Loading…

Comparison of unilateral versus bilateral percutaneous kyphoplasty for the treatment of patients with osteoporosis vertebral compression fracture (OVCF): a systematic review and meta-analysis

Purpose To compare the short- and long-term clinical outcomes, operation times, restoration rate, dosage of polymethylmeth-acrylate (PMMA) injected, complications and X-rays exposure frequency between unilateral and bilateral kyphoplasty approaches for the treatment of OVCF. Study design Systematic...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:European spine journal 2016-11, Vol.25 (11), p.3439-3449
Main Authors: Cheng, Xing, Long, Hou-Qing, Xu, Jing-Hui, Huang, Yang-Liang, Li, Fo-Bao
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c405t-f0fa3ed123ad3103c16eaad148d035fdb3cf37333f8245e9a6afcf73f039722a3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c405t-f0fa3ed123ad3103c16eaad148d035fdb3cf37333f8245e9a6afcf73f039722a3
container_end_page 3449
container_issue 11
container_start_page 3439
container_title European spine journal
container_volume 25
creator Cheng, Xing
Long, Hou-Qing
Xu, Jing-Hui
Huang, Yang-Liang
Li, Fo-Bao
description Purpose To compare the short- and long-term clinical outcomes, operation times, restoration rate, dosage of polymethylmeth-acrylate (PMMA) injected, complications and X-rays exposure frequency between unilateral and bilateral kyphoplasty approaches for the treatment of OVCF. Study design Systematic review and meta-analysis. Methods Randomized or non-randomized controlled trials published up to April 2015 that compared the unilateral and bilateral PKP for the treatment of OVCF were acquired by a comprehensive search in the Cochrane Controlled Trial Register, PubMed, MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science, OVID. Exclusion criteria were patients with neoplastic etiology (metastasis or myeloma), infection, neural compression syndrome, invasive and degenerative disease, traumatic fracture, re-operation, neurological deficits, significant scoliosis and spinal stenosis. The main end points included: operation times, the short- and long-term postoperative Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) scores, the short-term postoperative Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), restoration rate, dosage of PMMA injected, cement leakage, X-ray exposure frequency and postoperative adjacent-level fractures. Results A total of 8 studies involving 428 patients were included in the meta-analysis. The mean operative time was shorter in the unilateral groups compared with the bilateral groups [ P   0.05, WMD 0.03 (−0.34, 0.40)], the long-term postoperative VAS scores between them [ P  > 0.05, WMD 0.01 (−0.42, 0.45)] and the short-term postoperative ODI [ P  > 0.05, WMD −0.33 (−2.36, 1.69)] between the two groups. The unilateral approaches required significantly less dosage of PMMA than the bipedicular approaches did [ P   0.05, RR 0.91 (0.25, 3.26)] between the two methods. The mean X-ray exposure frequency in the unilateral groups was greater than the bilateral groups [ P  
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s00586-016-4395-6
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1837311174</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1837311174</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c405t-f0fa3ed123ad3103c16eaad148d035fdb3cf37333f8245e9a6afcf73f039722a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNks1u1TAQhS0EopfCA7BBltiURcB_cRJ21RUFpErdANtorjPmuiRxsJ1WeTpeDYeUCiEhsbI1PucbzfgQ8pyz15yx6k1krKx1wbgulGzKQj8gO66kKFgjxUOyY41iha54c0KexHjNGC8bph-TE6FrrlRV7siPvR8mCC76kXpL59H1kDBAT28wxDnSw31hwmDmBCP6XP62TEc_9RDTQq0PNB2RpoCQBhzTSpoguXyN9NalI_UxoZ988NHFlZzwsCJNbh4wRpe72wAmzQHp2dWX_cWrtxRoXLJtyCBDA944vKUwdnTABAWM0C8Z9pQ8stBHfHZ3npLPF-8-7T8Ul1fvP-7PLwujWJkKyyxI7LiQ0EnOpOEaATqu6o7J0nYHaayspJS2FqrEBjRYYytpmWwqIUCekrONOwX_fcaY2sFFg32_7aPldbZzziv1H1KhdVkzWWfpy7-k134OebRfQKFk1dQ6q_imMnl_MaBtp-AGCEvLWbsGod2C0OYgtGsQ2tXz4o48Hwbs7h2_fz4LxCaI-Wn8iuGP1v-k_gRdBcM9</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1832437986</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison of unilateral versus bilateral percutaneous kyphoplasty for the treatment of patients with osteoporosis vertebral compression fracture (OVCF): a systematic review and