Loading…

Is sentinel lymph node biopsy a viable alternative to complete axillary dissection following neoadjuvant chemotherapy in women with node-positive breast cancer at diagnosis? An updated meta-analysis involving 3,398 patients

The use of sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) following neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) in patients presenting with clinically positive lymph nodes remains controversial. A computer-aided search of the literature regarding SLNB in clinically node-positive breast cancer treated with NAC was carried out...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:The American journal of surgery 2016-11, Vol.212 (5), p.969-981
Main Authors: El Hage Chehade, Hiba, Headon, Hannah, El Tokhy, Omar, Heeney, Jennifer, Kasem, Abdul, Mokbel, Kefah
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c393t-a54566b7eb4b3591afea2cbb94cfce60fdf53e04c69348be2417c9546c62a46f3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c393t-a54566b7eb4b3591afea2cbb94cfce60fdf53e04c69348be2417c9546c62a46f3
container_end_page 981
container_issue 5
container_start_page 969
container_title The American journal of surgery
container_volume 212
creator El Hage Chehade, Hiba
Headon, Hannah
El Tokhy, Omar
Heeney, Jennifer
Kasem, Abdul
Mokbel, Kefah
description The use of sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) following neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) in patients presenting with clinically positive lymph nodes remains controversial. A computer-aided search of the literature regarding SLNB in clinically node-positive breast cancer treated with NAC was carried out to identify the false negative rate (FNR), sentinel lymph node identification rate (IR), and axillary pathological complete response (pCR). Nineteen articles were used in the analysis yielding 3,398 patients. The pooled estimate of the FNR was 13% and that of the IR was 91%. The adjusted pCR rate was 47%. A trend toward significance was observed with only clinical stage N1 (cN1) disease whereby clinical stage N1 was associated with an increased pCR rate when compared to N2 or N3 disease (P = .06). SLNB after NAC in biopsy-proven node-positive patients results in reasonably acceptable FNR and IR, making it a valid alternative management strategy to axillary dissection. More refined patient selection and optimal techniques can improve the FNR and IR in this patient population. •The pooled estimate of false negative rate was 13%.•The pooled estimate of identification rate was 91%.•The adjusted pathological complete response rate was 47%.•There was a trend toward significance with only cN1 disease.•SLNB post NAC in node-positive patients is a valid alternative strategy to ALND.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2016.07.018
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1835522830</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0002961016304330</els_id><sourcerecordid>1835522830</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c393t-a54566b7eb4b3591afea2cbb94cfce60fdf53e04c69348be2417c9546c62a46f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFUk1v1DAQjRCIlsJPAFniwoEsdpzPU1VVfFSqxAXO1sSZ7Dpy7GA7W_bX8leY7S4cuHCxNZ43b8ZvXpa9FnwjuKg_TBuYp7iG7aagcMObDRftk-xStE2Xi7aVT7NLznmRd7XgF9mLGCcKhSjl8-yiaOpGcFlcZr_uIovoknFomT3My445PyDrjV_igQHbG-gtMrAJg4Nk9siSZ9rPi8VE7z-NtRAObDAxok7GOzZ6a_2DcVvm0MMwrXtwiekdzj7tMMByYMaxBz8jnSadOuaLj-aRvg8IkfDgNAYGiahh6ygbr9mNY-syQMKBzZggBwf2QBki3Hu7P_aU72XXsoVGpW_Fl9mzEWzEV-f7Kvv-6eO32y_5_dfPd7c397mWnUw5VGVV132DfdnLqhMwIhS677tSjxprPg5jJZGXuu5k2fZYlKLRXVXWui6grEd5lb078S7B_1gxJjWbqJG0IQ3WqEQrq6ooWskJ-vYf6ORX0tY-omictuMloaoTSgcfY8BRLcHMpLQSXB0doCZ1doA6OkDxRpEDqO7NmX3tZxz-Vv1ZOQGuTwAkOfYGg4qapNI4mEALVIM3_2nxG2m2yxs</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1833938904</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Is sentinel lymph node biopsy a viable alternative to complete axillary dissection following neoadjuvant chemotherapy in women with node-positive breast cancer at diagnosis? An updated meta-analysis involving 3,398 patients</title><source>ScienceDirect Freedom Collection 2022-2024</source><creator>El Hage Chehade, Hiba ; Headon, Hannah ; El Tokhy, Omar ; Heeney, Jennifer ; Kasem, Abdul ; Mokbel, Kefah</creator><creatorcontrib>El Hage Chehade, Hiba ; Headon, Hannah ; El Tokhy, Omar ; Heeney, Jennifer ; Kasem, Abdul ; Mokbel, Kefah</creatorcontrib><description>The use of sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) following neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) in patients presenting with clinically positive lymph nodes remains controversial. A computer-aided search of the literature regarding SLNB in clinically