Loading…

The cascade of care in diagnosis and treatment of latent tuberculosis infection: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Summary Background WHO estimates that a third of the world's population has latent tuberculosis infection and that less than 5% of those infected are diagnosed and treated to prevent tuberculosis. We aimed to systematically review studies that report the steps from initial tuberculosis screenin...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:The Lancet infectious diseases 2016-11, Vol.16 (11), p.1269-1278
Main Authors: Alsdurf, Hannah, MPH, Hill, Philip C, Prof, Matteelli, Alberto, MD, Getahun, Haileyesus, MD, Menzies, Dick, Dr
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c547t-3ba80c98b3ebdf952de4fa2031b238d810bf4b0f4bbe6b1565da21b7333b49e23
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c547t-3ba80c98b3ebdf952de4fa2031b238d810bf4b0f4bbe6b1565da21b7333b49e23
container_end_page 1278
container_issue 11
container_start_page 1269
container_title The Lancet infectious diseases
container_volume 16
creator Alsdurf, Hannah, MPH
Hill, Philip C, Prof
Matteelli, Alberto, MD
Getahun, Haileyesus, MD
Menzies, Dick, Dr
description Summary Background WHO estimates that a third of the world's population has latent tuberculosis infection and that less than 5% of those infected are diagnosed and treated to prevent tuberculosis. We aimed to systematically review studies that report the steps from initial tuberculosis screening through to treatment for latent tuberculosis infection, which we call the latent tuberculosis cascade of care. We specifically aimed to assess the number of people lost at each stage of the cascade. Methods We did a systematic review and meta-analysis of study-level observational data. We searched MEDLINE (via OVID), Embase, and Health Star for observational studies, published between 1946 and April 12, 2015, that reported primary data for diagnosis and treatment of latent tuberculosis infection. We did meta-analyses using random and fixed effects analyses to identify percentages of patients with latent tuberculosis infection completing each step in the cascade. We also estimated pooled proportions in subgroups stratified by different characteristics of interest to assess risk factors for losses. Results We identified 58 studies, describing 70 distinct cohorts and 748 572 people. Steps in the cascade associated with greater losses included completion of testing (71·9% [95% CI 71·8–72·0] of people intended for screening), completion of medical evaluation (43·7% [42·5–44·9]), recommendation for treatment (35·0% [33·8–36·4]), and completion of treatment if started (18·8% [16·3–19·7]). Steps with fewer losses included receiving test results, referral for evaluation if test positive, and accepting to start therapy if recommended. Factors associated with fewer losses were immune-compromising medical indications, being part of contact investigations, and use of rifamycin-based regimens. Interpretation We identify major losses at several steps in the cascade of care for latent tuberculosis infection. Improvements in management of latent tuberculosis will need programmatic approaches to address the losses at each step in the cascade. Funders Canadian Institutes of Health Research.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/S1473-3099(16)30216-X
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1837293205</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S147330991630216X</els_id><sourcerecordid>4225188781</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c547t-3ba80c98b3ebdf952de4fa2031b238d810bf4b0f4bbe6b1565da21b7333b49e23</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkUtrFjEUhoMotlZ_ghJwUxfT5joXF4oUb1BwYYVvF3I5o6kzmZpkKt-_b2amKnRjFyEn4TlPOHkRek7JCSW0Pv1KRcMrTrrumNavOGG0rnYP0GG5FpUQsnm41htygJ6kdEkIbSgRj9EBayRjjPNDdH3xA7DVyWoHeOpLGQH7gJ3X38OUfMI6OJwj6DxCyAsy6LxUeTYQ7TyskA892Oyn8BprnPYpw6iztzjCtYffq2OErCsd9LAvDU_Ro14PCZ7d7kfo24f3F2efqvMvHz-fvTuvrBRNrrjRLbFdazgY13eSORC9ZoRTw3jrWkpMLwwpy0BtqKyl04yahnNuRAeMH6HjzXsVp18zpKxGnywMgw4wzUnRljes44zI-6CybhspaEFf3kEvpzmW0VaKcipbTgolN8rGKaUIvbqKftRxryhRS4ZqzVAtAalyWjNUu9L34tY-mxHc364_oRXg7QZA-bnyv1El6yFYcD6WFJSb_H-feHPHYAcfvNXDT9hD-jeNSkyRTbI4aL0advwGjGDBHA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1831315830</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The cascade of care in diagnosis and treatment of latent tuberculosis infection: a systematic review and meta-analysis</title><source>ScienceDirect Freedom Collection 2022-2024</source><creator>Alsdurf, Hannah, MPH ; Hill, Philip C, Prof ; Matteelli, Alberto, MD ; Getahun, Haileyesus, MD ; Menzies, Dick, Dr</creator><creatorcontrib>Alsdurf, Hannah, MPH ; Hill, Philip C, Prof ; Matteelli, Alberto, MD ; Getahun, Haileyesus, MD ; Menzies, Dick, Dr</creatorcontrib><description>Summary Background WHO estimates that a third of the world's population has latent tuberculosis