Loading…

Optical frequency domain imaging vs. intravascular ultrasound in percutaneous coronary intervention (OPINION trial): Study protocol for a randomized controlled trial

Abstract Background Optical coherence tomography is becoming increasingly widespread as an adjunctive intravascular diagnostic technique in percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), because of its ability to visualize coronary structures at high resolution. Several studies have reported that intrava...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of cardiology 2016-11, Vol.68 (5), p.455-460
Main Authors: Kubo, Takashi, MD, PhD, FJCC, Shinke, Toshiro, MD, PhD, FJCC, Okamura, Takayuki, MD, PhD, Hibi, Kiyoshi, MD, PhD, FJCC, Nakazawa, Gaku, MD, PhD, Morino, Yoshihiro, MD, PhD, Shite, Junya, MD, PhD, FJCC, Fusazaki, Tetsuya, MD, PhD, Otake, Hiromasa, MD, PhD, Kozuma, Ken, MD, PhD, Akasaka, Takashi, MD, PhD, FJCC
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c545t-637b58b46f9fa6575a0cb70ddf1677a5ea226980135f76af7f90f686b72d253f3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c545t-637b58b46f9fa6575a0cb70ddf1677a5ea226980135f76af7f90f686b72d253f3
container_end_page 460
container_issue 5
container_start_page 455
container_title Journal of cardiology
container_volume 68
creator Kubo, Takashi, MD, PhD, FJCC
Shinke, Toshiro, MD, PhD, FJCC
Okamura, Takayuki, MD, PhD
Hibi, Kiyoshi, MD, PhD, FJCC
Nakazawa, Gaku, MD, PhD
Morino, Yoshihiro, MD, PhD
Shite, Junya, MD, PhD, FJCC
Fusazaki, Tetsuya, MD, PhD
Otake, Hiromasa, MD, PhD
Kozuma, Ken, MD, PhD
Akasaka, Takashi, MD, PhD, FJCC
description Abstract Background Optical coherence tomography is becoming increasingly widespread as an adjunctive intravascular diagnostic technique in percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), because of its ability to visualize coronary structures at high resolution. Several studies have reported that intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) guidance in PCI might be helpful to reduce subsequent stent thrombosis, restenosis, repeat revascularization, myocardial infarction, and cardiac death. The OPtical frequency domain imaging vs. INtravascular ultrasound in percutaneous coronary InterventiON (OPINION) trial is aimed at evaluating the impact of optical frequency domain imaging (OFDI) guidance in PCI on clinical outcomes compared with IVUS guidance. Methods and design The OPINION trial is a multicenter, prospective, randomized, controlled, open-label, parallel group, non-inferiority trial in Japan. The eligible patients are randomly assigned to receive either OFDI-guided PCI or IVUS-guided PCI. PCI is performed using the biolimus-eluting stent in accordance with a certain criteria of OFDI and IVUS for optimal stent deployment. All patients will undergo a follow-up angiography at 8 months. The primary endpoint is target vessel failure composed of cardiac death, myocardial infarction attributed to the target vessel, and clinically-driven target vessel revascularization at 12 months. Conclusion When completed, the OPINION trial will contribute to define the clinical value of the OFDI guidance in PCI.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.jjcc.2015.11.007
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1835453784</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>1_s2_0_S0914508715003731</els_id><sourcerecordid>1835453784</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c545t-637b58b46f9fa6575a0cb70ddf1677a5ea226980135f76af7f90f686b72d253f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9Ustu1DAUjRCIDoUfYIG8LIsEO47tBCEkVFEYqeogFdaW40fl4LEH2xkp_A__idMpLFiwsi2fx7333Kp6iWCDIKJvpmaapGxaiEiDUAMhe1RtUM9o3THcP642cEBdTWDPzqpnKU0QUjj09Gl11lJGMYVkU_3aHbKVwgET9Y9Ze7kAFfbCemD34s76O3BMDbA-R3EUSc5ORDC78kph9qp8gIOOcs7C6zAnIEMMXsRlZeh41D7b4MHF7sv2Zru7ATla4V6_Bbd5Vgs4xJCDDMU7RCBAFL5Y259aFZliGJwr13vK8-qJES7pFw_nefXt6uPXy8_19e7T9vLDdS1JR3JNMRtJP3bUDEZQwoiAcmRQKYMoY4Jo0bZ06CHCxDAqDDMDNLSnI2tVS7DB59XFSbeUVqaRMt_bJLVzp_Y46nExwqzvCrQ9QWUMKUVt-CGWkcWFI8jXePjE13j4Gg9HiJd4CunVg_487rX6S_mTRwG8OwF06fJodeRJ2pKKVjZqmbkK9v_67_-hS2f9mu93veg0hTn6Mj-OeGo55Lfrgqz7gQiEmGGEfwNbS7mP</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1835453784</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Optical frequency domain imaging vs. intravascular ultrasound in percutaneous coronary intervention (OPINION trial): Study protocol for a randomized controlled trial</title><source>ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Kubo, Takashi, MD, PhD, FJCC ; Shinke, Toshiro, MD, PhD, FJCC ; Okamura, Takayuki, MD, PhD ; Hibi, Kiyoshi, MD, PhD, FJCC ; Nakazawa, Gaku, MD, PhD ; Morino, Yoshihiro, MD, PhD ; Shite, Junya, MD, PhD, FJCC ; Fusazaki, Tetsuya, MD, PhD ; Otake, Hiromasa, MD, PhD ; Kozuma, Ken, MD, PhD ; Akasaka, Takashi, MD, PhD, FJCC</creator><creatorcontrib>Kubo, Takashi, MD, PhD, FJCC ; Shinke, Toshiro, MD, PhD, FJCC ; Okamura, Takayuki, MD, PhD ; Hibi, Kiyoshi, MD, PhD, FJCC ; Nakazawa, Gaku, MD, PhD ; Morino, Yoshihiro, MD, PhD ; Shite, Junya, MD, PhD, FJCC ; Fusazaki, Tetsuya, MD, PhD ; Otake, Hiromasa, MD, PhD ; Kozuma, Ken, MD, PhD ; Akasaka, Takashi, MD, PhD, FJCC</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract Background Optical coherence tomography is becoming increasingly widespread as an adjunctive intravascular diagnostic technique in percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), because of its ability to visualize coronary structures at high resolution. Several studies have reported that intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) guidance in PCI might be helpful to reduce subsequent stent thrombosis, restenosis, repeat revascularization, myocardial infarction, and cardiac death. The OPtical frequency domain imaging vs. INtravascular ultrasound in percutaneous coronary InterventiON (OPINION) trial is aimed at evaluating the impact of optical frequency domain imaging (OFDI) guidance in PCI on clinical outcomes compared with IVUS guidance. Methods and design The OPINION trial is a multicenter, prospective, randomized, controlled, open-label, parallel group, non-inferiority trial in Japan. The eligible patients are randomly assigned to receive either OFDI-guided PCI or IVUS-guided PCI. PCI is performed using the biolimus-eluting stent in accordance with a certain criteria of OFDI and IVUS for optimal stent deployment. All patients will undergo a follow-up angiography at 8 months. The primary endpoint is target vessel failure composed of cardiac death, myocardial infarction attributed to the target vessel, and clinically-driven target vessel revascularization at 12 months. Conclusion When completed, the OPINION trial will contribute to define the clinical value of the OFDI guidance in PCI.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0914-5087</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1876-4738</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jjcc.2015.11.007</identifier><identifier>PMID: 26763605</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Netherlands: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Cardiovascular ; Coronary artery disease ; Coronary Artery Disease - therapy ; Drug-eluting stent ; Drug-Eluting Stents ; Female ; Humans ; Intravascular ultrasound ; Japan ; Male ; Optical coherence tomography ; Percutaneous coronary intervention ; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention - methods ; Prospective Studies ; Tomography, Optical Coherence ; Ultrasonography, Interventional</subject><ispartof>Journal of cardiology, 2016-11, Vol.68 (5), p.455-460</ispartof><rights>Japanese College of Cardiology</rights><rights>2015 Japanese College of Cardiology</rights><rights>Copyright © 2015 Japanese College of Cardiology. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c545t-637b58b46f9fa6575a0cb70ddf1677a5ea226980135f76af7f90f686b72d253f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c545t-637b58b46f9fa6575a0cb70ddf1677a5ea226980135f76af7f90f686b72d253f3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26763605$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kubo, Takashi, MD, PhD, FJCC</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shinke, Toshiro, MD, PhD, FJCC</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Okamura, Takayuki, MD, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hibi, Kiyoshi, MD, PhD, FJCC</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nakazawa, Gaku, MD, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Morino, Yoshihiro, MD, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shite, Junya, MD, PhD, FJCC</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fusazaki, Tetsuya, MD, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Otake, Hiromasa, MD, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kozuma, Ken, MD, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Akasaka, Takashi, MD, PhD, FJCC</creatorcontrib><title>Optical frequency domain imaging vs. intravascular ultrasound in percutaneous coronary intervention (OPINION trial): Study protocol for a randomized controlled trial</title><title>Journal of cardiology</title><addtitle>J Cardiol</addtitle><description>Abstract Background Optical coherence tomography is becoming increasingly widespread as an adjunctive intravascular diagnostic technique in percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), because of its ability to visualize coronary structures at high resolution. Several studies have reported that intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) guidance in PCI might be helpful to reduce subsequent stent