Loading…

Recruitment Limitation, Population Regulation, and Larval Connectivity in Reef Fish Metapopulations

Two central debates in marine ecology concern the role of connectivity patterns via larval dispersal in structuring marine metapopulations and the relative importance of larval supply vs. events occurring during or after settlement in determining adult abundance. Both issues were examined using age-...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Ecology (Durham) 2002-04, Vol.83 (4), p.1092-1104
Main Author: Armsworth, Paul R.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4282-ad8f98799a9798b01addfa2c1b12d20c2d27dd63549227b5fccb309812a7bed13
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4282-ad8f98799a9798b01addfa2c1b12d20c2d27dd63549227b5fccb309812a7bed13
container_end_page 1104
container_issue 4
container_start_page 1092
container_title Ecology (Durham)
container_volume 83
creator Armsworth, Paul R.
description Two central debates in marine ecology concern the role of connectivity patterns via larval dispersal in structuring marine metapopulations and the relative importance of larval supply vs. events occurring during or after settlement in determining adult abundance. Both issues were examined using age-structured models and simulations of reef fish population dynamics at the regional scale of closed metapopulations and the local scale of individual reefs. Local populations on individual reefs were assumed to be at once both partially open and partially closed. Two sets of models over both spatial scales are presented. One set examines density-independent dynamics. In the other set, mortality in the first year depends on the density of the settling cohort, and the density dependence is compensatory. The sensitivities of local population dynamics to the rates of self-recruitment and external larval supply were predicted. If external larval supply is regular and there is little self-recruitment, then a local population can appear to be regulated without conventional forms of density dependence. Elsewhere, this process has been termed "recruitment regulation." However, with increased self-recruitment a local population will grow without bound in the absence of regulatory density dependence. Metapopulation persistence requires a sufficiently strong linkage between stock and recruitment in some local population. In such a local population, individuals must contribute sufficiently many offspring to replace themselves locally in subsequent generations. Such a local population could either be partially closed or lie in a region of the metapopulation that is strongly interconnected. Metapopulation regulation requires that density dependence acts to curb population growth in local source populations but does not require that it acts in local sink populations. The density dependence need not be so strong as to prevent subsequent cohort sizes from correlating well with varying recruitment levels. Recruitment regulation alone cannot regulate a metapopulation. Two versions of the recruitment limitation hypothesis were examined. The first version states that varying recruitment levels are good predictors of subsequent population size; the second version states that postrecruitment demographic rates are density independent. The present models, along with a growing body of empirical data, support the first hypothesis but provide less support for the second one. Population regul
doi_str_mv 10.1890/0012-9658(2002)083[1092:RLPRAL]2.0.CO;2
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_18399564</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>3071916</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>3071916</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4282-ad8f98799a9798b01addfa2c1b12d20c2d27dd63549227b5fccb309812a7bed13</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqdkV1rFDEUhgex4Nr2PwRRqdDZniTzkehVGdoqjGxZ9UJEQiaT0SyzM2uSqey_N3GWKl540UCSQ_Kc93DOmyQXGJaYcbgAwCTlRc7OCAB5BYx-wcDJ63V9u76sv5IlLKvVG_IoWWBOecpxCY-TxX3Wk-SpcxsIC2dskai1VnYyfqsHj2qzNV56Mw7n6HbcTf3vGK31t0N4juTQolraO9mjahwGrby5M36PTMR0h66N-47eay939_nuJDnqZO_06eE-Tj5dX32s3qb16uZddVmnKiOMpLJlHWcl55KXnDWAZdt2kijcYNISUOEo27agecYJKZu8U6qhwBkmsmx0i-lx8nLW3dnxx6SdF1vjlO57OehxcgIzynleZAE8-z9YFKEIDmRAn_2DbsbJDqENQTAHyIBE6GaGlB2ds7oTO2u20u4FBhFNE3H8Io5fRNNEME1E08RsmggvoloJEpReHMpJp2TfWTko4_7I0ZxhKGKrH2bup-n1_qHlxFX1OQKMZvE7qD6fVTfOj_ZvVUKhFGHjMBX6Cwc4vcU</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>219004023</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Recruitment Limitation, Population Regulation, and Larval Connectivity in Reef Fish Metapopulations</title><source>JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection</source><source>Wiley-Blackwell Read &amp; Publish Collection</source><creator>Armsworth, Paul R.</creator><creatorcontrib>Armsworth, Paul R.