Loading…

Evaluating the growth of eyelid lesions: comparison of clinical evaluation and a software-based model

Purpose To evaluate the accuracy of clinicians in evaluating the growth of eyelid lesions and to compare the measurements of experienced ophthalmologists to a novel computerized measurement method. Design Prospective, single center, observational study. Methods Six experienced ophthalmologists were...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:International ophthalmology 2017-12, Vol.37 (6), p.1257-1261
Main Authors: Soto, Julie Linden, Vrcek, Ivan, Ozgur, Omar, Mancini, Ronald
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-562455f7f427a69850dca5812d08c7625ebbe1bcc35ab3ab02e49e0644c377813
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-562455f7f427a69850dca5812d08c7625ebbe1bcc35ab3ab02e49e0644c377813
container_end_page 1261
container_issue 6
container_start_page 1257
container_title International ophthalmology
container_volume 37
creator Soto, Julie Linden
Vrcek, Ivan
Ozgur, Omar
Mancini, Ronald
description Purpose To evaluate the accuracy of clinicians in evaluating the growth of eyelid lesions and to compare the measurements of experienced ophthalmologists to a novel computerized measurement method. Design Prospective, single center, observational study. Methods Six experienced ophthalmologists were asked to measure 3 simulated eyelid lesions using a slit lamp. These lesions were then enlarged, and the same examiners were asked to measure the enlarged lesions without prompting that the lesions had changed. Slit lamp photography of the original lesions and enlarged lesions were analyzed using freely available software from the National Institutes of Health. The results of clinician measurements were compared to the software-generated data. Results Clinician data regarding the growth of the lesions were as follows: −40.9 to +76.8% for lesion 1, +29.3 to +134.4% for lesion 2, and +148.5 to +1169.2% for lesion 3. Software-based measurements were as follows: +53.6, +100.7, and +182.2% for lesions 1, 2, and 3, respectively. Conclusions Monitoring growth of eyelid lesions in clinical practice can be challenging. We propose that using computerized software to analyze surface area of concerning eyelid lesions may provide a significant advantage over current clinical practices.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s10792-016-0394-1
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1839114573</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1957694179</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-562455f7f427a69850dca5812d08c7625ebbe1bcc35ab3ab02e49e0644c377813</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kUtr3DAUhUVpaKZJfkA3RdBNNkp09bCs7kpIHxDIpl0LWb6eOMjWVLIb8u-jYaalFLoS3POdo8u5hLwDfgWcm-sC3FjBODSMS6sYvCIb0EYy0Uj-mmyqoJk2HE7J21IeOefW2OYNORWmlUIJuyF4-8vH1S_jvKXLA9JtTk_LA00DxWeMY08jljHN5SMNadr5PJY079UQx3kMPlI8-uvYzz31tKRhefIZWecL9nRKPcZzcjL4WPDi-J6RH59vv998ZXf3X77dfLpjQRqxMN0IpfVgBiWMb2yreR-8bkH0vA2mERq7DqELQWrfSd9xgcoib5SqftOCPCOXh9xdTj9XLIubxhIwRj9jWouDVloAVSuq6Id_0Me05rlu58Bq01gFxlYKDlTIqZSMg9vlcfL52QF3-xu4ww1crdrtb-D2S7w_Jq_dhP0fx-_SKyAOQKnSvMX819f_TX0BO-GRMw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1957694179</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Evaluating the growth of eyelid lesions: comparison of clinical evaluation and a software-based model</title><source>Springer Nature</source><creator>Soto, Julie Linden ; Vrcek, Ivan ; Ozgur, Omar ; Mancini, Ronald</creator><creatorcontrib>Soto, Julie Linden ; Vrcek, Ivan ; Ozgur, Omar ; Mancini, Ronald</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose To evaluate the accuracy of clinicians in evaluating the growth of eyelid lesions and to compare the measurements of experienced ophthalmologists to a novel computerized measurement method. Design Prospective, single center, observational study. Methods Six experienced ophthalmologists were asked to measure 3 simulated eyelid lesions using a slit lamp. These lesions were then enlarged, and the same examiners were asked to measure the enlarged lesions without prompting that the lesions had changed. Slit lamp photography of the original lesions and enlarged lesions were analyzed using freely available software from the National Institutes of Health. The results of clinician measurements were compared to the software-generated data. Results Clinician data regarding the growth of the lesions were as follows: −40.9 to +76.8% for lesion 1, +29.3 to +134.4% for lesion 2, and +148.5 to +1169.2% for lesion 3. Software-based measurements were as follows: +53.6, +100.7, and +182.2% for lesions 1, 2, and 3, respectively. Conclusions Monitoring growth of eyelid lesions in clinical practice can be challenging. We propose that using computerized software to analyze surface area of concerning eyelid lesions may provide a significant advantage over current clinical practices.