meta-analysis</title><source>Springer Nature</source><creator>Cheng, Xing ; Long, Hou-Qing ; Xu, Jing-Hui ; Huang, Yang-Liang ; Li, Fo-Bao</creator><creatorcontrib>Cheng, Xing ; Long, Hou-Qing ; Xu, Jing-Hui ; Huang, Yang-Liang ; Li, Fo-Bao</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose To compare the short- and long-term clinical outcomes, operation times, restoration rate, dosage of polymethylmeth-acrylate (PMMA) injected, complications and X-rays exposure frequency between unilateral and bilateral kyphoplasty approaches for the treatment of OVCF. Study design Systematic review and meta-analysis. Methods Randomized or non-randomized controlled trials published up to April 2015 that compared the unilateral and bilateral PKP for the treatment of OVCF were acquired by a comprehensive search in the Cochrane Controlled Trial Register, PubMed, MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science, OVID. Exclusion criteria were patients with neoplastic etiology (metastasis or myeloma), infection, neural compression syndrome, invasive and degenerative disease, traumatic fracture, re-operation, neurological deficits, significant scoliosis and spinal stenosis. The main end points included: operation times, the short- and long-term postoperative Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) scores, the short-term postoperative Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), restoration rate, dosage of PMMA injected, cement leakage, X-ray exposure frequency and postoperative adjacent-level fractures. Results A total of 8 studies involving 428 patients were included in the meta-analysis. The mean operative time was shorter in the unilateral groups compared with the bilateral groups [ P  &lt; 0.05, weighted mean difference (WMD) −19.74 (−30.56, −8.92)]. There was no significant difference in the short-term postoperative VAS scores [ P  &gt; 0.05, WMD 0.03 (−0.34, 0.40)], the long-term postoperative VAS scores between them [ P  &gt; 0.05, WMD 0.01 (−0.42, 0.45)] and the short-term postoperative ODI [ P  &gt; 0.05, WMD −0.33 (−2.36, 1.69)] between the two groups. The unilateral approaches required significantly less dosage of PMMA than the bipedicular approaches did [ P  &lt; 0.05, WMD −1.56 (−1.59, −1.16)]. The restoration rate in the bilateral groups was higher than the unilateral groups [ P  &lt; 0.05, WMD −7.82 (−12.23, −3.41)]. There was no significant difference in the risk ratio of cement leakage [ P  &gt; 0.05, RR 0.86 (0.36, 2.06)] and postoperative adjacent-level fractures [ P  &gt; 0.05, RR 0.91 (0.25, 3.26)] between the two methods. The mean X-ray exposure frequency in the unilateral groups was greater than the bilateral groups [ P  &lt; 0.05, WMD −5.69 (−10.67, −0.70)]. Conclusions A definitive verdict could not be reached regarding which approach is better for the treatment of OVCF. Although unilateral PKP was associated with shorter operative time, less X- ray exposure frequency and dosage of PMMA than bilateral PKP. There was no apparent difference in the short- and long-term clinical outcomes and complications between them. However, bilateral PKP approaches were higher than unilateral PKP in term of the restoration rate. But on account of lack of some high-quality evidence, we hold that amounts of high-quality randomized controlled trials should be required and more complications should be analysed to resolve which surgical approach is better for the treatment of OVCF in the future.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0940-6719</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1432-0932</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00586-016-4395-6</identifier><identifier>PMID: 26814475</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg</publisher><subject>Fractures, Compression - surgery ; Humans ; Kyphoplasty - adverse effects ; Kyphoplasty - methods ; Kyphoplasty - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Medicine ; Medicine &amp; Public Health ; Neurosurgery ; Operative Time ; Original Article ; Osteoporotic Fractures - surgery ; Pain, Postoperative ; Spinal Fractures - surgery ; Surgical Orthopedics</subject><ispartof>European spine journal, 2016-11, Vol.25 (11), p.3439-3449</ispartof><rights>Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2016</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c405t-f0fa3ed123ad3103c16eaad148d035fdb3cf37333f8245e9a6afcf73f039722a3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c405t-f0fa3ed123ad3103c16eaad148d035fdb3cf37333f8245e9a6afcf73f039722a3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27923,27924</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26814475$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Cheng, Xing</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Long, Hou-Qing</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xu, Jing-Hui</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Huang, Yang-Liang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Fo-Bao</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison of unilateral versus bilateral percutaneous kyphoplasty for the treatment of patients with osteoporosis vertebral compression fracture (OVCF): a systematic review and meta-analysis</title><title>European spine journal</title><addtitle>Eur Spine J</addtitle><addtitle>Eur Spine J</addtitle><description>Purpose To compare the short- and long-term clinical outcomes, operation times, restoration rate, dosage of polymethylmeth-acrylate (PMMA) injected, complications and X-rays exposure frequency between unilateral and bilateral kyphoplasty approaches for the treatment of OVCF. Study design Systematic review and meta-analysis. Methods Randomized or non-randomized controlled trials published up to April 2015 that compared the unilateral and bilateral PKP for the treatment of OVCF were acquired by a comprehensive search in the Cochrane Controlled Trial Register, PubMed, MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science, OVID. Exclusion criteria were patients with neoplastic etiology (metastasis or myeloma), infection, neural compression syndrome, invasive and degenerative disease, traumatic fracture, re-operation, neurological deficits, significant scoliosis and spinal stenosis. The main end points included: operation times, the short- and long-term postoperative Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) scores, the short-term postoperative Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), restoration rate, dosage of PMMA injected, cement leakage, X-ray exposure frequency and postoperative adjacent-level fractures. Results A total of 8 studies involving 428 patients were included in the meta-analysis. The mean operative time was shorter in the unilateral groups compared with the bilateral groups [ P  &lt; 0.05, weighted mean difference (WMD) −19.74 (−30.56, −8.92)]. There was no significant difference in the short-term postoperative VAS scores [ P  &gt; 0.05, WMD 0.03 (−0.34, 0.40)], the long-term postoperative VAS scores between them [ P  &gt; 0.05, WMD 0.01 (−0.42, 0.45)] and the short-term postoperative ODI [ P  &gt; 0.05, WMD −0.33 (−2.36, 1.69)] between the two groups. The unilateral approaches required significantly less dosage of PMMA than the bipedicular approaches did [ P  &lt; 0.05, WMD −1.56 (−1.59, −1.16)]. The restoration rate in the bilateral groups was higher than the unilateral groups [ P  &lt; 0.05, WMD −7.82 (−12.23, −3.41)]. There was no significant difference in the risk ratio of cement leakage [ P  &gt; 0.05, RR 0.86 (0.36, 2.06)] and postoperative adjacent-level fractures [ P  &gt; 0.05, RR 0.91 (0.25, 3.26)] between the two methods. The mean X-ray exposure frequency in the unilateral groups was greater than the bilateral groups [ P  &lt; 0.05, WMD −5.69 (−10.67, −0.70)]. Conclusions A definitive verdict could not be reached regarding which approach is better for the treatment of OVCF. Although unilateral PKP was associated with shorter operative time, less X- ray exposure frequency and dosage of PMMA than bilateral PKP. There was no apparent difference in the short- and long-term clinical outcomes and complications between them. However, bilateral PKP approaches were higher than unilateral PKP in term of the restoration rate. But on account of lack of some high-quality evidence, we hold that amounts of high-quality randomized controlled trials should be required and more complications should be analysed to resolve which surgical approach is better for the treatment of OVCF in the future.