Loading…
Meeting future food demand with current agricultural resources
•The global food system requires large amounts of water, nitrogen, CO2, and land.•We project these requirements and emissions to 2050 under future diet scenarios.•Even with improved efficiencies, agriculture’s environmental burden will grow.•Alternative diets and improved efficiency can reduce the f...
Saved in:
Published in: | Global environmental change 2016-07, Vol.39, p.125-132 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c414t-95c4b7aa764e1ea9bc443f877666629bb055272e9c41a067a3ab1269abb440e83 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c414t-95c4b7aa764e1ea9bc443f877666629bb055272e9c41a067a3ab1269abb440e83 |
container_end_page | 132 |
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 125 |
container_title | Global environmental change |
container_volume | 39 |
creator | Davis, Kyle F. Gephart, Jessica A. Emery, Kyle A. Leach, Allison M. Galloway, James N. D’Odorico, Paolo |
description | •The global food system requires large amounts of water, nitrogen, CO2, and land.•We project these requirements and emissions to 2050 under future diet scenarios.•Even with improved efficiencies, agriculture’s environmental burden will grow.•Alternative diets and improved efficiency can reduce the food system’s impacts.
Meeting the food needs of the growing and increasingly affluent human population with the planet’s limited resources is a major challenge of our time. Seen as the preferred approach to global food security issues, ‘sustainable intensification’ is the enhancement of crop yields while minimizing environmental impacts and preserving the ability of future generations to use the land. It is still unclear to what extent sustainable intensification would allow humanity to meet its demand for food commodities. Here we use the footprints for water, nitrogen, carbon and land to quantitatively evaluate resource demands and greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions of future agriculture and investigate whether an increase in these environmental burdens of food production can be avoided under a variety of dietary scenarios. We calculate average footprints of the current diet and find that animal products account for 43–87% of an individual’s environmental burden – compared to 18% of caloric intake and 39% of protein intake. Interestingly, we find that projected improvements in production efficiency would be insufficient to meet future food demand without also increasing the total environmental burden of food production. Transitioning to less impactful diets would in many cases allow production efficiency to keep pace with growth in human demand while minimizing the food system’s environmental burden. This study provides a useful approach for evaluating the attainability of sustainable targets and for better integrating food security and environmental impacts. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2016.05.004 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1835590672</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0959378016300632</els_id><sourcerecordid>1816866865</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c414t-95c4b7aa764e1ea9bc443f877666629bb055272e9c41a067a3ab1269abb440e83</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkU9LAzEQxYMoWKufwT162TXZzd-LUIpWoeJFzyGbnW1Ttpua7Fb89qZUvNrHwMDwe-8wD6FbgguCCb_fFKvOQ7-3a1OU6VBgVmBMz9CESFHmiip2jiZYMZVXQuJLdBXjBiepqpqgh1eAwfWrrB2HMUDWet9kDWxN32RfblhndgwB-iEzq-Ds2CXIdFmA6MdgIV6ji9Z0EW5-9xR9PD2-z5_z5dviZT5b5pYSOuSKWVoLYwSnQMCo2lJatVIInlSqusaMlaIElXCDuTCVqUnJlalrSjHIaorujrm74D9HiIPeumih60wPfoyayIoxlZzlCSjhkqdhp6BESka4Sqg4ojb4GAO0ehfc1oRvTbA-9KA3-q8HfehBY6ZTD8k5Ozoh_WfvIOhoHfQWGhfADrrx7t-MH2wMlIs</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1811885169</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Meeting future food demand with current agricultural resources</title><source>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</source><source>ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Davis, Kyle F. ; Gephart, Jessica A. ; Emery, Kyle A. ; Leach, Allison M. ; Galloway, James N. ; D’Odorico, Paolo</creator><creatorcontrib>Davis, Kyle F. ; Gephart, Jessica A. ; Emery, Kyle A. ; Leach, Allison M. ; Galloway, James N. ; D’Odorico, Paolo</creatorcontrib><description>•The global food system requires large amounts of water, nitrogen, CO2, and land.•We project these requirements and emissions to 2050 under future diet scenarios.•Even with improved efficiencies, agriculture’s environmental burden will grow.•Alternative diets and improved efficiency can reduce the food system’s impacts.
