Will the Conscious–Subconscious Pacing Quagmire Help Elucidate the Mechanisms of Self-Paced Exercise? New Opportunities in Dual Process Theory and Process Tracing Methods

• Published in: Sports medicine (Auckland) 2017-07, Vol.47 (7), p.1231-1239
• Main Authors: Micklewright, Dominic, Kegerreis, Sue, Raglin, John, Hettinga, Florentina
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Athletes; Athletic Performance - physiology; Athletic Performance - psychology; Cognition & reasoning; Cognitive ability; Consciousness; Consciousness - physiology; Current Opinion; Decision Making; Decision theory; Emotions; Exercise - physiology; Exercise - psychology; Exercise intensity; Governors; Humans; Medicine; Medicine & Public Health; Memory; Perception; Physiology; Problem solving; Psychobiology; Recruitment; Research methods; Speed skating; Sports - physiology; Sports Medicine; Subconscious; Unconscious (Psychology)
• ISSN: 0112-1642; 1179-2035
• DOI: 10.1007/s40279-016-0642-6

The extent to which athletic pacing decisions are made consciously or subconsciously is a prevailing issue. In this article we discuss why the one-dimensional conscious–subconscious debate that has reigned in the pacing literature has suppressed our understanding of the multidimensional processes that occur in pacing decisions. How do we make our decisions in real-life competitive situations? What information do we use and how do we respond to opponents? These are questions that need to be explored and better understood, using smartly designed experiments. The paper provides clarity about key conscious, preconscious, subconscious and unconscious concepts, terms that have previously been used in conflicting and confusing ways. The potential of dual process theory in articulating multidimensional aspects of intuitive and deliberative decision-making processes is discussed in the context of athletic pacing along with associated process-tracing research methods. In attempting to refine pacing models and improve training strategies and psychological skills for athletes, the dual-process framework could be used to gain a clearer understanding of (1) the situational conditions for which either intuitive or deliberative decisions are optimal; (2) how intuitive and deliberative decisions are biased by things such as perception, emotion and experience; and (3) the underlying cognitive mechanisms such as memory, attention allocation, problem solving and hypothetical thought.