Loading…

Finding flowers in the dark: nectar-feeding bats integrate olfaction and echolocation while foraging for nectar

Nectar-feeding bats depend mainly on floral nectar to fulfil their energetic requirements. Chiropterophilous flowers generally present strong floral scents and provide conspicuous acoustic echoes to attract bats. While floral scents are assumed to attract bats over long distances, acoustic propertie...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Royal Society open science 2016-08, Vol.3 (8), p.160199-160199
Main Authors: Gonzalez-Terrazas, Tania P., Martel, Carlos, Milet-Pinheiro, Paulo, Ayasse, Manfred, Kalko, Elisabeth K. V., Tschapka, Marco
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c572t-458f5fc0aa5ed7bd194a0f74606f66f60cd739866366abb0d2ad5efde4e6458d3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c572t-458f5fc0aa5ed7bd194a0f74606f66f60cd739866366abb0d2ad5efde4e6458d3
container_end_page 160199
container_issue 8
container_start_page 160199
container_title Royal Society open science
container_volume 3
creator Gonzalez-Terrazas, Tania P.
Martel, Carlos
Milet-Pinheiro, Paulo
Ayasse, Manfred
Kalko, Elisabeth K. V.
Tschapka, Marco
description Nectar-feeding bats depend mainly on floral nectar to fulfil their energetic requirements. Chiropterophilous flowers generally present strong floral scents and provide conspicuous acoustic echoes to attract bats. While floral scents are assumed to attract bats over long distances, acoustic properties of flower structures may provide detailed information, thus supporting the localization of a flower at close ranges. So far, to our knowledge, there is no study trying to understand the relative importance as well as the combination of these generally coupled cues for detection (presence) and localization (exact position) of open flowers in nature. For a better comprehension of the significance of olfaction and echolocation in the foraging behaviour of nectar-feeding bats, we conducted two-choice experiments with Leptonycteris yerbabuenae. We tested the bats' behaviour in three experimental scenarios with different cues: (i) olfaction versus echolocation, (ii) echolocation versus echolocation and olfaction, and (iii) olfaction versus echolocation and olfaction. We used the floral scent of the bat-pollinated cactus Pachycereus pringlei as olfactory cue and an acrylic paraboloid as acoustic cue. Additionally, we recorded the echolocation behaviour of the bats and analysed the floral scent of P. pringlei. When decoupled cues were offered, bats displayed no preference in choice for any of the two cues. However, bats reacted first to and chose more often the coupled cues. All bats echolocated continuously and broadcast a long terminal group before a successful visit. The floral scent bouquet of P. pringlei is composed of 20 compounds, some of which (e.g. methyl benzoate) were already reported from chiropterophilous plants. Our investigation demonstrates for the first time to our knowledge, that nectar-feeding bats integrate over different sensory modes for detection and precise localization of open flowers. The combined information from olfactory and acoustic cues allows bats to forage more efficiently.
