Loading…
Rational use of distraction osteogenesis in craniofacial surgery
Distraction osteogenesis, initially developed by Ilizarov for limb, is the tissular extension caused by the progressive space of the osseous pieces following an osteotomy. Distraction is osteogenesic and histogenic. Twenty-five years ago, at the instigation of McCarthy, this technique was used to ha...
Saved in:
Published in: | Annales de chirurgie plastique et esthétique 2016-10, Vol.61 (5), p.764-769 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | fre |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | |
---|---|
cites | |
container_end_page | 769 |
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | 764 |
container_title | Annales de chirurgie plastique et esthétique |
container_volume | 61 |
creator | Guerreschi, P Wolber, A Bennis, Y Vinchon, M Martinot-Duquennoy, V |
description | Distraction osteogenesis, initially developed by Ilizarov for limb, is the tissular extension caused by the progressive space of the osseous pieces following an osteotomy. Distraction is osteogenesic and histogenic. Twenty-five years ago, at the instigation of McCarthy, this technique was used to handle the craniofacial malformations in the various floors of the face : mandibular, mediofacial and cranial. The most wide-spread protocols respect a latency period from 0 to 7 days, a rhythm of distraction from 1 to 2mm a day in 2 at 4 times and a period of consolidation from 4 to 8 weeks. Distraction is the result of the inventiveness of the pioneers then the work to always adapt to the multiple complex clinical situations. The surgeon has to choose between internal or external materials allowing a mono- or multi-vectorial extension, in osseous and/or dental anchoring. The mandibular distraction is very effective for the treatment of the secondary obstructive syndromes in the unilateral or bilateral severe hypomandibular malformations. She also allows desobstruction of the superior airways within the framework of the mediofacial hypoplasies as well as the secondary treatment of the growth defects in cleft lips and palates. Finally, the distraction osteogenesis enhanced reliability of the fronto-facial advancement in early and secondary treatment of craniofaciosynostosis. This is a real support of the facial growth, which has to be included in a plan of global treatment. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.anplas.2016.07.009 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1835452168</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1835452168</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p211t-ed248034f51a103a4123f512fbb9b64b039e74ea7b64b1230ff4ed0faddc3d5d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo1j01Lw0AQhhdBbK3-A5EcvSTu7Ec-bkrxCwqCKHgLk-xs2ZJm425y6L83xXqaed73YWAYuwGeAYf8fpdhP3QYMzFTxouM8-qMLaHIy1RC9b1glzHuOAfFRXnBFqLQotSgl-zhA0fne-ySKVLibWJcHAO2xzDxcSS_pZ6ii4nrkzZg77zF1s1-nMKWwuGKnVvsIl2f5op9PT99rl_TzfvL2_pxkw4CYEzJCFVyqawGBC5RgZDzLmzTVE2uGi4rKhRhcYS549YqMtyiMa002sgVu_u7OwT_M1Ec672LLXUd9uSnWEMptdIC8nJWb0_q1OzJ1ENwewyH-v9r-QsnIlo7</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1835452168</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Rational use of distraction osteogenesis in craniofacial surgery</title><source>ScienceDirect Freedom Collection</source><creator>Guerreschi, P ; Wolber, A ; Bennis, Y ; Vinchon, M ; Martinot-Duquennoy, V</creator><creatorcontrib>Guerreschi, P ; Wolber, A ; Bennis, Y ; Vinchon, M ; Martinot-Duquennoy, V</creatorcontrib><description>Distraction osteogenesis, initially developed by Ilizarov for limb, is the tissular extension caused by the progressive space of the osseous pieces following an osteotomy. Distraction is osteogenesic and histogenic. Twenty-five years ago, at the instigation of McCarthy, this technique was used to handle the craniofacial malformations in the various floors of the face : mandibular, mediofacial and cranial. The most wide-spread protocols respect a latency period from 0 to 7 days, a rhythm of distraction from 1 to 2mm a day in 2 at 4 times and a period of consolidation from 4 to 8 weeks. Distraction is the result of the inventiveness of the pioneers then the work to always adapt to the multiple complex clinical situations. The surgeon has to choose between internal or external materials allowing a mono- or multi-vectorial extension, in osseous and/or dental anchoring. The mandibular distraction is very effective for the treatment of the secondary obstructive syndromes in the unilateral or bilateral severe hypomandibular malformations. She also allows desobstruction of the superior airways within the framework of the mediofacial hypoplasies as well as the secondary treatment of the growth defects in cleft lips and palates. Finally, the distraction osteogenesis enhanced reliability of the fronto-facial advancement in early and secondary treatment of craniofaciosynostosis. This is a real support of the facial growth, which has to be included in a plan of global treatment.</description><identifier>EISSN: 1768-319X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.anplas.2016.07.009</identifier><identifier>PMID: 27528515</identifier><language>fre</language><publisher>France</publisher><subject>Craniofacial Abnormalities - surgery ; Humans ; Osteogenesis, Distraction - instrumentation</subject><ispartof>Annales de chirurgie plastique et esthétique, 2016-10, Vol.61 (5), p.764-769</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27528515$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Guerreschi, P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wolber, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bennis, Y</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vinchon, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Martinot-Duquennoy, V</creatorcontrib><title>Rational use of distraction osteogenesis in craniofacial surgery</title><title>Annales de chirurgie plastique et esthétique</title><addtitle>Ann Chir Plast Esthet</addtitle><description>Distraction osteogenesis, initially developed by Ilizarov for limb, is the tissular extension caused by the progressive space of the osseous pieces following an osteotomy. Distraction is osteogenesic and histogenic. Twenty-five years ago, at the instigation of McCarthy, this technique was used to handle the craniofacial malformations in the various floors of the face : mandibular, mediofacial and cranial. The most wide-spread protocols respect a latency period from 0 to 7 days, a rhythm of distraction from 1 to 2mm a day in 2 at 4 times and a period of consolidation from 4 to 8 weeks. Distraction is the result of the inventiveness of the pioneers then the work to always adapt to the multiple complex clinical situations. The surgeon has to choose between internal or external materials allowing a mono- or multi-vectorial extension, in osseous and/or dental anchoring. The mandibular distraction is very effective for the treatment of the secondary obstructive syndromes in the unilateral or bilateral severe hypomandibular malformations. She also allows desobstruction of the superior airways within the framework of the mediofacial hypoplasies as well as the secondary treatment of the growth defects in cleft lips and palates. Finally, the distraction osteogenesis enhanced reliability of the fronto-facial advancement in early and secondary treatment of craniofaciosynostosis. This is a real support of the facial growth, which has to be included in a plan of global treatment.</description><subject>Craniofacial Abnormalities - surgery</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Osteogenesis, Distraction - instrumentation</subject><issn>1768-319X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNo1j01Lw0AQhhdBbK3-A5EcvSTu7Ec-bkrxCwqCKHgLk-xs2ZJm425y6L83xXqaed73YWAYuwGeAYf8fpdhP3QYMzFTxouM8-qMLaHIy1RC9b1glzHuOAfFRXnBFqLQotSgl-zhA0fne-ySKVLibWJcHAO2xzDxcSS_pZ6ii4nrkzZg77zF1s1-nMKWwuGKnVvsIl2f5op9PT99rl_TzfvL2_pxkw4CYEzJCFVyqawGBC5RgZDzLmzTVE2uGi4rKhRhcYS549YqMtyiMa002sgVu_u7OwT_M1Ec672LLXUd9uSnWEMptdIC8nJWb0_q1OzJ1ENwewyH-v9r-QsnIlo7</recordid><startdate>201610</startdate><enddate>201610</enddate><creator>Guerreschi, P</creator><creator>Wolber, A</creator><creator>Bennis, Y</creator><creator>Vinchon, M</creator><creator>Martinot-Duquennoy, V</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201610</creationdate><title>Rational use of distraction osteogenesis in craniofacial surgery</title><author>Guerreschi, P ; Wolber, A ; Bennis, Y ; Vinchon, M ; Martinot-Duquennoy, V</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p211t-ed248034f51a103a4123f512fbb9b64b039e74ea7b64b1230ff4ed0faddc3d5d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>fre</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Craniofacial Abnormalities - surgery</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Osteogenesis, Distraction - instrumentation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Guerreschi, P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wolber, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bennis, Y</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vinchon, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Martinot-Duquennoy, V</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Annales de chirurgie plastique et esthétique</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Guerreschi, P</au><au>Wolber, A</au><au>Bennis, Y</au><au>Vinchon, M</au><au>Martinot-Duquennoy, V</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Rational use of distraction osteogenesis in craniofacial surgery</atitle><jtitle>Annales de chirurgie plastique et esthétique</jtitle><addtitle>Ann Chir Plast Esthet</addtitle><date>2016-10</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>61</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>764</spage><epage>769</epage><pages>764-769</pages><eissn>1768-319X</eissn><abstract>Distraction osteogenesis, initially developed by Ilizarov for limb, is the tissular extension caused by the progressive space of the osseous pieces following an osteotomy. Distraction is osteogenesic and histogenic. Twenty-five years ago, at the instigation of McCarthy, this technique was used to handle the craniofacial malformations in the various floors of the face : mandibular, mediofacial and cranial. The most wide-spread protocols respect a latency period from 0 to 7 days, a rhythm of distraction from 1 to 2mm a day in 2 at 4 times and a period of consolidation from 4 to 8 weeks. Distraction is the result of the inventiveness of the pioneers then the work to always adapt to the multiple complex clinical situations. The surgeon has to choose between internal or external materials allowing a mono- or multi-vectorial extension, in osseous and/or dental anchoring. The mandibular distraction is very effective for the treatment of the secondary obstructive syndromes in the unilateral or bilateral severe hypomandibular malformations. She also allows desobstruction of the superior airways within the framework of the mediofacial hypoplasies as well as the secondary treatment of the growth defects in cleft lips and palates. Finally, the distraction osteogenesis enhanced reliability of the fronto-facial advancement in early and secondary treatment of craniofaciosynostosis. This is a real support of the facial growth, which has to be included in a plan of global treatment.</abstract><cop>France</cop><pmid>27528515</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.anplas.2016.07.009</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | EISSN: 1768-319X |
ispartof | Annales de chirurgie plastique et esthétique, 2016-10, Vol.61 (5), p.764-769 |
issn | 1768-319X |
language | fre |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1835452168 |
source | ScienceDirect Freedom Collection |
subjects | Craniofacial Abnormalities - surgery Humans Osteogenesis, Distraction - instrumentation |
title | Rational use of distraction osteogenesis in craniofacial surgery |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T15%3A38%3A19IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Rational%20use%20of%20distraction%20osteogenesis%20in%20craniofacial%20surgery&rft.jtitle=Annales%20de%20chirurgie%20plastique%20et%20esth%C3%A9tique&rft.au=Guerreschi,%20P&rft.date=2016-10&rft.volume=61&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=764&rft.epage=769&rft.pages=764-769&rft.eissn=1768-319X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.anplas.2016.07.009&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E1835452168%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p211t-ed248034f51a103a4123f512fbb9b64b039e74ea7b64b1230ff4ed0faddc3d5d3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1835452168&rft_id=info:pmid/27528515&rfr_iscdi=true |