Loading…
Detection of graft detachments immediately following Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) comparing time domain and spectral domain OCT
Purpose Correct early graft attachment is believed to be crucial for final visual outcome after Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK). Nonetheless, it is not yet known which imaging technique gives superior results for examining early postoperative graft adherence status. We compared ima...
Saved in:
Published in: | Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology 2016-12, Vol.254 (12), p.2431-2437 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-3be7cd7c3104f11c8fde7749ebf960a530d9f09db603630912f61768a4f74b9d3 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-3be7cd7c3104f11c8fde7749ebf960a530d9f09db603630912f61768a4f74b9d3 |
container_end_page | 2437 |
container_issue | 12 |
container_start_page | 2431 |
container_title | Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology |
container_volume | 254 |
creator | Siebelmann, Sebastian Gehlsen, Uta Le Blanc, Carolin Stanzel, Tisha Prabriputaloong Cursiefen, Claus Steven, Philipp |
description | Purpose
Correct early graft attachment is believed to be crucial for final visual outcome after Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK). Nonetheless, it is not yet known which imaging technique gives superior results for examining early postoperative graft adherence status. We compared imaging data taken with two different OCT devices to examine the development of graft adherence immediately after DMEK and to determine the superior device in terms of visualization of graft adherence.
Methods
Ten consecutive patients (1 man/9 women) were examined three times postoperatively within the first 7 h after DMEK surgery using spectral domain OCT (SD-OCT) and time domain OCT (TD-OCT), as prospective case series and retrospective image data analyses. The parameters analyzed were localization and number, visibility and size of graft detachments.
Results
TD-OCT was able to detect a greater number of graft detachments after DMEK; however, SD-OCT provided better resolution of minor detachments. Graft detachments varied in position and degree at different time points immediately after surgery. All patients had some graft detachment within the first 7 h after DMEK surgery.
Conclusions
TD-OCT enabled better overall analysis of graft detachments, even in the periphery, whereas SD-OCT allowed for the detection of even minor detachments, which suggests that a combination of the two techniques is optimal. Our results indicate that dynamic processes affecting the DMEK graft immediately after transplantation are responsible for changes in the attachment of donor tissue at an early postoperative stage. Modulation of early graft attachment may improve the final graft attachment. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s00417-016-3484-x |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1842534909</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>4255523901</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-3be7cd7c3104f11c8fde7749ebf960a530d9f09db603630912f61768a4f74b9d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kc1u1DAUhS1ERYfCA7BBltiURcCOnThZopnyoxZ1U6TuIse-bl3sONgetfMePHAdzYAqJFZXuvrOuT8HoTeUfKCEiI-JEE5FRWhbMd7x6uEZWlHOmkqQ-vo5WhFR06pj9fUxepnSHSk4a-gLdFyLpm1E16zQ7w1kUNmGCQeDb6I0GWvIUt16mHLC1nvQVmZwO2yCc-HeTjd4A0mBh4w9-DHKCTBMOuRbcFY6_BOizGF2MuUdPt18Pzt_j1Xws4yLNlsPWAcv7YTlpHGay_xYZIfe5frqFToy0iV4fagn6Mfns6v11-ri8su39aeLSjFR54qNIJQWilHCDaWqMxqE4D2Mpm-JbBjRvSG9HlvCWkZ6WpuWiraT3Ag-9pqdoNO97xzDry2kPHhbDnOuXBS2aaAdrxvGe9IX9N0_6F3Yxqlst1C0oYL2olB0T6kYUopghjlaL-NuoGRYIhv2kQ0lsmGJbHgomrcH5-1Yfv1X8SejAtR7IM3LAyE-Gf1f10fn6qPW</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1841517197</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Detection of graft detachments immediately following Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) comparing time domain and spectral domain OCT</title><source>Springer Nature</source><creator>Siebelmann, Sebastian ; Gehlsen, Uta ; Le Blanc, Carolin ; Stanzel, Tisha Prabriputaloong ; Cursiefen, Claus ; Steven, Philipp</creator><creatorcontrib>Siebelmann, Sebastian ; Gehlsen, Uta ; Le Blanc, Carolin ; Stanzel, Tisha Prabriputaloong ; Cursiefen, Claus ; Steven, Philipp</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose
Correct early graft attachment is believed to be crucial for final visual outcome after Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK). Nonetheless, it is not yet known which imaging technique gives superior results for examining early postoperative graft adherence status. We compared imaging data taken with two different OCT devices to examine the development of graft adherence immediately after DMEK and to determine the superior device in terms of visualization of graft adherence.
Methods
Ten consecutive patients (1 man/9 women) were examined three times postoperatively within the first 7 h after DMEK surgery using spectral domain OCT (SD-OCT) and time domain OCT (TD-OCT), as prospective case series and retrospective image data analyses. The parameters analyzed were localization and number, visibility and size of graft detachments.
Results
TD-OCT was able to detect a greater number of graft detachments after DMEK; however, SD-OCT provided better resolution of minor detachments. Graft detachments varied in position and degree at different time points immediately after surgery. All patients had some graft detachment within the first 7 h after DMEK surgery.
