Loading…

Comparing distance visual acuity measurement with a novel eye chart and the Landolt C chart in a population of children aged 6–18 years

Purpose The Handy Eye Chart™ is designed to assist in evaluating the visual acuity of patients with non-standard communication styles. The Handy Eye Chart™ has been previously validated against the early treatment diabetic retinopathy study (ETDRS) chart. The aim of this research is to compare visua...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:International ophthalmology 2017-12, Vol.37 (6), p.1345-1348
Main Authors: Gorham, John P., Bruce, Beau B., Hutchinson, Amy K.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Purpose The Handy Eye Chart™ is designed to assist in evaluating the visual acuity of patients with non-standard communication styles. The Handy Eye Chart™ has been previously validated against the early treatment diabetic retinopathy study (ETDRS) chart. The aim of this research is to compare visual acuity outcomes with The Handy Eye Chart™ against the international gold standard, the Landolt C chart, in a population of children. Methods Sixty participants between the ages of 6 and 18 were recruited at the Pediatric Section of the Department of Ophthalmology at the Emory Eye Center. Visual acuity was evaluated using The Handy Eye Chart™ and the Landolt C Chart, altering the order of administration between charts. The visual acuity data were compared using t test, linear regression, and Bland–Altman analysis. Results The mean difference in visual acuity was 0.02 logMAR (CI 0.009–0.04, p  = 0.002). The correlation coefficient was 0.98. The Bland–Altman analysis shows the 95% limits of agreement between the charts to be −0.14 to 0.09 logMAR. Conclusions The Handy Eye Chart™ is a valid measure of visual acuity when compared with the international gold standard, the Landolt C Chart.
ISSN:0165-5701
1573-2630
DOI:10.1007/s10792-016-0384-3