Loading…
Recruitment Limitation, Population Regulation, and Larval Connectivity in Reef Fish Metapopulations
Two central debates in marine ecology concern the role of connectivity patterns via larval dispersal in structuring marine metapopulations and the relative importance of larval supply vs. events occurring during or after settlement in determining adult abundance. Both issues were examined using age-...
Saved in:
Published in: | Ecology (Durham) 2002-04, Vol.83 (4), p.1092-1104 |
---|---|
Main Author: | |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4282-ad8f98799a9798b01addfa2c1b12d20c2d27dd63549227b5fccb309812a7bed13 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4282-ad8f98799a9798b01addfa2c1b12d20c2d27dd63549227b5fccb309812a7bed13 |
container_end_page | 1104 |
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 1092 |
container_title | Ecology (Durham) |
container_volume | 83 |
creator | Armsworth, Paul R. |
description | Two central debates in marine ecology concern the role of connectivity patterns via larval dispersal in structuring marine metapopulations and the relative importance of larval supply vs. events occurring during or after settlement in determining adult abundance. Both issues were examined using age-structured models and simulations of reef fish population dynamics at the regional scale of closed metapopulations and the local scale of individual reefs. Local populations on individual reefs were assumed to be at once both partially open and partially closed. Two sets of models over both spatial scales are presented. One set examines density-independent dynamics. In the other set, mortality in the first year depends on the density of the settling cohort, and the density dependence is compensatory. The sensitivities of local population dynamics to the rates of self-recruitment and external larval supply were predicted. If external larval supply is regular and there is little self-recruitment, then a local population can appear to be regulated without conventional forms of density dependence. Elsewhere, this process has been termed "recruitment regulation." However, with increased self-recruitment a local population will grow without bound in the absence of regulatory density dependence. Metapopulation persistence requires a sufficiently strong linkage between stock and recruitment in some local population. In such a local population, individuals must contribute sufficiently many offspring to replace themselves locally in subsequent generations. Such a local population could either be partially closed or lie in a region of the metapopulation that is strongly interconnected. Metapopulation regulation requires that density dependence acts to curb population growth in local source populations but does not require that it acts in local sink populations. The density dependence need not be so strong as to prevent subsequent cohort sizes from correlating well with varying recruitment levels. Recruitment regulation alone cannot regulate a metapopulation. Two versions of the recruitment limitation hypothesis were examined. The first version states that varying recruitment levels are good predictors of subsequent population size; the second version states that postrecruitment demographic rates are density independent. The present models, along with a growing body of empirical data, support the first hypothesis but provide less support for the second one. Population regul |
doi_str_mv | 10.1890/0012-9658(2002)083[1092:RLPRAL]2.0.CO;2 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_18399564</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>3071916</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>3071916</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4282-ad8f98799a9798b01addfa2c1b12d20c2d27dd63549227b5fccb309812a7bed13</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqdkV1rFDEUhgex4Nr2PwRRqdDZniTzkehVGdoqjGxZ9UJEQiaT0SyzM2uSqey_N3GWKl540UCSQ_Kc93DOmyQXGJaYcbgAwCTlRc7OCAB5BYx-wcDJ63V9u76sv5IlLKvVG_IoWWBOecpxCY-TxX3Wk-SpcxsIC2dskai1VnYyfqsHj2qzNV56Mw7n6HbcTf3vGK31t0N4juTQolraO9mjahwGrby5M36PTMR0h66N-47eay939_nuJDnqZO_06eE-Tj5dX32s3qb16uZddVmnKiOMpLJlHWcl55KXnDWAZdt2kijcYNISUOEo27agecYJKZu8U6qhwBkmsmx0i-lx8nLW3dnxx6SdF1vjlO57OehxcgIzynleZAE8-z9YFKEIDmRAn_2DbsbJDqENQTAHyIBE6GaGlB2ds7oTO2u20u4FBhFNE3H8Io5fRNNEME1E08RsmggvoloJEpReHMpJp2TfWTko4_7I0ZxhKGKrH2bup-n1_qHlxFX1OQKMZvE7qD6fVTfOj_ZvVUKhFGHjMBX6Cwc4vcU</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>219004023</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Recruitment Limitation, Population Regulation, and Larval Connectivity in Reef Fish Metapopulations</title><source>JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection</source><source>Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection</source><creator>Armsworth, Paul R.</creator><creatorcontrib>Armsworth, Paul R.