Loading…
Nutrient content and nutrient availability of sorghum wet distiller's grain in comparison with the parental grain for ruminants
BACKGROUND The present study aimed to compare wet sorghum distiller's grain (WSDG) with sorghum grain (SG) in terms of: (i) chemical composition; (ii) in situ rumen degradation kinetics of organic matter (OM) and neutral detergent fiber (NDF); (iii) crude protein (CP) sub‐fractions; (iv) in sit...
Saved in:
| Published in: | Journal of the science of food and agriculture 2017-06, Vol.97 (8), p.2353-2357 |
|---|---|
| Main Authors: | , , |
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Subjects: | |
| Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
| Online Access: | Get full text |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3536-73acab09d6f4b74d022fd9feb9ce83936ef14de22bd9d0c157c51364af1bb2893 |
|---|---|
| cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3536-73acab09d6f4b74d022fd9feb9ce83936ef14de22bd9d0c157c51364af1bb2893 |
| container_end_page | 2357 |
| container_issue | 8 |
| container_start_page | 2353 |
| container_title | Journal of the science of food and agriculture |
| container_volume | 97 |
| creator | Trujillo, Ana I Bruni, María Chilibroste, Pablo |
| description | BACKGROUND
The present study aimed to compare wet sorghum distiller's grain (WSDG) with sorghum grain (SG) in terms of: (i) chemical composition; (ii) in situ rumen degradation kinetics of organic matter (OM) and neutral detergent fiber (NDF); (iii) crude protein (CP) sub‐fractions; (iv) in situ disappearance at 12 and 48 h; and (v) energy values. The WSDG intestinal digestibility (ID) of undegradable crude protein (UCP) was compared to soybean meal (SBM).
RESULTS
Compared to SG, WSDG exhibited: (i) lower (P |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1002/jsfa.8046 |
| format | article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1835684150</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1835684150</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3536-73acab09d6f4b74d022fd9feb9ce83936ef14de22bd9d0c157c51364af1bb2893</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp10U1rFDEYB_Agil2rB7-ABDyoh2mfTCaZybEU6wtFD-p5yOSlmyWTrEmmy5786mbdrQdBCDzw5MefhD9CLwlcEID2cpOtvBig44_QioDoGwACj9Gq3rUNI117hp7lvAEAITh_is7anjNKiVihX1-WkpwJBasYymHKoHF4WMp76bycnHdlj6PFOaa79TLjnSlYu1yc9ya9yfguSRdwPSrOW5lcjgHvXFnjsja4LmqW9CdlY8JpmV2QoeTn6ImVPpsXp3mOfty8_379sbn9-uHT9dVtoyijvOmpVHICobntpr7T9WNWC2smocxABeXGkk6btp200KAI6xUjlHfSkmlqB0HP0dtj7jbFn4vJZZxdVsZ7GUxc8kgGyvjQEQaVvv6HbuKSQn1dVYKBANaTqt4dlUox52TsuE1ulmk_EhgPrYyHVsZDK9W-OiUu02z0X_lQQwWXR7Bz3uz_nzR-_nZz9SfyNwHimYI</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1895090571</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Nutrient content and nutrient availability of sorghum wet distiller's grain in comparison with the parental grain for ruminants</title><source>Wiley</source><creator>Trujillo, Ana I ; Bruni, María ; Chilibroste, Pablo</creator><creatorcontrib>Trujillo, Ana I ; Bruni, María ; Chilibroste, Pablo</creatorcontrib><description><![CDATA[BACKGROUND
The present study aimed to compare wet sorghum distiller's grain (WSDG) with sorghum grain (SG) in terms of: (i) chemical composition; (ii) in situ rumen degradation kinetics of organic matter (OM) and neutral detergent fiber (NDF); (iii) crude protein (CP) sub‐fractions; (iv) in situ disappearance at 12 and 48 h; and (v) energy values. The WSDG intestinal digestibility (ID) of undegradable crude protein (UCP) was compared to soybean meal (SBM).
