Loading…
Is sentinel lymph node biopsy a viable alternative to complete axillary dissection following neoadjuvant chemotherapy in women with node-positive breast cancer at diagnosis? An updated meta-analysis involving 3,398 patients
The use of sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) following neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) in patients presenting with clinically positive lymph nodes remains controversial. A computer-aided search of the literature regarding SLNB in clinically node-positive breast cancer treated with NAC was carried out...
Saved in:
Published in: | The American journal of surgery 2016-11, Vol.212 (5), p.969-981 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c393t-a54566b7eb4b3591afea2cbb94cfce60fdf53e04c69348be2417c9546c62a46f3 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c393t-a54566b7eb4b3591afea2cbb94cfce60fdf53e04c69348be2417c9546c62a46f3 |
container_end_page | 981 |
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | 969 |
container_title | The American journal of surgery |
container_volume | 212 |
creator | El Hage Chehade, Hiba Headon, Hannah El Tokhy, Omar Heeney, Jennifer Kasem, Abdul Mokbel, Kefah |
description | The use of sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) following neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) in patients presenting with clinically positive lymph nodes remains controversial.
A computer-aided search of the literature regarding SLNB in clinically node-positive breast cancer treated with NAC was carried out to identify the false negative rate (FNR), sentinel lymph node identification rate (IR), and axillary pathological complete response (pCR).
Nineteen articles were used in the analysis yielding 3,398 patients. The pooled estimate of the FNR was 13% and that of the IR was 91%. The adjusted pCR rate was 47%. A trend toward significance was observed with only clinical stage N1 (cN1) disease whereby clinical stage N1 was associated with an increased pCR rate when compared to N2 or N3 disease (P = .06).
SLNB after NAC in biopsy-proven node-positive patients results in reasonably acceptable FNR and IR, making it a valid alternative management strategy to axillary dissection. More refined patient selection and optimal techniques can improve the FNR and IR in this patient population.
•The pooled estimate of false negative rate was 13%.•The pooled estimate of identification rate was 91%.•The adjusted pathological complete response rate was 47%.•There was a trend toward significance with only cN1 disease.•SLNB post NAC in node-positive patients is a valid alternative strategy to ALND. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2016.07.018 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1835522830</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0002961016304330</els_id><sourcerecordid>1835522830</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c393t-a54566b7eb4b3591afea2cbb94cfce60fdf53e04c69348be2417c9546c62a46f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFUk1v1DAQjRCIlsJPAFniwoEsdpzPU1VVfFSqxAXO1sSZ7Dpy7GA7W_bX8leY7S4cuHCxNZ43b8ZvXpa9FnwjuKg_TBuYp7iG7aagcMObDRftk-xStE2Xi7aVT7NLznmRd7XgF9mLGCcKhSjl8-yiaOpGcFlcZr_uIovoknFomT3My445PyDrjV_igQHbG-gtMrAJg4Nk9siSZ9rPi8VE7z-NtRAObDAxok7GOzZ6a_2DcVvm0MMwrXtwiekdzj7tMMByYMaxBz8jnSadOuaLj-aRvg8IkfDgNAYGiahh6ygbr9mNY-syQMKBzZggBwf2QBki3Hu7P_aU72XXsoVGpW_Fl9mzEWzEV-f7Kvv-6eO32y_5_dfPd7c397mWnUw5VGVV132DfdnLqhMwIhS677tSjxprPg5jJZGXuu5k2fZYlKLRXVXWui6grEd5lb078S7B_1gxJjWbqJG0IQ3WqEQrq6ooWskJ-vYf6ORX0tY-omictuMloaoTSgcfY8BRLcHMpLQSXB0doCZ1doA6OkDxRpEDqO7NmX3tZxz-Vv1ZOQGuTwAkOfYGg4qapNI4mEALVIM3_2nxG2m2yxs</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1833938904</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Is sentinel lymph node biopsy a viable alternative to complete axillary dissection following neoadjuvant chemotherapy in women with node-positive breast cancer at diagnosis? An updated meta-analysis involving 3,398 patients</title><source>ScienceDirect Freedom Collection 2022-2024</source><creator>El Hage Chehade, Hiba ; Headon, Hannah ; El Tokhy, Omar ; Heeney, Jennifer ; Kasem, Abdul ; Mokbel, Kefah</creator><creatorcontrib>El Hage Chehade, Hiba ; Headon, Hannah ; El Tokhy, Omar ; Heeney, Jennifer ; Kasem, Abdul ; Mokbel, Kefah</creatorcontrib><description>The use of sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) following neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) in patients presenting with clinically positive lymph nodes remains controversial.