thrombosis, restenosis, repeat revascularization, myocardial infarction, and cardiac death. The OPtical frequency domain imaging vs. INtravascular ultrasound in percutaneous coronary InterventiON (OPINION) trial is aimed at evaluating the impact of optical frequency domain imaging (OFDI) guidance in PCI on clinical outcomes compared with IVUS guidance. Methods and design The OPINION trial is a multicenter, prospective, randomized, controlled, open-label, parallel group, non-inferiority trial in Japan. The eligible patients are randomly assigned to receive either OFDI-guided PCI or IVUS-guided PCI. PCI is performed using the biolimus-eluting stent in accordance with a certain criteria of OFDI and IVUS for optimal stent deployment. All patients will undergo a follow-up angiography at 8 months. The primary endpoint is target vessel failure composed of cardiac death, myocardial infarction attributed to the target vessel, and clinically-driven target vessel revascularization at 12 months. Conclusion When completed, the OPINION trial will contribute to define the clinical value of the OFDI guidance in PCI.</description><subject>Cardiovascular</subject><subject>Coronary artery disease</subject><subject>Coronary Artery Disease - therapy</subject><subject>Drug-eluting stent</subject><subject>Drug-Eluting Stents</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Intravascular ultrasound</subject><subject>Japan</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Optical coherence tomography</subject><subject>Percutaneous coronary intervention</subject><subject>Percutaneous Coronary Intervention - methods</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Tomography, Optical Coherence</subject><subject>Ultrasonography, Interventional</subject><issn>0914-5087</issn><issn>1876-4738</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9Ustu1DAUjRCIDoUfYIG8LIsEO47tBCEkVFEYqeogFdaW40fl4LEH2xkp_A__idMpLFiwsi2fx7333Kp6iWCDIKJvpmaapGxaiEiDUAMhe1RtUM9o3THcP642cEBdTWDPzqpnKU0QUjj09Gl11lJGMYVkU_3aHbKVwgET9Y9Ze7kAFfbCemD34s76O3BMDbA-R3EUSc5ORDC78kph9qp8gIOOcs7C6zAnIEMMXsRlZeh41D7b4MHF7sv2Zru7ATla4V6_Bbd5Vgs4xJCDDMU7RCBAFL5Y259aFZliGJwr13vK8-qJES7pFw_nefXt6uPXy8_19e7T9vLDdS1JR3JNMRtJP3bUDEZQwoiAcmRQKYMoY4Jo0bZ06CHCxDAqDDMDNLSnI2tVS7DB59XFSbeUVqaRMt_bJLVzp_Y46nExwqzvCrQ9QWUMKUVt-CGWkcWFI8jXePjE13j4Gg9HiJd4CunVg_487rX6S_mTRwG8OwF06fJodeRJ2pKKVjZqmbkK9v_67_-hS2f9mu93veg0hTn6Mj-OeGo55Lfrgqz7gQiEmGGEfwNbS7mP</recordid><startdate>20161101</startdate><enddate>20161101</enddate><creator>Kubo, Takashi, MD, PhD, FJCC</creator><creator>Shinke, Toshiro, MD, PhD, FJCC</creator><creator>Okamura, Takayuki, MD, PhD</creator><creator>Hibi, Kiyoshi, MD, PhD, FJCC</creator><creator>Nakazawa, Gaku, MD, PhD</creator><creator>Morino, Yoshihiro, MD, PhD</creator><creator>Shite, Junya, MD, PhD, FJCC</creator><creator>Fusazaki, Tetsuya, MD, PhD</creator><creator>Otake, Hiromasa, MD, PhD</creator><creator>Kozuma, Ken, MD, PhD</creator><creator>Akasaka, Takashi, MD, PhD, FJCC</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20161101</creationdate><title>Optical frequency domain imaging vs. intravascular ultrasound in percutaneous coronary intervention (OPINION trial): Study protocol for a randomized controlled trial</title><author>Kubo, Takashi, MD, PhD, FJCC ; Shinke, Toshiro, MD, PhD, FJCC ; Okamura, Takayuki, MD, PhD ; Hibi, Kiyoshi, MD, PhD, FJCC ; Nakazawa, Gaku, MD, PhD ; Morino, Yoshihiro, MD, PhD ; Shite, Junya, MD, PhD, FJCC ; Fusazaki, Tetsuya, MD, PhD ; Otake, Hiromasa, MD, PhD ; Kozuma, Ken, MD, PhD ; Akasaka, Takashi, MD, PhD, FJCC</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c545t-637b58b46f9fa6575a0cb70ddf1677a5ea226980135f76af7f90f686b72d253f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Cardiovascular</topic><topic>Coronary artery disease</topic><topic>Coronary Artery Disease - therapy</topic><topic>Drug-eluting stent</topic><topic>Drug-Eluting Stents</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Intravascular ultrasound</topic><topic>Japan</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Optical coherence tomography</topic><topic>Percutaneous coronary intervention</topic><topic>Percutaneous Coronary Intervention - methods</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Tomography, Optical Coherence</topic><topic>Ultrasonography, Interventional</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kubo, Takashi, MD, PhD, FJCC</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shinke, Toshiro, MD, PhD, FJCC</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Okamura, Takayuki, MD, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hibi, Kiyoshi, MD, PhD, FJCC</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nakazawa, Gaku, MD, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Morino, Yoshihiro, MD, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shite, Junya, MD, PhD, FJCC</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fusazaki, Tetsuya, MD, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Otake, Hiromasa, MD, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kozuma, Ken, MD, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Akasaka, Takashi, MD, PhD, FJCC</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of cardiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kubo, Takashi, MD, PhD, FJCC</au><au>Shinke, Toshiro, MD, PhD, FJCC</au><au>Okamura, Takayuki, MD, PhD</au><au>Hibi, Kiyoshi, MD, PhD, FJCC</au><au>Nakazawa, Gaku, MD, PhD</au><au>Morino, Yoshihiro, MD, PhD</au><au>Shite, Junya, MD, PhD, FJCC</au><au>Fusazaki, Tetsuya, MD, PhD</au><au>Otake, Hiromasa, MD, PhD</au><au>Kozuma, Ken, MD, PhD</au><au>Akasaka, Takashi, MD, PhD, FJCC</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Optical frequency domain imaging vs. intravascular ultrasound in percutaneous coronary intervention (OPINION trial): Study protocol for a randomized controlled trial</atitle><jtitle>Journal of cardiology</jtitle><addtitle>J Cardiol</addtitle><date>2016-11-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>68</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>455</spage><epage>460</epage><pages>455-460</pages><issn>0914-5087</issn><eissn>1876-4738</eissn><abstract>Abstract Background Optical coherence tomography is becoming increasingly widespread as an adjunctive intravascular diagnostic technique in percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), because of its ability to visualize coronary structures at high resolution. Several studies have reported that intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) guidance in PCI might be helpful to reduce subsequent stent thrombosis, restenosis, repeat revascularization, myocardial infarction, and cardiac death. The OPtical frequency domain imaging vs. INtravascular ultrasound in percutaneous coronary InterventiON (OPINION) trial is aimed at evaluating the impact of optical frequency domain imaging (OFDI) guidance in PCI on clinical outcomes compared with IVUS guidance. Methods and design The OPINION trial is a multicenter, prospective, randomized, controlled, open-label, parallel group, non-inferiority trial in Japan. The eligible patients are randomly assigned to receive either OFDI-guided PCI or IVUS-guided PCI. PCI is performed using the biolimus-eluting stent in accordance with a certain criteria of OFDI and IVUS for optimal stent deployment. All patients will undergo a follow-up angiography at 8 months. The primary endpoint is target vessel failure composed of cardiac death, myocardial infarction attributed to the target vessel, and clinically-driven target vessel revascularization at 12 months. Conclusion When completed, the OPINION trial will contribute to define the clinical value of the OFDI guidance in PCI.</abstract><cop>Netherlands</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>26763605</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.jjcc.2015.11.007</doi><tpages>6</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0914-5087
ispartof Journal of cardiology, 2016-11, Vol.68 (5), p.455-460
issn 0914-5087
1876-4738
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1835453784
source ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Cardiovascular
Coronary artery disease
Coronary Artery Disease - therapy
Drug-eluting stent
Drug-Eluting Stents
Female
Humans
Intravascular ultrasound
Japan
Male
Optical coherence tomography
Percutaneous coronary intervention
Percutaneous Coronary Intervention - methods
Prospective Studies
Tomography, Optical Coherence
Ultrasonography, Interventional
title Optical frequency domain imaging vs. intravascular ultrasound in percutaneous coronary intervention (OPINION trial): Study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-05T14%3A56%3A48IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Optical%20frequency%20domain%20imaging%20vs.%20intravascular%20ultrasound%20in%20percutaneous%20coronary%20intervention%20(OPINION%20trial):%20Study%20protocol%20for%20a%20randomized%20controlled%20trial&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20cardiology&rft.au=Kubo,%20Takashi,%20MD,%20PhD,%20FJCC&rft.date=2016-11-01&rft.volume=68&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=455&rft.epage=460&rft.pages=455-460&rft.issn=0914-5087&rft.eissn=1876-4738&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jjcc.2015.11.007&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1835453784%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c545t-637b58b46f9fa6575a0cb70ddf1677a5ea226980135f76af7f90f686b72d253f3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1835453784&rft_id=info:pmid/26763605&rfr_iscdi=true