Loading…

The Agile-Stage-Gate Hybrid Model: A Promising New Approach and a New Research Opportunity

Agile development methodologies have been widely employed in the software industry, where they have been found to yield positive results. But can these new methods, with their new tools such as sprints, scrums, burndown charts, and backlogs, really be integrated with the traditional and popular Stag...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:The Journal of product innovation management 2016-09, Vol.33 (5), p.513-526
Main Authors: Cooper, Robert G., Sommer, Anita F.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3184-82c1825ae3976b2bfb3104bce61203b129070a508773609d175869508c84883
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3184-82c1825ae3976b2bfb3104bce61203b129070a508773609d175869508c84883
container_end_page 526
container_issue 5
container_start_page 513
container_title The Journal of product innovation management
container_volume 33
creator Cooper, Robert G.
Sommer, Anita F.
description Agile development methodologies have been widely employed in the software industry, where they have been found to yield positive results. But can these new methods, with their new tools such as sprints, scrums, burndown charts, and backlogs, really be integrated with the traditional and popular Stage‐Gate approach and then applied to physical products? Initial but limited evidence suggests yes: Larger IT firms have already integrated Agile and Stage‐Gate and gained the benefits of both approaches; and most recently, a handful of manufacturing firms have employed this Agile–Stage‐Gate hybrid model for physical new products. And if recent evidence can be trusted, this new approach promises to be the most significant change to our thinking about how new‐product development should be done since the introduction of today's popular gating systems 30 years ago. The benefits of this hybrid model are a faster and more adaptive response to changing customer needs, better integration of voice‐of‐customer, better team communication, improved development productivity, and faster to market. A case example from a toy company, LEGO, is provided as an illustration. But there are negatives as well, and additionally, manufacturers must make modifications to Agile in order to adopt it successfully. Although initial results appear promising, much research is needed to explore this new Agile–Stage‐Gate hybrid model, and many research challenges remain.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/jpim.12314
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1835553386</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1835553386</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3184-82c1825ae3976b2bfb3104bce61203b129070a508773609d175869508c84883</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kV9LwzAUxYMoOKcvfoKALyJ0Jk3TpL6V4dbJ_uGGgi8hbbOts2tr0jH77c029cEH78vlXn7ncjgXgGuMOtjW_brKNh3sEuydgBamHnIo5_QUtBAjzPEZd8_BhTFrhBDmrtcCb_OVguEyy5Uzq-VSOX1ZKxg1sc5SOCpTlT_AEE51uclMVizhWO1gWFW6lMkKyiKF8rB6VkZJbVeTqip1vS2yurkEZwuZG3X13dtg1nucdyNnOOkPuuHQSQjmnsPdxFqhUpGA-bEbL2KCkRcnyscuIjF2A8SQpIgzRnwUpJhR7gd2TrjHOWmD2-NV6-ljq0wtrNNE5bksVLk1AnNCKSWE-xa9-YOuy60urDdLIUqoS1lgqbsjlejSGK0WotLZRupGYCT2IYt9yOIQsoXxEd7ZBJt_SPE0HYx-NM5Rk5laff5qpH4Xvv0SFa_jvpiNxtE4Gr2IHvkC0hmKmw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1805352579</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Agile-Stage-Gate Hybrid Model: A Promising New Approach and a New Research Opportunity</title><source>Business Source Ultimate</source><source>Wiley</source><creator>Cooper, Robert G. ; Sommer, Anita F.</creator><creatorcontrib>Cooper, Robert G. ; Sommer, Anita F.</creatorcontrib><description>Agile development methodologies have been widely employed in the software industry, where they have been found to yield positive results. But can these new methods, with their new tools such as sprints, scrums, burndown charts, and backlogs, really be integrated with the traditional and popular Stage‐Gate approach and then applied to physical products? Initial but limited evidence suggests yes: Larger IT firms have already integrated Agile and Stage‐Gate and gained the benefits of both approaches; and most recently, a handful of manufacturing firms have employed this Agile–Stage‐Gate hybrid model for physical new products. And if recent evidence can be trusted, this new approach promises to be the most significant change to our thinking about how new‐product development should be done since the introduction of today's popular gating systems 30 years ago. The benefits of this hybrid model are a faster and more adaptive response to changing customer needs, better integration of voice‐of‐customer, better team communication, improved development productivity, and faster to market. A case example from a toy company, LEGO, is provided as an illustration. But there are negatives as well, and additionally, manufacturers must make modifications to Agile in order to adopt it successfully. Although initial results appear promising, much research is needed to explore this new Agile–Stage‐Gate hybrid model, and many research challenges remain.