</creatorcontrib><description>Two central debates in marine ecology concern the role of connectivity patterns via larval dispersal in structuring marine metapopulations and the relative importance of larval supply vs. events occurring during or after settlement in determining adult abundance. Both issues were examined using age-structured models and simulations of reef fish population dynamics at the regional scale of closed metapopulations and the local scale of individual reefs. Local populations on individual reefs were assumed to be at once both partially open and partially closed. Two sets of models over both spatial scales are presented. One set examines density-independent dynamics. In the other set, mortality in the first year depends on the density of the settling cohort, and the density dependence is compensatory. The sensitivities of local population dynamics to the rates of self-recruitment and external larval supply were predicted. If external larval supply is regular and there is little self-recruitment, then a local population can appear to be regulated without conventional forms of density dependence. Elsewhere, this process has been termed "recruitment regulation." However, with increased self-recruitment a local population will grow without bound in the absence of regulatory density dependence. Metapopulation persistence requires a sufficiently strong linkage between stock and recruitment in some local population. In such a local population, individuals must contribute sufficiently many offspring to replace themselves locally in subsequent generations. Such a local population could either be partially closed or lie in a region of the metapopulation that is strongly interconnected. Metapopulation regulation requires that density dependence acts to curb population growth in local source populations but does not require that it acts in local sink populations. The density dependence need not be so strong as to prevent subsequent cohort sizes from correlating well with varying recruitment levels. Recruitment regulation alone cannot regulate a metapopulation. Two versions of the recruitment limitation hypothesis were examined. The first version states that varying recruitment levels are good predictors of subsequent population size; the second version states that postrecruitment demographic rates are density independent. The present models, along with a growing body of empirical data, support the first hypothesis but provide less support for the second one. Population regulation and the first form of recruitment limitation are not antithetical processes.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0012-9658</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1939-9170</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1890/0012-9658(2002)083[1092:RLPRAL]2.0.CO;2</identifier><identifier>CODEN: ECGYAQ</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Washington, DC: Ecological Society of America</publisher><subject>Agnatha. Pisces ; Animal and plant ecology ; Animal populations ; Animal, plant and microbial ecology ; Animals ; Biological and medical sciences ; connectivity patterns ; Coral reefs ; Demecology ; density dependence ; Ecology ; Eigenvalues ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; General aspects. Techniques ; Larvae ; larval dispersal ; Marine ; Marine biology ; Marine ecology ; marine metapopulations ; Metapopulation ecology ; Methods and techniques (sampling, tagging, trapping, modelling...) ; Mortality ; open vs. closed populations ; Pisces ; Population density ; Population dynamics ; Population ecology ; Population growth ; population regulation ; recruitment limitation ; recruitment vs. post-recruitment processes ; reef fishes ; self-recruitment ; source–sink dynamics ; Studies ; Vertebrata</subject><ispartof>Ecology (Durham), 2002-04, Vol.83 (4), p.1092-1104</ispartof><rights>Copyright 2002 Ecological Society of America</rights><rights>2002 by the Ecological Society of America</rights><rights>2002 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright Ecological Society of America Apr 2002</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4282-ad8f98799a9798b01addfa2c1b12d20c2d27dd63549227b5fccb309812a7bed13</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4282-ad8f98799a9798b01addfa2c1b12d20c2d27dd63549227b5fccb309812a7bed13</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/3071916$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/3071916$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,27905,27906,58219,58452</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=13581061$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Armsworth, Paul R.</creatorcontrib><title>Recruitment Limitation, Population Regulation, and Larval Connectivity in Reef Fish Metapopulations</title><title>Ecology (Durham)</title><description>Two central debates in marine ecology concern the role of connectivity patterns via larval dispersal in structuring marine metapopulations and the relative importance of larval supply vs. events occurring during or after settlement in determining adult abundance. Both issues were examined using age-structured models and simulations of reef fish population dynamics at the regional scale of closed metapopulations and the local scale of individual reefs. Local populations on individual reefs were assumed to be at once both partially open and partially closed. Two sets of models over both spatial scales are presented. One set examines density-independent dynamics. In the other set, mortality in the first year depends on the density of the settling cohort, and the density dependence is compensatory. The sensitivities of local population dynamics to the rates of self-recruitment and external larval supply were predicted. If external larval supply is regular and there is little self-recruitment, then a local population can appear to be regulated without conventional forms of density dependence. Elsewhere, this process has been termed "recruitment