A computer-aided search of the literature regarding SLNB in clinically node-positive breast cancer treated with NAC was carried out to identify the false negative rate (FNR), sentinel lymph node identification rate (IR), and axillary pathological complete response (pCR).
Nineteen articles were used in the analysis yielding 3,398 patients. The pooled estimate of the FNR was 13% and that of the IR was 91%. The adjusted pCR rate was 47%. A trend toward significance was observed with only clinical stage N1 (cN1) disease whereby clinical stage N1 was associated with an increased pCR rate when compared to N2 or N3 disease (P = .06).
SLNB after NAC in biopsy-proven node-positive patients results in reasonably acceptable FNR and IR, making it a valid alternative management strategy to axillary dissection. More refined patient selection and optimal techniques can improve the FNR and IR in this patient population.
•The pooled estimate of false negative rate was 13%.•The pooled estimate of identification rate was 91%.•The adjusted pathological complete response rate was 47%.•There was a trend toward significance with only cN1 disease.•SLNB post NAC in node-positive patients is a valid alternative strategy to ALND.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0002-9610</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-1883</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2016.07.018</identifier><identifier>PMID: 27671032</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; Axilla ; Bias ; Biopsy ; Breast cancer ; Breast Neoplasms - mortality ; Breast Neoplasms - pathology ; Breast Neoplasms - therapy ; Cancer therapies ; Chemotherapy ; False Negative Reactions ; Female ; Humans ; Lymph Node Excision - methods ; Lymph Nodes - pathology ; Lymph Nodes - surgery ; Lymphatic system ; Mastectomy - methods ; Medical prognosis ; Middle Aged ; Neoadjuvant chemotherapy ; Neoadjuvant Therapy - methods ; Neoplasm Invasiveness - pathology ; Neoplasm Staging ; Node positive ; Prognosis ; Risk Assessment ; Sentinel Lymph Node - pathology ; Sentinel lymph node biopsy ; Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy - methods ; Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy - statistics & numerical data ; Statistical analysis ; Studies ; Survival Analysis</subject><ispartof>The American journal of surgery, 2016-11, Vol.212 (5), p.969-981</ispartof><rights>2016 Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Limited Nov 01, 2016</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c393t-a54566b7eb4b3591afea2cbb94cfce60fdf53e04c69348be2417c9546c62a46f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c393t-a54566b7eb4b3591afea2cbb94cfce60fdf53e04c69348be2417c9546c62a46f3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27671032$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>El Hage Chehade, Hiba</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Headon, Hannah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>El Tokhy, Omar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Heeney, Jennifer</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kasem, Abdul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mokbel, Kefah</creatorcontrib><title>Is sentinel lymph node biopsy a viable alternative to complete axillary dissection following neoadjuvant chemotherapy in women with node-positive breast cancer at diagnosis? An updated meta-analysis involving 3,398 patients</title><title>The American journal of surgery</title><addtitle>Am J Surg</addtitle><description>The use of sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) following neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) in patients presenting with clinically positive lymph nodes remains controversial.
A computer-aided search of the literature regarding SLNB in clinically node-positive breast cancer treated with NAC was carried out to identify the false negative rate (FNR), sentinel lymph node identification rate (IR), and axillary pathological complete response (pCR).
Nineteen articles were used in the analysis yielding 3,398 patients. The pooled estimate of the FNR was 13% and that of the IR was 91%. The adjusted pCR rate was 47%. A trend toward significance was observed with only clinical stage N1 (cN1) disease whereby clinical stage N1 was associated with an increased pCR rate when compared to N2 or N3 disease (P = .06).
SLNB after NAC in biopsy-proven node-positive patients results in reasonably acceptable FNR and IR, making it a valid alternative management strategy to axillary dissection. More refined patient selection and optimal techniques can improve the FNR and IR in this patient population.
