Loading…

Clinical Outcome and Cost Analysis of Sutureless Versus Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation With Propensity Score Matching Analysis

Surgical sutureless and interventional transcatheter aortic valve prostheses are nowadays extensively adopted in high-risk elderly patients. An explorative analysis was carried out to compare the clinical outcome and costs associated to these approaches. Since 2010, a total of 626 patients were dist...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:The American journal of cardiology 2015-12, Vol.116 (11), p.1737-1743
Main Authors: Santarpino, Giuseppe, MD, Pfeiffer, Steffen, MD, Jessl, Jürgen, MD, Dell'Aquila, Angelo, MD, Vogt, Ferdinand, MD, von Wardenburg, Che, MD, Schwab, Johannes, MD, Sirch, Joachim, MD, Pauschinger, Matthias, MD, Fischlein, Theodor, MD
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c466t-4a1a2ac40b0c1fff5aafc5c51adb9f2b6526f7f0022e371de2b20e557268ffb63
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c466t-4a1a2ac40b0c1fff5aafc5c51adb9f2b6526f7f0022e371de2b20e557268ffb63
container_end_page 1743
container_issue 11
container_start_page 1737
container_title The American journal of cardiology
container_volume 116
creator Santarpino, Giuseppe, MD
Pfeiffer, Steffen, MD
Jessl, Jürgen, MD
Dell'Aquila, Angelo, MD
Vogt, Ferdinand, MD
von Wardenburg, Che, MD
Schwab, Johannes, MD
Sirch, Joachim, MD
Pauschinger, Matthias, MD
Fischlein, Theodor, MD
description Surgical sutureless and interventional transcatheter aortic valve prostheses are nowadays extensively adopted in high-risk elderly patients. An explorative analysis was carried out to compare the clinical outcome and costs associated to these approaches. Since 2010, a total of 626 patients were distributed between transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI; n = 364) and sutureless (n = 262) groups. Patients of both groups were not comparable for clinical and surgical characteristics, but many patients were in a “gray zone”; therefore, a retrospective propensity score analysis was possible and performed. For the matched pair samples, postoperative, follow-up clinical data, and costs data were obtained. In-hospital death occurred in 5 patients in sutureless group and 3 patients in TAVI group (p = 0.36). Blood transfusions were higher in sutureless group (2.1 ± 2.3 vs 0.4 ± 1.0 U). TAVI group had a shorter intensive care unit and hospital stay (2.2 ± 2.7 vs 3.2 ± 3.5 days, p = 0.037; 12 ± 6 vs 14 ± 6 days, p = 0.017). No differences in postoperative neurologic (p = 0.361), renal (p = 0.106), or respiratory (p = 0.391) complications were observed between groups. At follow-up (24.5 ± 13.8 months), 1 patient in sutureless group and 7 patients in TAVI group died (p = 0.032). Paravalvular leakage occurred more frequently in patients in TAVI group (35 [34%] vs 7 [6.9%]; p
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.amjcard.2015.08.043
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1837342277</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0002914915019256</els_id><sourcerecordid>1733931091</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c466t-4a1a2ac40b0c1fff5aafc5c51adb9f2b6526f7f0022e371de2b20e557268ffb63</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkttu1DAQhi0EotuFRwBZ4oabBB_iHG5AqxWHSkVF2lIuLccZsw5JvNhOpX2CvjZedilSb3pljfTNjP_5f4ReUZJTQst3fa7GXivf5YxQkZM6JwV_gha0rpqMNpQ_RQtCCMsaWjRn6DyEPpWUivI5OmNlwTmrqgW6Ww92sloN-GqO2o2A1dThtQsRryY17IMN2Bm8mePsYYAQ8A34MAd87dUUtIpbiODxyvloNb5Rwy3gi3E3qCmqaN2Ef9i4xd-828EUbNzjjXYe8FcV9dZOP--XvEDPjBoCvDy9S_T908fr9Zfs8urzxXp1memiLGNWKKqY0gVpiabGGKGU0UILqrq2MawtBStNZZJuBryiHbCWERCiYmVtTFvyJXp7nLvz7vcMIcrRBg1D-jC4OUha84oXLN3mcbTivOGUpFsv0ZsHaO9mn6T9pVgtBGM8UeJIae9C8GDkzttR-b2kRB5Mlb08mSoPpkpSy2Rq6nt9mj63I3T3Xf9cTMCHIwDpcrcWvAzawqShsx50lJ2zj654_2CCPuXiF-wh_FcjA5NEbg7JOgSLCkIbJkr-B7liy-c</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1732855223</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Clinical Outcome and Cost Analysis of Sutureless Versus Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation With Propensity Score Matching Analysis</title><source>ScienceDirect Freedom Collection 2022-2024</source><creator>Santarpino, Giuseppe, MD ; Pfeiffer, Steffen, MD ; Jessl, Jürgen, MD ; Dell'Aquila, Angelo, MD ; Vogt, Ferdinand, MD ; von