Impact of a clinical pathway on appropriate empiric vancomycin use in cancer patients with febrile neutropenia

• Published in: Journal of oncology pharmacy practice 2017-12, Vol.23 (8), p.575-581
• Main Authors: Vicente, Mildred, Al-Nahedh, Mohammad, Parsad, Sandeep, Knoebel, Randall W, Pisano, Jennifer, Pettit, Natasha N
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Adult; Aged; Anti-Bacterial Agents - therapeutic use; Critical Pathways; Empirical Research; Febrile Neutropenia - diagnosis; Febrile Neutropenia - drug therapy; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Neoplasms - diagnosis; Neoplasms - drug therapy; Practice Guidelines as Topic - standards; Retrospective Studies; Vancomycin - therapeutic use
• ISSN: 1078-1552; 1477-092X
• DOI: 10.1177/1078155216668672

Objectives Febrile neutropenia management guidelines recommend the use of vancomycin as part of an empiric antimicrobial regimen when specific criteria are met. Often, vancomycin use among patients with febrile neutropenia is not indicated and may be over utilized for this indication. We sought to evaluate the impact of implementing a febrile neutropenia clinical pathway on empiric vancomycin use for febrile neutropenia and to identify predictors of vancomycin use when not indicated. Methods Adult febrile neutropenia patients who received initial therapy with an anti-pseudomonal beta-lactam with or without vancomycin were identified before (June 2008 to November 2010) and after (June 2012 to June 2013) pathway implementation. Patients were assessed for appropriateness of therapy based on whether the patient received vancomycin consistent with guideline recommendations. Using a comorbidity index used for risk assessment in high risk hematology/oncology patients, we evaluated whether specific comorbidities are associated with inappropriate vancomycin use in the setting of febrile neutropenia. Results A total of 206 patients were included in the pre-pathway time period with 35.9% of patients receiving vancomycin therapy that was inconsistent with the pathway. A total of 131 patients were included in the post-pathway time period with 11.4% of patients receiving vancomycin inconsistent with the pathway (p = 0.001). None of the comorbidities assessed, nor the comorbidity index score were found to be predictors of vancomycin use inconsistent with guideline recommendations. Conclusion Our study has demonstrated that implementation of a febrile neutropenia pathway can significantly improve adherence to national guideline recommendations with respect to empiric vancomycin utilization for febrile neutropenia.