•The pooled estimate of false negative rate was 13%.•The pooled estimate of identification rate was 91%.•The adjusted pathological complete response rate was 47%.•There was a trend toward significance with only cN1 disease.•SLNB post NAC in node-positive patients is a valid alternative strategy to ALND.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Axilla</subject><subject>Bias</subject><subject>Biopsy</subject><subject>Breast cancer</subject><subject>Breast Neoplasms - mortality</subject><subject>Breast Neoplasms - pathology</subject><subject>Breast Neoplasms - therapy</subject><subject>Cancer therapies</subject><subject>Chemotherapy</subject><subject>False Negative Reactions</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Lymph Node Excision - methods</subject><subject>Lymph Nodes - pathology</subject><subject>Lymph Nodes - surgery</subject><subject>Lymphatic system</subject><subject>Mastectomy - methods</subject><subject>Medical prognosis</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Neoadjuvant chemotherapy</subject><subject>Neoadjuvant Therapy - methods</subject><subject>Neoplasm Invasiveness - pathology</subject><subject>Neoplasm Staging</subject><subject>Node positive</subject><subject>Prognosis</subject><subject>Risk Assessment</subject><subject>Sentinel Lymph Node - pathology</subject><subject>Sentinel lymph node biopsy</subject><subject>Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy - methods</subject><subject>Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Statistical analysis</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Survival Analysis</subject><issn>0002-9610</issn><issn>1879-1883</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFUk1v1DAQjRCIlsJPAFniwoEsdpzPU1VVfFSqxAXO1sSZ7Dpy7GA7W_bX8leY7S4cuHCxNZ43b8ZvXpa9FnwjuKg_TBuYp7iG7aagcMObDRftk-xStE2Xi7aVT7NLznmRd7XgF9mLGCcKhSjl8-yiaOpGcFlcZr_uIovoknFomT3My445PyDrjV_igQHbG-gtMrAJg4Nk9siSZ9rPi8VE7z-NtRAObDAxok7GOzZ6a_2DcVvm0MMwrXtwiekdzj7tMMByYMaxBz8jnSadOuaLj-aRvg8IkfDgNAYGiahh6ygbr9mNY-syQMKBzZggBwf2QBki3Hu7P_aU72XXsoVGpW_Fl9mzEWzEV-f7Kvv-6eO32y_5_dfPd7c397mWnUw5VGVV132DfdnLqhMwIhS677tSjxprPg5jJZGXuu5k2fZYlKLRXVXWui6grEd5lb078S7B_1gxJjWbqJG0IQ3WqEQrq6ooWskJ-vYf6ORX0tY-omictuMloaoTSgcfY8BRLcHMpLQSXB0doCZ1doA6OkDxRpEDqO7NmX3tZxz-Vv1ZOQGuTwAkOfYGg4qapNI4mEALVIM3_2nxG2m2yxs</recordid><startdate>201611</startdate><enddate>201611</enddate><creator>El Hage Chehade, Hiba</creator><creator>Headon, Hannah</creator><creator>El Tokhy, Omar</creator><creator>Heeney, Jennifer</creator><creator>Kasem, Abdul</creator><creator>Mokbel, Kefah</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier Limited</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201611</creationdate><title>Is sentinel lymph node biopsy a viable alternative to complete axillary dissection following neoadjuvant chemotherapy in women with node-positive breast cancer at diagnosis? An updated meta-analysis involving 3,398 patients</title><author>El Hage Chehade, Hiba ; Headon, Hannah ; El Tokhy, Omar ; Heeney, Jennifer ; Kasem, Abdul ; Mokbel, Kefah</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c393t-a54566b7eb4b3591afea2cbb94cfce60fdf53e04c69348be2417c9546c62a46f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Axilla</topic><topic>Bias</topic><topic>Biopsy</topic><topic>Breast cancer</topic><topic>Breast Neoplasms - mortality</topic><topic>Breast Neoplasms - pathology</topic><topic>Breast Neoplasms - therapy</topic><topic>Cancer therapies</topic><topic>Chemotherapy</topic><topic>False Negative Reactions</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Lymph Node Excision - methods</topic><topic>Lymph Nodes - pathology</topic><topic>Lymph Nodes - surgery</topic><topic>Lymphatic system</topic><topic>Mastectomy - methods</topic><topic>Medical prognosis</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Neoadjuvant chemotherapy</topic><topic>Neoadjuvant Therapy - methods</topic><topic>Neoplasm Invasiveness - pathology</topic><topic>Neoplasm Staging</topic><topic>Node positive</topic><topic>Prognosis</topic><topic>Risk Assessment</topic><topic>Sentinel Lymph Node - pathology</topic><topic>Sentinel lymph node biopsy</topic><topic>Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy - methods</topic><topic>Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Statistical analysis</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Survival Analysis</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>El Hage Chehade, Hiba</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Headon, Hannah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>El Tokhy, Omar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Heeney, Jennifer</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kasem, Abdul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mokbel, Kefah</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>PML(ProQuest Medical Library)</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The American journal of surgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>El Hage Chehade, Hiba</au><au>Headon, Hannah</au><au>El Tokhy, Omar</au><au>Heeney, Jennifer</au><au>Kasem, Abdul</au><au>Mokbel, Kefah</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Is sentinel lymph node biopsy a viable alternative to complete axillary dissection following neoadjuvant chemotherapy in women with node-positive breast cancer at diagnosis? An updated meta-analysis involving 3,398 patients</atitle><jtitle>The American journal of surgery</jtitle><addtitle>Am J Surg</addtitle><date>2016-11</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>212</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>969</spage><epage>981</epage><pages>969-981</pages><issn>0002-9610</issn><eissn>1879-1883</eissn><abstract>The use of sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) following neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) in patients presenting with clinically positive lymph nodes remains controversial.