doi_str_mv 10.1098/rsos.160199
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1841137935</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_726c80be1f0d47a5bad03ee7923a1d9a</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>1841137935</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c572t-458f5fc0aa5ed7bd194a0f74606f66f60cd739866366abb0d2ad5efde4e6458d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kc9rFDEUxwdRbKk9eZc5CrL1ZTJJZjwIUqwWCgWrJw_hTfKym3V2UpNsy_rXO7uzlq6IEMivTz7fR15RvGRwxqBt3sYU0hmTwNr2SXFcgahnQgF_-mh9VJymtAQAJoArqZ4XR5VqBBetOC7ChR-sH-al68M9xVT6ocwLKi3GH-_KgUzGOHNEO6bDvAUyzSNmKkPv0GQfhhIHW5JZhD4Y3B3cL3xPpQsR5zt5iHvXi-KZwz7R6X4-Kb5dfPx6_nl2df3p8vzD1cwIVeVZLRonnAFEQVZ1lrU1glO1BOnkOMBYxdtGSi4ldh3YCq0gZ6kmOb61_KS4nLw24FLfRr_CuNEBvd4dhDjXGLM3PWlVSdNAR8yBrRWKDi1wItVWHJltcXS9n1y3625F1tCQI_YH0sObwS_0PNxpwaBpazEKXu8FMfxcU8p65ZOhvseBwjpp1tSMcdXyLfpmQk0MKUVyDzEM9LbjettxPXV8pF89ruyB_dPfEfg-ATFsxu8OxlPe6GVYx2Hc6i831zd33DcaGs5A1YrV-pe_nTK49imtSR9E_hUP_7P_q-Lfi-XacQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1841137935</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Finding flowers in the dark: nectar-feeding bats integrate olfaction and echolocation while foraging for nectar</title><source>Royal Society Open Access Journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Gonzalez-Terrazas, Tania P. ; Martel, Carlos ; Milet-Pinheiro, Paulo ; Ayasse, Manfred ; Kalko, Elisabeth K. V. ; Tschapka, Marco</creator><creatorcontrib>Gonzalez-Terrazas, Tania P. ; Martel, Carlos ; Milet-Pinheiro, Paulo ; Ayasse, Manfred ; Kalko, Elisabeth K. V. ; Tschapka, Marco</creatorcontrib><description>Nectar-feeding bats depend mainly on floral nectar to fulfil their energetic requirements. Chiropterophilous flowers generally present strong floral scents and provide conspicuous acoustic echoes to attract bats. While floral scents are assumed to attract bats over long distances, acoustic properties of flower structures may provide detailed information, thus supporting the localization of a flower at close ranges. So far, to our knowledge, there is no study trying to understand the relative importance as well as the combination of these generally coupled cues for detection (presence) and localization (exact position) of open flowers in nature. For a better comprehension of the significance of olfaction and echolocation in the foraging behaviour of nectar-feeding bats, we conducted two-choice experiments with Leptonycteris yerbabuenae. We tested the bats' behaviour in three experimental scenarios with different cues: (i) olfaction versus echolocation, (ii) echolocation versus echolocation and olfaction, and (iii) olfaction versus echolocation and olfaction. We used the floral scent of the bat-pollinated cactus Pachycereus pringlei as olfactory cue and an acrylic paraboloid as acoustic cue. Additionally, we recorded the echolocation behaviour of the bats and analysed the floral scent of P. pringlei. When decoupled cues were offered, bats displayed no preference in choice for any of the two cues. However, bats reacted first to and chose more often the coupled cues. All bats echolocated continuously and broadcast a long terminal group before a successful visit. The floral scent bouquet of P. pringlei is composed of 20 compounds, some of which (e.g. methyl benzoate) were already reported from chiropterophilous plants. Our investigation demonstrates for the first time to our knowledge, that nectar-feeding bats integrate over different sensory modes for detection and precise localization of open flowers. The combined information from olfactory and acoustic cues allows bats to forage more efficiently.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2054-5703</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2054-5703</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1098/rsos.160199</identifier><identifier>PMID: 27853595</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: The Royal Society</publisher><subject>Acoustic Cues ; Bat Pollination ; Biology (whole Organism) ; Chiropterophily ; Columnar Cactus ; Floral Scent</subject><ispartof>Royal Society open science, 2016-08, Vol.3 (8), p.160199-160199</ispartof><rights>2016 The Authors.</rights><rights>2016 The Authors. 