</description><subject>Fractures, Compression - surgery</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Kyphoplasty - adverse effects</subject><subject>Kyphoplasty - methods</subject><subject>Kyphoplasty - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine &amp; Public Health</subject><subject>Neurosurgery</subject><subject>Operative Time</subject><subject>Original Article</subject><subject>Osteoporotic Fractures - surgery</subject><subject>Pain, Postoperative</subject><subject>Spinal Fractures - surgery</subject><subject>Surgical Orthopedics</subject><issn>0940-6719</issn><issn>1432-0932</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNks1u1TAQhS0EopfCA7BBltiURcB_cRJ21RUFpErdANtorjPmuiRxsJ1WeTpeDYeUCiEhsbI1PucbzfgQ8pyz15yx6k1krKx1wbgulGzKQj8gO66kKFgjxUOyY41iha54c0KexHjNGC8bph-TE6FrrlRV7siPvR8mCC76kXpL59H1kDBAT28wxDnSw31hwmDmBCP6XP62TEc_9RDTQq0PNB2RpoCQBhzTSpoguXyN9NalI_UxoZ988NHFlZzwsCJNbh4wRpe72wAmzQHp2dWX_cWrtxRoXLJtyCBDA944vKUwdnTABAWM0C8Z9pQ8stBHfHZ3npLPF-8-7T8Ul1fvP-7PLwujWJkKyyxI7LiQ0EnOpOEaATqu6o7J0nYHaayspJS2FqrEBjRYYytpmWwqIUCekrONOwX_fcaY2sFFg32_7aPldbZzziv1H1KhdVkzWWfpy7-k134OebRfQKFk1dQ6q_imMnl_MaBtp-AGCEvLWbsGod2C0OYgtGsQ2tXz4o48Hwbs7h2_fz4LxCaI-Wn8iuGP1v-k_gRdBcM9</recordid><startdate>20161101</startdate><enddate>20161101</enddate><creator>Cheng, Xing</creator><creator>Long, Hou-Qing</creator><creator>Xu, Jing-Hui</creator><creator>Huang, Yang-Liang</creator><creator>Li, Fo-Bao</creator><general>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20161101</creationdate><title>Comparison of unilateral versus bilateral percutaneous kyphoplasty for the treatment of patients with osteoporosis vertebral compression fracture (OVCF): a systematic review and meta-analysis</title><author>Cheng, Xing ; Long, Hou-Qing ; Xu, Jing-Hui ; Huang, Yang-Liang ; Li, Fo-Bao</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c405t-f0fa3ed123ad3103c16eaad148d035fdb3cf37333f8245e9a6afcf73f039722a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Fractures, Compression - surgery</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Kyphoplasty - adverse effects</topic><topic>Kyphoplasty - methods</topic><topic>Kyphoplasty - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine &amp; Public Health</topic><topic>Neurosurgery</topic><topic>Operative Time</topic><topic>Original Article</topic><topic>Osteoporotic Fractures - surgery</topic><topic>Pain, Postoperative</topic><topic>Spinal Fractures - surgery</topic><topic>Surgical Orthopedics</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Cheng, Xing</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Long, Hou-Qing</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xu, Jing-Hui</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Huang, Yang-Liang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Fo-Bao</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Calcium &amp; Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>PML(ProQuest Medical Library)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>European spine journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Cheng, Xing</au><au>Long, Hou-Qing</au><au>Xu, Jing-Hui</au><au>Huang, Yang-Liang</au><au>Li, Fo-Bao</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison of unilateral versus bilateral percutaneous kyphoplasty for the treatment of patients with osteoporosis vertebral compression fracture (OVCF): a systematic review and meta-analysis</atitle><jtitle>European spine journal</jtitle><stitle>Eur Spine J</stitle><addtitle>Eur Spine J</addtitle><date>2016-11-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>25</volume><issue>11</issue><spage>3439</spage><epage>3449</epage><pages>3439-3449</pages><issn>0940-6719</issn><eissn>1432-0932</eissn><abstract>Purpose To compare the short- and long-term clinical outcomes, operation times, restoration rate, dosage of polymethylmeth-acrylate (PMMA) injected, complications and X-rays exposure frequency between unilateral and bilateral kyphoplasty approaches for the treatment of OVCF. Study design Systematic review and meta-analysis. Methods Randomized or non-randomized controlled trials published up to April 2015 that compared the unilateral and bilateral PKP for the treatment of OVCF were acquired by a comprehensive search in the Cochrane Controlled Trial Register, PubMed, MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science, OVID. Exclusion criteria