infection and that less than 5% of those infected are diagnosed and treated to prevent tuberculosis. We aimed to systematically review studies that report the steps from initial tuberculosis screening through to treatment for latent tuberculosis infection, which we call the latent tuberculosis cascade of care. We specifically aimed to assess the number of people lost at each stage of the cascade. Methods We did a systematic review and meta-analysis of study-level observational data. We searched MEDLINE (via OVID), Embase, and Health Star for observational studies, published between 1946 and April 12, 2015, that reported primary data for diagnosis and treatment of latent tuberculosis infection. We did meta-analyses using random and fixed effects analyses to identify percentages of patients with latent tuberculosis infection completing each step in the cascade. We also estimated pooled proportions in subgroups stratified by different characteristics of interest to assess risk factors for losses. Results We identified 58 studies, describing 70 distinct cohorts and 748 572 people. Steps in the cascade associated with greater losses included completion of testing (71·9% [95% CI 71·8–72·0] of people intended for screening), completion of medical evaluation (43·7% [42·5–44·9]), recommendation for treatment (35·0% [33·8–36·4]), and completion of treatment if started (18·8% [16·3–19·7]). Steps with fewer losses included receiving test results, referral for evaluation if test positive, and accepting to start therapy if recommended. Factors associated with fewer losses were immune-compromising medical indications, being part of contact investigations, and use of rifamycin-based regimens. Interpretation We identify major losses at several steps in the cascade of care for latent tuberculosis infection. Improvements in management of latent tuberculosis will need programmatic approaches to address the losses at each step in the cascade. Funders Canadian Institutes of Health Research.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1473-3099</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1474-4457</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/S1473-3099(16)30216-X</identifier><identifier>PMID: 27522233</identifier><identifier>CODEN: LANCAO</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Antirheumatic Agents - therapeutic use ; Antitubercular Agents - therapeutic use ; Continuity of Patient Care ; Data collection ; Humans ; Infections ; Infectious Disease ; Infectious diseases ; Isoniazid - therapeutic use ; Latent Tuberculosis - diagnosis ; Latent Tuberculosis - drug therapy ; Lost to Follow-Up ; Medical diagnosis ; Mycobacterium ; Observational studies ; Patients ; Population ; Public health ; Rifamycins - therapeutic use ; Risk assessment ; Risk factors ; Studies ; Tuberculosis</subject><ispartof>The Lancet infectious diseases, 2016-11, Vol.16 (11), p.1269-1278</ispartof><rights>Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>2016 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Limited Nov 01, 2016</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c547t-3ba80c98b3ebdf952de4fa2031b238d810bf4b0f4bbe6b1565da21b7333b49e23</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c547t-3ba80c98b3ebdf952de4fa2031b238d810bf4b0f4bbe6b1565da21b7333b49e23</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27522233$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Alsdurf, Hannah, MPH</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hill, Philip C, Prof</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Matteelli, Alberto, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Getahun, Haileyesus, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Menzies, Dick, Dr</creatorcontrib><title>The cascade of care in diagnosis and treatment of latent tuberculosis infection: a systematic review and meta-analysis</title><title>The Lancet infectious diseases</title><addtitle>Lancet Infect Dis</addtitle><description>Summary Background WHO estimates that a third of the world's population has latent tuberculosis infection and that less than 5% of those infected are diagnosed and treated to prevent tuberculosis. We aimed to systematically review studies that report the steps from initial tuberculosis screening through to treatment for latent tuberculosis infection, which we call the latent tuberculosis cascade of care. We specifically aimed to assess the number of people lost at each stage of the cascade. Methods We did a systematic review and meta-analysis of study-level observational data. We searched MEDLINE (via OVID), Embase, and Health Star for observational studies, published between 1946 and April 12, 2015, that reported primary data for diagnosis and treatment of latent tuberculosis infection. We did meta-analyses using random and fixed effects analyses to identify percentages of patients with latent tuberculosis infection completing