2016</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c572t-458f5fc0aa5ed7bd194a0f74606f66f60cd739866366abb0d2ad5efde4e6458d3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c572t-458f5fc0aa5ed7bd194a0f74606f66f60cd739866366abb0d2ad5efde4e6458d3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5108945/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5108945/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,881,3309,27124,27901,27902,53766,53768,55530,55540</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27853595$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Gonzalez-Terrazas, Tania P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Martel, Carlos</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Milet-Pinheiro, Paulo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ayasse, Manfred</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kalko, Elisabeth K. V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tschapka, Marco</creatorcontrib><title>Finding flowers in the dark: nectar-feeding bats integrate olfaction and echolocation while foraging for nectar</title><title>Royal Society open science</title><addtitle>R. Soc. open sci</addtitle><addtitle>R Soc Open Sci</addtitle><description>Nectar-feeding bats depend mainly on floral nectar to fulfil their energetic requirements. Chiropterophilous flowers generally present strong floral scents and provide conspicuous acoustic echoes to attract bats. While floral scents are assumed to attract bats over long distances, acoustic properties of flower structures may provide detailed information, thus supporting the localization of a flower at close ranges. So far, to our knowledge, there is no study trying to understand the relative importance as well as the combination of these generally coupled cues for detection (presence) and localization (exact position) of open flowers in nature. For a better comprehension of the significance of olfaction and echolocation in the foraging behaviour of nectar-feeding bats, we conducted two-choice experiments with Leptonycteris yerbabuenae. We tested the bats' behaviour in three experimental scenarios with different cues: (i) olfaction versus echolocation, (ii) echolocation versus echolocation and olfaction, and (iii) olfaction versus echolocation and olfaction. We used the floral scent of the bat-pollinated cactus Pachycereus pringlei as olfactory cue and an acrylic paraboloid as acoustic cue. Additionally, we recorded the echolocation behaviour of the bats and analysed the floral scent of P. pringlei. When decoupled cues were offered, bats displayed no preference in choice for any of the two cues. However, bats reacted first to and chose more often the coupled cues. All bats echolocated continuously and broadcast a long terminal group before a successful visit. The floral scent bouquet of P. pringlei is composed of 20 compounds, some of which (e.g. methyl benzoate) were already reported from chiropterophilous plants. Our investigation demonstrates for the first time to our knowledge, that nectar-feeding bats integrate over different sensory modes for detection and precise localization of open flowers. The combined information from olfactory and acoustic cues allows bats to forage more efficiently.</description><subject>Acoustic Cues</subject><subject>Bat Pollination</subject><subject>Biology (whole Organism)</subject><subject>Chiropterophily</subject><subject>Columnar Cactus</subject><subject>Floral Scent</subject><issn>2054-5703</issn><issn>2054-5703</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kc9rFDEUxwdRbKk9eZc5CrL1ZTJJZjwIUqwWCgWrJw_hTfKym3V2UpNsy_rXO7uzlq6IEMivTz7fR15RvGRwxqBt3sYU0hmTwNr2SXFcgahnQgF_-mh9VJymtAQAJoArqZ4XR5VqBBetOC7ChR-sH-al68M9xVT6ocwLKi3GH-_KgUzGOHNEO6bDvAUyzSNmKkPv0GQfhhIHW5JZhD4Y3B3cL3xPpQsR5zt5iHvXi-KZwz7R6X4-Kb5dfPx6_nl2df3p8vzD1cwIVeVZLRonnAFEQVZ1lrU1glO1BOnkOMBYxdtGSi4ldh3YCq0gZ6kmOb61_KS4nLw24FLfRr_CuNEBvd4dhDjXGLM3PWlVSdNAR8yBrRWKDi1wItVWHJltcXS9n1y3625F1tCQI_YH0sObwS_0PNxpwaBpazEKXu8FMfxcU8p65ZOhvseBwjpp1tSMcdXyLfpmQk0MKUVyDzEM9LbjettxPXV8pF89ruyB_dPfEfg-ATFsxu8OxlPe6GVYx2Hc6i831zd33DcaGs5A1YrV-pe_nTK49imtSR9E_hUP_7P_q-Lfi-XacQ</recordid><startdate>20160801</startdate><enddate>20160801</enddate><creator>Gonzalez-Terrazas, Tania P.</creator><creator>Martel, Carlos</creator><creator>Milet-Pinheiro, Paulo</creator><creator>Ayasse, Manfred</creator><creator>Kalko, Elisabeth K. V.</creator><creator>Tschapka, Marco</creator><general>The Royal Society</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20160801</creationdate><title>Finding flowers in the dark: nectar-feeding bats integrate olfaction and echolocation while foraging for nectar</title><author>Gonzalez-Terrazas, Tania P. ; Martel, Carlos ; Milet-Pinheiro, Paulo ; Ayasse, Manfred ; Kalko, Elisabeth K. V. ; Tschapka, Marco</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c572t-458f5fc0aa5ed7bd194a0f74606f66f60cd739866366abb0d2ad5efde4e6458d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Acoustic Cues</topic><topic>Bat Pollination</topic><topic>Biology (whole Organism)</topic><topic>Chiropterophily</topic><topic>Columnar Cactus</topic><topic>Floral Scent</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Gonzalez-Terrazas, Tania P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Martel, Carlos</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Milet-Pinheiro, Paulo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ayasse, Manfred</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kalko, Elisabeth K. V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tschapka, Marco</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Royal Society open science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Gonzalez-Terrazas, Tania P.