</creatorcontrib><description>Two central debates in marine ecology concern the role of connectivity patterns via larval dispersal in structuring marine metapopulations and the relative importance of larval supply vs. events occurring during or after settlement in determining adult abundance. Both issues were examined using age-structured models and simulations of reef fish population dynamics at the regional scale of closed metapopulations and the local scale of individual reefs. Local populations on individual reefs were assumed to be at once both partially open and partially closed. Two sets of models over both spatial scales are presented. One set examines density-independent dynamics. In the other set, mortality in the first year depends on the density of the settling cohort, and the density dependence is compensatory. The sensitivities of local population dynamics to the rates of self-recruitment and external larval supply were predicted. If external larval supply is regular and there is little self-recruitment, then a local population can appear to be regulated without conventional forms of density dependence. Elsewhere, this process has been termed "recruitment regulation." However, with increased self-recruitment a local population will grow without bound in the absence of regulatory density dependence. Metapopulation persistence requires a sufficiently strong linkage between stock and recruitment in some local population. In such a local population, individuals must contribute sufficiently many offspring to replace themselves locally in subsequent generations. Such a local population could either be partially closed or lie in a region of the metapopulation that is strongly interconnected. Metapopulation regulation requires that density dependence acts to curb population growth in local source populations but does not require that it acts in local sink populations. The density dependence need not be so strong as to prevent subsequent cohort sizes from correlating well with varying recruitment levels. Recruitment regulation alone cannot regulate a metapopulation. Two versions of the recruitment limitation hypothesis were examined. The first version states that varying recruitment levels are good predictors of subsequent population size; the second version states that postrecruitment demographic rates are density independent. The present models, along with a growing body of empirical data, support the first hypothesis but provide less support for the second one. Population regulation and the first form of recruitment limitation are not antithetical processes.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0012-9658</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1939-9170</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1890/0012-9658(2002)083[1092:RLPRAL]2.0.CO;2</identifier><identifier>CODEN: ECGYAQ</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Washington, DC: Ecological Society of America</publisher><subject>Agnatha. Pisces ; Animal and plant ecology ; Animal populations ; Animal, plant and microbial ecology ; Animals ; Biological and medical sciences ; connectivity patterns ; Coral reefs ; Demecology ; density dependence ; Ecology ; Eigenvalues ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; General aspects. Techniques ; Larvae ; larval dispersal ; Marine ; Marine biology ; Marine ecology ; marine metapopulations ; Metapopulation ecology ; Methods and techniques (sampling, tagging, trapping, modelling...) ; Mortality ; open vs. closed populations ; Pisces ; Population density ; Population dynamics ; Population ecology ; Population growth ; population regulation ; recruitment limitation ; recruitment vs. post-recruitment processes ; reef fishes ; self-recruitment ; source–sink dynamics ; Studies ; Vertebrata</subject><ispartof>Ecology (Durham), 2002-04, Vol.83 (4), p.1092-1104</ispartof><rights>Copyright 2002 Ecological Society of America</rights><rights>2002 by the Ecological Society of America</rights><rights>2002 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright Ecological Society of America Apr 2002</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4282-ad8f98799a9798b01addfa2c1b12d20c2d27dd63549227b5fccb309812a7bed13</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4282-ad8f98799a9798b01addfa2c1b12d20c2d27dd63549227b5fccb309812a7bed13</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/3071916$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/3071916$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,27905,27906,58219,58452</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=13581061$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Armsworth, Paul R.</creatorcontrib><title>Recruitment Limitation, Population Regulation, and Larval Connectivity in Reef Fish Metapopulations</title><title>Ecology (Durham)</title><description>Two central debates in marine ecology concern the role of connectivity patterns via larval dispersal in structuring marine metapopulations and the relative importance of larval supply vs. events occurring during or after settlement in determining adult abundance. Both issues were examined using age-structured models and simulations of reef fish population dynamics at the regional scale of closed metapopulations and the local scale of individual reefs. Local populations on individual reefs were assumed to be at once both partially open and partially closed. Two sets of models over both spatial scales are presented. One set examines density-independent dynamics. In the other set, mortality in the first year depends on the density of the settling cohort, and the density dependence is compensatory. The sensitivities of local population dynamics to the rates of self-recruitment and external larval supply were predicted. If external larval supply is regular and there is little self-recruitment, then a local population can appear to be regulated without conventional forms of density dependence. Elsewhere, this process has been termed "recruitment