Conclusions
TD-OCT enabled better overall analysis of graft detachments, even in the periphery, whereas SD-OCT allowed for the detection of even minor detachments, which suggests that a combination of the two techniques is optimal. Our results indicate that dynamic processes affecting the DMEK graft immediately after transplantation are responsible for changes in the attachment of donor tissue at an early postoperative stage. Modulation of early graft attachment may improve the final graft attachment.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0721-832X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1435-702X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00417-016-3484-x</identifier><identifier>PMID: 27565785</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg</publisher><subject>Aged ; Cornea ; Descemet Membrane - pathology ; Descemet Stripping Endothelial Keratoplasty - adverse effects ; Female ; Follow-Up Studies ; Fuchs' Endothelial Dystrophy - surgery ; Graft Rejection - diagnosis ; Graft Rejection - etiology ; Graft Survival ; Humans ; Male ; Medicine ; Medicine & Public Health ; Middle Aged ; Ophthalmology ; Postoperative Complications ; Prospective Studies ; Tomography, Optical Coherence - methods ; Visual Acuity</subject><ispartof>Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology, 2016-12, Vol.254 (12), p.2431-2437</ispartof><rights>Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2016</rights><rights>Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology is a copyright of Springer, 2016.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-3be7cd7c3104f11c8fde7749ebf960a530d9f09db603630912f61768a4f74b9d3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-3be7cd7c3104f11c8fde7749ebf960a530d9f09db603630912f61768a4f74b9d3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27565785$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Siebelmann, Sebastian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gehlsen, Uta</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Le Blanc, Carolin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stanzel, Tisha Prabriputaloong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cursiefen, Claus</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Steven, Philipp</creatorcontrib><title>Detection of graft detachments immediately following Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) comparing time domain and spectral domain OCT</title><title>Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology</title><addtitle>Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol</addtitle><addtitle>Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol</addtitle><description>Purpose
Correct early graft attachment is believed to be crucial for final visual outcome after Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK). Nonetheless, it is not yet known which imaging technique gives superior results for examining early postoperative graft adherence status. We compared imaging data taken with two different OCT devices to examine the development of graft adherence immediately after DMEK and to determine the superior device in terms of visualization of graft adherence.
Methods
Ten consecutive patients (1 man/9 women) were examined three times postoperatively within the first 7 h after DMEK surgery using spectral domain OCT (SD-OCT) and time domain OCT (TD-OCT), as prospective case series and retrospective image data analyses. The parameters analyzed were localization and number, visibility and size of graft detachments.
Results
TD-OCT was able to detect a greater number of graft detachments after DMEK; however, SD-OCT provided better resolution of minor detachments. Graft detachments varied in position and degree at different time points immediately after surgery. All patients had some graft detachment within the first 7 h after DMEK surgery.
Conclusions
TD-OCT enabled better overall analysis of graft detachments, even in the periphery, whereas SD-OCT allowed for the detection of even minor detachments, which suggests that a combination of the two techniques is optimal. Our results indicate that dynamic processes affecting the DMEK graft immediately after transplantation are responsible for changes in the attachment of donor tissue at an early postoperative stage. Modulation of early graft attachment may improve the final graft attachment.</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Cornea</subject><subject>Descemet Membrane - pathology</subject><subject>Descemet Stripping Endothelial Keratoplasty - adverse effects</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Follow-Up Studies</subject><subject>Fuchs' Endothelial Dystrophy - surgery</subject><subject>Graft Rejection - diagnosis</subject><subject>Graft Rejection - etiology</subject><subject>Graft Survival</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine & Public Health</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Ophthalmology</subject><subject>Postoperative Complications</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Tomography, Optical Coherence - methods</subject><subject>Visual Acuity</subject><issn>0721-832X</issn><issn>1435-702X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kc1u1DAUhS1ERYfCA7BBltiURcCOnThZopnyoxZ1U6TuIse-bl3sONgetfMePHAdzYAqJFZXuvrOuT8HoTeUfKCEiI-JEE5FRWhbMd7x6uEZWlHOmkqQ-vo5WhFR06pj9fUxepnSHSk4a-gLdFyLpm1E16zQ7w1kUNmGCQeDb6I0GWvIUt16mHLC1nvQVmZwO2yCc-HeTjd4A0mBh4w9-DHKCTBMOuRbcFY6_BOizGF2MuUdPt18Pzt_j1Xws4yLNlsPWAcv7YTlpHGay_xYZIfe5frqFToy0iV4fagn6Mfns6v11-ri8su39aeLSjFR54qNIJQWilHCDaWqMxqE4D2Mpm-JbBjRvSG9HlvCWkZ6WpuWiraT3Ag-9pqdoNO97xzDry2kPHhbDnOuXBS2aaAdrxvGe9IX9N0_6F3Yxqlst1C0oYL2olB0T6kYUopghjlaL-NuoGRYIhv2kQ0lsmGJbHgomrcH5-1Yfv1X8SejAtR7IM3LAyE-Gf1f10fn6qPW</recordid><startdate>20161201</startdate><enddate>20161201</enddate><creator>Siebelmann, Sebastian</creator><creator>Gehlsen, Uta</creator><creator>Le Blanc, Carolin</creator><creator>Stanzel, Tisha Prabriputaloong</creator><creator>Cursiefen, Claus</creator><creator>Steven, Philipp</creator><general>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20161201</creationdate><title>Detection