Loading…

SMAP soil moisture drying more rapid than observed in situ following rainfall events

We examine soil drying rates by comparing surface soil moisture observations from the NASA Soil Moisture Active Passive (SMAP) mission to those from networks of in situ probes upscaled to SMAP's sensing footprint. SMAP and upscaled in situ probes record different soil drying dynamics after rain...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Geophysical research letters 2016-08, Vol.43 (15), p.8068-8075
Main Authors: Shellito, Peter J., Small, Eric E., Colliander, Andreas, Bindlish, Rajat, Cosh, Michael H., Berg, Aaron A., Bosch, David D., Caldwell, Todd G., Goodrich, David C., McNairn, Heather, Prueger, John H., Starks, Patrick J., Velde, Rogier, Walker, Jeffrey P.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a4612-ae5891b34774eb3e05a5d2132563e4b5d2d5eafd42f9144f44ed464eb2d700ce3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a4612-ae5891b34774eb3e05a5d2132563e4b5d2d5eafd42f9144f44ed464eb2d700ce3
container_end_page 8075
container_issue 15
container_start_page 8068
container_title Geophysical research letters
container_volume 43
creator Shellito, Peter J.
Small, Eric E.
Colliander, Andreas
Bindlish, Rajat
Cosh, Michael H.
Berg, Aaron A.
Bosch, David D.
Caldwell, Todd G.
Goodrich, David C.
McNairn, Heather
Prueger, John H.
Starks, Patrick J.
Velde, Rogier
Walker, Jeffrey P.
description We examine soil drying rates by comparing surface soil moisture observations from the NASA Soil Moisture Active Passive (SMAP) mission to those from networks of in situ probes upscaled to SMAP's sensing footprint. SMAP and upscaled in situ probes record different soil drying dynamics after rainfall. We modeled this process by fitting an exponential curve to 63 drydown events: the median SMAP drying timescale is 44% shorter and the magnitude of drying is 35% greater than in situ measurements. We also calculated drying rates between consecutive observations from 193 events. For 6 days after rainfall, soil moisture from SMAP dries at twice the rate of in situ measurements. Restricting in situ observations to times of SMAP observations does not change the drying timescale, magnitude, or rate. Therefore, observed differences are likely due to differences in sensing depths: SMAP measures shallower soil moisture than in situ probes, especially after rainfall. Key Points SMAP and networks of in situ probes observe soil drying after rainfall SMAP observes soil drying to occur over a 44% shorter timescale than in situ SMAP observes soil drying to occur at twice the rate as in situ
doi_str_mv 10.1002/2016GL069946
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1835564359</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1819136958</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a4612-ae5891b34774eb3e05a5d2132563e4b5d2d5eafd42f9144f44ed464eb2d700ce3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqN0U1LAzEQBuAgCtbqzR8Q8OLB6uRzN8dStAoVRet5SbuzmrLd1GS3pf_elHoQD-Jp3oGHgZkh5JzBNQPgNxyYHk9AGyP1AekxI-UgB8gOSQ_ApMwzfUxOYlwAgADBemT6-jh8ptG7mi69i20XkJZh65r31Kcc7MqVtP2wDfWziGGNJXUNja7taOXr2m92NFjXVLauKa6xaeMpOUpdxLPv2idvd7fT0f1g8jR-GA0nAys14wOLKjdsJmSWSZwJBGVVyZngSguUs5RLhbYqJa8Mk7KSEkupE-VlBjBH0SeX-7mr4D87jG2xdHGOdW0b9F0sWC6U0lIo8w_KDBPaqDzRi1904bvQpEUKZmB3W27UnypnIjfAtUjqaq_mwccYsCpWwS1t2BYMit3Pip8_S5zv-cbVuP3TFuOXiZI5cPEFr7yVag</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1813890263</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>SMAP soil moisture drying more rapid than observed in situ following rainfall events</title><source>Wiley-Blackwell AGU Digital Archive</source><creator>Shellito, Peter J. ; Small, Eric E. ; Colliander, Andreas ; Bindlish, Rajat ; Cosh, Michael H. ; Berg, Aaron A. ; Bosch, David D. ; Caldwell, Todd G. ; Goodrich, David C. ; McNairn, Heather ; Prueger, John H. ; Starks, Patrick J. ; Velde, Rogier ; Walker, Jeffrey P.</creator><creatorcontrib>Shellito, Peter J. ; Small, Eric E. ; Colliander, Andreas ; Bindlish, Rajat ; Cosh, Michael H. ; Berg, Aaron A. ; Bosch, David D. ; Caldwell, Todd G. ; Goodrich, David C. ; McNairn, Heather ; Prueger, John H. ; Starks, Patrick J. ; Velde, Rogier ; Walker, Jeffrey P.