FACTORS AFFECTING FEMALE REMATING FREQUENCY IN THE MEDITERRANEAN FRUIT FLY (DIPTERA: TEPHRITIDAE)

Mating and remating of two laboratory strains (Petapa and Guate), one wild population (Antigua) of Ceratitis capitata (Wiedemann) and one of the hybrids between them were studied under laboratory conditions. No evidence of sexual isolation at first mating was found among them. Remating frequency was...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:The Florida entomologist 2002-03, Vol.85 (1), p.156-164
Main Authors: Vera, M. T, Wood, R. J, Cladera, J. L, Gilburn, A. S
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Biology
Ceratitis capitata
compatibility
copulation
crowding
duration
Entomology
females
Fruit flies
Hybridity
hybrids
Insect reproduction
laboratory strains
Logistic regression
Male fertility
Mating behavior
mating duration
mating frequency
mating preferences
medfly
PROCEEDINGS OF AN FAO/IAEA RESEARCH COORDINATION PROJECT ON MEDFLY MATING
remating behavior
Spermatozoa
strain differences
strains
wild strains
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b517t-7b8610e43e42533b77116793e471cd92f5f6046d974eafa4b5a2d1be5f1475a73
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b517t-7b8610e43e42533b77116793e471cd92f5f6046d974eafa4b5a2d1be5f1475a73
container_end_page 164
container_issue 1
container_start_page 156
container_title The Florida entomologist
container_volume 85
creator Vera, M. T
Wood, R. J
Cladera, J. L
Gilburn, A. S
description Mating and remating of two laboratory strains (Petapa and Guate), one wild population (Antigua) of Ceratitis capitata (Wiedemann) and one of the hybrids between them were studied under laboratory conditions. No evidence of sexual isolation at first mating was found among them. Remating frequency was higher under crowded conditions for the two laboratory strains. The probability of Petapa females remating depended more on the origin of the male and was negatively associated with the duration of the first mating, but these variables had no effect on remating tendency of Guate females. Matings by Petapa males were significantly less prolonged than those of Guate or hybrid males. With respect to remating, Petapa non-virgin females preferred Petapa to Guate males.
doi_str_mv 10.1653/0015-4040(2002)085[0156:FAFRFI]2.0.CO;2
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_18398070</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>3496833</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>3496833</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-b517t-7b8610e43e42533b77116793e471cd92f5f6046d974eafa4b5a2d1be5f1475a73</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqdUU1r20AUXEoLdZP-g0KXHkpykPP2Syulp0Ve2QJHThX5EEpZVvaq2DhWqrUP_fddoZBDjz093sy84TGD0A2BKYkFuwEgIuLA4YoC0GtIxI-AxLe5yqu8-EmnMM1W3-gbNCEpSyJBgL5Fk9er9-iD93sASKkQE2RzldWr6gGrPNdZXZRznOs7tdS4CmPcK_19rcvsERclrhca3-lZUeuqUqVWZaDXRY3z5SO-mhX3AVe3uNb3i6qoi5nS15foXWsP3n18mRdones6W0TL1bzI1DJqBJGnSDZJTMBx5jgVjDVSEhLLNKySbLYpbUUbA4-3qeTOtpY3wtItaZxoCZfCSnaBvo6-z333--z8yTzt_MYdDvbourM3JGFpAhKC8Ms_wn137o_hN0NDZJxwoEE0H0WbvvO-d6157ndPtv9jCJihBzMkaoZEzdCDCT2YoQcz9mACYrKVGZw-jU57f-r6VxvG0zhhLNCfR7q1nbG_-p036wcKhAFNacIhCQo9Kppd1x3dfz_yF2gumtY</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>219341402</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>FACTORS AFFECTING FEMALE REMATING FREQUENCY IN THE MEDITERRANEAN FRUIT FLY (DIPTERA: TEPHRITIDAE)</title><source>Publicly Available Content Database</source><source>JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection</source><creator>Vera, M. T ; Wood, R. J ; Cladera, J. L ; Gilburn, A. S</creator><creatorcontrib>Vera, M. T ; Wood, R. J ; Cladera, J. L ; Gilburn, A. S</creatorcontrib><description>Mating and remating of two laboratory strains (Petapa and Guate), one wild population (Antigua) of Ceratitis capitata (Wiedemann) and one of the hybrids between them were studied under laboratory conditions. No evidence of sexual isolation at first mating was found among them. Remating frequency was higher under crowded conditions for the two laboratory strains. The probability of Petapa females remating depended more on the origin of the male and was negatively associated with the duration of the first mating, but these variables had no effect on remating tendency of Guate females. Matings by Petapa males were significantly less prolonged than those of Guate or hybrid males. With respect to remating, Petapa non-virgin females preferred Petapa to Guate males.