A computer-aided search of the literature regarding SLNB in clinically node-positive breast cancer treated with NAC was carried out to identify the false negative rate (FNR), sentinel lymph node identification rate (IR), and axillary pathological complete response (pCR).
Nineteen articles were used in the analysis yielding 3,398 patients. The pooled estimate of the FNR was 13% and that of the IR was 91%. The adjusted pCR rate was 47%. A trend toward significance was observed with only clinical stage N1 (cN1) disease whereby clinical stage N1 was associated with an increased pCR rate when compared to N2 or N3 disease (P = .06).
SLNB after NAC in biopsy-proven node-positive patients results in reasonably acceptable FNR and IR, making it a valid alternative management strategy to axillary dissection. More refined patient selection and optimal techniques can improve the FNR and IR in this patient population.
•The pooled estimate of false negative rate was 13%.•The pooled estimate of identification rate was 91%.•The adjusted pathological complete response rate was 47%.•There was a trend toward significance with only cN1 disease.•SLNB post NAC in node-positive patients is a valid alternative strategy to ALND.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>27671032</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.amjsurg.2016.07.018</doi><tpages>13</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0002-9610 |
ispartof | The American journal of surgery, 2016-11, Vol.212 (5), p.969-981 |
issn | 0002-9610 1879-1883 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1835522830 |
source | ScienceDirect Freedom Collection 2022-2024 |
subjects | Adult Aged Axilla Bias Biopsy Breast cancer Breast Neoplasms - mortality Breast Neoplasms - pathology Breast Neoplasms - therapy Cancer therapies Chemotherapy False Negative Reactions Female Humans Lymph Node Excision - methods Lymph Nodes - pathology Lymph Nodes - surgery Lymphatic system Mastectomy - methods Medical prognosis Middle Aged Neoadjuvant chemotherapy Neoadjuvant Therapy - methods Neoplasm Invasiveness - pathology Neoplasm Staging Node positive Prognosis Risk Assessment Sentinel Lymph Node - pathology Sentinel lymph node biopsy Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy - methods Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy - statistics & numerical data Statistical analysis Studies Survival Analysis |
title | Is sentinel lymph node biopsy a viable alternative to complete axillary dissection following neoadjuvant chemotherapy in women with node-positive breast cancer at diagnosis? An updated meta-analysis involving 3,398 patients |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-22T18%3A54%3A37IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Is%20sentinel%20lymph%20node%20biopsy%20a%20viable%20alternative%20to%20complete%20axillary%20dissection%20following%20neoadjuvant%20chemotherapy%20in%20women%20with%20node-positive%20breast%20cancer%20at%20diagnosis?%20An%20updated%20meta-analysis%20involving%203,398%20patients&rft.jtitle=The%20American%20journal%20of%20surgery&rft.au=El%20Hage%20Chehade,%20Hiba&rft.date=2016-11&rft.volume=212&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=969&rft.epage=981&rft.pages=969-981&rft.issn=0002-9610&rft.eissn=1879-1883&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2016.07.018&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1835522830%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c393t-a54566b7eb4b3591afea2cbb94cfce60fdf53e04c69348be2417c9546c62a46f3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1833938904&rft_id=info:pmid/27671032&rfr_iscdi=true |