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0737-6782</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1540-5885</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/jpim.12314</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JPIMDD</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hoboken: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Acquisitions &amp; mergers ; Agile manufacturing ; Charts ; Computer programs ; Gating systems ; Management ; Markets ; Product development ; Productivity ; Software</subject><ispartof>The Journal of product innovation management, 2016-09, Vol.33 (5), p.513-526</ispartof><rights>2016 Product Development &amp; Management Association</rights><rights>2016 Product Development and Management Association</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3184-82c1825ae3976b2bfb3104bce61203b129070a508773609d175869508c84883</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3184-82c1825ae3976b2bfb3104bce61203b129070a508773609d175869508c84883</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Cooper, Robert G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sommer, Anita F.</creatorcontrib><title>The Agile-Stage-Gate Hybrid Model: A Promising New Approach and a New Research Opportunity</title><title>The Journal of product innovation management</title><addtitle>J Prod Innov Manag</addtitle><description>Agile development methodologies have been widely employed in the software industry, where they have been found to yield positive results. But can these new methods, with their new tools such as sprints, scrums, burndown charts, and backlogs, really be integrated with the traditional and popular Stage‐Gate approach and then applied to physical products? Initial but limited evidence suggests yes: Larger IT firms have already integrated Agile and Stage‐Gate and gained the benefits of both approaches; and most recently, a handful of manufacturing firms have employed this Agile–Stage‐Gate hybrid model for physical new products. And if recent evidence can be trusted, this new approach promises to be the most significant change to our thinking about how new‐product development should be done since the introduction of today's popular gating systems 30 years ago. The benefits of this hybrid model are a faster and more adaptive response to changing customer needs, better integration of voice‐of‐customer, better team communication, improved development productivity, and faster to market. A case example from a toy company, LEGO, is provided as an illustration. But there are negatives as well, and additionally, manufacturers must make modifications to Agile in order to adopt it successfully. Although initial results appear promising, much research is needed to explore this new Agile–Stage‐Gate hybrid model, and many research challenges remain.</description><subject>Acquisitions &amp; mergers</subject><subject>Agile manufacturing</subject><subject>Charts</subject><subject>Computer programs</subject><subject>Gating systems</subject><subject>Management</subject><subject>Markets</subject><subject>Product development</subject><subject>Productivity</subject><subject>Software</subject><issn>0737-6782</issn><issn>1540-5885</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kV9LwzAUxYMoOKcvfoKALyJ0Jk3TpL6V4dbJ_uGGgi8hbbOts2tr0jH77c029cEH78vlXn7ncjgXgGuMOtjW_brKNh3sEuydgBamHnIo5_QUtBAjzPEZd8_BhTFrhBDmrtcCb_OVguEyy5Uzq-VSOX1ZKxg1sc5SOCpTlT_AEE51uclMVizhWO1gWFW6lMkKyiKF8rB6VkZJbVeTqip1vS2yurkEZwuZG3X13dtg1nucdyNnOOkPuuHQSQjmnsPdxFqhUpGA-bEbL2KCkRcnyscuIjF2A8SQpIgzRnwUpJhR7gd2TrjHOWmD2-NV6-ljq0wtrNNE5bksVLk1AnNCKSWE-xa9-YOuy60urDdLIUqoS1lgqbsjlejSGK0WotLZRupGYCT2IYt9yOIQsoXxEd7ZBJt_SPE0HYx-NM5Rk5laff5qpH4Xvv0SFa_jvpiNxtE4Gr2IHvkC0hmKmw</recordid><startdate>201609</startdate><enddate>201609</enddate><creator>Cooper, Robert G.</creator><creator>Sommer, Anita F.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>7TA</scope><scope>JG9</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201609</creationdate><title>The Agile-Stage-Gate Hybrid Model: A Promising New Approach and a New Research Opportunity</title><author>Cooper, Robert G. ; Sommer, Anita F.