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0015-4040</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1938-5102</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1653/0015-4040(2002)085[0156:FAFRFI]2.0.CO;2</identifier><identifier>CODEN: FETMAC</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Lutz: Florida Entomological Society</publisher><subject>Biology ; Ceratitis capitata ; compatibility ; copulation ; crowding ; duration ; Entomology ; females ; Fruit flies ; Hybridity ; hybrids ; Insect reproduction ; laboratory strains ; Logistic regression ; Male fertility ; Mating behavior ; mating duration ; mating frequency ; mating preferences ; medfly ; PROCEEDINGS OF AN FAO/IAEA RESEARCH COORDINATION PROJECT ON MEDFLY MATING ; remating behavior ; Spermatozoa ; strain differences ; strains ; wild strains</subject><ispartof>The Florida entomologist, 2002-03, Vol.85 (1), p.156-164</ispartof><rights>Florida Entomological Society</rights><rights>Copyright Florida Entomological Society Mar 2002</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-b517t-7b8610e43e42533b77116793e471cd92f5f6046d974eafa4b5a2d1be5f1475a73</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-b517t-7b8610e43e42533b77116793e471cd92f5f6046d974eafa4b5a2d1be5f1475a73</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/219341402/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/219341402?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,25752,27923,27924,37011,37012,44589,58237,58470,74897</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Vera, M. T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wood, R. J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cladera, J. L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gilburn, A. S</creatorcontrib><title>FACTORS AFFECTING FEMALE REMATING FREQUENCY IN THE MEDITERRANEAN FRUIT FLY (DIPTERA: TEPHRITIDAE)</title><title>The Florida entomologist</title><description>Mating and remating of two laboratory strains (Petapa and Guate), one wild population (Antigua) of Ceratitis capitata (Wiedemann) and one of the hybrids between them were studied under laboratory conditions. No evidence of sexual isolation at first mating was found among them. Remating frequency was higher under crowded conditions for the two laboratory strains. The probability of Petapa females remating depended more on the origin of the male and was negatively associated with the duration of the first mating, but these variables had no effect on remating tendency of Guate females. Matings by Petapa males were significantly less prolonged than those of Guate or hybrid males. With respect to remating, Petapa non-virgin females preferred Petapa to Guate males.</description><subject>Biology</subject><subject>Ceratitis capitata</subject><subject>compatibility</subject><subject>copulation</subject><subject>crowding</subject><subject>duration</subject><subject>Entomology</subject><subject>females</subject><subject>Fruit flies</subject><subject>Hybridity</subject><subject>hybrids</subject><subject>Insect reproduction</subject><subject>laboratory strains</subject><subject>Logistic regression</subject><subject>Male fertility</subject><subject>Mating behavior</subject><subject>mating duration</subject><subject>mating frequency</subject><subject>mating preferences</subject><subject>medfly</subject><subject>PROCEEDINGS OF AN FAO/IAEA RESEARCH COORDINATION PROJECT ON MEDFLY MATING</subject><subject>remating behavior</subject><subject>Spermatozoa</subject><subject>strain differences</subject><subject>strains</subject><subject>wild strains</subject><issn>0015-4040</issn><issn>1938-5102</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2002</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><recordid>eNqdUU1r20AUXEoLdZP-g0KXHkpykPP2Syulp0Ve2QJHThX5EEpZVvaq2DhWqrUP_fddoZBDjz093sy84TGD0A2BKYkFuwEgIuLA4YoC0GtIxI-AxLe5yqu8-EmnMM1W3-gbNCEpSyJBgL5Fk9er9-iD93sASKkQE2RzldWr6gGrPNdZXZRznOs7tdS4CmPcK_19rcvsERclrhca3-lZUeuqUqVWZaDXRY3z5SO-mhX3AVe3uNb3i6qoi5nS15foXWsP3n18mRdones6W0TL1bzI1DJqBJGnSDZJTMBx5jgVjDVSEhLLNKySbLYpbUUbA4-3qeTOtpY3wtItaZxoCZfCSnaBvo6-z333--z8yTzt_MYdDvbourM3JGFpAhKC8Ms_wn137o_hN0NDZJxwoEE0H0WbvvO-d6157ndPtv9jCJihBzMkaoZEzdCDCT2YoQcz9mACYrKVGZw-jU57f-r6VxvG0zhhLNCfR7q1nbG_-p036wcKhAFNacIhCQo9Kppd1x3dfz_yF2gumtY</recordid><startdate>20020301</startdate><enddate>20020301</enddate><creator>Vera, M. T</creator><creator>Wood, R. J</creator><creator>Cladera, J. L</creator><creator>Gilburn, A. S</creator><general>Florida Entomological Society</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QR</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88A</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20020301</creationdate><title>FACTORS AFFECTING FEMALE REMATING FREQUENCY IN THE MEDITERRANEAN FRUIT FLY (DIPTERA: TEPHRITIDAE)</title><author>Vera, M. T ; Wood, R. J ; Cladera, J. L ; Gilburn, A. S</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b517t-7b8610e43e42533b77116793e471cd92f5f6046d974eafa4b5a2d1be5f1475a73</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2002</creationdate><topic>Biology</topic><topic>Ceratitis capitata</topic><topic>compatibility</topic><topic>copulation</topic><topic>crowding</topic><topic>duration</topic><topic>Entomology</topic><topic>females</topic><topic>Fruit flies</topic><topic>Hybridity</topic><topic>hybrids</topic><topic>Insect reproduction</topic><topic>laboratory strains</topic><topic>Logistic regression</topic><topic>Male fertility</topic><topic>Mating behavior</topic><topic>mating duration</topic><topic>mating frequency</topic><topic>mating preferences</topic><topic>medfly</topic><topic>PROCEEDINGS OF AN FAO/IAEA RESEARCH COORDINATION PROJECT ON MEDFLY MATING</topic><topic>remating behavior</topic><topic>Spermatozoa</topic><topic>strain differences</topic><topic>strains</topic><topic>wild strains</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Vera, M. T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wood, R. J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cladera, J. L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gilburn, A. S</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Chemoreception Abstracts</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Biology Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences &amp; Living Resources</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Biological Sciences</collection><collection>Agriculture Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><jtitle>The Florida entomologist</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Vera, M. T</au><au>Wood, R. J</au><au>Cladera, J. L</au><au>Gilburn, A. S</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>FACTORS AFFECTING FEMALE REMATING FREQUENCY IN THE MEDITERRANEAN FRUIT FLY (DIPTERA: TEPHRITIDAE)</atitle><jtitle>The Florida entomologist</jtitle><date>2002-03-01</date><risdate>2002</risdate><volume>85</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>156</spage><epage>164</epage><pages>156-164</pages><issn>0015-4040</issn><eissn>1938-5102</eissn><coden>FETMAC</coden><abstract>Mating and remating of two laboratory strains (Petapa and Guate), one wild population (Antigua) of Ceratitis capitata (Wiedemann) and one of the hybrids between them were studied under laboratory conditions. No evidence of sexual isolation at first mating was found among them. Remating frequency was higher under crowded conditions for the two laboratory strains. The probability of Petapa females remating depended more on the origin of the male and was negatively associated with the duration of the first mating, but these variables had no effect on remating tendency of Guate females. Matings by Petapa males were significantly less prolonged than those of Guate or hybrid males. With respect to remating, Petapa non-virgin females preferred Petapa to Guate males.</abstract><cop>Lutz</cop><pub>Florida Entomological Society</pub><doi>10.1653/0015-4040(2002)085[0156:FAFRFI]2.0.CO;2</doi><tpages>9</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0015-4040
ispartof The Florida entomologist, 2002-03, Vol.85 (1), p.156-164
issn 0015-4040
1938-5102
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_18398070
source Publicly Available Content Database; JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection
subjects Biology
Ceratitis capitata
compatibility
copulation
crowding
duration
Entomology
females
Fruit flies
Hybridity
hybrids
Insect reproduction
laboratory strains
Logistic regression
Male fertility
Mating behavior
mating duration
mating frequency
mating preferences
medfly
PROCEEDINGS OF AN FAO/IAEA RESEARCH COORDINATION PROJECT ON MEDFLY MATING
remating behavior
Spermatozoa
strain differences
strains
wild strains
title FACTORS AFFECTING FEMALE REMATING FREQUENCY IN THE MEDITERRANEAN FRUIT FLY (DIPTERA: TEPHRITIDAE)
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-12T01%3A14%3A37IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=FACTORS%20AFFECTING%20FEMALE%20REMATING%20FREQUENCY%20IN%20THE%20MEDITERRANEAN%20FRUIT%20FLY%20(DIPTERA:%20TEPHRITIDAE)&rft.jtitle=The%20Florida%20entomologist&rft.au=Vera,%20M.%20T&rft.date=2002-03-01&rft.volume=85&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=156&rft.epage=164&rft.pages=156-164&rft.issn=0015-4040&rft.eissn=1938-5102&rft.coden=FETMAC&rft_id=info:doi/10.1653/0015-4040(2002)085%5B0156:FAFRFI%5D2.0.CO;2&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E3496833%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b517t-7b8610e43e42533b77116793e471cd92f5f6046d974eafa4b5a2d1be5f1475a73%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=219341402&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=3496833&rfr_iscdi=true