node-positive breast cancer treated with NAC was carried out to identify the false negative rate (FNR), sentinel lymph node identification rate (IR), and axillary pathological complete response (pCR). Nineteen articles were used in the analysis yielding 3,398 patients. The pooled estimate of the FNR was 13% and that of the IR was 91%. The adjusted pCR rate was 47%. A trend toward significance was observed with only clinical stage N1 (cN1) disease whereby clinical stage N1 was associated with an increased pCR rate when compared to N2 or N3 disease (P = .06). SLNB after NAC in biopsy-proven node-positive patients results in reasonably acceptable FNR and IR, making it a valid alternative management strategy to axillary dissection. More refined patient selection and optimal techniques can improve the FNR and IR in this patient population. •The pooled estimate of false negative rate was 13%.•The pooled estimate of identification rate was 91%.•The adjusted pathological complete response rate was 47%.•There was a trend toward significance with only cN1 disease.•SLNB post NAC in node-positive patients is a valid alternative strategy to ALND.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0002-9610</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-1883</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2016.07.018</identifier><identifier>PMID: 27671032</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; Axilla ; Bias ; Biopsy ; Breast cancer ; Breast Neoplasms - mortality ; Breast Neoplasms - pathology ; Breast Neoplasms - therapy ; Cancer therapies ; Chemotherapy ; False Negative Reactions ; Female ; Humans ; Lymph Node Excision - methods ; Lymph Nodes - pathology ; Lymph Nodes - surgery ; Lymphatic system ; Mastectomy - methods ; Medical prognosis ; Middle Aged ; Neoadjuvant chemotherapy ; Neoadjuvant Therapy - methods ; Neoplasm Invasiveness - pathology ; Neoplasm Staging ; Node positive ; Prognosis ; Risk Assessment ; Sentinel Lymph Node - pathology ; Sentinel lymph node biopsy ; Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy - methods ; Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Statistical analysis ; Studies ; Survival Analysis</subject><ispartof>The American journal of surgery, 2016-11, Vol.212 (5), p.969-981</ispartof><rights>2016 Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Limited Nov 01, 2016</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c393t-a54566b7eb4b3591afea2cbb94cfce60fdf53e04c69348be2417c9546c62a46f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c393t-a54566b7eb4b3591afea2cbb94cfce60fdf53e04c69348be2417c9546c62a46f3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27671032$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>El Hage Chehade, Hiba</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Headon, Hannah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>El Tokhy, Omar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Heeney, Jennifer</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kasem, Abdul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mokbel, Kefah</creatorcontrib><title>Is sentinel lymph node biopsy a viable alternative to complete axillary dissection following neoadjuvant chemotherapy in women with node-positive breast cancer at diagnosis? An updated meta-analysis involving 3,398 patients</title><title>The American journal of surgery</title><addtitle>Am J Surg</addtitle><description>The use of sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) following neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) in patients presenting with clinically positive lymph nodes remains controversial. A computer-aided search of the literature regarding SLNB in clinically node-positive breast cancer treated with NAC was carried out to identify the false negative rate (FNR), sentinel lymph node identification rate (IR), and axillary pathological complete response (pCR). Nineteen articles were used in the analysis yielding 3,398 patients. The pooled estimate of the FNR was 13% and that of the IR was 91%. The adjusted pCR rate was 47%. A trend toward significance was observed with only clinical stage N1 (cN1) disease whereby clinical stage N1 was associated with an increased pCR rate when compared to N2 or N3 disease (P = .06). SLNB after NAC in biopsy-proven node-positive patients results in reasonably acceptable FNR and IR, making it a valid alternative management strategy to axillary dissection. More refined patient selection and optimal techniques can improve the FNR and IR in this patient population. •The pooled estimate of false negative rate was 13%.•The pooled estimate of identification rate was 91%.•The adjusted pathological complete response rate was 47%.