Loading…

Increased social distance makes people more risk-neutral

Individuals are consistently observed to be risk-averse over gains and risk-seeking over losses. This study examined whether increased social distance would change these behavioral patterns. To test our hypothesis, social distance was manipulated by asking the participants to make decisions either f...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:The Journal of social psychology 2017-07, Vol.157 (4), p.502-512
Main Authors: Sun, Qingzhou, Liu, Yongfang, Zhang, Huanren, Lu, Jingyi
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c394t-67ef9c8ec67cbb33876c1916a2620c46a644e2ddc42977dfcfba32e2459b76e3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c394t-67ef9c8ec67cbb33876c1916a2620c46a644e2ddc42977dfcfba32e2459b76e3
container_end_page 512
container_issue 4
container_start_page 502
container_title The Journal of social psychology
container_volume 157
creator Sun, Qingzhou
Liu, Yongfang
Zhang, Huanren
Lu, Jingyi
description Individuals are consistently observed to be risk-averse over gains and risk-seeking over losses. This study examined whether increased social distance would change these behavioral patterns. To test our hypothesis, social distance was manipulated by asking the participants to make decisions either for themselves or for another person (Experiment 1), either for a known person or for an unknown person (Experiment 2), and either for a close friend or for a distant friend (Experiment 3). The results of Experiments 1 and 3 showed that increased social distance made people more risk-neutral, and such an effect was stronger in the gain domain than in the loss domain. However, the effect of social distance was not observed in Experiment 2. These findings suggest that risk preferences are influenced by the social distance between decision makers and beneficiaries.
doi_str_mv 10.1080/00224545.2016.1242471
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1837024272</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1837024272</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c394t-67ef9c8ec67cbb33876c1916a2620c46a644e2ddc42977dfcfba32e2459b76e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1LwzAYx4Mobk4_glLw4qUzSdOkuSnDl8HAy-4hTZ9Ct7SpSYvs25uy6cGDuTwEfs_L_4fQLcFLggv8iDGlLGf5kmLCl4QyygQ5Q3MiGU4JKbJzNJ-YdIJm6CqEHY5PSHKJZlTwIqcsm6Ni3RkPOkCVBGcabZOqCYPuDCSt3kNIenC9jR_nIfFN2KcdjIPX9hpd1NoGuDnVBdq-vmxX7-nm4229et6kJpNsSLmAWpoCDBemLLOsENwQSbimnGLDuOaMAa0qw6gUoqpNXeqMQowmS8EhW6CH49jeu88RwqDaJhiwVnfgxqBiUIFjeEEjev8H3bnRd_E4RSTGUuaMiUjlR8p4F4KHWvW-abU_KILVZFb9mFWTWXUyG_vuTtPHsoXqt-tHZQSejkDT1c63-st5W6lBH6zztY9Gm6Cy_3d8A6Ujhgc</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1900995447</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Increased social distance makes people more risk-neutral</title><source>EBSCOhost Business Source Ultimate</source><source>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</source><source>Taylor &amp; Francis</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><source>EBSCOhost SPORTDiscus - Ebooks</source><creator>Sun, Qingzhou ; Liu, Yongfang ; Zhang, Huanren ; Lu, Jingyi</creator><creatorcontrib>Sun, Qingzhou ; Liu, Yongfang ; Zhang, Huanren ; Lu, Jingyi</creatorcontrib><description>Individuals are consistently observed to be risk-averse over gains and risk-seeking over losses. This study examined whether increased social distance would change these behavioral patterns. To test our hypothesis, social distance was manipulated by asking the participants to make decisions either for themselves or for another person (Experiment 1), either for a known person or for an unknown person (Experiment 2), and either for a close friend or for a distant friend (Experiment 3). The results of Experiments 1 and 3 showed that increased social distance made people more risk-neutral, and such an effect was stronger in the gain domain than in the loss domain. However, the effect of social distance was not observed in Experiment 2. These findings suggest that risk preferences are influenced by the social distance between decision makers and beneficiaries.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-4545</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1940-1183</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/00224545.2016.1242471</identifier><identifier>PMID: 27685243</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Routledge</publisher><subject>Adult ; Behavior change ; Beneficiaries ; Decision makers ; Decision Making ; Experiments ; Female ; Gain/loss domain ; Humans ; Male ; Risk ; risk preference ; Risk preferences ; Risk-Taking ; Social change ; Social Distance ; Social research ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>The Journal of social psychology, 2017-07, Vol.157 (4), p.502-512</ispartof><rights>2017 Taylor &amp; Francis 2017</rights><rights>2017 Taylor &amp; Francis</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c394t-67ef9c8ec67cbb33876c1916a2620c46a644e2ddc42977dfcfba32e2459b76e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c394t-67ef9c8ec67cbb33876c1916a2620c46a644e2ddc42977dfcfba32e2459b76e3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27923,27924,30998,33222,33773</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27685243$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Sun, Qingzhou</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Yongfang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Huanren</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lu, Jingyi</creatorcontrib><title>Increased social distance makes people more risk-neutral</title><title>The Journal of social psychology</title><addtitle>J Soc Psychol</addtitle><description>Individuals are consistently observed to be risk-averse over gains and risk-seeking over losses. This study examined whether increased social distance would change these behavioral patterns. To test our hypothesis, social distance was manipulated by asking the participants to make decisions either for themselves or for another person (Experiment 1), either for a known person or for an unknown person (Experiment 2), and either for a close friend or for a distant friend (Experiment 3). The results of Experiments 1 and 3 showed that increased social distance made people more risk-neutral, and such an effect was stronger in the gain domain than in the loss domain. However, the effect of social distance was not observed in Experiment 2. These findings suggest that risk preferences are influenced by the social distance between decision makers and beneficiaries.