Loading…

Detection of graft detachments immediately following Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) comparing time domain and spectral domain OCT

Purpose Correct early graft attachment is believed to be crucial for final visual outcome after Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK). Nonetheless, it is not yet known which imaging technique gives superior results for examining early postoperative graft adherence status. We compared ima...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology 2016-12, Vol.254 (12), p.2431-2437
Main Authors: Siebelmann, Sebastian, Gehlsen, Uta, Le Blanc, Carolin, Stanzel, Tisha Prabriputaloong, Cursiefen, Claus, Steven, Philipp
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-3be7cd7c3104f11c8fde7749ebf960a530d9f09db603630912f61768a4f74b9d3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-3be7cd7c3104f11c8fde7749ebf960a530d9f09db603630912f61768a4f74b9d3
container_end_page 2437
container_issue 12
container_start_page 2431
container_title Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology
container_volume 254
creator Siebelmann, Sebastian
Gehlsen, Uta
Le Blanc, Carolin
Stanzel, Tisha Prabriputaloong
Cursiefen, Claus
Steven, Philipp
description Purpose Correct early graft attachment is believed to be crucial for final visual outcome after Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK). Nonetheless, it is not yet known which imaging technique gives superior results for examining early postoperative graft adherence status. We compared imaging data taken with two different OCT devices to examine the development of graft adherence immediately after DMEK and to determine the superior device in terms of visualization of graft adherence. Methods Ten consecutive patients (1 man/9 women) were examined three times postoperatively within the first 7 h after DMEK surgery using spectral domain OCT (SD-OCT) and time domain OCT (TD-OCT), as prospective case series and retrospective image data analyses. The parameters analyzed were localization and number, visibility and size of graft detachments. Results TD-OCT was able to detect a greater number of graft detachments after DMEK; however, SD-OCT provided better resolution of minor detachments. Graft detachments varied in position and degree at different time points immediately after surgery. All patients had some graft detachment within the first 7 h after DMEK surgery. Conclusions TD-OCT enabled better overall analysis of graft detachments, even in the periphery, whereas SD-OCT allowed for the detection of even minor detachments, which suggests that a combination of the two techniques is optimal. Our results indicate that dynamic processes affecting the DMEK graft immediately after transplantation are responsible for changes in the attachment of donor tissue at an early postoperative stage. Modulation of early graft attachment may improve the final graft attachment.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s00417-016-3484-x
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1842534909</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>4255523901</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-3be7cd7c3104f11c8fde7749ebf960a530d9f09db603630912f61768a4f74b9d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kc1u1DAUhS1ERYfCA7BBltiURcCOnThZopnyoxZ1U6TuIse-bl3sONgetfMePHAdzYAqJFZXuvrOuT8HoTeUfKCEiI-JEE5FRWhbMd7x6uEZWlHOmkqQ-vo5WhFR06pj9fUxepnSHSk4a-gLdFyLpm1E16zQ7w1kUNmGCQeDb6I0GWvIUt16mHLC1nvQVmZwO2yCc-HeTjd4A0mBh4w9-DHKCTBMOuRbcFY6_BOizGF2MuUdPt18Pzt_j1Xws4yLNlsPWAcv7YTlpHGay_xYZIfe5frqFToy0iV4fagn6Mfns6v11-ri8su39aeLSjFR54qNIJQWilHCDaWqMxqE4D2Mpm-JbBjRvSG9HlvCWkZ6WpuWiraT3Ag-9pqdoNO97xzDry2kPHhbDnOuXBS2aaAdrxvGe9IX9N0_6F3Yxqlst1C0oYL2olB0T6kYUopghjlaL-NuoGRYIhv2kQ0lsmGJbHgomrcH5-1Yfv1X8SejAtR7IM3LAyE-Gf1f10fn6qPW</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1841517197</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Detection of graft detachments immediately following Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) comparing time domain and spectral domain OCT</title><source>Springer Nature</source><creator>Siebelmann, Sebastian ; Gehlsen, Uta ; Le Blanc, Carolin ; Stanzel, Tisha Prabriputaloong ; Cursiefen, Claus ; Steven, Philipp</creator><creatorcontrib>Siebelmann, Sebastian ; Gehlsen, Uta ; Le Blanc, Carolin ; Stanzel, Tisha Prabriputaloong ; Cursiefen, Claus ; Steven, Philipp</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose Correct early graft attachment is believed to be crucial for final visual outcome after Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK). Nonetheless, it is not yet known which imaging technique gives superior results for examining early postoperative graft adherence status. We compared imaging data taken with two different OCT devices to examine the development of graft adherence immediately after DMEK and to determine the superior device in terms of visualization of graft adherence. Methods Ten consecutive patients (1 man/9 women) were examined three times postoperatively within the first 7 h after DMEK surgery using spectral domain OCT (SD-OCT) and time domain OCT (TD-OCT), as prospective case series and retrospective image data analyses. The parameters analyzed were localization and number, visibility and size of graft detachments. Results TD-OCT was able to detect a greater number of graft detachments after DMEK; however, SD-OCT provided better resolution of minor detachments. Graft detachments varied in position and degree at different time points immediately after surgery. All patients had some graft detachment within the first 7 h after DMEK surgery. Conclusions TD-OCT enabled better overall analysis of graft detachments, even in the periphery, whereas SD-OCT allowed for the detection of even minor detachments, which suggests that a combination of the two techniques is optimal. Our results indicate that dynamic processes affecting the DMEK graft immediately after transplantation are responsible for changes in the attachment of donor tissue at an early postoperative stage. Modulation of early graft attachment may improve the final graft attachment.