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3184-82c1825ae3976b2bfb3104bce61203b129070a508773609d175869508c84883</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Acquisitions &amp; mergers</topic><topic>Agile manufacturing</topic><topic>Charts</topic><topic>Computer programs</topic><topic>Gating systems</topic><topic>Management</topic><topic>Markets</topic><topic>Product development</topic><topic>Productivity</topic><topic>Software</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Cooper, Robert G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sommer, Anita F.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Mechanical &amp; Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Materials Business File</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><jtitle>The Journal of product innovation management</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Cooper, Robert G.</au><au>Sommer, Anita F.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The Agile-Stage-Gate Hybrid Model: A Promising New Approach and a New Research Opportunity</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of product innovation management</jtitle><addtitle>J Prod Innov Manag</addtitle><date>2016-09</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>33</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>513</spage><epage>526</epage><pages>513-526</pages><issn>0737-6782</issn><eissn>1540-5885</eissn><coden>JPIMDD</coden><abstract>Agile development methodologies have been widely employed in the software industry, where they have been found to yield positive results. But can these new methods, with their new tools such as sprints, scrums, burndown charts, and backlogs, really be integrated with the traditional and popular Stage‐Gate approach and then applied to physical products? Initial but limited evidence suggests yes: Larger IT firms have already integrated Agile and Stage‐Gate and gained the benefits of both approaches; and most recently, a handful of manufacturing firms have employed this Agile–Stage‐Gate hybrid model for physical new products. And if recent evidence can be trusted, this new approach promises to be the most significant change to our thinking about how new‐product development should be done since the introduction of today's popular gating systems 30 years ago. The benefits of this hybrid model are a faster and more adaptive response to changing customer needs, better integration of voice‐of‐customer, better team communication, improved development productivity, and faster to market. A case example from a toy company, LEGO, is provided as an illustration. But there are negatives as well, and additionally, manufacturers must make modifications to Agile in order to adopt it successfully. Although initial results appear promising, much research is needed to explore this new Agile–Stage‐Gate hybrid model, and many research challenges remain.</abstract><cop>Hoboken</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1111/jpim.12314</doi><tpages>14</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0737-6782
ispartof The Journal of product innovation management, 2016-09, Vol.33 (5), p.513-526
issn 0737-6782
1540-5885
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1835553386
source Business Source Ultimate; Wiley
subjects Acquisitions & mergers
Agile manufacturing
Charts
Computer programs
Gating systems
Management
Markets
Product development
Productivity
Software
title The Agile-Stage-Gate Hybrid Model: A Promising New Approach and a New Research Opportunity
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-08T14%3A00%3A30IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Agile-Stage-Gate%20Hybrid%20Model:%20A%20Promising%20New%20Approach%20and%20a%20New%20Research%20Opportunity&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20product%20innovation%20management&rft.au=Cooper,%20Robert%20G.&rft.date=2016-09&rft.volume=33&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=513&rft.epage=526&rft.pages=513-526&rft.issn=0737-6782&rft.eissn=1540-5885&rft.coden=JPIMDD&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/jpim.12314&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1835553386%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3184-82c1825ae3976b2bfb3104bce61203b129070a508773609d175869508c84883%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1805352579&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true