Real-time safety audits in a neonatal unit

• Published in: Anales de pediatría (Barcelona, Spain : 2003) Spain : 2003), 2017-09, Vol.87 (3), p.148-154
• Main Authors: Bergon-Sendin, Elena, Perez-Grande, María Del Carmen, Lora-Pablos, David, Melgar-Bonis, Ana, Ureta-Velasco, Noelia, Moral-Pumarega, María Teresa, Pallas-Alonso, Carmen Rosa
• Format: Article
• Language: Spanish
• Subjects: Clinical Audit; Computer Systems; Guideline Adherence; Humans; Infant, Newborn; Intensive Care Units, Neonatal - standards; Intensive Care, Neonatal - standards; Patient Safety - standards; Prospective Studies
• ISSN: 1695-9531
• DOI: 10.1016/j.anpedi.2016.08.005

Random audits are a safety tool to help in the prevention of adverse events, but they have not been widely used in hospitals. The aim of the study was to determine, through random safety audits, whether the information and material required for resuscitation were available for each patient in a neonatal intensive care unit and determine if factors related to the patient, time or location affect the implementation of the recommendations. Prospective observational study conducted in a level III-C neonatal intensive care unit during the year 2012. The evaluation of written information on the endotracheal tube, mask and ambu bag prepared of each patient and laryngoscopes of the emergency trolley were included within a broader audit of technological resources and study procedures. The technological resources and procedures were randomly selected twice a week for audit. Appropriate overall use was defined when all evaluated variables were correctly programmed in the same procedure. A total of 296 audits were performed. The kappa coefficient of inter-observer agreement was 0.93. The rate of appropriate overall use of written information and material required for resuscitation was 62.50% (185/296). Mask and ambu bag prepared for each patient was the variable with better compliance (97.3%, P=.001). Significant differences were found with improved usage during weekends versus working-day (73.97 vs. 58.74%, P=.01), and the rest of the year versus 3 quarter (66.06 vs. 52%, P=.02). Only in 62.5% of cases was the information and the material necessary to attend to a critical situation urgently easily available. Opportunities for improvement were identified through the audits.