Loading…

Efficacy of washing with a commercial flatbed brush washer, using conventional and experimental washing agents, in reducing populations of Escherichia coli on artificially inoculated apples

Conventional and experimental washing formulations were applied with a commercial flatbed brush washer under conditions representative of commercial practice to determine their efficacy in decontaminating apples inoculated with a nonpathogenic Escherichia coli strain. Golden Delicious apples (18 kg)...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of food protection 2001-02, Vol.64 (2), p.159-163
Main Authors: ANNOUS, Bassam A, SAPERS, Gerald M, MATTRAZZO, Angela M, RIORDAN, Denise C. R
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Conventional and experimental washing formulations were applied with a commercial flatbed brush washer under conditions representative of commercial practice to determine their efficacy in decontaminating apples inoculated with a nonpathogenic Escherichia coli strain. Golden Delicious apples (18 kg) inoculated with E. coli were mixed with approximately 109 kg of uninoculated Fuji apples (distinctly different in appearance) in a wet dump tank containing 1,325 liters of water at 20 degrees C for 15 min. The combined apples were washed in a flatbed brush washer with the following washing solutions: water at 20 degrees C, water at 50 degrees C, 200 ppm of chlorine (pH 6.4) at 20 degrees C, 8% trisodium phosphate at 20 degrees C, 8% trisodium phosphate at 50 degrees C, 5% hydrogen peroxide at 20 degrees C, 5% hydrogen peroxide at 50 degrees C, 1% APL Kleen 245 at 50 degrees C, and two-stage washing treatments using the combination of 1% APL Kleen 245 at 20 or 50 degrees C followed by 5% hydrogen peroxide at 35 or 50 degrees C. None of the washing treatments tested under the conditions of this experiment significantly reduced the E. coli populations on the inoculated apples or in cider made from these apples, probably as a consequence of the inability of this washing system to inactivate or remove the bacterial cells in inaccessible calyx and stem areas of apples. These results are important because they demonstrate the need for new fruit washing technology that can overcome this limitation. Also, there was no significant cross-contamination of the Fuji apples in the dump tank. Significant cross-contamination of cider, made with uninoculated apples, occurred in the hammer mill and/or the press cloth when these units were not sanitized following a trial with inoculated apples.
ISSN:0362-028X
1944-9097
DOI:10.4315/0362-028X-64.2.159