Loading…

Spine Injuries Sustained by U.S. Military Personnel in Combat are Different From Non-Combat Spine Injuries

Spine injuries are more prevalent among Iraq and Afghanistan veterans than among veterans of previous conflicts. The purpose of this investigation was to characterize the context, mode, and clinical outcomes of spine injuries sustained by U.S. military personnel in theater. Injury and clinical data...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Military medicine 2016-10, Vol.181 (10), p.1314-1323
Main Authors: Szuflita, Nicholas S, Neal, Chris J, Rosner, Michael K, Frankowski, Ralph F, Grossman, Robert G
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-24de8d22b9fae84d96a00eb09e471998550d5b7ed40c3d13171dcf3750ba6aa73
cites
container_end_page 1323
container_issue 10
container_start_page 1314
container_title Military medicine
container_volume 181
creator Szuflita, Nicholas S
Neal, Chris J
Rosner, Michael K
Frankowski, Ralph F
Grossman, Robert G
description Spine injuries are more prevalent among Iraq and Afghanistan veterans than among veterans of previous conflicts. The purpose of this investigation was to characterize the context, mode, and clinical outcomes of spine injuries sustained by U.S. military personnel in theater. Injury and clinical data from patients who sustained a spine injury in Iraq or Afghanistan between 2003 and 2008 were extracted from the Joint Theater Trauma Registry. Fischer's exact test was used to compare demographic variables between battle and nonbattle spine injuries. Two-sided t tests and univariate analyses were performed to analyze the association between injury context, mechanism, and severity with clinical outcome. A total of 307 patients sustained spine injuries in theater during the study period, and 296 had adequate data for analysis. Most injuries occurred in battle (69.6%), and these injuries were more likely to have an Injury Severity Score considered severe (44.7% vs. 20.0%; p < 0.001) or critical (13.6% vs. 5.6%; p = 0.0458). Blast was the most common mechanism of injury (42.2%) and was more likely to be blunt (81.6%) than penetrating (18.4%; p < 0.0001). Battle-associated spine injuries were most commonly caused by blasts, were more severe, and more likely to involve multiple spinal levels.
doi_str_mv 10.7205/MILMED-D-15-00332
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1835453467</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>4210303411</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-24de8d22b9fae84d96a00eb09e471998550d5b7ed40c3d13171dcf3750ba6aa73</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkUFr4zAQhcWypc2m_QF7WQR76UXpSLIs-7gkzTaQtIW00JuQrTE42HJWsg_593WabGH3NDDzvcfwHiHfOcy0AHW3Wa039wu2YFwxACnFFzLhuQSWcvn2lUwARMoS0OqKfItxB8CTPOOX5EporaTSMCG77b72SFd-N4QaI90OsbfjxtHiQF9n2xnd1E3d23Cgzxhi5z02tPZ03rWF7akNSBd1VWFA39Nl6Fr62Hl2vv7rfU0uKttEvDnPKXld3r_MH9j66fdq_mvNSqlFz0TiMHNCFHllMUtcnloALCDHRPM8z5QCpwqNLoFSOi655q6spFZQ2NRaLafk9uS7D92fAWNv2jqW2DTWYzdEwzOpEiWT9Ij-_A_ddUPw43cjJXQKMlNipPiJKkMXY8DK7EPdjpEYDuZYhDkVYRaGK_NRxKj5cXYeihbdp-Jv8vId5V6DEQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1827603852</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Spine Injuries Sustained by U.S. Military Personnel in Combat are Different From Non-Combat Spine Injuries</title><source>Oxford Journals Online</source><creator>Szuflita, Nicholas S ; Neal, Chris J ; Rosner, Michael K ; Frankowski, Ralph F ; Grossman, Robert G</creator><creatorcontrib>Szuflita, Nicholas S ; Neal, Chris J ; Rosner, Michael K ; Frankowski, Ralph F ; Grossman, Robert G</creatorcontrib><description>Spine injuries are more prevalent among Iraq and Afghanistan veterans than among veterans of previous conflicts. The purpose of this investigation was to characterize the context, mode, and clinical outcomes of spine injuries sustained by U.S. military personnel in theater. Injury and clinical data from patients who sustained a spine injury in Iraq or Afghanistan between 2003 and 2008 were extracted from the Joint Theater Trauma Registry. Fischer's exact test was used to compare demographic variables between battle and nonbattle spine injuries. Two-sided t tests and univariate analyses were performed to analyze the association between injury context, mechanism, and severity with clinical outcome. A total of 307 patients sustained spine injuries in theater during the study period, and 296 had adequate data for analysis. Most injuries occurred in battle (69.6%), and these injuries were more likely to have an Injury Severity Score considered severe (44.7% vs. 20.0%; p &lt; 0.001) or critical (13.6% vs. 5.6%; p = 0.0458). Blast was the most common mechanism of injury (42.2%) and was more likely to be blunt (81.6%) than penetrating (18.4%; p &lt; 0.0001). Battle-associated spine injuries were most commonly caused by blasts, were more severe, and more likely to involve multiple spinal levels.