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0165-5701</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-2630</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10792-016-0394-1</identifier><identifier>PMID: 27832429</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands</publisher><subject>Computer programs ; Computer simulation ; Expansion ; Eye cancer ; Eyelid ; Eyelid Neoplasms - diagnosis ; Head &amp; neck cancer ; Humans ; Lesions ; Medical personnel ; Medicine ; Medicine &amp; Public Health ; Ophthalmology ; Original Paper ; Patient Simulation ; Photography ; Photography - methods ; Prospective Studies ; Reproducibility of Results ; Slit Lamp Microscopy ; Software</subject><ispartof>International ophthalmology, 2017-12, Vol.37 (6), p.1257-1261</ispartof><rights>Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2016</rights><rights>International Ophthalmology is a copyright of Springer, 2017.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-562455f7f427a69850dca5812d08c7625ebbe1bcc35ab3ab02e49e0644c377813</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-562455f7f427a69850dca5812d08c7625ebbe1bcc35ab3ab02e49e0644c377813</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27832429$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Soto, Julie Linden</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vrcek, Ivan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ozgur, Omar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mancini, Ronald</creatorcontrib><title>Evaluating the growth of eyelid lesions: comparison of clinical evaluation and a software-based model</title><title>International ophthalmology</title><addtitle>Int Ophthalmol</addtitle><addtitle>Int Ophthalmol</addtitle><description>Purpose To evaluate the accuracy of clinicians in evaluating the growth of eyelid lesions and to compare the measurements of experienced ophthalmologists to a novel computerized measurement method. Design Prospective, single center, observational study. Methods Six experienced ophthalmologists were asked to measure 3 simulated eyelid lesions using a slit lamp. These lesions were then enlarged, and the same examiners were asked to measure the enlarged lesions without prompting that the lesions had changed. Slit lamp photography of the original lesions and enlarged lesions were analyzed using freely available software from the National Institutes of Health. The results of clinician measurements were compared to the software-generated data. Results Clinician data regarding the growth of the lesions were as follows: −40.9 to +76.8% for lesion 1, +29.3 to +134.4% for lesion 2, and +148.5 to +1169.2% for lesion 3. Software-based measurements were as follows: +53.6, +100.7, and +182.2% for lesions 1, 2, and 3, respectively. Conclusions Monitoring growth of eyelid lesions in clinical practice can be challenging. We propose that using computerized software to analyze surface area of concerning eyelid lesions may provide a significant advantage over current clinical practices.</description><subject>Computer programs</subject><subject>Computer simulation</subject><subject>Expansion</subject><subject>Eye cancer</subject><subject>Eyelid</subject><subject>Eyelid Neoplasms - diagnosis</subject><subject>Head &amp; neck cancer</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Lesions</subject><subject>Medical personnel</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine &amp; Public Health</subject><subject>Ophthalmology</subject><subject>Original Paper</subject><subject>Patient Simulation</subject><subject>Photography</subject><subject>Photography - methods</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>Slit Lamp Microscopy</subject><subject>Software</subject><issn>0165-5701</issn><issn>1573-2630</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kUtr3DAUhUVpaKZJfkA3RdBNNkp09bCs7kpIHxDIpl0LWb6eOMjWVLIb8u-jYaalFLoS3POdo8u5hLwDfgWcm-sC3FjBODSMS6sYvCIb0EYy0Uj-mmyqoJk2HE7J21IeOefW2OYNORWmlUIJuyF4-8vH1S_jvKXLA9JtTk_LA00DxWeMY08jljHN5SMNadr5PJY079UQx3kMPlI8-uvYzz31tKRhefIZWecL9nRKPcZzcjL4WPDi-J6RH59vv998ZXf3X77dfLpjQRqxMN0IpfVgBiWMb2yreR-8bkH0vA2mERq7DqELQWrfSd9xgcoib5SqftOCPCOXh9xdTj9XLIubxhIwRj9jWouDVloAVSuq6Id_0Me05rlu58Bq01gFxlYKDlTIqZSMg9vlcfL52QF3-xu4ww1crdrtb-D2S7w_Jq_dhP0fx-_SKyAOQKnSvMX819f_TX0BO-GRMw</recordid><startdate>20171201</startdate><enddate>20171201</enddate><creator>Soto, Julie Linden</creator><creator>Vrcek, Ivan</creator><creator>Ozgur, Omar</creator><creator>Mancini, Ronald</creator><general>Springer Netherlands</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20171201</creationdate><title>Evaluating the growth of eyelid lesions: comparison of clinical evaluation and a software-based model</title><author>Soto, Julie Linden ; Vrcek, Ivan ; Ozgur, Omar ; Mancini, Ronald</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-562455f7f427a69850dca5812d08c7625ebbe1bcc35ab3ab02e49e0644c377813</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Computer programs</topic><topic>Computer simulation</topic><topic>Expansion</topic><topic>Eye cancer</topic><topic>Eyelid</topic><topic>Eyelid Neoplasms - diagnosis</topic><topic>Head &amp; neck cancer</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Lesions</topic><topic>Medical personnel</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine &amp; Public Health</topic><topic>Ophthalmology</topic><topic>Original Paper</topic><topic>Patient Simulation</topic><topic>Photography</topic><topic>Photography - methods</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>Slit Lamp Microscopy</topic><topic>Software</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Soto, Julie Linden</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vrcek, Ivan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ozgur, Omar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mancini, Ronald</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Proquest)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>PML(ProQuest Medical Library)</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>International ophthalmology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Soto, Julie Linden</au><au>Vrcek, Ivan</au><au>Ozgur, Omar</au><au>Mancini, Ronald</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Evaluating the growth of eyelid lesions: comparison of clinical evaluation and a software-based model</atitle><jtitle>International ophthalmology</jtitle><stitle>Int Ophthalmol</stitle><addtitle>Int Ophthalmol</addtitle><date>2017-12-01</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>37</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>1257</spage><epage>1261</epage><pages>1257-1261</pages><issn>0165-5701</issn><eissn>1573-2630</eissn><abstract>Purpose To evaluate the accuracy of clinicians in evaluating the growth of eyelid lesions and to compare the measurements of experienced ophthalmologists to a novel computerized measurement method. Design Prospective, single center, observational study. Methods Six experienced ophthalmologists were asked to measure 3 simulated eyelid lesions using a slit lamp. These lesions were then enlarged, and the same examiners were asked to measure the enlarged lesions without prompting that the lesions had changed. Slit lamp photography of the original lesions and enlarged lesions were analyzed using freely available software from the National Institutes of Health. The results of clinician measurements were compared to the software-generated data. Results Clinician data regarding the growth of the lesions were as follows: −40.9 to +76.8% for lesion 1, +29.3 to +134.4% for lesion 2, and +148.5 to +1169.2% for lesion 3. Software-based measurements were as follows: +53.6, +100.7, and +182.2% for lesions 1, 2, and 3, respectively. Conclusions Monitoring growth of eyelid lesions in clinical practice can be challenging. We propose that using computerized software to analyze surface area of concerning eyelid lesions may provide a significant advantage over current clinical practices.</abstract><cop>Dordrecht</cop><pub>Springer Netherlands</pub><pmid>27832429</pmid><doi>10.1007/s10792-016-0394-1</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0165-5701
ispartof International ophthalmology, 2017-12, Vol.37 (6), p.1257-1261
issn 0165-5701
1573-2630
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1839114573
source Springer Nature
subjects Computer programs
Computer simulation
Expansion
Eye cancer
Eyelid
Eyelid Neoplasms - diagnosis
Head & neck cancer
Humans
Lesions
Medical personnel
Medicine
Medicine & Public Health
Ophthalmology
Original Paper
Patient Simulation
Photography
Photography - methods
Prospective Studies
Reproducibility of Results
Slit Lamp Microscopy
Software
title Evaluating the growth of eyelid lesions: comparison of clinical evaluation and a software-based model
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-24T13%3A29%3A34IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Evaluating%20the%20growth%20of%20eyelid%20lesions:%20comparison%20of%20clinical%20evaluation%20and%20a%20software-based%20model&rft.jtitle=International%20ophthalmology&rft.au=Soto,%20Julie%20Linden&rft.date=2017-12-01&rft.volume=37&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=1257&rft.epage=1261&rft.pages=1257-1261&rft.issn=0165-5701&rft.eissn=1573-2630&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10792-016-0394-1&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1957694179%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-562455f7f427a69850dca5812d08c7625ebbe1bcc35ab3ab02e49e0644c377813%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1957694179&rft_id=info:pmid/27832429&rfr_iscdi=true