</creatorcontrib><description>We examine soil drying rates by comparing surface soil moisture observations from the NASA Soil Moisture Active Passive (SMAP) mission to those from networks of in situ probes upscaled to SMAP's sensing footprint. SMAP and upscaled in situ probes record different soil drying dynamics after rainfall. We modeled this process by fitting an exponential curve to 63 drydown events: the median SMAP drying timescale is 44% shorter and the magnitude of drying is 35% greater than in situ measurements. We also calculated drying rates between consecutive observations from 193 events. For 6 days after rainfall, soil moisture from SMAP dries at twice the rate of in situ measurements. Restricting in situ observations to times of SMAP observations does not change the drying timescale, magnitude, or rate. Therefore, observed differences are likely due to differences in sensing depths: SMAP measures shallower soil moisture than in situ probes, especially after rainfall. Key Points SMAP and networks of in situ probes observe soil drying after rainfall SMAP observes soil drying to occur over a 44% shorter timescale than in situ SMAP observes soil drying to occur at twice the rate as in situ</description><identifier>ISSN: 0094-8276</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1944-8007</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/2016GL069946</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Washington: John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</publisher><subject>Curve fitting ; Detection ; drydown ; Drying ; Dynamics ; Herbivores ; In situ measurement ; in situ monitoring ; Mathematical models ; Moisture ; Networks ; Probes ; Rain ; Rainfall ; Sensors ; Soil ; Soil (material) ; Soil drying ; Soil dynamics ; Soil moisture ; Soil Moisture Active Passive (SMAP) ; Soil surfaces ; Soils ; Time ; validation</subject><ispartof>Geophysical research letters, 2016-08, Vol.43 (15), p.8068-8075</ispartof><rights>2016. American Geophysical Union. All Rights Reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a4612-ae5891b34774eb3e05a5d2132563e4b5d2d5eafd42f9144f44ed464eb2d700ce3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a4612-ae5891b34774eb3e05a5d2132563e4b5d2d5eafd42f9144f44ed464eb2d700ce3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2F2016GL069946$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2F2016GL069946$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,11495,27903,27904,46446,46870</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Shellito, Peter J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Small, Eric E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Colliander, Andreas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bindlish, Rajat</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cosh, Michael H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Berg, Aaron A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bosch, David D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Caldwell, Todd G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Goodrich, David C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McNairn, Heather</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Prueger, John H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Starks, Patrick J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Velde, Rogier</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Walker, Jeffrey P.</creatorcontrib><title>SMAP soil moisture drying more rapid than observed in situ following rainfall events</title><title>Geophysical research letters</title><description>We examine soil drying rates by comparing surface soil moisture observations from the NASA Soil Moisture Active Passive (SMAP) mission to those from networks of in situ probes upscaled to SMAP's sensing footprint. SMAP and upscaled in situ probes record different soil drying dynamics after rainfall. We modeled this process by fitting an exponential curve to 63 drydown events: the median SMAP drying timescale is 44% shorter and the magnitude of drying is 35% greater than in situ measurements. We also calculated drying rates between consecutive observations from 193 events. For 6 days after rainfall, soil moisture from SMAP dries at twice the rate of in situ measurements. Restricting