RESULTS
Compared to SG, WSDG exhibited: (i) lower (P < 0.01) dry matter and non‐fiber carbohydrate content, whereas the other chemical components were higher (P < 0.01); (ii) higher (P < 0.01) degradation rates of OM and NDF and lower (P < 0.01) degradable fraction of OM and NDF; (iii) lower (P < 0.05) contents of CP sub‐fractions A, B1 and B2, and higher (P < 0.05) contents of B3 and C; (iv) lower (P < 0.05) protein disappearance at 12 and 48 h and higher UCP; and (v) lower (P < 0.05) energy content. The ID of UCP for WSDG was lower (P < 0.05) compared to SBM.
CONCLUSION
The WSDG as a supplement provides a good source of energy. To enable its use as a protein supplement, further studies should be performed. © 2016 Society of Chemical Industry]]></description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-5142</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1097-0010</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/jsfa.8046</identifier><identifier>PMID: 27653319</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd</publisher><subject>Animal Feed - analysis ; Animals ; Carbohydrates ; Cattle ; Chemical composition ; Degradation ; degradation kinetic ; Dietary Fiber - analysis ; Dietary Proteins - analysis ; Digestibility ; distiller's grain ; Dry matter ; Energy sources ; Energy value ; Feeds ; Female ; Glycine max ; Grain ; Intestine ; Nutrient availability ; Nutrient content ; Nutritive Value ; Organic matter ; Proteins ; Rumen ; Rumen - metabolism ; Sorghum ; Sorghum - chemistry ; sorghum grain ; Soybeans</subject><ispartof>Journal of the science of food and agriculture, 2017-06, Vol.97 (8), p.2353-2357</ispartof><rights>2016 Society of Chemical Industry</rights><rights>2016 Society of Chemical Industry.</rights><rights>2017 Society of Chemical Industry</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3536-73acab09d6f4b74d022fd9feb9ce83936ef14de22bd9d0c157c51364af1bb2893</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3536-73acab09d6f4b74d022fd9feb9ce83936ef14de22bd9d0c157c51364af1bb2893</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27653319$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Trujillo, Ana I</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bruni, María</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chilibroste, Pablo</creatorcontrib><title>Nutrient content and nutrient availability of sorghum wet distiller's grain in comparison with the parental grain for ruminants</title><title>Journal of the science of food and agriculture</title><addtitle>J Sci Food Agric</addtitle><description><![CDATA[BACKGROUND
The present study aimed to compare wet sorghum distiller's grain (WSDG) with sorghum grain (SG) in terms of: (i) chemical composition; (ii) in situ rumen degradation kinetics of organic matter (OM) and neutral detergent fiber (NDF); (iii) crude protein (CP) sub‐fractions; (iv) in situ disappearance at 12 and 48 h; and (v) energy values. The WSDG intestinal digestibility (ID) of undegradable crude protein (UCP) was compared to soybean meal (SBM).
RESULTS
Compared to SG, WSDG exhibited: (i) lower (P < 0.01) dry matter and non‐fiber carbohydrate content, whereas the other chemical components were higher (P < 0.01); (ii) higher (P < 0.01) degradation rates of OM and NDF and lower (P < 0.01) degradable fraction of OM and NDF; (iii) lower (P < 0.05) contents of CP sub‐fractions A, B1 and B2, and higher (P < 0.05) contents of B3 and C; (iv) lower (P < 0.05) protein disappearance at 12 and 48 h and higher UCP; and (v) lower (P < 0.05) energy content. The ID of UCP for WSDG was lower (P < 0.05) compared to SBM.
