Loading…

Trait Liabilities and Specific Promotive Processes in Psychopathology: The Example of Suicidal Behavior

Abstract Background The RDoC matrix framework calls for investigation of mental health problems through analysis of core biobehavioral processes quantified and studied across multiple domains of measurement. Critics have raised concerns about RDoC, including overemphasis on biological concepts/measu...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of affective disorders 2017-07, Vol.216, p.100-108
Main Authors: Buchman-Schmitt, Jennifer M, Brislin, Sarah J, Venables, Noah C, Joiner, Thomas E, Patrick, Christopher J
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c451t-89bab0fcf099bb40eaefdf379ab142c5af2cc0147a7d4944e1cf42ed5f6fd5663
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c451t-89bab0fcf099bb40eaefdf379ab142c5af2cc0147a7d4944e1cf42ed5f6fd5663
container_end_page 108
container_issue
container_start_page 100
container_title Journal of affective disorders
container_volume 216
creator Buchman-Schmitt, Jennifer M
Brislin, Sarah J
Venables, Noah C
Joiner, Thomas E
Patrick, Christopher J
description Abstract Background The RDoC matrix framework calls for investigation of mental health problems through analysis of core biobehavioral processes quantified and studied across multiple domains of measurement. Critics have raised concerns about RDoC, including overemphasis on biological concepts/measures and disregard for the principle of multifinality, which holds that identical biological predispositions can give rise to differing behavioral outcomes. The current work illustrates an ontogenetic process approach to addressing these concerns, focusing on biobehavioral traits corresponding to RDoC constructs as predictors, and suicidal behavior as the outcome variable. Method Data were collected from a young adult sample ( N = 105), preselected to enhance rates of suicidality. Participants completed self-report measures of traits (threat sensitivity, response inhibition) and suicide-specific processes. Results We show that previously reported associations of traits of threat sensitivity and weak inhibitory control with suicidal behavior are mediated by more specific suicide-promoting processes—namely, thwarted belongingness, perceived burdensomeness, and capability for suicide. Limitations The sample was relatively small and the data were cross-sectional, limiting conclusions that can be drawn from the mediation analyses. Conclusions Given prior research documenting neurophysiological as well as psychological bases to these trait dispositions, the current work sets the stage for an intensive RDoC-oriented investigation of suicidal tendencies in which both traits and suicide-promoting processes are quantified using indicators from different domains of measurement. More broadly, this work illustrates how an RDoC research approach can contribute to a nuanced understanding of specific clinical problems, through consideration of how general biobehavioral liabilities interface with distinct problem-promoting processes.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.jad.2016.09.050
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1835397927</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>1_s2_0_S0165032716306759</els_id><sourcerecordid>1835397927</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c451t-89bab0fcf099bb40eaefdf379ab142c5af2cc0147a7d4944e1cf42ed5f6fd5663</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kV2L1DAUhoMo7rj6A7yRXHrTmqRNM1EQdFk_YMCFGa9DmpzspLZNTdrB-femzOqFF17lQJ73hfMchF5SUlJCmzdd2WlbsjyWRJaEk0doQ7moCsapeIw2-YMXpGLiCj1LqSOENFKQp-iKCcGa7VZu0P0haj_jndet7_3sIWE9WryfwHjnDb6LYQizP8E6GUgpA37Ed-lsjmHS8zH04f78Fh-OgG9_6WHqAQeH94s33uoef4SjPvkQn6MnTvcJXjy81-j7p9vDzZdi9-3z15sPu8LUnM7FVra6Jc44ImXb1gQ0OOsqIXVLa2a4dswYQmuhha1lXQM1rmZguWuc5U1TXaPXl94php8LpFkNPhnoez1CWJKi24pXUkgmMkovqIkhpQhOTdEPOp4VJWr1qzqV_arVryJSZb858-qhfmkHsH8Tf4Rm4N0FgLzkyUNUyXgYDVgfwczKBv_f-vf_pE3vR290_wPOkLqwxDHbU1Qlpojarwde70ubijSCy-o3hZihxw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1835397927</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Trait Liabilities and Specific Promotive Processes in Psychopathology: The Example of Suicidal Behavior</title><source>ScienceDirect Freedom Collection</source><creator>Buchman-Schmitt, Jennifer M ; Brislin, Sarah J ; Venables, Noah C ; Joiner, Thomas E ; Patrick, Christopher J</creator><creatorcontrib>Buchman-Schmitt, Jennifer M ; Brislin, Sarah J ; Venables, Noah C ; Joiner, Thomas E ; Patrick, Christopher J</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract Background The RDoC matrix framework calls for investigation of mental health problems through analysis of core biobehavioral processes quantified and studied across multiple domains of measurement. Critics have raised concerns about RDoC, including overemphasis on biological concepts/measures and disregard for the principle of multifinality, which holds that identical biological predispositions can give rise to differing behavioral outcomes. The current work illustrates an ontogenetic process approach to addressing these concerns, focusing on biobehavioral traits corresponding to RDoC constructs as predictors, and suicidal behavior as the outcome variable. Method Data were collected from a young adult sample ( N = 105), preselected to enhance rates of suicidality. Participants completed self-report measures of traits (threat sensitivity, response inhibition) and suicide-specific processes. Results We show that previously reported associations of traits of threat sensitivity and weak inhibitory control with suicidal behavior are mediated by more specific suicide-promoting processes—namely, thwarted belongingness, perceived burdensomeness, and capability for suicide. Limitations The sample was relatively small and the data were cross-sectional, limiting conclusions that can be drawn from the mediation analyses. Conclusions Given prior research documenting neurophysiological as well as psychological bases to these trait dispositions, the current work sets the stage for an intensive RDoC-oriented investigation of suicidal tendencies in which both traits and suicide-promoting processes are quantified using indicators from different domains of measurement. More broadly, this work illustrates how an RDoC research approach can contribute to a nuanced understanding of specific clinical problems, through consideration of how general biobehavioral liabilities interface with distinct problem-promoting processes.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0165-0327</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-2517</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jad.2016.09.050</identifier><identifier>PMID: 27726889</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Netherlands: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Adult ; Cross-Sectional Studies ; Disinhibition ; Female ; Humans ; Inhibition (Psychology) ; Interpersonal Relations ; Interpersonal Theory of Suicide ; Male ; Mental Processes ; Perception ; Personality ; Psychiatry ; Psychopathology ; Research Domain Criteria ; Social Adjustment ; Suicidal behavior ; Suicide - psychology ; Threat sensitivity ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>Journal of affective disorders, 2017-07, Vol.216, p.100-108</ispartof><rights>2016 Elsevier B.V.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c451t-89bab0fcf099bb40eaefdf379ab142c5af2cc0147a7d4944e1cf42ed5f6fd5663</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c451t-89bab0fcf099bb40eaefdf379ab142c5af2cc0147a7d4944e1cf42ed5f6fd5663</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27726889$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Buchman-Schmitt, Jennifer M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brislin, Sarah J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Venables, Noah C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Joiner, Thomas E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Patrick, Christopher J</creatorcontrib><title>Trait Liabilities and Specific Promotive Processes in Psychopathology: The Example of Suicidal Behavior</title><title>Journal of affective disorders</title><addtitle>J Affect Disord</addtitle><description>Abstract Background The RDoC matrix framework calls for investigation of mental health problems through analysis of core biobehavioral processes quantified and studied across multiple domains of measurement. Critics have raised concerns about RDoC, including overemphasis on biological concepts/measures and disregard for the principle of multifinality, which holds that identical biological predispositions can give rise to differing behavioral outcomes. The current work illustrates an ontogenetic process approach to addressing these concerns, focusing on biobehavioral traits corresponding to RDoC constructs as predictors, and suicidal behavior as the outcome variable. Method Data were collected from a young adult sample ( N = 105), preselected to enhance rates of suicidality. Participants completed self-report measures of traits (threat sensitivity, response inhibition) and suicide-specific processes. Results We show that previously reported associations of traits of threat sensitivity and weak inhibitory control with suicidal behavior are mediated by more specific suicide-promoting processes—namely, thwarted belongingness, perceived burdensomeness, and capability for suicide. Limitations The sample was relatively small and the data were cross-sectional, limiting conclusions that can be drawn from the mediation analyses. Conclusions Given prior research documenting neurophysiological as well as psychological bases to these trait dispositions, the current work sets the stage for an intensive RDoC-oriented investigation of suicidal tendencies in which both traits and suicide-promoting processes are quantified using indicators from different domains of measurement. More broadly, this work illustrates how an RDoC research approach can contribute to a nuanced understanding of specific clinical problems, through consideration of how general biobehavioral liabilities interface with distinct problem-promoting processes.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Cross-Sectional Studies</subject><subject>Disinhibition</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Inhibition (Psychology)</subject><subject>Interpersonal Relations</subject><subject>Interpersonal Theory of Suicide</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Mental Processes</subject><subject>Perception</subject><subject>Personality</subject><subject>Psychiatry</subject><subject>Psychopathology</subject><subject>Research Domain Criteria</subject><subject>Social Adjustment</subject><subject>Suicidal behavior</subject><subject>Suicide - psychology</subject><subject>Threat sensitivity</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>0165-0327</issn><issn>1573-2517</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kV2L1DAUhoMo7rj6A7yRXHrTmqRNM1EQdFk_YMCFGa9DmpzspLZNTdrB-femzOqFF17lQJ73hfMchF5SUlJCmzdd2WlbsjyWRJaEk0doQ7moCsapeIw2-YMXpGLiCj1LqSOENFKQp-iKCcGa7VZu0P0haj_jndet7_3sIWE9WryfwHjnDb6LYQizP8E6GUgpA37Ed-lsjmHS8zH04f78Fh-OgG9_6WHqAQeH94s33uoef4SjPvkQn6MnTvcJXjy81-j7p9vDzZdi9-3z15sPu8LUnM7FVra6Jc44ImXb1gQ0OOsqIXVLa2a4dswYQmuhha1lXQM1rmZguWuc5U1TXaPXl94php8LpFkNPhnoez1CWJKi24pXUkgmMkovqIkhpQhOTdEPOp4VJWr1qzqV_arVryJSZb858-qhfmkHsH8Tf4Rm4N0FgLzkyUNUyXgYDVgfwczKBv_f-vf_pE3vR290_wPOkLqwxDHbU1Qlpojarwde70ubijSCy-o3hZihxw</recordid><startdate>20170701</startdate><enddate>20170701</enddate><creator>Buchman-Schmitt, Jennifer M</creator><creator>Brislin, Sarah J</creator><creator>Venables, Noah C</creator><creator>Joiner, Thomas E</creator><creator>Patrick, Christopher J</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20170701</creationdate><title>Trait Liabilities and Specific Promotive Processes in Psychopathology: The Example of Suicidal Behavior</title><author>Buchman-Schmitt, Jennifer M ; Brislin, Sarah J ; Venables, Noah C ; Joiner, Thomas E ; Patrick, Christopher J</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c451t-89bab0fcf099bb40eaefdf379ab142c5af2cc0147a7d4944e1cf42ed5f6fd5663</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Cross-Sectional Studies</topic><topic>Disinhibition</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Inhibition (Psychology)</topic><topic>Interpersonal Relations</topic><topic>Interpersonal Theory of Suicide</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Mental Processes</topic><topic>Perception</topic><topic>Personality</topic><topic>Psychiatry</topic><topic>Psychopathology</topic><topic>Research Domain Criteria</topic><topic>Social Adjustment</topic><topic>Suicidal behavior</topic><topic>Suicide - psychology</topic><topic>Threat sensitivity</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Buchman-Schmitt, Jennifer M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brislin, Sarah J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Venables, Noah C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Joiner, Thomas E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Patrick, Christopher