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0721-832X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1435-702X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00417-016-3484-x</identifier><identifier>PMID: 27565785</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg</publisher><subject>Aged ; Cornea ; Descemet Membrane - pathology ; Descemet Stripping Endothelial Keratoplasty - adverse effects ; Female ; Follow-Up Studies ; Fuchs' Endothelial Dystrophy - surgery ; Graft Rejection - diagnosis ; Graft Rejection - etiology ; Graft Survival ; Humans ; Male ; Medicine ; Medicine &amp; Public Health ; Middle Aged ; Ophthalmology ; Postoperative Complications ; Prospective Studies ; Tomography, Optical Coherence - methods ; Visual Acuity</subject><ispartof>Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology, 2016-12, Vol.254 (12), p.2431-2437</ispartof><rights>Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2016</rights><rights>Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology is a copyright of Springer, 2016.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-3be7cd7c3104f11c8fde7749ebf960a530d9f09db603630912f61768a4f74b9d3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-3be7cd7c3104f11c8fde7749ebf960a530d9f09db603630912f61768a4f74b9d3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27565785$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Siebelmann, Sebastian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gehlsen, Uta</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Le Blanc, Carolin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stanzel, Tisha Prabriputaloong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cursiefen, Claus</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Steven, Philipp</creatorcontrib><title>Detection of graft detachments immediately following Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) comparing time domain and spectral domain OCT</title><title>Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology</title><addtitle>Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol</addtitle><addtitle>Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol</addtitle><description>Purpose Correct early graft attachment is believed to be crucial for final visual outcome after Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK). Nonetheless, it is not yet known which imaging technique gives superior results for examining early postoperative graft adherence status. We compared imaging data taken with two different OCT devices to examine the development of graft adherence immediately after DMEK and to determine the superior device in terms of visualization of graft adherence. Methods Ten consecutive patients (1 man/9 women) were examined three times postoperatively within the first 7 h after DMEK surgery using spectral domain OCT (SD-OCT) and time domain OCT (TD-OCT), as prospective case series and retrospective image data analyses. The parameters analyzed were localization and number, visibility and size of graft detachments. Results TD-OCT was able to detect a greater number of graft detachments after DMEK; however, SD-OCT provided better resolution of minor detachments. Graft detachments varied in position and degree at different time points immediately after surgery. All patients had some graft detachment within the first 7 h after DMEK surgery. Conclusions TD-OCT enabled better overall analysis of graft detachments, even in the periphery, whereas SD-OCT allowed for the detection of even minor detachments, which suggests that a combination of the two techniques is optimal. Our results indicate that dynamic processes affecting the DMEK graft immediately after transplantation are responsible for changes in the attachment of donor tissue at an early postoperative stage. Modulation of early graft attachment may improve the final graft attachment.</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Cornea</subject><subject>Descemet Membrane - pathology</subject><subject>Descemet Stripping Endothelial Keratoplasty - adverse effects</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Follow-Up Studies</subject><subject>Fuchs' Endothelial Dystrophy - surgery</subject><subject>Graft Rejection - diagnosis</subject><subject>Graft Rejection - etiology</subject><subject>Graft Survival</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine &amp; Public Health</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Ophthalmology</subject><subject>Postoperative Complications</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Tomography, Optical Coherence - methods</subject><subject>Visual Acuity</subject><issn>0721-832X</issn><issn>1435-702X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kc1u1DAUhS1ERYfCA7BBltiURcCOnThZopnyoxZ1U6TuIse-bl3sONgetfMePHAdzYAqJFZXuvrOuT8HoTeUfKCEiI-JEE5FRWhbMd7x6uEZWlHOmkqQ-vo5WhFR06pj9fUxepnSHSk4a-gLdFyLpm1E16zQ7w1kUNmGCQeDb6I0GWvIUt16mHLC1nvQVmZwO2yCc-HeTjd4A0mBh4w9-DHKCTBMOuRbcFY6_BOizGF2MuUdPt18Pzt_j1Xws4yLNlsPWAcv7YTlpHGay_xYZIfe5frqFToy0iV4fagn6Mfns6v11-ri8su39aeLSjFR54qNIJQWilHCDaWqMxqE4D2Mpm-JbBjRvSG9HlvCWkZ6WpuWiraT3Ag-9pqdoNO97xzDry2kPHhbDnOuXBS2aaAdrxvGe9IX9N0_6F3Yxqlst1C0oYL2olB0T6kYUopghjlaL-NuoGRYIhv2kQ0lsmGJbHgomrcH5-1Yfv1X8SejAtR7IM3LAyE-Gf1f10fn6qPW</recordid><startdate>20161201</startdate><enddate>20161201</enddate><creator>Siebelmann, Sebastian</creator><creator>Gehlsen, Uta</creator><creator>Le Blanc, Carolin</creator><creator>Stanzel, Tisha Prabriputaloong</creator><creator>Cursiefen, Claus</creator><creator>Steven, Philipp</creator><general>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20161201</creationdate><title>Detection of graft detachments immediately following Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) comparing time domain and spectral domain OCT</title><author>Siebelmann, Sebastian ; Gehlsen, Uta ; Le Blanc, Carolin ; Stanzel, Tisha Prabriputaloong ; Cursiefen, Claus ; Steven, Philipp</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-3be7cd7c3104f11c8fde7749ebf960a530d9f09db603630912f61768a4f74b9d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Cornea</topic><topic>Descemet Membrane - pathology</topic><topic>Descemet Stripping Endothelial Keratoplasty - adverse effects</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Follow-Up Studies</topic><topic>Fuchs' Endothelial Dystrophy - surgery</topic><topic>Graft Rejection - diagnosis</topic><topic>Graft Rejection - etiology</topic><topic>Graft Survival</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine &amp; Public Health</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Ophthalmology</topic><topic>Postoperative Complications</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Tomography, Optical Coherence - methods</topic><topic>Visual Acuity</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Siebelmann, Sebastian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gehlsen, Uta</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Le Blanc, Carolin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stanzel, Tisha Prabriputaloong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cursiefen, Claus</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Steven, Philipp</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Siebelmann, Sebastian</au><au>Gehlsen, Uta</au><au>Le Blanc, Carolin</au><au>Stanzel, Tisha Prabriputaloong</au><au>Cursiefen, Claus</au><au>Steven, Philipp</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Detection of graft detachments immediately following Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) comparing time domain and spectral domain OCT</atitle><jtitle>Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology</jtitle><stitle>Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol</stitle><addtitle>Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol</addtitle><date>2016-12-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>254</volume><issue>12</issue><spage>2431</spage><epage>2437</epage><pages>2431-2437</pages><issn>0721-832X</issn><eissn>1435-702X</eissn><abstract>Purpose Correct early graft attachment is believed to be crucial for final visual outcome after Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK). Nonetheless, it is not yet known which imaging technique gives superior results for examining early postoperative graft adherence status. We compared imaging data taken with two different OCT devices to examine the development of graft adherence immediately after DMEK and to determine the superior device in terms of visualization of graft adherence. Methods Ten consecutive patients (1 man/9 women) were examined three times postoperatively within the first 7 h after DMEK surgery using spectral domain OCT (SD-OCT) and time domain OCT (TD-OCT), as prospective case series and retrospective image data analyses. The parameters analyzed were localization and number, visibility and size of graft detachments. Results TD-OCT was able to detect a greater number of graft detachments after DMEK; however, SD-OCT provided better resolution of minor detachments. Graft detachments varied in position and degree at different time points immediately after surgery. All patients had some graft detachment within the first 7 h after DMEK surgery. Conclusions TD-OCT enabled better overall analysis of graft detachments, even in the periphery, whereas SD-OCT allowed for the detection of even minor detachments, which suggests that a combination of the two techniques is optimal. Our results indicate that dynamic processes affecting the DMEK graft immediately after transplantation are responsible for changes in the attachment of donor tissue at an early postoperative stage. Modulation of early graft attachment may improve the final graft attachment.</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</pub><pmid>27565785</pmid><doi>10.1007/s00417-016-3484-x</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0721-832X
ispartof Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology, 2016-12, Vol.254 (12), p.2431-2437
issn 0721-832X
1435-702X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1842534909
source Springer Nature
subjects Aged
Cornea
Descemet Membrane - pathology
Descemet Stripping Endothelial Keratoplasty - adverse effects
Female
Follow-Up Studies
Fuchs' Endothelial Dystrophy - surgery
Graft Rejection - diagnosis
Graft Rejection - etiology
Graft Survival
Humans
Male
Medicine
Medicine & Public Health
Middle Aged
Ophthalmology
Postoperative Complications
Prospective Studies
Tomography, Optical Coherence - methods
Visual Acuity
title Detection of graft detachments immediately following Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) comparing time domain and spectral domain OCT
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-01T19%3A45%3A55IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Detection%20of%20graft%20detachments%20immediately%20following%20Descemet%20membrane%20endothelial%20keratoplasty%20(DMEK)%20comparing%20time%20domain%20and%20spectral%20domain%20OCT&rft.jtitle=Graefe's%20archive%20for%20clinical%20and%20experimental%20ophthalmology&rft.au=Siebelmann,%20Sebastian&rft.date=2016-12-01&rft.volume=254&rft.issue=12&rft.spage=2431&rft.epage=2437&rft.pages=2431-2437&rft.issn=0721-832X&rft.eissn=1435-702X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00417-016-3484-x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E4255523901%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-3be7cd7c3104f11c8fde7749ebf960a530d9f09db603630912f61768a4f74b9d3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1841517197&rft_id=info:pmid/27565785&rfr_iscdi=true