Loading…

Inverse problem for the current loop model: Possibilities and restrictions

The possibilities of determining arbitrary current loop parameters based on the spatial structures of the magnetic field components generated by this loop on a sphere with a specified radius have been considered with the use of models. The model parameters were selected such that anomalies created b...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Geomagnetism and Aeronomy 2016-07, Vol.56 (4), p.415-425
Main Authors: Demina, I. M., Farafonova, Yu. G.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c382t-908d76decd5f3c1bebb711b5658c21b287a1bd006f35d7da5551fb27cb650f673
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c382t-908d76decd5f3c1bebb711b5658c21b287a1bd006f35d7da5551fb27cb650f673
container_end_page 425
container_issue 4
container_start_page 415
container_title Geomagnetism and Aeronomy
container_volume 56
creator Demina, I. M.
Farafonova, Yu. G.
description The possibilities of determining arbitrary current loop parameters based on the spatial structures of the magnetic field components generated by this loop on a sphere with a specified radius have been considered with the use of models. The model parameters were selected such that anomalies created by current loops on a sphere with a radius of 6378 km would be comparable in value with the different-scale anomalies of the observed main geomagnetic field (MGF). The least squares method was used to solve the inverse problem. Estimates close to the specified values were obtained for all current loop parameters except the current strength and radius. The radius determination error can reach ±120 km; at the same time, the magnetic moment value is determined with an accuracy of ±1%. The resolvability of the current force and radius can to a certain degree be improved by decreasing the observation sphere radius such that the ratio of the source distance to the current loop radius would be at least smaller than eight, which can be difficult to reach when modeling MGF.
doi_str_mv 10.1134/S0016793216030038
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1835674665</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>4145899351</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c382t-908d76decd5f3c1bebb711b5658c21b287a1bd006f35d7da5551fb27cb650f673</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkc1LxDAQxYMouK7-Ad4CXrxUM81O0nqTxY-VBQUVvJXmo5ql26xJK_jfm3U9iCJ4msP7vcfMPEIOgZ0A8MnpPWMgZMlzEIwzxostMgJEzMQEn7bJaC1na32X7MW4SARDhBG5mXVvNkRLV8Gr1i5p4wPtXyzVQwi262nr_YouvbHtGb3zMTrlWtc7G2ndGRps7IPTvfNd3Cc7Td1Ge_A1x-Tx8uJhep3Nb69m0_N5pnmR91nJCiOFsdpgwzUoq5QEUCiw0DmovJA1KMOYaDgaaep0BDQql1oJZI2QfEyON7lp5dchLVAtXdS2bevO-iFWUHAUciIE_gMFKCRizhN69ANd-CF06ZBPiklWYpko2FA6pF8E21Sr4JZ1eK-AVesiql9FJE--8cTEds82fEv-0_QBa_SJJA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1811070959</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Inverse problem for the current loop model: Possibilities and restrictions</title><source>Springer Link</source><creator>Demina, I. M. ; Farafonova, Yu. G.</creator><creatorcontrib>Demina, I. M. ; Farafonova, Yu. G.</creatorcontrib><description>The possibilities of determining arbitrary current loop parameters based on the spatial structures of the magnetic field components generated by this loop on a sphere with a specified radius have been considered with the use of models. The model parameters were selected such that anomalies created by current loops on a sphere with a radius of 6378 km would be comparable in value with the different-scale anomalies of the observed main geomagnetic field (MGF). The least squares method was used to solve the inverse problem. Estimates close to the specified values were obtained for all current loop parameters except the current strength and radius. The radius determination error can reach ±120 km; at the same time, the magnetic moment value is determined with an accuracy of ±1%. The resolvability of the current force and radius can to a certain degree be improved by decreasing the observation sphere radius such that the ratio of the source distance to the current loop radius would be at least smaller than eight, which can be difficult to reach when modeling MGF.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0016-7932</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1555-645X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 0016-7940</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1134/S0016793216030038</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Moscow: Pleiades Publishing</publisher><subject>Anomalies ; Earth and Environmental Science ; Earth Sciences ; Estimates ; Geomagnetic field ; Geomagnetic fields ; Geomagnetism ; Geophysics/Geodesy ; Inverse problems ; Least squares method ; Loops ; Magnetic fields ; Mathematical models ; Parameter estimation</subject><ispartof>Geomagnetism and Aeronomy, 2016-07, Vol.56 (4), p.415-425</ispartof><rights>Pleiades Publishing, Ltd. 2016</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c382t-908d76decd5f3c1bebb711b5658c21b287a1bd006f35d7da5551fb27cb650f673</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c382t-908d76decd5f3c1bebb711b5658c21b287a1bd006f35d7da5551fb27cb650f673</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Demina, I. M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Farafonova, Yu. G.</creatorcontrib><title>Inverse problem for the current loop model: Possibilities and restrictions</title><title>Geomagnetism and Aeronomy</title><addtitle>Geomagn. Aeron</addtitle><description>The possibilities of determining arbitrary current loop parameters based on the spatial structures of the magnetic field components generated by this loop on a sphere with a specified radius have been considered with the use of models. The model parameters were selected such that anomalies created by current loops on a sphere with a radius of 6378 km would be comparable in value with the different-scale anomalies of the observed main geomagnetic field (MGF). The least squares method was used to solve the inverse problem. Estimates close to the specified values were obtained for all current loop parameters except the current strength and radius. The radius determination error can reach ±120 km; at the same time, the magnetic moment value is determined with an accuracy of ±1%. The resolvability of the current force and radius can to a certain degree be improved by decreasing the observation sphere radius such that the ratio of the source distance to the current loop radius would be at least smaller than eight, which can be difficult to reach when modeling MGF.