Loading…
Defining Communication Improvement Needs in General Surgery: An Analysis of Pages, Communications, Patterns, and Content☆?
Objective To describe patterns of pages communication to general surgery (GS) residents, identify the need for and develop strategies to improve interprofessional communication. Design Retrospective cohort study. Setting General surgery (GS) service at a tertiary care academic institution, Sunnybroo...
Saved in:
Published in: | Journal of surgical education 2016-11, Vol.73 (6), p.959-967 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c414t-72140fc51f59702e34b26e3eed652cd214d35731491ccfd6f09f2c6db38282aa3 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c414t-72140fc51f59702e34b26e3eed652cd214d35731491ccfd6f09f2c6db38282aa3 |
container_end_page | 967 |
container_issue | 6 |
container_start_page | 959 |
container_title | Journal of surgical education |
container_volume | 73 |
creator | Hallet, Julie, MD, MSc Wallace, David, MSc El-Sedfy, Abraham, MD Ahmed, Najma, MD, PhD Smith, Andrew J., MD, MSc Nathens, Avery B., MD, PhD Conn, Lesley Gotlib, PhD Coburn, Natalie G., MD, MPH |
description | Objective To describe patterns of pages communication to general surgery (GS) residents, identify the need for and develop strategies to improve interprofessional communication. Design Retrospective cohort study. Setting General surgery (GS) service at a tertiary care academic institution, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, in Toronto, Ontario, Canada. Participants All pages sent to GS residents over 4 weeks at an academic institution. Timing, training level of receiver and content of pages were captured. Results Communication priority was assigned by 2 independent reviewers—low (121+ min), medium (31-120 min), high (6-30 min), and immediate (0-5 min) priority. Overall, 2 independent reviewers analyzed pages’ content through an inductive process, and generated themes. Of 2025 pages retrieved, 963 (47.5%) contained exclusively a call back number. A median of 74 pages per day (range: 43-116) were received, with median page interval of 9.4 minutes (range: 0-640). Junior residents received 79.5% of pages. Timing of the pages was 43.9% weekday shift, 31.8% weeknight shift, and 24.3% weekend call. Communication priority was deemed low for 35.4% of pages, medium for 32.3%, high for 12.4%, and immediate for 0.7%. Content analysis of 1062 pages generated 5 major themes: nonurgent medical issue (54.0%), administrative (15.3%), communication (13.5%), emergencies (4.8%), and GS consultation requests (4.0%). Priority and content of pages varied according to training level and page timing. Conclusions Pages to GS residents were frequent and most often of low priority. They were seldom related to urgent medical matters. Education and new communication strategies are warranted to reduce low priority pages. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.jsurg.2016.05.004 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1844028988</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1931720416300502</els_id><sourcerecordid>1844028988</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c414t-72140fc51f59702e34b26e3eed652cd214d35731491ccfd6f09f2c6db38282aa3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFUdtqFTEUHUSxtfoFguTRB8-Y28xkBJVy1FooWqg-h5xk55BxJtMmM4UDfe43-H1-iXs8VdAXIZC92Wtf1lpF8ZTRklFWv-zKLs9pW3JMSlqVlMp7xSFTjVo1suL3MW4FWzWcyoPiUc4dpZVsefuwOOCNUnVbq8Pi5h34EEPckvU4DHMM1kxhjOR0uEzjNQwQJ_IJwGUSIjmBCMn05ALXQtq9IscRn-l3OWQyenJutpBf_D0J83MzTZCWyESH1Tjh1B_fb98-Lh5402d4cvcfFV8_vP-y_rg6-3xyuj4-W1nJ5IQMmKTeVsxXbUM5CLnhNQi8qq64dVh1omoEky2z1rva09ZzW7uNUFxxY8RR8Xw_FzldzZAnPYRsoe9NhHHOmikpKVetUggVe6hNY84JvL5MYTBppxnVi-y6079k14vsmlYaZceuZ3cL5s0A7k_Pb50R8HoPAKR5HSDpbANECy4ksJN2Y_jPgjf_9Ns-LBL332AHuRvnhD4gE525pvpicX4xntUCXadc_ATFO6so</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1844028988</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Defining Communication Improvement Needs in General Surgery: An Analysis of Pages, Communications, Patterns, and Content☆?