each step in the cascade. We also estimated pooled proportions in subgroups stratified by different characteristics of interest to assess risk factors for losses. Results We identified 58 studies, describing 70 distinct cohorts and 748 572 people. Steps in the cascade associated with greater losses included completion of testing (71·9% [95% CI 71·8–72·0] of people intended for screening), completion of medical evaluation (43·7% [42·5–44·9]), recommendation for treatment (35·0% [33·8–36·4]), and completion of treatment if started (18·8% [16·3–19·7]). Steps with fewer losses included receiving test results, referral for evaluation if test positive, and accepting to start therapy if recommended. Factors associated with fewer losses were immune-compromising medical indications, being part of contact investigations, and use of rifamycin-based regimens. Interpretation We identify major losses at several steps in the cascade of care for latent tuberculosis infection. Improvements in management of latent tuberculosis will need programmatic approaches to address the losses at each step in the cascade. Funders Canadian Institutes of Health Research.</description><subject>Antirheumatic Agents - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Antitubercular Agents - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Continuity of Patient Care</subject><subject>Data collection</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Infections</subject><subject>Infectious Disease</subject><subject>Infectious diseases</subject><subject>Isoniazid - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Latent Tuberculosis - diagnosis</subject><subject>Latent Tuberculosis - drug therapy</subject><subject>Lost to Follow-Up</subject><subject>Medical diagnosis</subject><subject>Mycobacterium</subject><subject>Observational studies</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Population</subject><subject>Public health</subject><subject>Rifamycins - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Risk assessment</subject><subject>Risk factors</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Tuberculosis</subject><issn>1473-3099</issn><issn>1474-4457</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNkUtrFjEUhoMotlZ_ghJwUxfT5joXF4oUb1BwYYVvF3I5o6kzmZpkKt-_b2amKnRjFyEn4TlPOHkRek7JCSW0Pv1KRcMrTrrumNavOGG0rnYP0GG5FpUQsnm41htygJ6kdEkIbSgRj9EBayRjjPNDdH3xA7DVyWoHeOpLGQH7gJ3X38OUfMI6OJwj6DxCyAsy6LxUeTYQ7TyskA892Oyn8BprnPYpw6iztzjCtYffq2OErCsd9LAvDU_Ro14PCZ7d7kfo24f3F2efqvMvHz-fvTuvrBRNrrjRLbFdazgY13eSORC9ZoRTw3jrWkpMLwwpy0BtqKyl04yahnNuRAeMH6HjzXsVp18zpKxGnywMgw4wzUnRljes44zI-6CybhspaEFf3kEvpzmW0VaKcipbTgolN8rGKaUIvbqKftRxryhRS4ZqzVAtAalyWjNUu9L34tY-mxHc364_oRXg7QZA-bnyv1El6yFYcD6WFJSb_H-feHPHYAcfvNXDT9hD-jeNSkyRTbI4aL0advwGjGDBHA</recordid><startdate>20161101</startdate><enddate>20161101</enddate><creator>Alsdurf, Hannah, MPH</creator><creator>Hill, Philip C, Prof</creator><creator>Matteelli, Alberto, MD</creator><creator>Getahun, Haileyesus, MD</creator><creator>Menzies, Dick, Dr</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier Limited</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0TZ</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8C2</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20161101</creationdate><title>The cascade of care in diagnosis and treatment of latent tuberculosis infection: a systematic review and meta-analysis</title><author>Alsdurf, Hannah, MPH ; Hill, Philip C, Prof ; Matteelli, Alberto, MD ; Getahun, Haileyesus, MD ; Menzies, Dick, Dr</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c547t-3ba80c98b3ebdf952de4fa2031b238d810bf4b0f4bbe6b1565da21b7333b49e23</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Antirheumatic Agents - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Antitubercular Agents - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Continuity of Patient Care</topic><topic>Data collection</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Infections</topic><topic>Infectious Disease</topic><topic>Infectious diseases</topic><topic>Isoniazid - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Latent Tuberculosis - diagnosis</topic><topic>Latent Tuberculosis - drug therapy</topic><topic>Lost to Follow-Up</topic><topic>Medical diagnosis</topic><topic>Mycobacterium</topic><topic>Observational studies</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Population</topic><topic>Public health</topic><topic>Rifamycins - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Risk assessment</topic><topic>Risk factors</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Tuberculosis</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Alsdurf, Hannah, MPH</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hill, Philip C, Prof</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Matteelli, Alberto, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Getahun, Haileyesus, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Menzies, Dick, Dr</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Pharma