Wardenburg, Che, MD ; Schwab, Johannes, MD ; Sirch, Joachim, MD ; Pauschinger, Matthias, MD ; Fischlein, Theodor, MD</creator><creatorcontrib>Santarpino, Giuseppe, MD ; Pfeiffer, Steffen, MD ; Jessl, Jürgen, MD ; Dell'Aquila, Angelo, MD ; Vogt, Ferdinand, MD ; von Wardenburg, Che, MD ; Schwab, Johannes, MD ; Sirch, Joachim, MD ; Pauschinger, Matthias, MD ; Fischlein, Theodor, MD</creatorcontrib><description>Surgical sutureless and interventional transcatheter aortic valve prostheses are nowadays extensively adopted in high-risk elderly patients. An explorative analysis was carried out to compare the clinical outcome and costs associated to these approaches. Since 2010, a total of 626 patients were distributed between transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI; n = 364) and sutureless (n = 262) groups. Patients of both groups were not comparable for clinical and surgical characteristics, but many patients were in a “gray zone”; therefore, a retrospective propensity score analysis was possible and performed. For the matched pair samples, postoperative, follow-up clinical data, and costs data were obtained. In-hospital death occurred in 5 patients in sutureless group and 3 patients in TAVI group (p = 0.36). Blood transfusions were higher in sutureless group (2.1 ± 2.3 vs 0.4 ± 1.0 U). TAVI group had a shorter intensive care unit and hospital stay (2.2 ± 2.7 vs 3.2 ± 3.5 days, p = 0.037; 12 ± 6 vs 14 ± 6 days, p = 0.017). No differences in postoperative neurologic (p = 0.361), renal (p = 0.106), or respiratory (p = 0.391) complications were observed between groups. At follow-up (24.5 ± 13.8 months), 1 patient in sutureless group and 7 patients in TAVI group died (p = 0.032). Paravalvular leakage occurred more frequently in patients in TAVI group (35 [34%] vs 7 [6.9%]; p &lt;0.001) with an impact on follow-up survival rate. The costs associated to the 2 procedures are similar when the cost of the device was excluded (p = 0.217). When included, the sutureless approach resulted a cost saving (€22,451 vs €33,877, p &lt;0.001). In conclusion, the patients in the “gray zone” record a satisfying clinical outcome after sutureless surgery and TAVI. Patients in the sutureless group endure more hospital complications, but TAVI entails a higher follow-up mortality. On the costs aspects, TAVI technologies are more expensive, and it reflects on higher overall hospital costs.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0002-9149</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-1913</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2015.08.043</identifier><identifier>PMID: 26433277</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Acute coronary syndromes ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Aortic Valve Stenosis - economics ; Aortic Valve Stenosis - surgery ; Bioprosthesis ; Cardiology ; Cardiopulmonary Bypass ; Cardiovascular ; Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease ; Clinical outcomes ; Costs ; Diabetes ; Endoscopy ; Female ; Heart Valve Prosthesis ; Hospital Costs ; Hospitals ; Humans ; Laboratories ; Logistics ; Male ; Matched-Pair Analysis ; Ostomy ; Patients ; Propensity Score ; Prostheses ; Prosthesis Design ; Pulmonary hypertension ; Retrospective Studies ; Standard deviation ; Surgery ; Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement ; Treatment Outcome ; Variables ; Veins &amp; arteries</subject><ispartof>The American journal of cardiology, 2015-12, Vol.116 (11), p.1737-1743</ispartof><rights>Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>2015 Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>2015. Elsevier Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c466t-4a1a2ac40b0c1fff5aafc5c51adb9f2b6526f7f0022e371de2b20e557268ffb63</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c466t-4a1a2ac40b0c1fff5aafc5c51adb9f2b6526f7f0022e371de2b20e557268ffb63</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26433277$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Santarpino, Giuseppe, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pfeiffer, Steffen, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jessl, Jürgen, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dell'Aquila, Angelo, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vogt, Ferdinand, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>von Wardenburg, Che, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schwab, Johannes, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sirch, Joachim, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pauschinger, Matthias, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fischlein, Theodor, MD</creatorcontrib><title>Clinical Outcome and Cost Analysis of Sutureless Versus Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation With Propensity Score Matching Analysis</title><title>The American journal of cardiology</title><addtitle>Am J Cardiol</addtitle><description>Surgical sutureless and interventional transcatheter aortic valve prostheses are nowadays extensively adopted in high-risk elderly patients. An explorative analysis was carried out to compare the clinical outcome and costs associated to these approaches. Since 2010, a total of 626 patients were distributed between transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI; n = 364) and sutureless (n = 262) groups. Patients of both groups were not comparable for clinical and surgical characteristics, but many patients were in a “gray zone”; therefore, a retrospective propensity score analysis was possible and performed. For the matched pair samples, postoperative, follow-up clinical data, and costs data were obtained. In-hospital death occurred in 5 patients in sutureless group and 3 patients in TAVI group (p = 0.36). Blood transfusions were higher in sutureless group (2.1 ± 2.3 vs 0.4 ± 1.0 U). TAVI group had a shorter intensive care unit and hospital stay (2.2 ± 2.7 vs 3.2 ± 3.5 days, p = 0.037; 12 ± 6 vs 14 ± 6 days, p = 0.017). No differences in postoperative neurologic (p = 0.361), renal (p = 0.106), or respiratory (p = 0.391) complications were observed between groups. At follow-up (24.5 ± 13.8 months), 1 patient in sutureless group and 7 patients in TAVI group died (p = 0.032). Paravalvular leakage occurred more frequently in patients in TAVI group (35 [34%] vs 7 [6.9%]; p &lt;0.001) with an impact on follow-up survival rate. The costs associated to the 2 procedures are similar when the cost of the device was excluded (p = 0.217). When included, the sutureless approach resulted a cost saving (€22,451 vs €33,877, p &lt;0.001). In conclusion, the patients in the “gray zone” record a satisfying clinical outcome after sutureless surgery and TAVI. Patients in the sutureless group endure more hospital complications, but TAVI entails a higher follow-up mortality. On the costs aspects, TAVI technologies are more expensive, and it reflects on higher overall hospital costs.</description><subject>Acute coronary syndromes</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Aortic Valve Stenosis - economics</subject><subject>Aortic Valve Stenosis - surgery</subject><subject>Bioprosthesis</subject><subject>Cardiology</subject><subject>Cardiopulmonary Bypass</subject><subject>Cardiovascular</subject><subject>Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease</subject><subject>Clinical outcomes</subject><subject>Costs</subject><subject>Diabetes</subject><subject>Endoscopy</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Heart Valve Prosthesis</subject><subject>Hospital Costs</subject><subject>Hospitals</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Laboratories</subject><subject>Logistics</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Matched-Pair Analysis</subject><subject>Ostomy</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Propensity Score</subject><subject>Prostheses</subject><subject>Prosthesis Design</subject><subject>Pulmonary hypertension</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Standard deviation</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><subject>Variables</subject><subject>Veins &amp; arteries</subject><issn>0002-9149</issn><issn>1879-1913</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkttu1DAQhi0EotuFRwBZ4oabBB_iHG5AqxWHSkVF2lIuLccZsw5JvNhOpX2CvjZedilSb3pljfTNjP_5f4ReUZJTQst3fa7GXivf5YxQkZM6JwV_gha0rpqMNpQ_RQtCCMsaWjRn6DyEPpWUivI5OmNlwTmrqgW6Ww92sloN-GqO2o2A1dThtQsRryY17IMN2Bm8mePsYYAQ8A34MAd87dUUtIpbiODxyvloNb5Rwy3gi3E3qCmqaN2Ef9i4xd-828EUbNzjjXYe8FcV9dZOP--XvEDPjBoCvDy9S_T908fr9Zfs8urzxXp1memiLGNWKKqY0gVpiabGGKGU0UILqrq2MawtBStNZZJuBryiHbCWERCiYmVtTFvyJXp7nLvz7vcMIcrRBg1D-jC4OUha84oXLN3mcbTivOGUpFsv0ZsHaO9mn6T9pVgtBGM8UeJIae9C8GDkzttR-b2kRB5Mlb08mSoPpkpSy2Rq6nt9mj63I3T3Xf9cTMCHIwDpcrcWvAzawqShsx50lJ2zj654_2CCPuXiF-wh_FcjA5NEbg7JOgSLCkIbJkr-B7liy-c</recordid><startdate>20151201</startdate><enddate>20151201</enddate><creator>Santarpino, Giuseppe, MD</creator><creator>Pfeiffer, Steffen, MD</creator><creator>Jessl, Jürgen, MD</creator><creator>Dell'Aquila, Angelo, MD</creator><creator>Vogt, Ferdinand, MD</creator><creator>von Wardenburg, Che, MD</creator><creator>Schwab, Johannes, MD</creator><creator>Sirch, Joachim, MD</creator><creator>Pauschinger, Matthias, MD</creator><creator>Fischlein, Theodor, MD</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier Limited</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7TS</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M7Z</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7QO</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20151201</creationdate><title>Clinical Outcome and Cost Analysis of Sutureless Versus Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation With Propensity Score Matching Analysis</title><author>Santarpino, Giuseppe, MD ; Pfeiffer, Steffen, MD ; Jessl, Jürgen, MD ; Dell'Aquila, Angelo, MD ; Vogt, Ferdinand, MD ; von Wardenburg, Che, MD ; Schwab, Johannes, MD ; Sirch, Joachim, MD ; Pauschinger, Matthias, MD ; Fischlein, Theodor, MD</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c466t-4a1a2ac40b0c1fff5aafc5c51adb9f2b6526f7f0022e371de2b20e557268ffb63</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Acute coronary syndromes</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Aortic Valve Stenosis - economics</topic><topic>Aortic Valve Stenosis - surgery</topic><topic>Bioprosthesis</topic><topic>Cardiology</topic><topic>Cardiopulmonary Bypass</topic><topic>Cardiovascular</topic><topic>Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease</topic><topic>Clinical outcomes</topic><topic>Costs</topic><topic>Diabetes</topic><topic>Endoscopy</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Heart Valve Prosthesis</topic><topic>Hospital Costs</topic><topic>Hospitals</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Laboratories</topic><topic>Logistics</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Matched-Pair Analysis</topic><topic>Ostomy</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Propensity Score</topic><topic>Prostheses</topic><topic>Prosthesis Design</topic><topic>Pulmonary hypertension</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Standard deviation</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><topic>Variables</topic><topic>Veins &amp; arteries</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Santarpino, Giuseppe, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pfeiffer, Steffen, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jessl, Jürgen, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dell'Aquila, Angelo, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vogt, Ferdinand, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>von Wardenburg, Che, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schwab, Johannes, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sirch, Joachim, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pauschinger, Matthias, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fischlein, Theodor, MD</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Physical Education Index</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>ProQuest research library</collection><collection>Biochemistry Abstracts 1</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><jtitle>The American journal of cardiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Santarpino, Giuseppe, MD</au><au>Pfeiffer, Steffen, MD</au><au>Jessl, Jürgen, MD</au><au>Dell'Aquila, Angelo, MD</au><au>Vogt, Ferdinand, MD</au><au>von Wardenburg, Che, MD</au><au>Schwab, Johannes, MD</au><au>Sirch, Joachim, MD</au><au>Pauschinger, Matthias, MD</au><au>Fischlein, Theodor, MD</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Clinical Outcome and Cost Analysis of Sutureless Versus Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation With Propensity Score Matching Analysis</atitle><jtitle>The American journal of cardiology</jtitle><addtitle>Am J