J</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of affective disorders</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Buchman-Schmitt, Jennifer M</au><au>Brislin, Sarah J</au><au>Venables, Noah C</au><au>Joiner, Thomas E</au><au>Patrick, Christopher J</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Trait Liabilities and Specific Promotive Processes in Psychopathology: The Example of Suicidal Behavior</atitle><jtitle>Journal of affective disorders</jtitle><addtitle>J Affect Disord</addtitle><date>2017-07-01</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>216</volume><spage>100</spage><epage>108</epage><pages>100-108</pages><issn>0165-0327</issn><eissn>1573-2517</eissn><abstract>Abstract Background The RDoC matrix framework calls for investigation of mental health problems through analysis of core biobehavioral processes quantified and studied across multiple domains of measurement. Critics have raised concerns about RDoC, including overemphasis on biological concepts/measures and disregard for the principle of multifinality, which holds that identical biological predispositions can give rise to differing behavioral outcomes. The current work illustrates an ontogenetic process approach to addressing these concerns, focusing on biobehavioral traits corresponding to RDoC constructs as predictors, and suicidal behavior as the outcome variable. Method Data were collected from a young adult sample ( N = 105), preselected to enhance rates of suicidality. Participants completed self-report measures of traits (threat sensitivity, response inhibition) and suicide-specific processes. Results We show that previously reported associations of traits of threat sensitivity and weak inhibitory control with suicidal behavior are mediated by more specific suicide-promoting processes—namely, thwarted belongingness, perceived burdensomeness, and capability for suicide. Limitations The sample was relatively small and the data were cross-sectional, limiting conclusions that can be drawn from the mediation analyses. Conclusions Given prior research documenting neurophysiological as well as psychological bases to these trait dispositions, the current work sets the stage for an intensive RDoC-oriented investigation of suicidal tendencies in which both traits and suicide-promoting processes are quantified using indicators from different domains of measurement. More broadly, this work illustrates how an RDoC research approach can contribute to a nuanced understanding of specific clinical problems, through consideration of how general biobehavioral liabilities interface with distinct problem-promoting processes.</abstract><cop>Netherlands</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><pmid>27726889</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.jad.2016.09.050</doi><tpages>9</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0165-0327
ispartof Journal of affective disorders, 2017-07, Vol.216, p.100-108
issn 0165-0327
1573-2517
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1835397927
source ScienceDirect Freedom Collection
subjects Adolescent
Adult
Cross-Sectional Studies
Disinhibition
Female
Humans
Inhibition (Psychology)
Interpersonal Relations
Interpersonal Theory of Suicide
Male
Mental Processes
Perception
Personality
Psychiatry
Psychopathology
Research Domain Criteria
Social Adjustment
Suicidal behavior
Suicide - psychology
Threat sensitivity
Young Adult
title Trait Liabilities and Specific Promotive Processes in Psychopathology: The Example of Suicidal Behavior
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-27T18%3A46%3A55IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Trait%20Liabilities%20and%20Specific%20Promotive%20Processes%20in%20Psychopathology:%20The%20Example%20of%20Suicidal%20Behavior&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20affective%20disorders&rft.au=Buchman-Schmitt,%20Jennifer%20M&rft.date=2017-07-01&rft.volume=216&rft.spage=100&rft.epage=108&rft.pages=100-108&rft.issn=0165-0327&rft.eissn=1573-2517&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jad.2016.09.050&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1835397927%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c451t-89bab0fcf099bb40eaefdf379ab142c5af2cc0147a7d4944e1cf42ed5f6fd5663%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1835397927&rft_id=info:pmid/27726889&rfr_iscdi=true