regulation." However, with increased self-recruitment a local population will grow without bound in the absence of regulatory density dependence. Metapopulation persistence requires a sufficiently strong linkage between stock and recruitment in some local population. In such a local population, individuals must contribute sufficiently many offspring to replace themselves locally in subsequent generations. Such a local population could either be partially closed or lie in a region of the metapopulation that is strongly interconnected. Metapopulation regulation requires that density dependence acts to curb population growth in local source populations but does not require that it acts in local sink populations. The density dependence need not be so strong as to prevent subsequent cohort sizes from correlating well with varying recruitment levels. Recruitment regulation alone cannot regulate a metapopulation. Two versions of the recruitment limitation hypothesis were examined. The first version states that varying recruitment levels are good predictors of subsequent population size; the second version states that postrecruitment demographic rates are density independent. The present models, along with a growing body of empirical data, support the first hypothesis but provide less support for the second one. Population regulation and the first form of recruitment limitation are not antithetical processes.</description><subject>Agnatha. Pisces</subject><subject>Animal and plant ecology</subject><subject>Animal populations</subject><subject>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>connectivity patterns</subject><subject>Coral reefs</subject><subject>Demecology</subject><subject>density dependence</subject><subject>Ecology</subject><subject>Eigenvalues</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>General aspects. Techniques</subject><subject>Larvae</subject><subject>larval dispersal</subject><subject>Marine</subject><subject>Marine biology</subject><subject>Marine ecology</subject><subject>marine metapopulations</subject><subject>Metapopulation ecology</subject><subject>Methods and techniques (sampling, tagging, trapping, modelling...)</subject><subject>Mortality</subject><subject>open vs. closed populations</subject><subject>Pisces</subject><subject>Population density</subject><subject>Population dynamics</subject><subject>Population ecology</subject><subject>Population growth</subject><subject>population regulation</subject><subject>recruitment limitation</subject><subject>recruitment vs. post-recruitment processes</subject><subject>reef fishes</subject><subject>self-recruitment</subject><subject>source–sink dynamics</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Vertebrata</subject><issn>0012-9658</issn><issn>1939-9170</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2002</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqdkV1rFDEUhgex4Nr2PwRRqdDZniTzkehVGdoqjGxZ9UJEQiaT0SyzM2uSqey_N3GWKl540UCSQ_Kc93DOmyQXGJaYcbgAwCTlRc7OCAB5BYx-wcDJ63V9u76sv5IlLKvVG_IoWWBOecpxCY-TxX3Wk-SpcxsIC2dskai1VnYyfqsHj2qzNV56Mw7n6HbcTf3vGK31t0N4juTQolraO9mjahwGrby5M36PTMR0h66N-47eay939_nuJDnqZO_06eE-Tj5dX32s3qb16uZddVmnKiOMpLJlHWcl55KXnDWAZdt2kijcYNISUOEo27agecYJKZu8U6qhwBkmsmx0i-lx8nLW3dnxx6SdF1vjlO57OehxcgIzynleZAE8-z9YFKEIDmRAn_2DbsbJDqENQTAHyIBE6GaGlB2ds7oTO2u20u4FBhFNE3H8Io5fRNNEME1E08RsmggvoloJEpReHMpJp2TfWTko4_7I0ZxhKGKrH2bup-n1_qHlxFX1OQKMZvE7qD6fVTfOj_ZvVUKhFGHjMBX6Cwc4vcU</recordid><startdate>200204</startdate><enddate>200204</enddate><creator>Armsworth, Paul R.</creator><general>Ecological Society of America</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7TN</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>L.G</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200204</creationdate><title>Recruitment Limitation, Population Regulation, and Larval Connectivity in Reef Fish Metapopulations</title><author>Armsworth, Paul R.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4282-ad8f98799a9798b01addfa2c1b12d20c2d27dd63549227b5fccb309812a7bed13</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2002</creationdate><topic>Agnatha. Pisces</topic><topic>Animal and plant ecology</topic><topic>Animal populations</topic><topic>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>connectivity patterns</topic><topic>Coral reefs</topic><topic>Demecology</topic><topic>density dependence</topic><topic>Ecology</topic><topic>Eigenvalues</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>General aspects. Techniques</topic><topic>Larvae</topic><topic>larval dispersal</topic><topic>Marine</topic><topic>Marine biology</topic><topic>Marine ecology</topic><topic>marine metapopulations</topic><topic>Metapopulation ecology</topic><topic>Methods and techniques (sampling, tagging, trapping, modelling...)</topic><topic>Mortality</topic><topic>open vs. closed populations</topic><topic>Pisces</topic><topic>Population density</topic><topic>Population dynamics</topic><topic>Population ecology</topic><topic>Population growth</topic><topic>population regulation</topic><topic>recruitment limitation</topic><topic>recruitment vs. post-recruitment processes</topic><topic>reef fishes</topic><topic>self-recruitment</topic><topic>source–sink dynamics</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Vertebrata</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Armsworth, Paul R.