016</rights><rights>Copyright © 2016. Published by Elsevier Masson SAS.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c428t-e2adc2e24ff5ae3a2fab865d5e2e1467cd89272eaf38a902795687ce342b30823</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c428t-e2adc2e24ff5ae3a2fab865d5e2e1467cd89272eaf38a902795687ce342b30823</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27616487$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Gallay, L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Petiot, P.</creatorcontrib><title>Sporadic inclusion-body myositis: Recent advances and the state of the art in 2016</title><title>Revue neurologique</title><addtitle>Rev Neurol (Paris)</addtitle><description>Sporadic inclusion-body myositis (sIBM) is the most frequent myopathy after 50 years of age. As the clinical presentation may often be typical, pathological confirmation by muscle biopsy appears necessary, but sometimes difficult. Further delineation of the framework of this particular disease, especially during its early-onset stage, appears to be challenging. New classification of diagnostic criteria as well as the identification of new diagnostic hallmarks appear to be the two main tools towards to achieve this purpose. sIBM pathophysiology has long been discussed and remains yet controversial. Since its initial description, there have been two major pathogenic hypotheses: inflammatory and degenerative. To date, the debate is still ongoing, as recent works support both pathophysiological mechanisms, although the inflammatory process seems to be slightly more preeminent in the recent literature. Treatment remains the most disappointing aspect of the disease as, despite various therapeutic attempts, no significant efficacy has been reported thus far. Nevertheless, advances in our pathophysiological understanding of the disease are paving the way for further therapeutic perspectives that might arise in the years to come. The objective of the present work was to summarize the most significant data published on sIBM during the past 2 years.</description><subject>Biopsy</subject><subject>Classification</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Inclusion-body myositis</subject><subject>Myositis, Inclusion Body - diagnosis</subject><subject>Myositis, Inclusion Body - genetics</subject><subject>Myositis, Inclusion Body - physiopathology</subject><subject>Myositis, Inclusion Body - therapy</subject><subject>Pathogenesis</subject><subject>Review</subject><subject>Therapeutic management</subject><issn>0035-3787</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9UM1LwzAczUFxc_ofiOTopTVN2ibzIIj4BQNh6jmkya-Y0TYzSQf7783c9Ojp8eB98B5CFwXJC1LU16t8gNG7LqeJ5YTnCY7QlBBWZYwLPkGnIawIoQUn7ARNKK-LuhR8ipZva-eVsRrbQXdjsG7IGme2uN-6YKMNN3gJGoaIldmoQUPAajA4fgIOUUXArv0hyseUgHf9Z-i4VV2A8wPO0Mfjw_v9c7Z4fXq5v1tkuqQiZkCV0RRo2baVAqZoqxpRV6YCCkVZc23EnHIKqmVCzQnl86oWXAMracOIoGyGrva5a---RghR9jZo6Do1gBuDLASrmOCiFEla7qXauxA8tHLtba_8VhZE7h6UK7l_UO4WSMJlgmS7PDSMTQ_mz_R7XxLc7gWQdm4seBm0hfSSsR50lMbZ_xu-ARTahVY</recordid><startdate>201610</startdate><enddate>201610</enddate><creator>Gallay, L.</creator><creator>Petiot, P.</creator><general>Elsevier Masson SAS</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201610</creationdate><title>Sporadic inclusion-body myositis: Recent advances and the state of the art in 2016</title><author>Gallay, L. ; Petiot, P.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c428t-e2adc2e24ff5ae3a2fab865d5e2e1467cd89272eaf38a902795687ce342b30823</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Biopsy</topic><topic>Classification</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Inclusion-body myositis</topic><topic>Myositis, Inclusion Body - diagnosis</topic><topic>Myositis, Inclusion Body - genetics</topic><topic>Myositis, Inclusion Body - physiopathology</topic><topic>Myositis, Inclusion Body - therapy</topic><topic>Pathogenesis</topic><topic>Review</topic><topic>Therapeutic management</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Gallay, L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Petiot, P.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Revue neurologique</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Gallay, L.</au><au>Petiot, P.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Sporadic inclusion-body myositis: Recent advances and the state of the art in 2016</atitle><jtitle>Revue neurologique</jtitle><addtitle>Rev Neurol (Paris)</addtitle><date>2016-10</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>172</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>581</spage><epage>586</epage><pages>581-586</pages><issn>0035-3787</issn><abstract>Sporadic inclusion-body myositis (sIBM) is the most frequent myopathy after 50 years of age. As the clinical presentation may often be typical, pathological confirmation by muscle biopsy appears necessary, but sometimes difficult. Further delineation of the framework of this particular disease, especially during its early-onset stage, appears to be challenging. New classification of diagnostic criteria as well as the identification of new diagnostic hallmarks appear to be the two main tools towards to achieve this purpose. sIBM pathophysiology has long been discussed and remains yet controversial. Since its initial description, there have been two major pathogenic hypotheses: inflammatory and degenerative. To date, the debate is still ongoing, as recent works support both pathophysiological mechanisms, although the inflammatory process seems to be slightly more preeminent in the recent literature. Treatment remains the most disappointing aspect of the disease as, despite various therapeutic attempts, no significant efficacy has been reported thus far. Nevertheless, advances in our pathophysiological understanding of the disease are paving the way for further therapeutic perspectives that might arise in the years to come. The objective of the present work was to summarize the most significant data published on sIBM during the past 2 years.</abstract><cop>France</cop><pub>Elsevier Masson SAS</pub><pmid>27616487</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.neurol.2016.07.016</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0035-3787
ispartof Revue neurologique, 2016-10, Vol.172 (10), p.581-586
issn 0035-3787
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1835387848
source ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Biopsy
Classification
Humans
Inclusion-body myositis
Myositis, Inclusion Body - diagnosis
Myositis, Inclusion Body - genetics
Myositis, Inclusion Body - physiopathology
Myositis, Inclusion Body - therapy
Pathogenesis
Review
Therapeutic management
title Sporadic inclusion-body myositis: Recent advances and the state of the art in 2016
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T08%3A05%3A22IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Sporadic%20inclusion-body%20myositis:%20Recent%20advances%20and%20the%20state%20of%20the%20art%20in%202016&rft.jtitle=Revue%20neurologique&rft.au=Gallay,%20L.&rft.date=2016-10&rft.volume=172&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=581&rft.epage=586&rft.pages=581-586&rft.issn=0035-3787&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.neurol.2016.07.016&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1835387848%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c428t-e2adc2e24ff5ae3a2fab865d5e2e1467cd89272eaf38a902795687ce342b30823%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1835387848&rft_id=info:pmid/27616487&rfr_iscdi=true