Loading…
Spine Injuries Sustained by U.S. Military Personnel in Combat are Different From Non-Combat Spine Injuries
Spine injuries are more prevalent among Iraq and Afghanistan veterans than among veterans of previous conflicts. The purpose of this investigation was to characterize the context, mode, and clinical outcomes of spine injuries sustained by U.S. military personnel in theater. Injury and clinical data...
Saved in:
Published in: | Military medicine 2016-10, Vol.181 (10), p.1314-1323 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-24de8d22b9fae84d96a00eb09e471998550d5b7ed40c3d13171dcf3750ba6aa73 |
---|---|
cites | |
container_end_page | 1323 |
container_issue | 10 |
container_start_page | 1314 |
container_title | Military medicine |
container_volume | 181 |
creator | Szuflita, Nicholas S Neal, Chris J Rosner, Michael K Frankowski, Ralph F Grossman, Robert G |
description | Spine injuries are more prevalent among Iraq and Afghanistan veterans than among veterans of previous conflicts. The purpose of this investigation was to characterize the context, mode, and clinical outcomes of spine injuries sustained by U.S. military personnel in theater. Injury and clinical data from patients who sustained a spine injury in Iraq or Afghanistan between 2003 and 2008 were extracted from the Joint Theater Trauma Registry. Fischer's exact test was used to compare demographic variables between battle and nonbattle spine injuries. Two-sided t tests and univariate analyses were performed to analyze the association between injury context, mechanism, and severity with clinical outcome. A total of 307 patients sustained spine injuries in theater during the study period, and 296 had adequate data for analysis. Most injuries occurred in battle (69.6%), and these injuries were more likely to have an Injury Severity Score considered severe (44.7% vs. 20.0%; p < 0.001) or critical (13.6% vs. 5.6%; p = 0.0458). Blast was the most common mechanism of injury (42.2%) and was more likely to be blunt (81.6%) than penetrating (18.4%; p < 0.0001). Battle-associated spine injuries were most commonly caused by blasts, were more severe, and more likely to involve multiple spinal levels. |
doi_str_mv | 10.7205/MILMED-D-15-00332 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1835453467</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>4210303411</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-24de8d22b9fae84d96a00eb09e471998550d5b7ed40c3d13171dcf3750ba6aa73</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkUFr4zAQhcWypc2m_QF7WQR76UXpSLIs-7gkzTaQtIW00JuQrTE42HJWsg_593WabGH3NDDzvcfwHiHfOcy0AHW3Wa039wu2YFwxACnFFzLhuQSWcvn2lUwARMoS0OqKfItxB8CTPOOX5EporaTSMCG77b72SFd-N4QaI90OsbfjxtHiQF9n2xnd1E3d23Cgzxhi5z02tPZ03rWF7akNSBd1VWFA39Nl6Fr62Hl2vv7rfU0uKttEvDnPKXld3r_MH9j66fdq_mvNSqlFz0TiMHNCFHllMUtcnloALCDHRPM8z5QCpwqNLoFSOi655q6spFZQ2NRaLafk9uS7D92fAWNv2jqW2DTWYzdEwzOpEiWT9Ij-_A_ddUPw43cjJXQKMlNipPiJKkMXY8DK7EPdjpEYDuZYhDkVYRaGK_NRxKj5cXYeihbdp-Jv8vId5V6DEQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1827603852</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Spine Injuries Sustained by U.S. Military Personnel in Combat are Different From Non-Combat Spine Injuries</title><source>Oxford Journals Online</source><creator>Szuflita, Nicholas S ; Neal, Chris J ; Rosner, Michael K ; Frankowski, Ralph F ; Grossman, Robert G</creator><creatorcontrib>Szuflita, Nicholas S ; Neal, Chris J ; Rosner, Michael K ; Frankowski, Ralph F ; Grossman, Robert G</creatorcontrib><description>Spine injuries are more prevalent among Iraq and Afghanistan veterans than among veterans of previous conflicts. The purpose of this investigation was to characterize the context, mode, and clinical outcomes of spine injuries sustained by U.S. military personnel in theater. Injury and clinical data from patients who sustained a spine injury in Iraq or Afghanistan between 2003 and 2008 were extracted from the Joint Theater Trauma Registry. Fischer's exact test was used to compare demographic variables between battle and nonbattle spine injuries. Two-sided t tests and univariate analyses were performed to analyze the association between injury context, mechanism, and severity with clinical outcome. A total of 307 patients sustained spine injuries in theater during the study period, and 296 had adequate data for analysis. Most injuries occurred in battle (69.6%), and these injuries were more likely to have an Injury Severity Score considered severe (44.7% vs. 20.0%; p < 0.001) or critical (13.6% vs. 5.6%; p = 0.0458). Blast was the most common mechanism of injury (42.2%) and was more likely to be blunt (81.6%) than penetrating (18.4%; p < 0.0001). Battle-associated spine injuries were most commonly caused by blasts, were more severe, and more likely to involve multiple spinal levels.