in situ observations to times of SMAP observations does not change the drying timescale, magnitude, or rate. Therefore, observed differences are likely due to differences in sensing depths: SMAP measures shallower soil moisture than in situ probes, especially after rainfall. Key Points SMAP and networks of in situ probes observe soil drying after rainfall SMAP observes soil drying to occur over a 44% shorter timescale than in situ SMAP observes soil drying to occur at twice the rate as in situ</description><subject>Curve fitting</subject><subject>Detection</subject><subject>drydown</subject><subject>Drying</subject><subject>Dynamics</subject><subject>Herbivores</subject><subject>In situ measurement</subject><subject>in situ monitoring</subject><subject>Mathematical models</subject><subject>Moisture</subject><subject>Networks</subject><subject>Probes</subject><subject>Rain</subject><subject>Rainfall</subject><subject>Sensors</subject><subject>Soil</subject><subject>Soil (material)</subject><subject>Soil drying</subject><subject>Soil dynamics</subject><subject>Soil moisture</subject><subject>Soil Moisture Active Passive (SMAP)</subject><subject>Soil surfaces</subject><subject>Soils</subject><subject>Time</subject><subject>validation</subject><issn>0094-8276</issn><issn>1944-8007</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqN0U1LAzEQBuAgCtbqzR8Q8OLB6uRzN8dStAoVRet5SbuzmrLd1GS3pf_elHoQD-Jp3oGHgZkh5JzBNQPgNxyYHk9AGyP1AekxI-UgB8gOSQ_ApMwzfUxOYlwAgADBemT6-jh8ptG7mi69i20XkJZh65r31Kcc7MqVtP2wDfWziGGNJXUNja7taOXr2m92NFjXVLauKa6xaeMpOUpdxLPv2idvd7fT0f1g8jR-GA0nAys14wOLKjdsJmSWSZwJBGVVyZngSguUs5RLhbYqJa8Mk7KSEkupE-VlBjBH0SeX-7mr4D87jG2xdHGOdW0b9F0sWC6U0lIo8w_KDBPaqDzRi1904bvQpEUKZmB3W27UnypnIjfAtUjqaq_mwccYsCpWwS1t2BYMit3Pip8_S5zv-cbVuP3TFuOXiZI5cPEFr7yVag</recordid><startdate>20160816</startdate><enddate>20160816</enddate><creator>Shellito, Peter J.</creator><creator>Small, Eric E.</creator><creator>Colliander, Andreas</creator><creator>Bindlish, Rajat</creator><creator>Cosh, Michael H.</creator><creator>Berg, Aaron A.</creator><creator>Bosch, David D.</creator><creator>Caldwell, Todd G.</creator><creator>Goodrich, David C.</creator><creator>McNairn, Heather</creator><creator>Prueger, John H.</creator><creator>Starks, Patrick J.</creator><creator>Velde, Rogier</creator><creator>Walker, Jeffrey P.</creator><general>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TN</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>L7M</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20160816</creationdate><title>SMAP soil moisture drying more rapid than observed in situ following rainfall events</title><author>Shellito, Peter J. ; Small, Eric E. ; Colliander, Andreas ; Bindlish, Rajat ; Cosh, Michael H. ; Berg, Aaron A. ; Bosch, David D. ; Caldwell, Todd G. ; Goodrich, David C. ; McNairn, Heather ; Prueger, John H. ; Starks, Patrick J. ; Velde, Rogier ; Walker, Jeffrey P.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a4612-ae5891b34774eb3e05a5d2132563e4b5d2d5eafd42f9144f44ed464eb2d700ce3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Curve fitting</topic><topic>Detection</topic><topic>drydown</topic><topic>Drying</topic><topic>Dynamics</topic><topic>Herbivores</topic><topic>In situ measurement</topic><topic>in situ monitoring</topic><topic>Mathematical models</topic><topic>Moisture</topic><topic>Networks</topic><topic>Probes</topic><topic>Rain</topic><topic>Rainfall</topic><topic>Sensors</topic><topic>Soil</topic><topic>Soil (material)</topic><topic>Soil drying</topic><topic>Soil dynamics</topic><topic>Soil moisture</topic><topic>Soil Moisture Active Passive (SMAP)</topic><topic>Soil surfaces</topic><topic>Soils</topic><topic>Time</topic><topic>validation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Shellito, Peter J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Small, Eric E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Colliander, Andreas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bindlish, Rajat</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cosh, Michael H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Berg, Aaron A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bosch, David D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Caldwell, Todd G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Goodrich, David C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McNairn, Heather</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Prueger, John H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Starks, Patrick J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Velde, Rogier</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Walker, Jeffrey P.