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0026-4075</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1930-613X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.7205/MILMED-D-15-00332</identifier><identifier>PMID: 27753570</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Oxford University Press</publisher><subject>Adult ; Cohort Studies ; Female ; Humans ; Injury Severity Score ; Male ; Mechanics ; Military Medicine - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Military Medicine - trends ; Military Personnel - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Prevalence ; Registries ; Retrospective Studies ; Spinal Injuries - classification ; Spinal Injuries - etiology ; Wounds and Injuries - epidemiology</subject><ispartof>Military medicine, 2016-10, Vol.181 (10), p.1314-1323</ispartof><rights>Reprint &amp; Copyright © 2016 Association of Military Surgeons of the U.S.</rights><rights>Copyright Association of Military Surgeons of the United States Oct 2016</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-24de8d22b9fae84d96a00eb09e471998550d5b7ed40c3d13171dcf3750ba6aa73</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27753570$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Szuflita, Nicholas S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Neal, Chris J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rosner, Michael K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Frankowski, Ralph F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grossman, Robert G</creatorcontrib><title>Spine Injuries Sustained by U.S. Military Personnel in Combat are Different From Non-Combat Spine Injuries</title><title>Military medicine</title><addtitle>Mil Med</addtitle><description>Spine injuries are more prevalent among Iraq and Afghanistan veterans than among veterans of previous conflicts. The purpose of this investigation was to characterize the context, mode, and clinical outcomes of spine injuries sustained by U.S. military personnel in theater. Injury and clinical data from patients who sustained a spine injury in Iraq or Afghanistan between 2003 and 2008 were extracted from the Joint Theater Trauma Registry. Fischer's exact test was used to compare demographic variables between battle and nonbattle spine injuries. Two-sided t tests and univariate analyses were performed to analyze the association between injury context, mechanism, and severity with clinical outcome. A total of 307 patients sustained spine injuries in theater during the study period, and 296 had adequate data for analysis. Most injuries occurred in battle (69.6%), and these injuries were more likely to have an Injury Severity Score considered severe (44.7% vs. 20.0%; p &lt; 0.001) or critical (13.6% vs. 5.6%; p = 0.0458). Blast was the most common mechanism of injury (42.2%) and was more likely to be blunt (81.6%) than penetrating (18.4%; p &lt; 0.0001). Battle-associated spine injuries were most commonly caused by blasts, were more severe, and more likely to involve multiple spinal levels.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Cohort Studies</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Injury Severity Score</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Mechanics</subject><subject>Military Medicine - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Military Medicine - trends</subject><subject>Military Personnel - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Prevalence</subject><subject>Registries</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Spinal Injuries - classification</subject><subject>Spinal Injuries - etiology</subject><subject>Wounds and Injuries - epidemiology</subject><issn>0026-4075</issn><issn>1930-613X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpdkUFr4zAQhcWypc2m_QF7WQR76UXpSLIs-7gkzTaQtIW00JuQrTE42HJWsg_593WabGH3NDDzvcfwHiHfOcy0AHW3Wa039wu2YFwxACnFFzLhuQSWcvn2lUwARMoS0OqKfItxB8CTPOOX5EporaTSMCG77b72SFd-N4QaI90OsbfjxtHiQF9n2xnd1E3d23Cgzxhi5z02tPZ03rWF7akNSBd1VWFA39Nl6Fr62Hl2vv7rfU0uKttEvDnPKXld3r_MH9j66fdq_mvNSqlFz0TiMHNCFHllMUtcnloALCDHRPM8z5QCpwqNLoFSOi655q6spFZQ2NRaLafk9uS7D92fAWNv2jqW2DTWYzdEwzOpEiWT9Ij-_A_ddUPw43cjJXQKMlNipPiJKkMXY8DK7EPdjpEYDuZYhDkVYRaGK_NRxKj5cXYeihbdp-Jv8vId5V6DEQ</recordid><startdate>201610</startdate><enddate>201610</enddate><creator>Szuflita, Nicholas S</creator><creator>Neal, Chris J</creator><creator>Rosner, Michael K</creator><creator>Frankowski, Ralph F</creator><creator>Grossman, Robert G</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>4T-</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88F</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9-</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0R</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M1Q</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201610</creationdate><title>Spine Injuries Sustained by U.S. Military Personnel in Combat are Different From Non-Combat Spine Injuries</title><author>Szuflita, Nicholas S ; Neal, Chris J ; Rosner, Michael K ; Frankowski, Ralph F ; Grossman, Robert G</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-24de8d22b9fae84d96a00eb09e471998550d5b7ed40c3d13171dcf3750ba6aa73</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Cohort