regulation." However, with increased self-recruitment a local population will grow without bound in the absence of regulatory density dependence. Metapopulation persistence requires a sufficiently strong linkage between stock and recruitment in some local population. In such a local population, individuals must contribute sufficiently many offspring to replace themselves locally in subsequent generations. Such a local population could either be partially closed or lie in a region of the metapopulation that is strongly interconnected. Metapopulation regulation requires that density dependence acts to curb population growth in local source populations but does not require that it acts in local sink populations. The density dependence need not be so strong as to prevent subsequent cohort sizes from correlating well with varying recruitment levels. Recruitment regulation alone cannot regulate a metapopulation. Two versions of the recruitment limitation hypothesis were examined. The first version states that varying recruitment levels are good predictors of subsequent population size; the second version states that postrecruitment demographic rates are density independent. The present models, along with a growing body of empirical data, support the first hypothesis but provide less support for the second one. Population regulation and the first form of recruitment limitation are not antithetical processes.</description><subject>Agnatha. Pisces</subject><subject>Animal and plant ecology</subject><subject>Animal populations</subject><subject>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>connectivity patterns</subject><subject>Coral reefs</subject><subject>Demecology</subject><subject>density dependence</subject><subject>Ecology</subject><subject>Eigenvalues</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>General aspects. Techniques</subject><subject>Larvae</subject><subject>larval dispersal</subject><subject>Marine</subject><subject>Marine biology</subject><subject>Marine ecology</subject><subject>marine metapopulations</subject><subject>Metapopulation ecology</subject><subject>Methods and techniques (sampling, tagging, trapping, modelling...)</subject><subject>Mortality</subject><subject>open vs. closed populations</subject><subject>Pisces</subject><subject>Population density</subject><subject>Population dynamics</subject><subject>Population ecology</subject><subject>Population growth</subject><subject>population regulation</subject><subject>recruitment limitation</subject><subject>recruitment vs. post-recruitment processes</subject><subject>reef fishes</subject><subject>self-recruitment</subject><subject>source–sink dynamics</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Vertebrata</subject><issn>0012-9658</issn><issn>1939-9170</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2002</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqdkV1rFDEUhgex4Nr2PwRRqdDZniTzkehVGdoqjGxZ9UJEQiaT0SyzM2uSqey_N3GWKl540UCSQ_Kc93DOmyQXGJaYcbgAwCTlRc7OCAB5BYx-wcDJ63V9u76sv5IlLKvVG_IoWWBOecpxCY-TxX3Wk-SpcxsIC2dskai1VnYyfqsHj2qzNV56Mw7n6HbcTf3vGK31t0N4juTQolraO9mjahwGrby5M36PTMR0h66N-47eay939_nuJDnqZO_06eE-Tj5dX32s3qb16uZddVmnKiOMpLJlHWcl55KXnDWAZdt2kijcYNISUOEo27agecYJKZu8U6qhwBkmsmx0i-lx8nLW3dnxx6SdF1vjlO57OehxcgIzynleZAE8-z9YFKEIDmRAn_2DbsbJDqENQTAHyIBE6GaGlB2ds7oTO2u20u4FBhFNE3H8Io5fRNNEME1E08RsmggvoloJEpReHMpJp2TfWTko4_7I0ZxhKGKrH2bup-n1_qHlxFX1OQKMZvE7qD6fVTfOj_ZvVUKhFGHjMBX6Cwc4vcU</recordid><startdate>200204</startdate><enddate>200204</enddate><creator>Armsworth, Paul R.</creator><general>Ecological Society of America</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7TN</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>L.G</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200204</creationdate><title>Recruitment Limitation, Population Regulation, and Larval Connectivity in Reef Fish Metapopulations</title><author>Armsworth, Paul R.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4282-ad8f98799a9798b01addfa2c1b12d20c2d27dd63549227b5fccb309812a7bed13</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2002</creationdate><topic>Agnatha. Pisces</topic><topic>Animal and plant ecology</topic><topic>Animal populations</topic><topic>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>connectivity patterns</topic><topic>Coral reefs</topic><topic>Demecology</topic><topic>density dependence</topic><topic>Ecology</topic><topic>Eigenvalues</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>General aspects. Techniques</topic><topic>Larvae</topic><topic>larval dispersal</topic><topic>Marine</topic><topic>Marine biology</topic><topic>Marine ecology</topic><topic>marine metapopulations</topic><topic>Metapopulation ecology</topic><topic>Methods and techniques (sampling, tagging, trapping, modelling...)</topic><topic>Mortality</topic><topic>open vs. closed populations</topic><topic>Pisces</topic><topic>Population density</topic><topic>Population dynamics</topic><topic>Population ecology</topic><topic>Population growth</topic><topic>population regulation</topic><topic>recruitment limitation</topic><topic>recruitment vs. post-recruitment processes</topic><topic>reef fishes</topic><topic>self-recruitment</topic><topic>source–sink dynamics</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Vertebrata</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Armsworth, Paul R.