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0026-4075</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1930-613X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.7205/MILMED-D-15-00332</identifier><identifier>PMID: 27753570</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Oxford University Press</publisher><subject>Adult ; Cohort Studies ; Female ; Humans ; Injury Severity Score ; Male ; Mechanics ; Military Medicine - statistics & numerical data ; Military Medicine - trends ; Military Personnel - statistics & numerical data ; Prevalence ; Registries ; Retrospective Studies ; Spinal Injuries - classification ; Spinal Injuries - etiology ; Wounds and Injuries - epidemiology</subject><ispartof>Military medicine, 2016-10, Vol.181 (10), p.1314-1323</ispartof><rights>Reprint & Copyright © 2016 Association of Military Surgeons of the U.S.</rights><rights>Copyright Association of Military Surgeons of the United States Oct 2016</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-24de8d22b9fae84d96a00eb09e471998550d5b7ed40c3d13171dcf3750ba6aa73</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27753570$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Szuflita, Nicholas S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Neal, Chris J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rosner, Michael K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Frankowski, Ralph F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grossman, Robert G</creatorcontrib><title>Spine Injuries Sustained by U.S. Military Personnel in Combat are Different From Non-Combat Spine Injuries</title><title>Military medicine</title><addtitle>Mil Med</addtitle><description>Spine injuries are more prevalent among Iraq and Afghanistan veterans than among veterans of previous conflicts. The purpose of this investigation was to characterize the context, mode, and clinical outcomes of spine injuries sustained by U.S. military personnel in theater. Injury and clinical data from patients who sustained a spine injury in Iraq or Afghanistan between 2003 and 2008 were extracted from the Joint Theater Trauma Registry. Fischer's exact test was used to compare demographic variables between battle and nonbattle spine injuries. Two-sided t tests and univariate analyses were performed to analyze the association between injury context, mechanism, and severity with clinical outcome. A total of 307 patients sustained spine injuries in theater during the study period, and 296 had adequate data for analysis. Most injuries occurred in battle (69.6%), and these injuries were more likely to have an Injury Severity Score considered severe (44.7% vs. 20.0%; p < 0.001) or critical (13.6% vs. 5.6%; p = 0.0458). Blast was the most common mechanism of injury (42.2%) and was more likely to be blunt (81.6%) than penetrating (18.4%; p < 0.0001). Battle-associated spine injuries were most commonly caused by blasts, were more severe, and more likely to involve multiple spinal levels.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Cohort Studies</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Injury Severity Score</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Mechanics</subject><subject>Military Medicine - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Military Medicine - trends</subject><subject>Military Personnel - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Prevalence</subject><subject>Registries</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Spinal Injuries - classification</subject><subject>Spinal Injuries - etiology</subject><subject>Wounds and Injuries - epidemiology</subject><issn>0026-4075</issn><issn>1930-613X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpdkUFr4zAQhcWypc2m_QF7WQR76UXpSLIs-7gkzTaQtIW00JuQrTE42HJWsg_593WabGH3NDDzvcfwHiHfOcy0AHW3Wa039wu2YFwxACnFFzLhuQSWcvn2lUwARMoS0OqKfItxB8CTPOOX5EporaTSMCG77b72SFd-N4QaI90OsbfjxtHiQF9n2xnd1E3d23Cgzxhi5z02tPZ03rWF7akNSBd1VWFA39Nl6Fr62Hl2vv7rfU0uKttEvDnPKXld3r_MH9j66fdq_mvNSqlFz0TiMHNCFHllMUtcnloALCDHRPM8z5QCpwqNLoFSOi655q6spFZQ2NRaLafk9uS7D92fAWNv2jqW2DTWYzdEwzOpEiWT9Ij-_A_ddUPw43cjJXQKMlNipPiJKkMXY8DK7EPdjpEYDuZYhDkVYRaGK_NRxKj5cXYeihbdp-Jv8vId5V6DEQ</recordid><startdate>201610</startdate><enddate>201610</enddate><creator>Szuflita, Nicholas S</creator><creator>Neal, Chris J</creator><creator>Rosner, Michael K</creator><creator>Frankowski, Ralph F</creator><creator>Grossman, Robert G</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>4T-</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88F</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9-</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0R</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M1Q</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201610</creationdate><title>Spine Injuries Sustained by U.S. Military Personnel in Combat are Different From Non-Combat Spine Injuries</title><author>Szuflita, Nicholas S ; Neal, Chris J ; Rosner, Michael K ; Frankowski, Ralph F ; Grossman, Robert G</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-24de8d22b9fae84d96a00eb09e471998550d5b7ed40c3d13171dcf3750ba6aa73</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Cohort Studies</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Injury