</description><subject>Anomalies</subject><subject>Earth and Environmental Science</subject><subject>Earth Sciences</subject><subject>Estimates</subject><subject>Geomagnetic field</subject><subject>Geomagnetic fields</subject><subject>Geomagnetism</subject><subject>Geophysics/Geodesy</subject><subject>Inverse problems</subject><subject>Least squares method</subject><subject>Loops</subject><subject>Magnetic fields</subject><subject>Mathematical models</subject><subject>Parameter estimation</subject><issn>0016-7932</issn><issn>1555-645X</issn><issn>0016-7940</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNkc1LxDAQxYMouK7-Ad4CXrxUM81O0nqTxY-VBQUVvJXmo5ql26xJK_jfm3U9iCJ4msP7vcfMPEIOgZ0A8MnpPWMgZMlzEIwzxostMgJEzMQEn7bJaC1na32X7MW4SARDhBG5mXVvNkRLV8Gr1i5p4wPtXyzVQwi262nr_YouvbHtGb3zMTrlWtc7G2ndGRps7IPTvfNd3Cc7Td1Ge_A1x-Tx8uJhep3Nb69m0_N5pnmR91nJCiOFsdpgwzUoq5QEUCiw0DmovJA1KMOYaDgaaep0BDQql1oJZI2QfEyON7lp5dchLVAtXdS2bevO-iFWUHAUciIE_gMFKCRizhN69ANd-CF06ZBPiklWYpko2FA6pF8E21Sr4JZ1eK-AVesiql9FJE--8cTEds82fEv-0_QBa_SJJA</recordid><startdate>20160701</startdate><enddate>20160701</enddate><creator>Demina, I. M.</creator><creator>Farafonova, Yu. G.</creator><general>Pleiades Publishing</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20160701</creationdate><title>Inverse problem for the current loop model: Possibilities and restrictions</title><author>Demina, I. M. ; Farafonova, Yu. G.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c382t-908d76decd5f3c1bebb711b5658c21b287a1bd006f35d7da5551fb27cb650f673</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Anomalies</topic><topic>Earth and Environmental Science</topic><topic>Earth Sciences</topic><topic>Estimates</topic><topic>Geomagnetic field</topic><topic>Geomagnetic fields</topic><topic>Geomagnetism</topic><topic>Geophysics/Geodesy</topic><topic>Inverse problems</topic><topic>Least squares method</topic><topic>Loops</topic><topic>Magnetic fields</topic><topic>Mathematical models</topic><topic>Parameter estimation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Demina, I. M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Farafonova, Yu. G.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Science Database (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest advanced technologies &amp; aerospace journals</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Geomagnetism and Aeronomy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Demina, I. M.</au><au>Farafonova, Yu. G.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Inverse problem for the current loop model: Possibilities and restrictions</atitle><jtitle>Geomagnetism and Aeronomy</jtitle><stitle>Geomagn. Aeron</stitle><date>2016-07-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>56</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>415</spage><epage>425</epage><pages>415-425</pages><issn>0016-7932</issn><eissn>1555-645X</eissn><eissn>0016-7940</eissn><abstract>The possibilities of determining arbitrary current loop parameters based on the spatial structures of the magnetic field components generated by this loop on a sphere with a specified radius have been considered with the use of models. The model parameters were selected such that anomalies created by current loops on a sphere with a radius of 6378 km would be comparable in value with the different-scale anomalies of the observed main geomagnetic field (MGF). The least squares method was used to solve the inverse problem. Estimates close to the specified values were obtained for all current loop parameters except the current strength and radius. The radius determination error can reach ±120 km; at the same time, the magnetic moment value is determined with an accuracy of ±1%. The resolvability of the current force and radius can to a certain degree be improved by decreasing the observation sphere radius such that the ratio of the source distance to the current loop radius would be at least smaller than eight, which can be difficult to reach when modeling MGF.</abstract><cop>Moscow</cop><pub>Pleiades Publishing</pub><doi>10.1134/S0016793216030038</doi><tpages>11</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0016-7932
ispartof Geomagnetism and Aeronomy, 2016-07, Vol.56 (4), p.415-425
issn 0016-7932
1555-645X
0016-7940
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1835674665
source Springer Link
subjects Anomalies
Earth and Environmental Science
Earth Sciences
Estimates
Geomagnetic field
Geomagnetic fields
Geomagnetism
Geophysics/Geodesy
Inverse problems
Least squares method
Loops
Magnetic fields
Mathematical models
Parameter estimation
title Inverse problem for the current loop model: Possibilities and restrictions
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-01T07%3A20%3A57IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Inverse%20problem%20for%20the%20current%20loop%20model:%20Possibilities%20and%20restrictions&rft.jtitle=Geomagnetism%20and%20Aeronomy&rft.au=Demina,%20I.%20M.&rft.date=2016-07-01&rft.volume=56&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=415&rft.epage=425&rft.pages=415-425&rft.issn=0016-7932&rft.eissn=1555-645X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1134/S0016793216030038&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E4145899351%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c382t-908d76decd5f3c1bebb711b5658c21b287a1bd006f35d7da5551fb27cb650f673%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1811070959&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true