</au><au>Martel, Carlos</au><au>Milet-Pinheiro, Paulo</au><au>Ayasse, Manfred</au><au>Kalko, Elisabeth K. V.</au><au>Tschapka, Marco</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Finding flowers in the dark: nectar-feeding bats integrate olfaction and echolocation while foraging for nectar</atitle><jtitle>Royal Society open science</jtitle><stitle>R. Soc. open sci</stitle><addtitle>R Soc Open Sci</addtitle><date>2016-08-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>3</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>160199</spage><epage>160199</epage><pages>160199-160199</pages><issn>2054-5703</issn><eissn>2054-5703</eissn><abstract>Nectar-feeding bats depend mainly on floral nectar to fulfil their energetic requirements. Chiropterophilous flowers generally present strong floral scents and provide conspicuous acoustic echoes to attract bats. While floral scents are assumed to attract bats over long distances, acoustic properties of flower structures may provide detailed information, thus supporting the localization of a flower at close ranges. So far, to our knowledge, there is no study trying to understand the relative importance as well as the combination of these generally coupled cues for detection (presence) and localization (exact position) of open flowers in nature. For a better comprehension of the significance of olfaction and echolocation in the foraging behaviour of nectar-feeding bats, we conducted two-choice experiments with Leptonycteris yerbabuenae. We tested the bats' behaviour in three experimental scenarios with different cues: (i) olfaction versus echolocation, (ii) echolocation versus echolocation and olfaction, and (iii) olfaction versus echolocation and olfaction. We used the floral scent of the bat-pollinated cactus Pachycereus pringlei as olfactory cue and an acrylic paraboloid as acoustic cue. Additionally, we recorded the echolocation behaviour of the bats and analysed the floral scent of P. pringlei. When decoupled cues were offered, bats displayed no preference in choice for any of the two cues. However, bats reacted first to and chose more often the coupled cues. All bats echolocated continuously and broadcast a long terminal group before a successful visit. The floral scent bouquet of P. pringlei is composed of 20 compounds, some of which (e.g. methyl benzoate) were already reported from chiropterophilous plants. Our investigation demonstrates for the first time to our knowledge, that nectar-feeding bats integrate over different sensory modes for detection and precise localization of open flowers. The combined information from olfactory and acoustic cues allows bats to forage more efficiently.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>The Royal Society</pub><pmid>27853595</pmid><doi>10.1098/rsos.160199</doi><tpages>1</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2054-5703
ispartof Royal Society open science, 2016-08, Vol.3 (8), p.160199-160199
issn 2054-5703
2054-5703
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1841137935
source Royal Society Open Access Journals; PubMed Central
subjects Acoustic Cues
Bat Pollination
Biology (whole Organism)
Chiropterophily
Columnar Cactus
Floral Scent
title Finding flowers in the dark: nectar-feeding bats integrate olfaction and echolocation while foraging for nectar
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-30T19%3A46%3A41IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Finding%20flowers%20in%20the%20dark:%20nectar-feeding%20bats%20integrate%20olfaction%20and%20echolocation%20while%20foraging%20for%20nectar&rft.jtitle=Royal%20Society%20open%20science&rft.au=Gonzalez-Terrazas,%20Tania%20P.&rft.date=2016-08-01&rft.volume=3&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=160199&rft.epage=160199&rft.pages=160199-160199&rft.issn=2054-5703&rft.eissn=2054-5703&rft_id=info:doi/10.1098/rsos.160199&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_doaj_%3E1841137935%3C/proquest_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c572t-458f5fc0aa5ed7bd194a0f74606f66f60cd739866366abb0d2ad5efde4e6458d3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1841137935&rft_id=info:pmid/27853595&rfr_iscdi=true