</title><source>ScienceDirect Freedom Collection 2022-2024</source><creator>Hallet, Julie, MD, MSc ; Wallace, David, MSc ; El-Sedfy, Abraham, MD ; Ahmed, Najma, MD, PhD ; Smith, Andrew J., MD, MSc ; Nathens, Avery B., MD, PhD ; Conn, Lesley Gotlib, PhD ; Coburn, Natalie G., MD, MPH</creator><creatorcontrib>Hallet, Julie, MD, MSc ; Wallace, David, MSc ; El-Sedfy, Abraham, MD ; Ahmed, Najma, MD, PhD ; Smith, Andrew J., MD, MSc ; Nathens, Avery B., MD, PhD ; Conn, Lesley Gotlib, PhD ; Coburn, Natalie G., MD, MPH</creatorcontrib><description>Objective To describe patterns of pages communication to general surgery (GS) residents, identify the need for and develop strategies to improve interprofessional communication. Design Retrospective cohort study. Setting General surgery (GS) service at a tertiary care academic institution, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, in Toronto, Ontario, Canada. Participants All pages sent to GS residents over 4 weeks at an academic institution. Timing, training level of receiver and content of pages were captured. Results Communication priority was assigned by 2 independent reviewers—low (121+ min), medium (31-120 min), high (6-30 min), and immediate (0-5 min) priority. Overall, 2 independent reviewers analyzed pages’ content through an inductive process, and generated themes. Of 2025 pages retrieved, 963 (47.5%) contained exclusively a call back number. A median of 74 pages per day (range: 43-116) were received, with median page interval of 9.4 minutes (range: 0-640). Junior residents received 79.5% of pages. Timing of the pages was 43.9% weekday shift, 31.8% weeknight shift, and 24.3% weekend call. Communication priority was deemed low for 35.4% of pages, medium for 32.3%, high for 12.4%, and immediate for 0.7%. Content analysis of 1062 pages generated 5 major themes: nonurgent medical issue (54.0%), administrative (15.3%), communication (13.5%), emergencies (4.8%), and GS consultation requests (4.0%). Priority and content of pages varied according to training level and page timing. Conclusions Pages to GS residents were frequent and most often of low priority. They were seldom related to urgent medical matters. Education and new communication strategies are warranted to reduce low priority pages.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1931-7204</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1878-7452</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2016.05.004</identifier><identifier>PMID: 27886968</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Academic Medical Centers ; Adult ; Cohort Studies ; communication ; education ; Education, Medical, Graduate - methods ; Female ; General Surgery - education ; Humans ; Interdisciplinary Communication ; Internship and Residency - organization & administration ; Interpersonal and Communication Skills ; Male ; Needs Assessment ; Ontario ; page ; Patient Care ; Professionalism ; residents ; Retrospective Studies ; Surgery ; Tertiary Care Centers</subject><ispartof>Journal of surgical education, 2016-11, Vol.73 (6), p.959-967</ispartof><rights>Association of Program Directors in Surgery</rights><rights>2016 Association of Program Directors in Surgery</rights><rights>Copyright © 2016 Association of Program Directors in Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c414t-72140fc51f59702e34b26e3eed652cd214d35731491ccfd6f09f2c6db38282aa3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c414t-72140fc51f59702e34b26e3eed652cd214d35731491ccfd6f09f2c6db38282aa3</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-5108-1072</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27886968$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hallet, Julie, MD, MSc</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wallace, David, MSc</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>El-Sedfy, Abraham, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ahmed, Najma, MD, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smith, Andrew J., MD, MSc</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nathens, Avery B., MD, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Conn, Lesley Gotlib, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Coburn, Natalie G., MD, MPH</creatorcontrib><title>Defining Communication Improvement Needs in General Surgery: An Analysis of Pages, Communications, Patterns, and Content☆?</title><title>Journal of surgical education</title><addtitle>J Surg Educ</addtitle><description>Objective To describe patterns of pages communication to general surgery (GS) residents, identify the need for and develop strategies to improve interprofessional communication. Design Retrospective cohort study. Setting General surgery (GS) service at a tertiary care academic institution, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, in Toronto, Ontario, Canada. Participants All pages sent to GS residents over 4 weeks at an academic institution. Timing, training level of receiver and content of pages were captured. Results Communication priority was assigned by 2 independent reviewers—low (121+ min), medium (31-120 min), high (6-30 min), and immediate (0-5 min) priority. Overall, 2 independent reviewers analyzed pages’ content through an inductive process, and generated themes. Of 2025 pages