•There was a trend toward significance with only cN1 disease.•SLNB post NAC in node-positive patients is a valid alternative strategy to ALND.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Axilla</subject><subject>Bias</subject><subject>Biopsy</subject><subject>Breast cancer</subject><subject>Breast Neoplasms - mortality</subject><subject>Breast Neoplasms - pathology</subject><subject>Breast Neoplasms - therapy</subject><subject>Cancer therapies</subject><subject>Chemotherapy</subject><subject>False Negative Reactions</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Lymph Node Excision - methods</subject><subject>Lymph Nodes - pathology</subject><subject>Lymph Nodes - surgery</subject><subject>Lymphatic system</subject><subject>Mastectomy - methods</subject><subject>Medical prognosis</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Neoadjuvant chemotherapy</subject><subject>Neoadjuvant Therapy - methods</subject><subject>Neoplasm Invasiveness - pathology</subject><subject>Neoplasm Staging</subject><subject>Node positive</subject><subject>Prognosis</subject><subject>Risk Assessment</subject><subject>Sentinel Lymph Node - pathology</subject><subject>Sentinel lymph node biopsy</subject><subject>Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy - methods</subject><subject>Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Statistical analysis</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Survival Analysis</subject><issn>0002-9610</issn><issn>1879-1883</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFUk1v1DAQjRCIlsJPAFniwoEsdpzPU1VVfFSqxAXO1sSZ7Dpy7GA7W_bX8leY7S4cuHCxNZ43b8ZvXpa9FnwjuKg_TBuYp7iG7aagcMObDRftk-xStE2Xi7aVT7NLznmRd7XgF9mLGCcKhSjl8-yiaOpGcFlcZr_uIovoknFomT3My445PyDrjV_igQHbG-gtMrAJg4Nk9siSZ9rPi8VE7z-NtRAObDAxok7GOzZ6a_2DcVvm0MMwrXtwiekdzj7tMMByYMaxBz8jnSadOuaLj-aRvg8IkfDgNAYGiahh6ygbr9mNY-syQMKBzZggBwf2QBki3Hu7P_aU72XXsoVGpW_Fl9mzEWzEV-f7Kvv-6eO32y_5_dfPd7c397mWnUw5VGVV132DfdnLqhMwIhS677tSjxprPg5jJZGXuu5k2fZYlKLRXVXWui6grEd5lb078S7B_1gxJjWbqJG0IQ3WqEQrq6ooWskJ-vYf6ORX0tY-omictuMloaoTSgcfY8BRLcHMpLQSXB0doCZ1doA6OkDxRpEDqO7NmX3tZxz-Vv1ZOQGuTwAkOfYGg4qapNI4mEALVIM3_2nxG2m2yxs</recordid><startdate>201611</startdate><enddate>201611</enddate><creator>El Hage Chehade, Hiba</creator><creator>Headon, Hannah</creator><creator>El Tokhy, Omar</creator><creator>Heeney, Jennifer</creator><creator>Kasem, Abdul</creator><creator>Mokbel, Kefah</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier Limited</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201611</creationdate><title>Is sentinel lymph node biopsy a viable alternative to complete axillary dissection following neoadjuvant chemotherapy in women with node-positive breast cancer at diagnosis? An updated meta-analysis involving 3,398 patients</title><author>El Hage Chehade, Hiba ; Headon, Hannah ; El Tokhy, Omar ; Heeney, Jennifer ; Kasem, Abdul ; Mokbel, Kefah</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c393t-a54566b7eb4b3591afea2cbb94cfce60fdf53e04c69348be2417c9546c62a46f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Axilla</topic><topic>Bias</topic><topic>Biopsy</topic><topic>Breast cancer</topic><topic>Breast Neoplasms - mortality</topic><topic>Breast Neoplasms - pathology</topic><topic>Breast Neoplasms - therapy</topic><topic>Cancer therapies</topic><topic>Chemotherapy</topic><topic>False Negative Reactions</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Lymph Node Excision - methods</topic><topic>Lymph Nodes - pathology</topic><topic>Lymph Nodes - surgery</topic><topic>Lymphatic system</topic><topic>Mastectomy - methods</topic><topic>Medical prognosis</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Neoadjuvant chemotherapy</topic><topic>Neoadjuvant Therapy - methods</topic><topic>Neoplasm Invasiveness - pathology</topic><topic>Neoplasm Staging</topic><topic>Node positive</topic><topic>Prognosis</topic><topic>Risk Assessment</topic><topic>Sentinel Lymph Node - pathology</topic><topic>Sentinel lymph node biopsy</topic><topic>Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy - methods</topic><topic>Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Statistical analysis</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Survival Analysis</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>El Hage Chehade, Hiba</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Headon, Hannah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>El Tokhy, Omar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Heeney, Jennifer</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kasem, Abdul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mokbel, Kefah</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>PML(ProQuest Medical