Studies</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Injury Severity Score</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Mechanics</topic><topic>Military Medicine - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Military Medicine - trends</topic><topic>Military Personnel - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Prevalence</topic><topic>Registries</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Spinal Injuries - classification</topic><topic>Spinal Injuries - etiology</topic><topic>Wounds and Injuries - epidemiology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Szuflita, Nicholas S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Neal, Chris J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rosner, Michael K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Frankowski, Ralph F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grossman, Robert G</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Docstoc</collection><collection>ProQuest Nursing and Allied Health Journals</collection><collection>ProQuest Health and Medical</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Military Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>eLibrary</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Family Health Database (Proquest)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Military Database (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest Science Journals</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Military medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Szuflita, Nicholas S</au><au>Neal, Chris J</au><au>Rosner, Michael K</au><au>Frankowski, Ralph F</au><au>Grossman, Robert G</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Spine Injuries Sustained by U.S. Military Personnel in Combat are Different From Non-Combat Spine Injuries</atitle><jtitle>Military medicine</jtitle><addtitle>Mil Med</addtitle><date>2016-10</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>181</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>1314</spage><epage>1323</epage><pages>1314-1323</pages><issn>0026-4075</issn><eissn>1930-613X</eissn><abstract>Spine injuries are more prevalent among Iraq and Afghanistan veterans than among veterans of previous conflicts. The purpose of this investigation was to characterize the context, mode, and clinical outcomes of spine injuries sustained by U.S. military personnel in theater. Injury and clinical data from patients who sustained a spine injury in Iraq or Afghanistan between 2003 and 2008 were extracted from the Joint Theater Trauma Registry. Fischer's exact test was used to compare demographic variables between battle and nonbattle spine injuries. Two-sided t tests and univariate analyses were performed to analyze the association between injury context, mechanism, and severity with clinical outcome. A total of 307 patients sustained spine injuries in theater during the study period, and 296 had adequate data for analysis. Most injuries occurred in battle (69.6%), and these injuries were more likely to have an Injury Severity Score considered severe (44.7% vs. 20.0%; p &lt; 0.001) or critical (13.6% vs. 5.6%; p = 0.0458). Blast was the most common mechanism of injury (42.2%) and was more likely to be blunt (81.6%) than penetrating (18.4%; p &lt; 0.0001). Battle-associated spine injuries were most commonly caused by blasts, were more severe, and more likely to involve multiple spinal levels.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><pmid>27753570</pmid><doi>10.7205/MILMED-D-15-00332</doi><tpages>10</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0026-4075
ispartof Military medicine, 2016-10, Vol.181 (10), p.1314-1323
issn 0026-4075
1930-613X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1835453467
source Oxford Journals Online
subjects Adult
Cohort Studies
Female
Humans
Injury Severity Score
Male
Mechanics
Military Medicine - statistics & numerical data
Military Medicine - trends
Military Personnel - statistics & numerical data
Prevalence
Registries
Retrospective Studies
Spinal Injuries - classification
Spinal Injuries - etiology
Wounds and Injuries - epidemiology
title Spine Injuries Sustained by U.S. Military Personnel in Combat are Different From Non-Combat Spine Injuries
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-01T11%3A08%3A22IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Spine%20Injuries%20Sustained%20by%20U.S.%20Military%20Personnel%20in%20Combat%20are%20Different%20From%20Non-Combat%20Spine%20Injuries&rft.jtitle=Military%20medicine&rft.au=Szuflita,%20Nicholas%20S&rft.date=2016-10&rft.volume=181&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=1314&rft.epage=1323&rft.pages=1314-1323&rft.issn=0026-4075&rft.eissn=1930-613X&rft_id=info:doi/10.7205/MILMED-D-15-00332&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E4210303411%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-24de8d22b9fae84d96a00eb09e471998550d5b7ed40c3d13171dcf3750ba6aa73%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1827603852&rft_id=info:pmid/27753570&rfr_iscdi=true