CONCLUSION
The WSDG as a supplement provides a good source of energy. To enable its use as a protein supplement, further studies should be performed. © 2016 Society of Chemical Industry]]></description><subject>Animal Feed - analysis</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Carbohydrates</subject><subject>Cattle</subject><subject>Chemical composition</subject><subject>Degradation</subject><subject>degradation kinetic</subject><subject>Dietary Fiber - analysis</subject><subject>Dietary Proteins - analysis</subject><subject>Digestibility</subject><subject>distiller's grain</subject><subject>Dry matter</subject><subject>Energy sources</subject><subject>Energy value</subject><subject>Feeds</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Glycine max</subject><subject>Grain</subject><subject>Intestine</subject><subject>Nutrient availability</subject><subject>Nutrient content</subject><subject>Nutritive Value</subject><subject>Organic matter</subject><subject>Proteins</subject><subject>Rumen</subject><subject>Rumen - metabolism</subject><subject>Sorghum</subject><subject>Sorghum - chemistry</subject><subject>sorghum grain</subject><subject>Soybeans</subject><issn>0022-5142</issn><issn>1097-0010</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp10U1rFDEYB_Agil2rB7-ABDyoh2mfTCaZybEU6wtFD-p5yOSlmyWTrEmmy5786mbdrQdBCDzw5MefhD9CLwlcEID2cpOtvBig44_QioDoGwACj9Gq3rUNI117hp7lvAEAITh_is7anjNKiVihX1-WkpwJBasYymHKoHF4WMp76bycnHdlj6PFOaa79TLjnSlYu1yc9ya9yfguSRdwPSrOW5lcjgHvXFnjsja4LmqW9CdlY8JpmV2QoeTn6ImVPpsXp3mOfty8_379sbn9-uHT9dVtoyijvOmpVHICobntpr7T9WNWC2smocxABeXGkk6btp200KAI6xUjlHfSkmlqB0HP0dtj7jbFn4vJZZxdVsZ7GUxc8kgGyvjQEQaVvv6HbuKSQn1dVYKBANaTqt4dlUox52TsuE1ulmk_EhgPrYyHVsZDK9W-OiUu02z0X_lQQwWXR7Bz3uz_nzR-_nZz9SfyNwHimYI</recordid><startdate>201706</startdate><enddate>201706</enddate><creator>Trujillo, Ana I</creator><creator>Bruni, María</creator><creator>Chilibroste, Pablo</creator><general>John Wiley & Sons, Ltd</general><general>John Wiley and Sons, Limited</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QF</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QQ</scope><scope>7QR</scope><scope>7SC</scope><scope>7SE</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SP</scope><scope>7SR</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7TA</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7U5</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>8BQ</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F28</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>H8G</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>L~C</scope><scope>L~D</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201706</creationdate><title>Nutrient content and nutrient availability of sorghum wet distiller's grain in comparison with the parental grain for ruminants</title><author>Trujillo, Ana I ; Bruni, María ; Chilibroste, Pablo</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3536-73acab09d6f4b74d022fd9feb9ce83936ef14de22bd9d0c157c51364af1bb2893</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Animal Feed - analysis</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Carbohydrates</topic><topic>Cattle</topic><topic>Chemical composition</topic><topic>Degradation</topic><topic>degradation kinetic</topic><topic>Dietary Fiber - analysis</topic><topic>Dietary Proteins - analysis</topic><topic>Digestibility</topic><topic>distiller's grain</topic><topic>Dry matter</topic><topic>Energy sources</topic><topic>Energy value</topic><topic>Feeds</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Glycine max</topic><topic>Grain</topic><topic>Intestine</topic><topic>Nutrient availability</topic><topic>Nutrient content</topic><topic>Nutritive Value</topic><topic>Organic matter</topic><topic>Proteins</topic><topic>Rumen</topic><topic>Rumen - metabolism</topic><topic>Sorghum</topic><topic>Sorghum - chemistry</topic><topic>sorghum grain</topic><topic>Soybeans</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Trujillo, Ana I</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bruni, María</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chilibroste, Pablo</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Aluminium Industry Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Ceramic Abstracts</collection><collection>Chemoreception Abstracts</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts</collection><collection>Corrosion Abstracts</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Electronics & Communications Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineered Materials Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Materials Business File</collection><collection>Mechanical & Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Solid State and Superconductivity Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>METADEX</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ANTE: Abstracts in New Technology & Engineering</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Copper Technical Reference Library</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Academic</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of the science of food and agriculture</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Trujillo, Ana I</au><au>Bruni, María</au><au>Chilibroste, Pablo</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Nutrient content and nutrient availability of sorghum wet distiller's grain in comparison with the parental grain for ruminants</atitle><jtitle>Journal of the science of food and agriculture</jtitle><addtitle>J Sci Food Agric</addtitle><date>2017-06</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>97</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>2353</spage><epage>2357</epage><pages>2353-2357</pages><issn>0022-5142</issn><eissn>1097-0010</eissn><abstract><![CDATA[BACKGROUND
The present study aimed to compare wet sorghum distiller's grain (WSDG) with sorghum grain (SG) in terms of: (i) chemical composition; (ii) in situ rumen degradation kinetics of organic matter (OM) and neutral detergent fiber (NDF); (iii) crude protein (CP) sub‐fractions; (iv) in situ disappearance at 12 and 48 h; and (v) energy values. The WSDG intestinal digestibility (ID) of undegradable crude protein (UCP) was compared to soybean meal (SBM).
RESULTS
Compared to SG, WSDG exhibited: (i) lower (P < 0.01) dry matter and non‐fiber carbohydrate content, whereas the other chemical components were higher (P < 0.01); (ii) higher (P < 0.01) degradation rates of OM and NDF and lower (P < 0.01) degradable fraction of OM and NDF; (iii) lower (P < 0.05) contents of CP sub‐fractions A, B1 and B2, and higher (P < 0.05) contents of B3 and C; (iv) lower (P < 0.05) protein disappearance at 12 and 48 h and higher UCP; and (v) lower (P < 0.05) energy content. The ID of UCP for WSDG was lower (P < 0.05) compared to SBM.
CONCLUSION
The WSDG as a supplement provides a good source of energy. To enable its use as a protein supplement, further studies should be performed. © 2016 Society of Chemical Industry]]></abstract><cop>Chichester, UK</cop><pub>John Wiley & Sons, Ltd</pub><pmid>27653319</pmid><doi>10.1002/jsfa.8046</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0022-5142 |
| ispartof | Journal of the science of food and agriculture, 2017-06, Vol.97 (8), p.2353-2357 |
| issn | 0022-5142 1097-0010 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1835684150 |
| source | Wiley |
| subjects | Animal Feed - analysis Animals Carbohydrates Cattle Chemical composition Degradation degradation kinetic Dietary Fiber - analysis Dietary Proteins - analysis Digestibility distiller's grain Dry matter Energy sources Energy value Feeds Female Glycine max Grain Intestine Nutrient availability Nutrient content Nutritive Value Organic matter Proteins Rumen Rumen - metabolism Sorghum Sorghum - chemistry sorghum grain Soybeans |
| title | Nutrient content and nutrient availability of sorghum wet distiller's grain in comparison with the parental grain for ruminants |
| url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-31T08%3A18%3A57IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Nutrient%20content%20and%20nutrient%20availability%20of%20sorghum%20wet%20distiller's%20grain%20in%20comparison%20with%20the%20parental%20grain%20for%20ruminants&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20the%20science%20of%20food%20and%20agriculture&rft.au=Trujillo,%20Ana%20I&rft.date=2017-06&rft.volume=97&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=2353&rft.epage=2357&rft.pages=2353-2357&rft.issn=0022-5142&rft.eissn=1097-0010&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/jsfa.8046&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1835684150%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3536-73acab09d6f4b74d022fd9feb9ce83936ef14de22bd9d0c157c51364af1bb2893%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1895090571&rft_id=info:pmid/27653319&rfr_iscdi=true |