Meeting the food needs of the growing and increasingly affluent human population with the planet’s limited resources is a major challenge of our time. Seen as the preferred approach to global food security issues, ‘sustainable intensification’ is the enhancement of crop yields while minimizing environmental impacts and preserving the ability of future generations to use the land. It is still unclear to what extent sustainable intensification would allow humanity to meet its demand for food commodities. Here we use the footprints for water, nitrogen, carbon and land to quantitatively evaluate resource demands and greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions of future agriculture and investigate whether an increase in these environmental burdens of food production can be avoided under a variety of dietary scenarios. We calculate average footprints of the current diet and find that animal products account for 43–87% of an individual’s environmental burden – compared to 18% of caloric intake and 39% of protein intake. Interestingly, we find that projected improvements in production efficiency would be insufficient to meet future food demand without also increasing the total environmental burden of food production. Transitioning to less impactful diets would in many cases allow production efficiency to keep pace with growth in human demand while minimizing the food system’s environmental burden. This study provides a useful approach for evaluating the attainability of sustainable targets and for better integrating food security and environmental impacts.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0959-3780</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1872-9495</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2016.05.004</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Agricultural production ; Amplification ; Demand ; Dietary change ; Diets ; Environmental impact ; Food ; Food revolution ; Foods ; Footprint ; Future ; Future food demand ; Land ; Meetings ; Security ; Sustainability ; Sustainable intensification</subject><ispartof>Global environmental change, 2016-07, Vol.39, p.125-132</ispartof><rights>2016 Elsevier Ltd</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c414t-95c4b7aa764e1ea9bc443f877666629bb055272e9c41a067a3ab1269abb440e83</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c414t-95c4b7aa764e1ea9bc443f877666629bb055272e9c41a067a3ab1269abb440e83</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-4504-1407</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,33224</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Davis, Kyle F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gephart, Jessica A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Emery, Kyle A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leach, Allison M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Galloway, James N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>D’Odorico, Paolo</creatorcontrib><title>Meeting future food demand with current agricultural resources</title><title>Global environmental change</title><description>•The global food system requires large amounts of water, nitrogen, CO2, and land.•We project these requirements and emissions to 2050 under future diet scenarios.•Even with improved efficiencies, agriculture’s environmental burden will grow.•Alternative diets and improved efficiency can reduce the food system’s impacts.
Meeting the food needs of the growing and increasingly affluent human population with the planet’s limited resources is a major challenge of our time. Seen as the preferred approach to global food security issues, ‘sustainable intensification’ is the enhancement of crop yields while minimizing environmental impacts and preserving the ability of future generations to use the land. It is still unclear to what extent sustainable intensification would allow humanity to meet its demand for food commodities. Here we use the footprints for water, nitrogen, carbon and land to quantitatively evaluate resource demands and greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions of future agriculture and investigate whether an increase in these environmental burdens of food production can be avoided under a variety of dietary scenarios. We calculate average footprints of the current diet and find that animal products account for 43–87% of an individual’s environmental burden – compared to 18% of caloric intake and 39% of protein intake. Interestingly, we find that projected improvements in production efficiency would be insufficient to meet future food demand without also increasing the total environmental burden of food production. Transitioning to less impactful diets would in many cases allow production efficiency to keep pace with growth in human demand while minimizing the food system’s environmental burden. This study provides a useful approach for evaluating the attainability of sustainable targets and for better integrating food security and environmental impacts.</description><subject>Agricultural production</subject><subject>Amplification</subject><subject>Demand</subject><subject>Dietary change</subject><subject>Diets</subject><subject>Environmental impact</subject><subject>Food</subject><subject>Food revolution</subject><subject>Foods</subject><subject>Footprint</subject><subject>Future</subject><subject>Future food demand</subject><subject>Land</subject><subject>Meetings</subject><subject>Security</subject><subject>Sustainability</subject><subject>Sustainable intensification</subject><issn>0959-3780</issn><issn>1872-9495</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8BJ</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkU9LAzEQxYMoWKufwT162TXZzd-LUIpWoeJFzyGbnW1Ttpua7Fb89qZUvNrHwMDwe-8wD6FbgguCCb_fFKvOQ7-3a1OU6VBgVmBMz9CESFHmiip2jiZYMZVXQuJLdBXjBiepqpqgh1eAwfWrrB2HMUDWet9kDWxN32RfblhndgwB-iEzq-Ds2CXIdFmA6MdgIV6ji9Z0EW5-9xR9PD2-z5_z5dviZT5b5pYSOuSKWVoLYwSnQMCo2lJatVIInlSqusaMlaIElXCDuTCVqUnJlalrSjHIaorujrm74D9HiIPeumih60wPfoyayIoxlZzlCSjhkqdhp6BESka4Sqg4ojb4GAO0ehfc1oRvTbA-9KA3-q8HfehBY6ZTD8k5Ozoh_WfvIOhoHfQWGhfADrrx7t-MH2wMlIs</recordid><startdate>201607</startdate><enddate>201607</enddate><creator>Davis, Kyle F.