Wintertime Vitamin D Deficiency in Male Adolescents: Effect on Parathyroid Function and Response to Vitamin D sub(3) Supplements

• Published in: Osteoporosis international 2001-10, Vol.12 (10), p.875-879
• Main Authors: Guillemant, J, Le, H-T, Maria, A, Allemandou, A, Peres, G, Guillemant, S
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• ISSN: 0937-941X

The first part of this study consisted of an 18 month follow-up of the vitamin D status and parathyroid function in a group of 54 French male adolescents, aged from 13 to 16 years old and all pupils of a jockey training school. During the 18 month period four samplings were made, one every 6 months. The first was during September of the first year, the second and third during March and October of the second year, and the last in March of the third year. Therefore we had two main periods: summer and winter. The summer 25-hydroxyvitamin D(25 (OH)D) concentrations were higher (71.6 plus or minus 19.9 and 52.4 plus or minus 16.5 nmol/l) than the winter ones (20.4 plus or minus 6.9 and 21.4 plus or minus 6.1 nmol/l). Conversely, the winter intact parathyroid hormone (iPTH) serum levels (4.18 plus or minus 1.18 and 4.11 plus or minus 1.35 pmol/l) were higher than the summer ones (2.44 plus or minus 0.82 and 2.71 plus or minus 0.71 pmol/l). At the two winter time points the 25(OH)D concentrations were lower than 25 nmol/l (10 ng/ml) in 72% (2nd year) and 68% (3rd year) of the adolescents. In the second part of the study we tried a vitamin D sub(3) supplementation procedure designed to maintain the 25(OH)D and iPTH postsummer serum levels throughout the winter. Pairs of male adolescents matched for height, weight and Tanner pubertal stage were randomly assigned to either vitamin D sub(3) supplementation (2.5 mg, i.e., 100 000 IU) administered orally at three specific periods (end of September, November and January) or no vitamin D sub(3) treatment (control subjects). Blood was collected just before the first intake of vitamin D sub(3) and 2 months after the last intake (March). The control subjects had blood drawn at the same time points. In the vitamin D sub(3)-treated subjects, the concentrations of 25 (OH)D (55.3 plus or minus 11.5 nmol/l) and of iPTH (3.09 plus or minus 1.16 pmol/l) in March and September (53.8 plus or minus 12.3 nmol/l and 2.75 plus or minus 1.26 pmol/l) were not significantly different. In the control subjects, March 25(OH)D levels (21.0 plus or minus nmol/l were low, with values below 25 nmol/l in 78% of subjects, and iPTH concentrations (3.97 plus or minus 1.08 pmol/l) were significantly (p