of graft detachments immediately following Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) comparing time domain and spectral domain OCT</title><author>Siebelmann, Sebastian ; Gehlsen, Uta ; Le Blanc, Carolin ; Stanzel, Tisha Prabriputaloong ; Cursiefen, Claus ; Steven, Philipp</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-3be7cd7c3104f11c8fde7749ebf960a530d9f09db603630912f61768a4f74b9d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Cornea</topic><topic>Descemet Membrane - pathology</topic><topic>Descemet Stripping Endothelial Keratoplasty - adverse effects</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Follow-Up Studies</topic><topic>Fuchs' Endothelial Dystrophy - surgery</topic><topic>Graft Rejection - diagnosis</topic><topic>Graft Rejection - etiology</topic><topic>Graft Survival</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine & Public Health</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Ophthalmology</topic><topic>Postoperative Complications</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Tomography, Optical Coherence - methods</topic><topic>Visual Acuity</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Siebelmann, Sebastian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gehlsen, Uta</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Le Blanc, Carolin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stanzel, Tisha Prabriputaloong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cursiefen, Claus</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Steven, Philipp</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Siebelmann, Sebastian</au><au>Gehlsen, Uta</au><au>Le Blanc, Carolin</au><au>Stanzel, Tisha Prabriputaloong</au><au>Cursiefen, Claus</au><au>Steven, Philipp</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Detection of graft detachments immediately following Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) comparing time domain and spectral domain OCT</atitle><jtitle>Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology</jtitle><stitle>Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol</stitle><addtitle>Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol</addtitle><date>2016-12-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>254</volume><issue>12</issue><spage>2431</spage><epage>2437</epage><pages>2431-2437</pages><issn>0721-832X</issn><eissn>1435-702X</eissn><abstract>Purpose
Correct early graft attachment is believed to be crucial for final visual outcome after Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK). Nonetheless, it is not yet known which imaging technique gives superior results for examining early postoperative graft adherence status. We compared imaging data taken with two different OCT devices to examine the development of graft adherence immediately after DMEK and to determine the superior device in terms of visualization of graft adherence.
Methods
Ten consecutive patients (1 man/9 women) were examined three times postoperatively within the first 7 h after DMEK surgery using spectral domain OCT (SD-OCT) and time domain OCT (TD-OCT), as prospective case series and retrospective image data analyses. The parameters analyzed were localization and number, visibility and size of graft detachments.
Results
TD-OCT was able to detect a greater number of graft detachments after DMEK; however, SD-OCT provided better resolution of minor detachments. Graft detachments varied in position and degree at different time points immediately after surgery. All patients had some graft detachment within the first 7 h after DMEK surgery.
Conclusions
TD-OCT enabled better overall analysis of graft detachments, even in the periphery, whereas SD-OCT allowed for the detection of even minor detachments, which suggests that a combination of the two techniques is optimal. Our results indicate that dynamic processes affecting the DMEK graft immediately after transplantation are responsible for changes in the attachment of donor tissue at an early postoperative stage. Modulation of early graft attachment may improve the final graft attachment.</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</pub><pmid>27565785</pmid><doi>10.1007/s00417-016-3484-x</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0721-832X |
ispartof | Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology, 2016-12, Vol.254 (12), p.2431-2437 |
issn | 0721-832X 1435-702X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1842534909 |
source | Springer Nature |
subjects | Aged Cornea Descemet Membrane - pathology Descemet Stripping Endothelial Keratoplasty - adverse effects Female Follow-Up Studies Fuchs' Endothelial Dystrophy - surgery Graft Rejection - diagnosis Graft Rejection - etiology Graft Survival Humans Male Medicine Medicine & Public Health Middle Aged Ophthalmology Postoperative Complications Prospective Studies Tomography, Optical Coherence - methods Visual Acuity |
title | Detection of graft detachments immediately following Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) comparing time domain and spectral domain OCT |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-01T19%3A45%3A55IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Detection%20of%20graft%20detachments%20immediately%20following%20Descemet%20membrane%20endothelial%20keratoplasty%20(DMEK)%20comparing%20time%20domain%20and%20spectral%20domain%20OCT&rft.jtitle=Graefe's%20archive%20for%20clinical%20and%20experimental%20ophthalmology&rft.au=Siebelmann,%20Sebastian&rft.date=2016-12-01&rft.volume=254&rft.issue=12&rft.spage=2431&rft.epage=2437&rft.pages=2431-2437&rft.issn=0721-832X&rft.eissn=1435-702X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00417-016-3484-x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E4255523901%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-3be7cd7c3104f11c8fde7749ebf960a530d9f09db603630912f61768a4f74b9d3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1841517197&rft_id=info:pmid/27565785&rfr_iscdi=true |