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Oceanic Abstracts</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences & Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><jtitle>Ecology (Durham)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Armsworth, Paul R.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Recruitment Limitation, Population Regulation, and Larval Connectivity in Reef Fish Metapopulations</atitle><jtitle>Ecology (Durham)</jtitle><date>2002-04</date><risdate>2002</risdate><volume>83</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>1092</spage><epage>1104</epage><pages>1092-1104</pages><issn>0012-9658</issn><eissn>1939-9170</eissn><coden>ECGYAQ</coden><abstract>Two central debates in marine ecology concern the role of connectivity patterns via larval dispersal in structuring marine metapopulations and the relative importance of larval supply vs. events occurring during or after settlement in determining adult abundance. Both issues were examined using age-structured models and simulations of reef fish population dynamics at the regional scale of closed metapopulations and the local scale of individual reefs. Local populations on individual reefs were assumed to be at once both partially open and partially closed. Two sets of models over both spatial scales are presented. One set examines density-independent dynamics. In the other set, mortality in the first year depends on the density of the settling cohort, and the density dependence is compensatory. The sensitivities of local population dynamics to the rates of self-recruitment and external larval supply were predicted. If external larval supply is regular and there is little self-recruitment, then a local population can appear to be regulated without conventional forms of density dependence. Elsewhere, this process has been termed "recruitment regulation." However, with increased self-recruitment a local population will grow without bound in the absence of regulatory density dependence. Metapopulation persistence requires a sufficiently strong linkage between stock and recruitment in some local population. In such a local population, individuals must contribute sufficiently many offspring to replace themselves locally in subsequent generations. Such a local population could either be partially closed or lie in a region of the metapopulation that is strongly interconnected. Metapopulation regulation requires that density dependence acts to curb population growth in local source populations but does not require that it acts in local sink populations. The density dependence need not be so strong as to prevent subsequent cohort sizes from correlating well with varying recruitment levels. Recruitment regulation alone cannot regulate a metapopulation. Two versions of the recruitment limitation hypothesis were examined. The first version states that varying recruitment levels are good predictors of subsequent population size; the second version states that postrecruitment demographic rates are density independent. The present models, along with a growing body of empirical data, support the first hypothesis but provide less support for the second one. Population regulation and the first form of recruitment limitation are not antithetical processes.</abstract><cop>Washington, DC</cop><pub>Ecological Society of America</pub><doi>10.1890/0012-9658(2002)083[1092:RLPRAL]2.0.CO;2</doi><tpages>13</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0012-9658 |
ispartof | Ecology (Durham), 2002-04, Vol.83 (4), p.1092-1104 |
issn | 0012-9658 1939-9170 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_18399564 |
source | JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection; Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection |
subjects | Agnatha. Pisces Animal and plant ecology Animal populations Animal, plant and microbial ecology Animals Biological and medical sciences connectivity patterns Coral reefs Demecology density dependence Ecology Eigenvalues Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology General aspects. Techniques Larvae larval dispersal Marine Marine biology Marine ecology marine metapopulations Metapopulation ecology Methods and techniques (sampling, tagging, trapping, modelling...) Mortality open vs. closed populations Pisces Population density Population dynamics Population ecology Population growth population regulation recruitment limitation recruitment vs. post-recruitment processes reef fishes self-recruitment source–sink dynamics Studies Vertebrata |
title | Recruitment Limitation, Population Regulation, and Larval Connectivity in Reef Fish Metapopulations |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-19T18%3A15%3A02IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Recruitment%20Limitation,%20Population%20Regulation,%20and%20Larval%20Connectivity%20in%20Reef%20Fish%20Metapopulations&rft.jtitle=Ecology%20(Durham)&rft.au=Armsworth,%20Paul%20R.&rft.date=2002-04&rft.volume=83&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=1092&rft.epage=1104&rft.pages=1092-1104&rft.issn=0012-9658&rft.eissn=1939-9170&rft.coden=ECGYAQ&rft_id=info:doi/10.1890/0012-9658(2002)083%5B1092:RLPRAL%5D2.0.CO;2&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E3071916%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4282-ad8f98799a9798b01addfa2c1b12d20c2d27dd63549227b5fccb309812a7bed13%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=219004023&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=3071916&rfr_iscdi=true |