Loading…

Monoexponential, biexponential, and stretched exponential diffusion‐weighted imaging models: Quantitative biomarkers for differentiating renal clear cell carcinoma and minimal fat angiomyolipoma

Purpose To determine the utility of various diffusion parameters obtained from monoexponential, biexponential, and stretched exponential diffusion‐weighted imaging (DWI) models in differentiating between minimal fat angiomyolipoma (MFAML) and clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC). Materials and Me...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of magnetic resonance imaging 2017-07, Vol.46 (1), p.240-247
Main Authors: Li, Haojie, Liang, Lili, Li, Anqin, Hu, Yao, Hu, Daoyu, Li, Zhen, Kamel, Ihab R.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Purpose To determine the utility of various diffusion parameters obtained from monoexponential, biexponential, and stretched exponential diffusion‐weighted imaging (DWI) models in differentiating between minimal fat angiomyolipoma (MFAML) and clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC). Materials and Methods One hundred thirty‐one patients with pathologically confirmed MFAML (n = 27) or ccRCC (n = 104) underwent multi‐b value DWI (0∼1700 s/mm2) imaging at 3.0 Tesla MRI. An isotropic apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) was calculated from diffusion‐weighted images by using a monoexponential model. A pseudo‐ADC (Dp), true ADC (Dt), and perfusion fraction (fp) were calculated from diffusion‐weighted images by using a biexponential model. A water molecular diffusion heterogeneity index (α) and distributed diffusion coefficient (DDC) were calculated from diffusion‐weighted images by using a stretched exponential model. All parameters were compared between MFAML and ccRCC by using the Student's t test. Receiver operating characteristic and intraclass correlation coefficient analysis were used for statistical evaluations. Results ADC, Dt, and α values were significantly lower in the MFAML group than in the ccRCC group (P 
ISSN:1053-1807
1522-2586
DOI:10.1002/jmri.25524