</creator><creator>Gephart, Jessica A.</creator><creator>Emery, Kyle A.</creator><creator>Leach, Allison M.</creator><creator>Galloway, James N.</creator><creator>D’Odorico, Paolo</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H97</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L7M</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4504-1407</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201607</creationdate><title>Meeting future food demand with current agricultural resources</title><author>Davis, Kyle F. ; Gephart, Jessica A. ; Emery, Kyle A. ; Leach, Allison M. ; Galloway, James N. ; D’Odorico, Paolo</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c414t-95c4b7aa764e1ea9bc443f877666629bb055272e9c41a067a3ab1269abb440e83</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Agricultural production</topic><topic>Amplification</topic><topic>Demand</topic><topic>Dietary change</topic><topic>Diets</topic><topic>Environmental impact</topic><topic>Food</topic><topic>Food revolution</topic><topic>Foods</topic><topic>Footprint</topic><topic>Future</topic><topic>Future food demand</topic><topic>Land</topic><topic>Meetings</topic><topic>Security</topic><topic>Sustainability</topic><topic>Sustainable intensification</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Davis, Kyle F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gephart, Jessica A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Emery, Kyle A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leach, Allison M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Galloway, James N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>D’Odorico, Paolo</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 3: Aquatic Pollution & Environmental Quality</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><jtitle>Global environmental change</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Davis, Kyle F.</au><au>Gephart, Jessica A.</au><au>Emery, Kyle A.</au><au>Leach, Allison M.</au><au>Galloway, James N.</au><au>D’Odorico, Paolo</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Meeting future food demand with current agricultural resources</atitle><jtitle>Global environmental change</jtitle><date>2016-07</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>39</volume><spage>125</spage><epage>132</epage><pages>125-132</pages><issn>0959-3780</issn><eissn>1872-9495</eissn><abstract>•The global food system requires large amounts of water, nitrogen, CO2, and land.•We project these requirements and emissions to 2050 under future diet scenarios.•Even with improved efficiencies, agriculture’s environmental burden will grow.•Alternative diets and improved efficiency can reduce the food system’s impacts.
Meeting the food needs of the growing and increasingly affluent human population with the planet’s limited resources is a major challenge of our time. Seen as the preferred approach to global food security issues, ‘sustainable intensification’ is the enhancement of crop yields while minimizing environmental impacts and preserving the ability of future generations to use the land. It is still unclear to what extent sustainable intensification would allow humanity to meet its demand for food commodities. Here we use the footprints for water, nitrogen, carbon and land to quantitatively evaluate resource demands and greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions of future agriculture and investigate whether an increase in these environmental burdens of food production can be avoided under a variety of dietary scenarios. We calculate average footprints of the current diet and find that animal products account for 43–87% of an individual’s environmental burden – compared to 18% of caloric intake and 39% of protein intake. Interestingly, we find that projected improvements in production efficiency would be insufficient to meet future food demand without also increasing the total environmental burden of food production. Transitioning to less impactful diets would in many cases allow production efficiency to keep pace with growth in human demand while minimizing the food system’s environmental burden. This study provides a useful approach for evaluating the attainability of sustainable targets and for better integrating food security and environmental impacts.</abstract><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2016.05.004</doi><tpages>8</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4504-1407</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0959-3780 |
ispartof | Global environmental change, 2016-07, Vol.39, p.125-132 |
issn | 0959-3780 1872-9495 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1835590672 |
source | International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS); ScienceDirect Journals |
subjects | Agricultural production Amplification Demand Dietary change Diets Environmental impact Food Food revolution Foods Footprint Future Future food demand Land Meetings Security Sustainability Sustainable intensification |
title | Meeting future food demand with current agricultural resources |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-24T21%3A33%3A08IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Meeting%20future%20food%20demand%20with%20current%20agricultural%20resources&rft.jtitle=Global%20environmental%20change&rft.au=Davis,%20Kyle%20F.&rft.date=2016-07&rft.volume=39&rft.spage=125&rft.epage=132&rft.pages=125-132&rft.issn=0959-3780&rft.eissn=1872-9495&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2016.05.004&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1816866865%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c414t-95c4b7aa764e1ea9bc443f877666629bb055272e9c41a067a3ab1269abb440e83%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1811885169&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |