Loading…
Development of an exposure-free bednet trap for sampling Afrotropical malaria vectors
An exposure‐free bednet trap (the ‘Mbita trap’) for sampling of Afrotropical malaria vectors was developed during preliminary studies of mosquito behaviour around human‐occupied bednets. Its mosquito sampling efficiency was compared to the CDC miniature light‐trap and human landing catches under sem...
Saved in:
Published in: | Medical and veterinary entomology 2002-03, Vol.16 (1), p.67-74 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4330-79004885c10b8eaa62da87fdc8f72c85cc9fea8565e251269b84e5ad6cb277d33 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4330-79004885c10b8eaa62da87fdc8f72c85cc9fea8565e251269b84e5ad6cb277d33 |
container_end_page | 74 |
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 67 |
container_title | Medical and veterinary entomology |
container_volume | 16 |
creator | Mathenge, E. M. Killeen, G. F. Oulo, D. O. Irungu, L. W. Ndegwa, P. N. Knols, B. G. J. |
description | An exposure‐free bednet trap (the ‘Mbita trap’) for sampling of Afrotropical malaria vectors was developed during preliminary studies of mosquito behaviour around human‐occupied bednets. Its mosquito sampling efficiency was compared to the CDC miniature light‐trap and human landing catches under semi‐field conditions in a screen‐walled greenhouse using laboratory‐reared Anopheles gambiae Giles sensu stricto (Diptera: Culicidae). When compared in a competitive manner (side by side), the Mbita trap caught 4.1 ± 0.5 times as many mosquitoes as the CDC light‐trap, hung beside an occupied bednet (P |
doi_str_mv | 10.1046/j.0269-283x.2002.00350.x |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_18376493</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>18376493</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4330-79004885c10b8eaa62da87fdc8f72c85cc9fea8565e251269b84e5ad6cb277d33</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkMtu1DAUQC0EotPCL1ResUvqR_yIxKaUMlRqQa0o7c5ynOsqQxIHO1PSvyfpDLBlZcs651r3IIQpySkp5MkmJ0yWGdN8yhkhLCeEC5JPL9CKcikyVlLxEq3-QPcH6DClDSFUlYy9RgeUlpKXmq_Q7Ud4hDYMHfQjDh7bHsM0hLSNkPkIgCuoexjxGO2AfYg42W5om_4Bn_oYxhiGxtkWd7a1sbH4EdwYYnqDXnnbJni7P4_Q7afzb2efs8uv64uz08vMFZyTTJWEFFoLR0mlwVrJaquVr532irn53ZUerBZSABN0XqbSBQhbS1cxpWrOj9C73dwhhp9bSKPpmuSgbW0PYZsM1VzJolxAvQNdDClF8GaITWfjk6HELEnNxiy1zJLULEnNc1Izzerx_o9t1UH9T9w3nIH3O-BX08LTfw82V9_P58usZzu9SSNMf3UbfxipuBLm7sva3F9da7K--WDu-G9LwpXD</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>18376493</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Development of an exposure-free bednet trap for sampling Afrotropical malaria vectors</title><source>Wiley</source><creator>Mathenge, E. M. ; Killeen, G. F. ; Oulo, D. O. ; Irungu, L. W. ; Ndegwa, P. N. ; Knols, B. G. J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Mathenge, E. M. ; Killeen, G. F. ; Oulo, D. O. ; Irungu, L. W. ; Ndegwa, P. N. ; Knols, B. G. J.</creatorcontrib><description>An exposure‐free bednet trap (the ‘Mbita trap’) for sampling of Afrotropical malaria vectors was developed during preliminary studies of mosquito behaviour around human‐occupied bednets. Its mosquito sampling efficiency was compared to the CDC miniature light‐trap and human landing catches under semi‐field conditions in a screen‐walled greenhouse using laboratory‐reared Anopheles gambiae Giles sensu stricto (Diptera: Culicidae). When compared in a competitive manner (side by side), the Mbita trap caught 4.1 ± 0.5 times as many mosquitoes as the CDC light‐trap, hung beside an occupied bednet (P < 0.0001) and 43.2 ± 10% the number caught by human landing catches (P < 0.0001). The ratio of Mbita trap catches to those of the CDC light trap increased with decreasing mosquito density. Mosquito density did not affect the ratio of Mbita trap to human‐landing catches. In a non‐competitive comparison (each method independent of the other), the Mbita trap caught 89.7 ± 10% the number of mosquitoes caught by human landing catches (P < 0.0001) and 1.2 ± 0.1 times more mosquitoes than the CDC light trap (P = 0.0008). Differences in Mbita trap performance relative to the human landing catch under non‐competitive vs. competitive conditions were explained by the rate at which each method captured mosquitoes. Such bednet traps do not expose people to potentially infectious mosquito bites and operate passively all night without the need for skilled personnel. This trap is specifically designed to catch host‐seeking mosquitoes only and may be an effective, sensitive, user‐friendly and economic alternative to existing methods for mosquito surveillance in Africa.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0269-283X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1365-2915</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1046/j.0269-283x.2002.00350.x</identifier><identifier>PMID: 11963983</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK: Blackwell Science Ltd</publisher><subject>Africa ; Animals ; Anopheles - parasitology ; Anopheles - physiology ; Anopheles gambiae ; bednets ; CDC light trap ; entomological inoculation rate ; Female ; human-landing catch ; Humans ; Insect Bites and Stings - prevention & control ; Insect Vectors - parasitology ; Insect Vectors - physiology ; Kenya ; Light ; malaria ; Malaria - prevention & control ; Malaria - transmission ; Mbita trap ; Mosquito Control - methods ; mosquito sampling ; Population Dynamics</subject><ispartof>Medical and veterinary entomology, 2002-03, Vol.16 (1), p.67-74</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4330-79004885c10b8eaa62da87fdc8f72c85cc9fea8565e251269b84e5ad6cb277d33</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4330-79004885c10b8eaa62da87fdc8f72c85cc9fea8565e251269b84e5ad6cb277d33</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11963983$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Mathenge, E. M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Killeen, G. F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oulo, D. O.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Irungu, L. W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ndegwa, P. N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Knols, B. G. J.</creatorcontrib><title>Development of an exposure-free bednet trap for sampling Afrotropical malaria vectors</title><title>Medical and veterinary entomology</title><addtitle>Med Vet Entomol</addtitle><description>An exposure‐free bednet trap (the ‘Mbita trap’) for sampling of Afrotropical malaria vectors was developed during preliminary studies of mosquito behaviour around human‐occupied bednets. Its mosquito sampling efficiency was compared to the CDC miniature light‐trap and human landing catches under semi‐field conditions in a screen‐walled greenhouse using laboratory‐reared Anopheles gambiae Giles sensu stricto (Diptera: Culicidae). When compared in a competitive manner (side by side), the Mbita trap caught 4.1 ± 0.5 times as many mosquitoes as the CDC light‐trap, hung beside an occupied bednet (P < 0.0001) and 43.2 ± 10% the number caught by human landing catches (P < 0.0001). The ratio of Mbita trap catches to those of the CDC light trap increased with decreasing mosquito density. Mosquito density did not affect the ratio of Mbita trap to human‐landing catches. In a non‐competitive comparison (each method independent of the other), the Mbita trap caught 89.7 ± 10% the number of mosquitoes caught by human landing catches (P < 0.0001) and 1.2 ± 0.1 times more mosquitoes than the CDC light trap (P = 0.0008). Differences in Mbita trap performance relative to the human landing catch under non‐competitive vs. competitive conditions were explained by the rate at which each method captured mosquitoes. Such bednet traps do not expose people to potentially infectious mosquito bites and operate passively all night without the need for skilled personnel. This trap is specifically designed to catch host‐seeking mosquitoes only and may be an effective, sensitive, user‐friendly and economic alternative to existing methods for mosquito surveillance in Africa.</description><subject>Africa</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Anopheles - parasitology</subject><subject>Anopheles - physiology</subject><subject>Anopheles gambiae</subject><subject>bednets</subject><subject>CDC light trap</subject><subject>entomological inoculation rate</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>human-landing catch</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Insect Bites and Stings - prevention & control</subject><subject>Insect Vectors - parasitology</subject><subject>Insect Vectors - physiology</subject><subject>Kenya</subject><subject>Light</subject><subject>malaria</subject><subject>Malaria - prevention & control</subject><subject>Malaria - transmission</subject><subject>Mbita trap</subject><subject>Mosquito Control - methods</subject><subject>mosquito sampling</subject><subject>Population Dynamics</subject><issn>0269-283X</issn><issn>1365-2915</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2002</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNkMtu1DAUQC0EotPCL1ResUvqR_yIxKaUMlRqQa0o7c5ynOsqQxIHO1PSvyfpDLBlZcs651r3IIQpySkp5MkmJ0yWGdN8yhkhLCeEC5JPL9CKcikyVlLxEq3-QPcH6DClDSFUlYy9RgeUlpKXmq_Q7Ud4hDYMHfQjDh7bHsM0hLSNkPkIgCuoexjxGO2AfYg42W5om_4Bn_oYxhiGxtkWd7a1sbH4EdwYYnqDXnnbJni7P4_Q7afzb2efs8uv64uz08vMFZyTTJWEFFoLR0mlwVrJaquVr532irn53ZUerBZSABN0XqbSBQhbS1cxpWrOj9C73dwhhp9bSKPpmuSgbW0PYZsM1VzJolxAvQNdDClF8GaITWfjk6HELEnNxiy1zJLULEnNc1Izzerx_o9t1UH9T9w3nIH3O-BX08LTfw82V9_P58usZzu9SSNMf3UbfxipuBLm7sva3F9da7K--WDu-G9LwpXD</recordid><startdate>200203</startdate><enddate>200203</enddate><creator>Mathenge, E. M.</creator><creator>Killeen, G. F.</creator><creator>Oulo, D. O.</creator><creator>Irungu, L. W.</creator><creator>Ndegwa, P. N.</creator><creator>Knols, B. G. J.</creator><general>Blackwell Science Ltd</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>M7N</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200203</creationdate><title>Development of an exposure-free bednet trap for sampling Afrotropical malaria vectors</title><author>Mathenge, E. M. ; Killeen, G. F. ; Oulo, D. O. ; Irungu, L. W. ; Ndegwa, P. N. ; Knols, B. G. J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4330-79004885c10b8eaa62da87fdc8f72c85cc9fea8565e251269b84e5ad6cb277d33</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2002</creationdate><topic>Africa</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Anopheles - parasitology</topic><topic>Anopheles - physiology</topic><topic>Anopheles gambiae</topic><topic>bednets</topic><topic>CDC light trap</topic><topic>entomological inoculation rate</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>human-landing catch</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Insect Bites and Stings - prevention & control</topic><topic>Insect Vectors - parasitology</topic><topic>Insect Vectors - physiology</topic><topic>Kenya</topic><topic>Light</topic><topic>malaria</topic><topic>Malaria - prevention & control</topic><topic>Malaria - transmission</topic><topic>Mbita trap</topic><topic>Mosquito Control - methods</topic><topic>mosquito sampling</topic><topic>Population Dynamics</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Mathenge, E. M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Killeen, G. F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oulo, D. O.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Irungu, L. W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ndegwa, P. N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Knols, B. G. J.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences & Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><jtitle>Medical and veterinary entomology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Mathenge, E. M.</au><au>Killeen, G. F.</au><au>Oulo, D. O.</au><au>Irungu, L. W.</au><au>Ndegwa, P. N.</au><au>Knols, B. G. J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Development of an exposure-free bednet trap for sampling Afrotropical malaria vectors</atitle><jtitle>Medical and veterinary entomology</jtitle><addtitle>Med Vet Entomol</addtitle><date>2002-03</date><risdate>2002</risdate><volume>16</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>67</spage><epage>74</epage><pages>67-74</pages><issn>0269-283X</issn><eissn>1365-2915</eissn><abstract>An exposure‐free bednet trap (the ‘Mbita trap’) for sampling of Afrotropical malaria vectors was developed during preliminary studies of mosquito behaviour around human‐occupied bednets. Its mosquito sampling efficiency was compared to the CDC miniature light‐trap and human landing catches under semi‐field conditions in a screen‐walled greenhouse using laboratory‐reared Anopheles gambiae Giles sensu stricto (Diptera: Culicidae). When compared in a competitive manner (side by side), the Mbita trap caught 4.1 ± 0.5 times as many mosquitoes as the CDC light‐trap, hung beside an occupied bednet (P < 0.0001) and 43.2 ± 10% the number caught by human landing catches (P < 0.0001). The ratio of Mbita trap catches to those of the CDC light trap increased with decreasing mosquito density. Mosquito density did not affect the ratio of Mbita trap to human‐landing catches. In a non‐competitive comparison (each method independent of the other), the Mbita trap caught 89.7 ± 10% the number of mosquitoes caught by human landing catches (P < 0.0001) and 1.2 ± 0.1 times more mosquitoes than the CDC light trap (P = 0.0008). Differences in Mbita trap performance relative to the human landing catch under non‐competitive vs. competitive conditions were explained by the rate at which each method captured mosquitoes. Such bednet traps do not expose people to potentially infectious mosquito bites and operate passively all night without the need for skilled personnel. This trap is specifically designed to catch host‐seeking mosquitoes only and may be an effective, sensitive, user‐friendly and economic alternative to existing methods for mosquito surveillance in Africa.</abstract><cop>Oxford, UK</cop><pub>Blackwell Science Ltd</pub><pmid>11963983</pmid><doi>10.1046/j.0269-283x.2002.00350.x</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0269-283X |
ispartof | Medical and veterinary entomology, 2002-03, Vol.16 (1), p.67-74 |
issn | 0269-283X 1365-2915 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_18376493 |
source | Wiley |
subjects | Africa Animals Anopheles - parasitology Anopheles - physiology Anopheles gambiae bednets CDC light trap entomological inoculation rate Female human-landing catch Humans Insect Bites and Stings - prevention & control Insect Vectors - parasitology Insect Vectors - physiology Kenya Light malaria Malaria - prevention & control Malaria - transmission Mbita trap Mosquito Control - methods mosquito sampling Population Dynamics |
title | Development of an exposure-free bednet trap for sampling Afrotropical malaria vectors |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-28T13%3A04%3A42IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Development%20of%20an%20exposure-free%20bednet%20trap%20for%20sampling%20Afrotropical%20malaria%20vectors&rft.jtitle=Medical%20and%20veterinary%20entomology&rft.au=Mathenge,%20E.%20M.&rft.date=2002-03&rft.volume=16&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=67&rft.epage=74&rft.pages=67-74&rft.issn=0269-283X&rft.eissn=1365-2915&rft_id=info:doi/10.1046/j.0269-283x.2002.00350.x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E18376493%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4330-79004885c10b8eaa62da87fdc8f72c85cc9fea8565e251269b84e5ad6cb277d33%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=18376493&rft_id=info:pmid/11963983&rfr_iscdi=true |