and Biotech Premium PRO</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Lancet Titles</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The Lancet infectious diseases</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Alsdurf, Hannah, MPH</au><au>Hill, Philip C, Prof</au><au>Matteelli, Alberto, MD</au><au>Getahun, Haileyesus, MD</au><au>Menzies, Dick, Dr</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The cascade of care in diagnosis and treatment of latent tuberculosis infection: a systematic review and meta-analysis</atitle><jtitle>The Lancet infectious diseases</jtitle><addtitle>Lancet Infect Dis</addtitle><date>2016-11-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>16</volume><issue>11</issue><spage>1269</spage><epage>1278</epage><pages>1269-1278</pages><issn>1473-3099</issn><eissn>1474-4457</eissn><coden>LANCAO</coden><abstract>Summary Background WHO estimates that a third of the world's population has latent tuberculosis infection and that less than 5% of those infected are diagnosed and treated to prevent tuberculosis. We aimed to systematically review studies that report the steps from initial tuberculosis screening through to treatment for latent tuberculosis infection, which we call the latent tuberculosis cascade of care. We specifically aimed to assess the number of people lost at each stage of the cascade. Methods We did a systematic review and meta-analysis of study-level observational data. We searched MEDLINE (via OVID), Embase, and Health Star for observational studies, published between 1946 and April 12, 2015, that reported primary data for diagnosis and treatment of latent tuberculosis infection. We did meta-analyses using random and fixed effects analyses to identify percentages of patients with latent tuberculosis infection completing each step in the cascade. We also estimated pooled proportions in subgroups stratified by different characteristics of interest to assess risk factors for losses. Results We identified 58 studies, describing 70 distinct cohorts and 748 572 people. Steps in the cascade associated with greater losses included completion of testing (71·9% [95% CI 71·8–72·0] of people intended for screening), completion of medical evaluation (43·7% [42·5–44·9]), recommendation for treatment (35·0% [33·8–36·4]), and completion of treatment if started (18·8% [16·3–19·7]). Steps with fewer losses included receiving test results, referral for evaluation if test positive, and accepting to start therapy if recommended. Factors associated with fewer losses were immune-compromising medical indications, being part of contact investigations, and use of rifamycin-based regimens. Interpretation We identify major losses at several steps in the cascade of care for latent tuberculosis infection. Improvements in management of latent tuberculosis will need programmatic approaches to address the losses at each step in the cascade. Funders Canadian Institutes of Health Research.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>27522233</pmid><doi>10.1016/S1473-3099(16)30216-X</doi><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1473-3099
ispartof The Lancet infectious diseases, 2016-11, Vol.16 (11), p.1269-1278
issn 1473-3099
1474-4457
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1837293205
source ScienceDirect Freedom Collection 2022-2024
subjects Antirheumatic Agents - therapeutic use
Antitubercular Agents - therapeutic use
Continuity of Patient Care
Data collection
Humans
Infections
Infectious Disease
Infectious diseases
Isoniazid - therapeutic use
Latent Tuberculosis - diagnosis
Latent Tuberculosis - drug therapy
Lost to Follow-Up
Medical diagnosis
Mycobacterium
Observational studies
Patients
Population
Public health
Rifamycins - therapeutic use
Risk assessment
Risk factors
Studies
Tuberculosis
title The cascade of care in diagnosis and treatment of latent tuberculosis infection: a systematic review and meta-analysis
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-03T00%3A30%3A04IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20cascade%20of%20care%20in%20diagnosis%20and%20treatment%20of%20latent%20tuberculosis%20infection:%20a%20systematic%20review%20and%20meta-analysis&rft.jtitle=The%20Lancet%20infectious%20diseases&rft.au=Alsdurf,%20Hannah,%20MPH&rft.date=2016-11-01&rft.volume=16&rft.issue=11&rft.spage=1269&rft.epage=1278&rft.pages=1269-1278&rft.issn=1473-3099&rft.eissn=1474-4457&rft.coden=LANCAO&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/S1473-3099(16)30216-X&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E4225188781%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c547t-3ba80c98b3ebdf952de4fa2031b238d810bf4b0f4bbe6b1565da21b7333b49e23%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1831315830&rft_id=info:pmid/27522233&rfr_iscdi=true