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Behavior change</subject><subject>Beneficiaries</subject><subject>Decision makers</subject><subject>Decision Making</subject><subject>Experiments</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Gain/loss domain</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Risk</subject><subject>risk preference</subject><subject>Risk preferences</subject><subject>Risk-Taking</subject><subject>Social change</subject><subject>Social Distance</subject><subject>Social research</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>0022-4545</issn><issn>1940-1183</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><sourceid>8BJ</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kE1LwzAYx4Mobk4_glLw4qUzSdOkuSnDl8HAy-4hTZ9Ct7SpSYvs25uy6cGDuTwEfs_L_4fQLcFLggv8iDGlLGf5kmLCl4QyygQ5Q3MiGU4JKbJzNJ-YdIJm6CqEHY5PSHKJZlTwIqcsm6Ni3RkPOkCVBGcabZOqCYPuDCSt3kNIenC9jR_nIfFN2KcdjIPX9hpd1NoGuDnVBdq-vmxX7-nm4229et6kJpNsSLmAWpoCDBemLLOsENwQSbimnGLDuOaMAa0qw6gUoqpNXeqMQowmS8EhW6CH49jeu88RwqDaJhiwVnfgxqBiUIFjeEEjev8H3bnRd_E4RSTGUuaMiUjlR8p4F4KHWvW-abU_KILVZFb9mFWTWXUyG_vuTtPHsoXqt-tHZQSejkDT1c63-st5W6lBH6zztY9Gm6Cy_3d8A6Ujhgc</recordid><startdate>20170704</startdate><enddate>20170704</enddate><creator>Sun, Qingzhou</creator><creator>Liu, Yongfang</creator><creator>Zhang, Huanren</creator><creator>Lu, Jingyi</creator><general>Routledge</general><general>Taylor &amp; Francis Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>WZK</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20170704</creationdate><title>Increased social distance makes people more risk-neutral</title><author>Sun, Qingzhou ; Liu, Yongfang ; Zhang, Huanren ; Lu, Jingyi</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c394t-67ef9c8ec67cbb33876c1916a2620c46a644e2ddc42977dfcfba32e2459b76e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Behavior change</topic><topic>Beneficiaries</topic><topic>Decision makers</topic><topic>Decision Making</topic><topic>Experiments</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Gain/loss domain</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Risk</topic><topic>risk preference</topic><topic>Risk preferences</topic><topic>Risk-Taking</topic><topic>Social change</topic><topic>Social Distance</topic><topic>Social research</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sun, Qingzhou</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Yongfang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Huanren</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lu, Jingyi</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The Journal of social psychology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sun, Qingzhou</au><au>Liu, Yongfang</au><au>Zhang, Huanren</au><au>Lu, Jingyi</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Increased social distance makes people more risk-neutral</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of social psychology</jtitle><addtitle>J Soc Psychol</addtitle><date>2017-07-04</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>157</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>502</spage><epage>512</epage><pages>502-512</pages><issn>0022-4545</issn><eissn>1940-1183</eissn><abstract>Individuals are consistently observed to be risk-averse over gains and risk-seeking over losses. This study examined whether increased social distance would change these behavioral patterns. To test our hypothesis, social distance was manipulated by asking the participants to make decisions either for themselves or for another person (Experiment 1), either for a known person or for an unknown person (Experiment 2), and either for a close friend or for a distant friend (Experiment 3). The results of Experiments 1 and 3 showed that increased social distance made people more risk-neutral, and such an effect was stronger in the gain domain than in the loss domain. However, the effect of social distance was not observed in Experiment 2. These findings suggest that risk preferences are influenced by the social distance between decision makers and beneficiaries.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Routledge</pub><pmid>27685243</pmid><doi>10.1080/00224545.2016.1242471</doi><tpages>11</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0022-4545
ispartof The Journal of social psychology, 2017-07, Vol.157 (4), p.502-512
issn 0022-4545
1940-1183
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1837024272
source EBSCOhost Business Source Ultimate; Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS); Taylor & Francis; Sociological Abstracts; EBSCOhost SPORTDiscus - Ebooks
subjects Adult
Behavior change
Beneficiaries
Decision makers
Decision Making
Experiments
Female
Gain/loss domain
Humans
Male
Risk
risk preference
Risk preferences
Risk-Taking
Social change
Social Distance
Social research
Young Adult
title Increased social distance makes people more risk-neutral
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-12T19%3A08%3A36IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Increased%20social%20distance%20makes%20people%20more%20risk-neutral&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20social%20psychology&rft.au=Sun,%20Qingzhou&rft.date=2017-07-04&rft.volume=157&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=502&rft.epage=512&rft.pages=502-512&rft.issn=0022-4545&rft.eissn=1940-1183&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/00224545.2016.1242471&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E1837024272%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c394t-67ef9c8ec67cbb33876c1916a2620c46a644e2ddc42977dfcfba32e2459b76e3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1900995447&rft_id=info:pmid/27685243&rfr_iscdi=true