Library)</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The American journal of surgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>El Hage Chehade, Hiba</au><au>Headon, Hannah</au><au>El Tokhy, Omar</au><au>Heeney, Jennifer</au><au>Kasem, Abdul</au><au>Mokbel, Kefah</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Is sentinel lymph node biopsy a viable alternative to complete axillary dissection following neoadjuvant chemotherapy in women with node-positive breast cancer at diagnosis? An updated meta-analysis involving 3,398 patients</atitle><jtitle>The American journal of surgery</jtitle><addtitle>Am J Surg</addtitle><date>2016-11</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>212</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>969</spage><epage>981</epage><pages>969-981</pages><issn>0002-9610</issn><eissn>1879-1883</eissn><abstract>The use of sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) following neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) in patients presenting with clinically positive lymph nodes remains controversial. A computer-aided search of the literature regarding SLNB in clinically node-positive breast cancer treated with NAC was carried out to identify the false negative rate (FNR), sentinel lymph node identification rate (IR), and axillary pathological complete response (pCR). Nineteen articles were used in the analysis yielding 3,398 patients. The pooled estimate of the FNR was 13% and that of the IR was 91%. The adjusted pCR rate was 47%. A trend toward significance was observed with only clinical stage N1 (cN1) disease whereby clinical stage N1 was associated with an increased pCR rate when compared to N2 or N3 disease (P = .06). SLNB after NAC in biopsy-proven node-positive patients results in reasonably acceptable FNR and IR, making it a valid alternative management strategy to axillary dissection. More refined patient selection and optimal techniques can improve the FNR and IR in this patient population. •The pooled estimate of false negative rate was 13%.•The pooled estimate of identification rate was 91%.•The adjusted pathological complete response rate was 47%.•There was a trend toward significance with only cN1 disease.•SLNB post NAC in node-positive patients is a valid alternative strategy to ALND.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>27671032</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.amjsurg.2016.07.018</doi><tpages>13</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0002-9610
ispartof The American journal of surgery, 2016-11, Vol.212 (5), p.969-981
issn 0002-9610
1879-1883
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1835522830
source ScienceDirect Freedom Collection 2022-2024
subjects Adult
Aged
Axilla
Bias
Biopsy
Breast cancer
Breast Neoplasms - mortality
Breast Neoplasms - pathology
Breast Neoplasms - therapy
Cancer therapies
Chemotherapy
False Negative Reactions
Female
Humans
Lymph Node Excision - methods
Lymph Nodes - pathology
Lymph Nodes - surgery
Lymphatic system
Mastectomy - methods
Medical prognosis
Middle Aged
Neoadjuvant chemotherapy
Neoadjuvant Therapy - methods
Neoplasm Invasiveness - pathology
Neoplasm Staging
Node positive
Prognosis
Risk Assessment
Sentinel Lymph Node - pathology
Sentinel lymph node biopsy
Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy - methods
Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy - statistics & numerical data
Statistical analysis
Studies
Survival Analysis
title Is sentinel lymph node biopsy a viable alternative to complete axillary dissection following neoadjuvant chemotherapy in women with node-positive breast cancer at diagnosis? An updated meta-analysis involving 3,398 patients
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-22T18%3A54%3A37IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Is%20sentinel%20lymph%20node%20biopsy%20a%20viable%20alternative%20to%20complete%20axillary%20dissection%20following%20neoadjuvant%20chemotherapy%20in%20women%20with%20node-positive%20breast%20cancer%20at%20diagnosis?%20An%20updated%20meta-analysis%20involving%203,398%20patients&rft.jtitle=The%20American%20journal%20of%20surgery&rft.au=El%20Hage%20Chehade,%20Hiba&rft.date=2016-11&rft.volume=212&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=969&rft.epage=981&rft.pages=969-981&rft.issn=0002-9610&rft.eissn=1879-1883&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2016.07.018&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1835522830%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c393t-a54566b7eb4b3591afea2cbb94cfce60fdf53e04c69348be2417c9546c62a46f3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1833938904&rft_id=info:pmid/27671032&rfr_iscdi=true