Cardiol</addtitle><date>2015-12-01</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>116</volume><issue>11</issue><spage>1737</spage><epage>1743</epage><pages>1737-1743</pages><issn>0002-9149</issn><eissn>1879-1913</eissn><abstract>Surgical sutureless and interventional transcatheter aortic valve prostheses are nowadays extensively adopted in high-risk elderly patients. An explorative analysis was carried out to compare the clinical outcome and costs associated to these approaches. Since 2010, a total of 626 patients were distributed between transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI; n = 364) and sutureless (n = 262) groups. Patients of both groups were not comparable for clinical and surgical characteristics, but many patients were in a “gray zone”; therefore, a retrospective propensity score analysis was possible and performed. For the matched pair samples, postoperative, follow-up clinical data, and costs data were obtained. In-hospital death occurred in 5 patients in sutureless group and 3 patients in TAVI group (p = 0.36). Blood transfusions were higher in sutureless group (2.1 ± 2.3 vs 0.4 ± 1.0 U). TAVI group had a shorter intensive care unit and hospital stay (2.2 ± 2.7 vs 3.2 ± 3.5 days, p = 0.037; 12 ± 6 vs 14 ± 6 days, p = 0.017). No differences in postoperative neurologic (p = 0.361), renal (p = 0.106), or respiratory (p = 0.391) complications were observed between groups. At follow-up (24.5 ± 13.8 months), 1 patient in sutureless group and 7 patients in TAVI group died (p = 0.032). Paravalvular leakage occurred more frequently in patients in TAVI group (35 [34%] vs 7 [6.9%]; p &lt;0.001) with an impact on follow-up survival rate. The costs associated to the 2 procedures are similar when the cost of the device was excluded (p = 0.217). When included, the sutureless approach resulted a cost saving (€22,451 vs €33,877, p &lt;0.001). In conclusion, the patients in the “gray zone” record a satisfying clinical outcome after sutureless surgery and TAVI. Patients in the sutureless group endure more hospital complications, but TAVI entails a higher follow-up mortality. On the costs aspects, TAVI technologies are more expensive, and it reflects on higher overall hospital costs.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>26433277</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.amjcard.2015.08.043</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0002-9149
ispartof The American journal of cardiology, 2015-12, Vol.116 (11), p.1737-1743
issn 0002-9149
1879-1913
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1837342277
source ScienceDirect Freedom Collection 2022-2024
subjects Acute coronary syndromes
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Aortic Valve Stenosis - economics
Aortic Valve Stenosis - surgery
Bioprosthesis
Cardiology
Cardiopulmonary Bypass
Cardiovascular
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
Clinical outcomes
Costs
Diabetes
Endoscopy
Female
Heart Valve Prosthesis
Hospital Costs
Hospitals
Humans
Laboratories
Logistics
Male
Matched-Pair Analysis
Ostomy
Patients
Propensity Score
Prostheses
Prosthesis Design
Pulmonary hypertension
Retrospective Studies
Standard deviation
Surgery
Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement
Treatment Outcome
Variables
Veins & arteries
title Clinical Outcome and Cost Analysis of Sutureless Versus Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation With Propensity Score Matching Analysis
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-28T05%3A25%3A29IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Clinical%20Outcome%20and%20Cost%20Analysis%20of%20Sutureless%20Versus%20Transcatheter%20Aortic%20Valve%20Implantation%20With%20Propensity%20Score%20Matching%20Analysis&rft.jtitle=The%20American%20journal%20of%20cardiology&rft.au=Santarpino,%20Giuseppe,%20MD&rft.date=2015-12-01&rft.volume=116&rft.issue=11&rft.spage=1737&rft.epage=1743&rft.pages=1737-1743&rft.issn=0002-9149&rft.eissn=1879-1913&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.amjcard.2015.08.043&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1733931091%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c466t-4a1a2ac40b0c1fff5aafc5c51adb9f2b6526f7f0022e371de2b20e557268ffb63%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1732855223&rft_id=info:pmid/26433277&rfr_iscdi=true