retrieved, 963 (47.5%) contained exclusively a call back number. A median of 74 pages per day (range: 43-116) were received, with median page interval of 9.4 minutes (range: 0-640). Junior residents received 79.5% of pages. Timing of the pages was 43.9% weekday shift, 31.8% weeknight shift, and 24.3% weekend call. Communication priority was deemed low for 35.4% of pages, medium for 32.3%, high for 12.4%, and immediate for 0.7%. Content analysis of 1062 pages generated 5 major themes: nonurgent medical issue (54.0%), administrative (15.3%), communication (13.5%), emergencies (4.8%), and GS consultation requests (4.0%). Priority and content of pages varied according to training level and page timing. Conclusions Pages to GS residents were frequent and most often of low priority. They were seldom related to urgent medical matters. Education and new communication strategies are warranted to reduce low priority pages.</description><subject>Academic Medical Centers</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Cohort Studies</subject><subject>communication</subject><subject>education</subject><subject>Education, Medical, Graduate - methods</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>General Surgery - education</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Interdisciplinary Communication</subject><subject>Internship and Residency - organization & administration</subject><subject>Interpersonal and Communication Skills</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Needs Assessment</subject><subject>Ontario</subject><subject>page</subject><subject>Patient Care</subject><subject>Professionalism</subject><subject>residents</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>Tertiary Care Centers</subject><issn>1931-7204</issn><issn>1878-7452</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFUdtqFTEUHUSxtfoFguTRB8-Y28xkBJVy1FooWqg-h5xk55BxJtMmM4UDfe43-H1-iXs8VdAXIZC92Wtf1lpF8ZTRklFWv-zKLs9pW3JMSlqVlMp7xSFTjVo1suL3MW4FWzWcyoPiUc4dpZVsefuwOOCNUnVbq8Pi5h34EEPckvU4DHMM1kxhjOR0uEzjNQwQJ_IJwGUSIjmBCMn05ALXQtq9IscRn-l3OWQyenJutpBf_D0J83MzTZCWyESH1Tjh1B_fb98-Lh5402d4cvcfFV8_vP-y_rg6-3xyuj4-W1nJ5IQMmKTeVsxXbUM5CLnhNQi8qq64dVh1omoEky2z1rva09ZzW7uNUFxxY8RR8Xw_FzldzZAnPYRsoe9NhHHOmikpKVetUggVe6hNY84JvL5MYTBppxnVi-y6079k14vsmlYaZceuZ3cL5s0A7k_Pb50R8HoPAKR5HSDpbANECy4ksJN2Y_jPgjf_9Ns-LBL332AHuRvnhD4gE525pvpicX4xntUCXadc_ATFO6so</recordid><startdate>20161101</startdate><enddate>20161101</enddate><creator>Hallet, Julie, MD, MSc</creator><creator>Wallace, David, MSc</creator><creator>El-Sedfy, Abraham, MD</creator><creator>Ahmed, Najma, MD, PhD</creator><creator>Smith, Andrew J., MD, MSc</creator><creator>Nathens, Avery B., MD, PhD</creator><creator>Conn, Lesley Gotlib, PhD</creator><creator>Coburn, Natalie G., MD, MPH</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5108-1072</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20161101</creationdate><title>Defining Communication Improvement Needs in General Surgery: An Analysis of Pages, Communications, Patterns, and Content☆?</title><author>Hallet, Julie, MD, MSc ; Wallace, David, MSc ; El-Sedfy, Abraham, MD ; Ahmed, Najma, MD, PhD ; Smith, Andrew J., MD, MSc ; Nathens, Avery B., MD, PhD ; Conn, Lesley Gotlib, PhD ; Coburn, Natalie G., MD, MPH</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c414t-72140fc51f59702e34b26e3eed652cd214d35731491ccfd6f09f2c6db38282aa3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Academic Medical Centers</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Cohort Studies</topic><topic>communication</topic><topic>education</topic><topic>Education, Medical, Graduate - methods</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>General Surgery - education</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Interdisciplinary Communication</topic><topic>Internship and Residency - organization & administration</topic><topic>Interpersonal and Communication Skills</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Needs Assessment</topic><topic>Ontario</topic><topic>page</topic><topic>Patient Care</topic><topic>Professionalism</topic><topic>residents</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>Tertiary Care Centers</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hallet, Julie, MD, MSc</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wallace, David, MSc</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>El-Sedfy, Abraham, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ahmed, Najma, MD, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smith, Andrew J., MD, MSc</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nathens, Avery B., MD, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Conn, Lesley Gotlib, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Coburn, Natalie G., MD, MPH</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of surgical education</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hallet, Julie, MD, MSc</au><au>Wallace, David, MSc</au><au>El-Sedfy, Abraham, MD</au><au>Ahmed, Najma, MD, PhD</au><au>Smith, Andrew J., MD, MSc</au><au>Nathens, Avery B., MD, PhD</au><au>Conn, Lesley Gotlib, PhD</au><au>Coburn, Natalie G., MD, MPH</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Defining Communication Improvement Needs in General Surgery: An Analysis of Pages, Communications, Patterns, and Content☆?