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Oceanic Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy &amp; Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><jtitle>Geophysical research letters</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Shellito, Peter J.</au><au>Small, Eric E.</au><au>Colliander, Andreas</au><au>Bindlish, Rajat</au><au>Cosh, Michael H.</au><au>Berg, Aaron A.</au><au>Bosch, David D.</au><au>Caldwell, Todd G.</au><au>Goodrich, David C.</au><au>McNairn, Heather</au><au>Prueger, John H.</au><au>Starks, Patrick J.</au><au>Velde, Rogier</au><au>Walker, Jeffrey P.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>SMAP soil moisture drying more rapid than observed in situ following rainfall events</atitle><jtitle>Geophysical research letters</jtitle><date>2016-08-16</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>43</volume><issue>15</issue><spage>8068</spage><epage>8075</epage><pages>8068-8075</pages><issn>0094-8276</issn><eissn>1944-8007</eissn><abstract>We examine soil drying rates by comparing surface soil moisture observations from the NASA Soil Moisture Active Passive (SMAP) mission to those from networks of in situ probes upscaled to SMAP's sensing footprint. SMAP and upscaled in situ probes record different soil drying dynamics after rainfall. We modeled this process by fitting an exponential curve to 63 drydown events: the median SMAP drying timescale is 44% shorter and the magnitude of drying is 35% greater than in situ measurements. We also calculated drying rates between consecutive observations from 193 events. For 6 days after rainfall, soil moisture from SMAP dries at twice the rate of in situ measurements. Restricting in situ observations to times of SMAP observations does not change the drying timescale, magnitude, or rate. Therefore, observed differences are likely due to differences in sensing depths: SMAP measures shallower soil moisture than in situ probes, especially after rainfall. Key Points SMAP and networks of in situ probes observe soil drying after rainfall SMAP observes soil drying to occur over a 44% shorter timescale than in situ SMAP observes soil drying to occur at twice the rate as in situ</abstract><cop>Washington</cop><pub>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</pub><doi>10.1002/2016GL069946</doi><tpages>8</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0094-8276
ispartof Geophysical research letters, 2016-08, Vol.43 (15), p.8068-8075
issn 0094-8276
1944-8007
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1835564359
source Wiley-Blackwell AGU Digital Archive
subjects Curve fitting
Detection
drydown
Drying
Dynamics
Herbivores
In situ measurement
in situ monitoring
Mathematical models
Moisture
Networks
Probes
Rain
Rainfall
Sensors
Soil
Soil (material)
Soil drying
Soil dynamics
Soil moisture
Soil Moisture Active Passive (SMAP)
Soil surfaces
Soils
Time
validation
title SMAP soil moisture drying more rapid than observed in situ following rainfall events
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-28T00%3A11%3A18IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=SMAP%20soil%20moisture%20drying%20more%20rapid%20than%20observed%20in%20situ%20following%20rainfall%20events&rft.jtitle=Geophysical%20research%20letters&rft.au=Shellito,%20Peter%20J.&rft.date=2016-08-16&rft.volume=43&rft.issue=15&rft.spage=8068&rft.epage=8075&rft.pages=8068-8075&rft.issn=0094-8276&rft.eissn=1944-8007&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/2016GL069946&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1819136958%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a4612-ae5891b34774eb3e05a5d2132563e4b5d2d5eafd42f9144f44ed464eb2d700ce3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1813890263&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true