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Oceanic Abstracts</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences &amp; Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><jtitle>Ecology (Durham)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Armsworth, Paul R.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Recruitment Limitation, Population Regulation, and Larval Connectivity in Reef Fish Metapopulations</atitle><jtitle>Ecology (Durham)</jtitle><date>2002-04</date><risdate>2002</risdate><volume>83</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>1092</spage><epage>1104</epage><pages>1092-1104</pages><issn>0012-9658</issn><eissn>1939-9170</eissn><coden>ECGYAQ</coden><abstract>Two central debates in marine ecology concern the role of connectivity patterns via larval dispersal in structuring marine metapopulations and the relative importance of larval supply vs. events occurring during or after settlement in determining adult abundance. Both issues were examined using age-structured models and simulations of reef fish population dynamics at the regional scale of closed metapopulations and the local scale of individual reefs. Local populations on individual reefs were assumed to be at once both partially open and partially closed. Two sets of models over both spatial scales are presented. One set examines density-independent dynamics. In the other set, mortality in the first year depends on the density of the settling cohort, and the density dependence is compensatory. The sensitivities of local population dynamics to the rates of self-recruitment and external larval supply were predicted. If external larval supply is regular and there is little self-recruitment, then a local population can appear to be regulated without conventional forms of density dependence. Elsewhere, this process has been termed "recruitment regulation." However, with increased self-recruitment a local population will grow without bound in the absence of regulatory density dependence. Metapopulation persistence requires a sufficiently strong linkage between stock and recruitment in some local population. In such a local population, individuals must contribute sufficiently many offspring to replace themselves locally in subsequent generations. Such a local population could either be partially closed or lie in a region of the metapopulation that is strongly interconnected. Metapopulation regulation requires that density dependence acts to curb population growth in local source populations but does not require that it acts in local sink populations. The density dependence need not be so strong as to prevent subsequent cohort sizes from correlating well with varying recruitment levels. Recruitment regulation alone cannot regulate a metapopulation. Two versions of the recruitment limitation hypothesis were examined. The first version states that varying recruitment levels are good predictors of subsequent population size; the second version states that postrecruitment demographic rates are density independent. The present models, along with a growing body of empirical data, support the first hypothesis but provide less support for the second one. Population regulation and the first form of recruitment limitation are not antithetical processes.</abstract><cop>Washington, DC</cop><pub>Ecological Society of America</pub><doi>10.1890/0012-9658(2002)083[1092:RLPRAL]2.0.CO;2</doi><tpages>13</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0012-9658
ispartof Ecology (Durham), 2002-04, Vol.83 (4), p.1092-1104
issn 0012-9658
1939-9170
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_18399564
source JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection; Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection
subjects Agnatha. Pisces
Animal and plant ecology
Animal populations
Animal, plant and microbial ecology
Animals
Biological and medical sciences
connectivity patterns
Coral reefs
Demecology
density dependence
Ecology
Eigenvalues
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
General aspects. Techniques
Larvae
larval dispersal
Marine
Marine biology
Marine ecology
marine metapopulations
Metapopulation ecology
Methods and techniques (sampling, tagging, trapping, modelling...)
Mortality
open vs. closed populations
Pisces
Population density
Population dynamics
Population ecology
Population growth
population regulation
recruitment limitation
recruitment vs. post-recruitment processes
reef fishes
self-recruitment
source–sink dynamics
Studies
Vertebrata
title Recruitment Limitation, Population Regulation, and Larval Connectivity in Reef Fish Metapopulations
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-19T18%3A15%3A02IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Recruitment%20Limitation,%20Population%20Regulation,%20and%20Larval%20Connectivity%20in%20Reef%20Fish%20Metapopulations&rft.jtitle=Ecology%20(Durham)&rft.au=Armsworth,%20Paul%20R.&rft.date=2002-04&rft.volume=83&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=1092&rft.epage=1104&rft.pages=1092-1104&rft.issn=0012-9658&rft.eissn=1939-9170&rft.coden=ECGYAQ&rft_id=info:doi/10.1890/0012-9658(2002)083%5B1092:RLPRAL%5D2.0.CO;2&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E3071916%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4282-ad8f98799a9798b01addfa2c1b12d20c2d27dd63549227b5fccb309812a7bed13%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=219004023&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=3071916&rfr_iscdi=true