</atitle><jtitle>Journal of surgical education</jtitle><addtitle>J Surg Educ</addtitle><date>2016-11-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>73</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>959</spage><epage>967</epage><pages>959-967</pages><issn>1931-7204</issn><eissn>1878-7452</eissn><abstract>Objective To describe patterns of pages communication to general surgery (GS) residents, identify the need for and develop strategies to improve interprofessional communication. Design Retrospective cohort study. Setting General surgery (GS) service at a tertiary care academic institution, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, in Toronto, Ontario, Canada. Participants All pages sent to GS residents over 4 weeks at an academic institution. Timing, training level of receiver and content of pages were captured. Results Communication priority was assigned by 2 independent reviewers—low (121+ min), medium (31-120 min), high (6-30 min), and immediate (0-5 min) priority. Overall, 2 independent reviewers analyzed pages’ content through an inductive process, and generated themes. Of 2025 pages retrieved, 963 (47.5%) contained exclusively a call back number. A median of 74 pages per day (range: 43-116) were received, with median page interval of 9.4 minutes (range: 0-640). Junior residents received 79.5% of pages. Timing of the pages was 43.9% weekday shift, 31.8% weeknight shift, and 24.3% weekend call. Communication priority was deemed low for 35.4% of pages, medium for 32.3%, high for 12.4%, and immediate for 0.7%. Content analysis of 1062 pages generated 5 major themes: nonurgent medical issue (54.0%), administrative (15.3%), communication (13.5%), emergencies (4.8%), and GS consultation requests (4.0%). Priority and content of pages varied according to training level and page timing. Conclusions Pages to GS residents were frequent and most often of low priority. They were seldom related to urgent medical matters. Education and new communication strategies are warranted to reduce low priority pages.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>27886968</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.jsurg.2016.05.004</doi><tpages>9</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5108-1072</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1931-7204 |
ispartof | Journal of surgical education, 2016-11, Vol.73 (6), p.959-967 |
issn | 1931-7204 1878-7452 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1844028988 |
source | ScienceDirect Freedom Collection 2022-2024 |
subjects | Academic Medical Centers Adult Cohort Studies communication education Education, Medical, Graduate - methods Female General Surgery - education Humans Interdisciplinary Communication Internship and Residency - organization & administration Interpersonal and Communication Skills Male Needs Assessment Ontario page Patient Care Professionalism residents Retrospective Studies Surgery Tertiary Care Centers |
title | Defining Communication Improvement Needs in General Surgery: An Analysis of Pages, Communications, Patterns, and Content☆? |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-29T20%3A19%3A56IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Defining%20Communication%20Improvement%20Needs%20in%20General%20Surgery:%20An%20Analysis%20of%20Pages,%20Communications,%20Patterns,%20and%20Content%E2%98%86?&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20surgical%20education&rft.au=Hallet,%20Julie,%20MD,%20MSc&rft.date=2016-11-01&rft.volume=73&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=959&rft.epage=967&rft.pages=959-967&rft.issn=1931-7204&rft.eissn=1878-7452&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jsurg.2016.05.004&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1844028988%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c414t-72140fc51f59702e34b26e3eed652cd214d35731491ccfd6f09f2c6db38282aa3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1844028988&rft_id=info:pmid/27886968&rfr_iscdi=true |