Severity Score</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Mechanics</topic><topic>Military Medicine - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Military Medicine - trends</topic><topic>Military Personnel - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Prevalence</topic><topic>Registries</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Spinal Injuries - classification</topic><topic>Spinal Injuries - etiology</topic><topic>Wounds and Injuries - epidemiology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Szuflita, Nicholas S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Neal, Chris J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rosner, Michael K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Frankowski, Ralph F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grossman, Robert G</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Docstoc</collection><collection>ProQuest Nursing and Allied Health Journals</collection><collection>ProQuest Health and Medical</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Military Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>eLibrary</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Family Health Database (Proquest)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Military Database (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest Science Journals</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Military medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Szuflita, Nicholas S</au><au>Neal, Chris J</au><au>Rosner, Michael K</au><au>Frankowski, Ralph F</au><au>Grossman, Robert G</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Spine Injuries Sustained by U.S. Military Personnel in Combat are Different From Non-Combat Spine Injuries</atitle><jtitle>Military medicine</jtitle><addtitle>Mil Med</addtitle><date>2016-10</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>181</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>1314</spage><epage>1323</epage><pages>1314-1323</pages><issn>0026-4075</issn><eissn>1930-613X</eissn><abstract>Spine injuries are more prevalent among Iraq and Afghanistan veterans than among veterans of previous conflicts. The purpose of this investigation was to characterize the context, mode, and clinical outcomes of spine injuries sustained by U.S. military personnel in theater. Injury and clinical data from patients who sustained a spine injury in Iraq or Afghanistan between 2003 and 2008 were extracted from the Joint Theater Trauma Registry. Fischer's exact test was used to compare demographic variables between battle and nonbattle spine injuries. Two-sided t tests and univariate analyses were performed to analyze the association between injury context, mechanism, and severity with clinical outcome. A total of 307 patients sustained spine injuries in theater during the study period, and 296 had adequate data for analysis. Most injuries occurred in battle (69.6%), and these injuries were more likely to have an Injury Severity Score considered severe (44.7% vs. 20.0%; p < 0.001) or critical (13.6% vs. 5.6%; p = 0.0458). Blast was the most common mechanism of injury (42.2%) and was more likely to be blunt (81.6%) than penetrating (18.4%; p < 0.0001). Battle-associated spine injuries were most commonly caused by blasts, were more severe, and more likely to involve multiple spinal levels.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><pmid>27753570</pmid><doi>10.7205/MILMED-D-15-00332</doi><tpages>10</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0026-4075 |
ispartof | Military medicine, 2016-10, Vol.181 (10), p.1314-1323 |
issn | 0026-4075 1930-613X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1835453467 |
source | Oxford Journals Online |
subjects | Adult Cohort Studies Female Humans Injury Severity Score Male Mechanics Military Medicine - statistics & numerical data Military Medicine - trends Military Personnel - statistics & numerical data Prevalence Registries Retrospective Studies Spinal Injuries - classification Spinal Injuries - etiology Wounds and Injuries - epidemiology |
title | Spine Injuries Sustained by U.S. Military Personnel in Combat are Different From Non-Combat Spine Injuries |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-01T11%3A08%3A22IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Spine%20Injuries%20Sustained%20by%20U.S.%20Military%20Personnel%20in%20Combat%20are%20Different%20From%20Non-Combat%20Spine%20Injuries&rft.jtitle=Military%20medicine&rft.au=Szuflita,%20Nicholas%20S&rft.date=2016-10&rft.volume=181&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=1314&rft.epage=1323&rft.pages=1314-1323&rft.issn=0026-4075&rft.eissn=1930-613X&rft_id=info:doi/10.7205/MILMED-D-15-00332&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E4210303411%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-24de8d22b9fae84d96a00eb09e471998550d5b7ed40c3d13171dcf3750ba6aa73%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1827603852&rft_id=info:pmid/27753570&rfr_iscdi=true |