were patients with neoplastic etiology (metastasis or myeloma), infection, neural compression syndrome, invasive and degenerative disease, traumatic fracture, re-operation, neurological deficits, significant scoliosis and spinal stenosis. The main end points included: operation times, the short- and long-term postoperative Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) scores, the short-term postoperative Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), restoration rate, dosage of PMMA injected, cement leakage, X-ray exposure frequency and postoperative adjacent-level fractures. Results A total of 8 studies involving 428 patients were included in the meta-analysis. The mean operative time was shorter in the unilateral groups compared with the bilateral groups [ P  &lt; 0.05, weighted mean difference (WMD) −19.74 (−30.56, −8.92)]. There was no significant difference in the short-term postoperative VAS scores [ P  &gt; 0.05, WMD 0.03 (−0.34, 0.40)], the long-term postoperative VAS scores between them [ P  &gt; 0.05, WMD 0.01 (−0.42, 0.45)] and the short-term postoperative ODI [ P  &gt; 0.05, WMD −0.33 (−2.36, 1.69)] between the two groups. The unilateral approaches required significantly less dosage of PMMA than the bipedicular approaches did [ P  &lt; 0.05, WMD −1.56 (−1.59, −1.16)]. The restoration rate in the bilateral groups was higher than the unilateral groups [ P  &lt; 0.05, WMD −7.82 (−12.23, −3.41)]. There was no significant difference in the risk ratio of cement leakage [ P  &gt; 0.05, RR 0.86 (0.36, 2.06)] and postoperative adjacent-level fractures [ P  &gt; 0.05, RR 0.91 (0.25, 3.26)] between the two methods. The mean X-ray exposure frequency in the unilateral groups was greater than the bilateral groups [ P  &lt; 0.05, WMD −5.69 (−10.67, −0.70)]. Conclusions A definitive verdict could not be reached regarding which approach is better for the treatment of OVCF. Although unilateral PKP was associated with shorter operative time, less X- ray exposure frequency and dosage of PMMA than bilateral PKP. There was no apparent difference in the short- and long-term clinical outcomes and complications between them. However, bilateral PKP approaches were higher than unilateral PKP in term of the restoration rate. But on account of lack of some high-quality evidence, we hold that amounts of high-quality randomized controlled trials should be required and more complications should be analysed to resolve which surgical approach is better for the treatment of OVCF in the future.</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</pub><pmid>26814475</pmid><doi>10.1007/s00586-016-4395-6</doi><tpages>11</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0940-6719
ispartof European spine journal, 2016-11, Vol.25 (11), p.3439-3449
issn 0940-6719
1432-0932
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1837311174
source Springer Nature
subjects Fractures, Compression - surgery
Humans
Kyphoplasty - adverse effects
Kyphoplasty - methods
Kyphoplasty - statistics & numerical data
Medicine
Medicine & Public Health
Neurosurgery
Operative Time
Original Article
Osteoporotic Fractures - surgery
Pain, Postoperative
Spinal Fractures - surgery
Surgical Orthopedics
title Comparison of unilateral versus bilateral percutaneous kyphoplasty for the treatment of patients with osteoporosis vertebral compression fracture (OVCF): a systematic review and meta-analysis
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-12T19%3A39%3A02IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20of%20unilateral%20versus%20bilateral%20percutaneous%20kyphoplasty%20for%20the%20treatment%20of%20patients%20with%20osteoporosis%20vertebral%20compression%20fracture%20(OVCF):%20a%20systematic%20review%20and%20meta-analysis&rft.jtitle=European%20spine%20journal&rft.au=Cheng,%20Xing&rft.date=2016-11-01&rft.volume=25&rft.issue=11&rft.spage=3439&rft.epage=3449&rft.pages=3439-3449&rft.issn=0940-6719&rft.eissn=1432-0932&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00586-016-4395-6&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1837311174%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c405t-f0fa3ed123ad3103c16eaad148d035fdb3cf37333f8245e9a6afcf73f039722a3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1832437986&rft_id=info:pmid/26814475&rfr_iscdi=true