Loading…

Defining Communication Improvement Needs in General Surgery: An Analysis of Pages, Communications, Patterns, and Content☆?

Objective To describe patterns of pages communication to general surgery (GS) residents, identify the need for and develop strategies to improve interprofessional communication. Design Retrospective cohort study. Setting General surgery (GS) service at a tertiary care academic institution, Sunnybroo...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of surgical education 2016-11, Vol.73 (6), p.959-967
Main Authors: Hallet, Julie, MD, MSc, Wallace, David, MSc, El-Sedfy, Abraham, MD, Ahmed, Najma, MD, PhD, Smith, Andrew J., MD, MSc, Nathens, Avery B., MD, PhD, Conn, Lesley Gotlib, PhD, Coburn, Natalie G., MD, MPH
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c414t-72140fc51f59702e34b26e3eed652cd214d35731491ccfd6f09f2c6db38282aa3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c414t-72140fc51f59702e34b26e3eed652cd214d35731491ccfd6f09f2c6db38282aa3
container_end_page 967
container_issue 6
container_start_page 959
container_title Journal of surgical education
container_volume 73
creator Hallet, Julie, MD, MSc
Wallace, David, MSc
El-Sedfy, Abraham, MD
Ahmed, Najma, MD, PhD
Smith, Andrew J., MD, MSc
Nathens, Avery B., MD, PhD
Conn, Lesley Gotlib, PhD
Coburn, Natalie G., MD, MPH
description Objective To describe patterns of pages communication to general surgery (GS) residents, identify the need for and develop strategies to improve interprofessional communication. Design Retrospective cohort study. Setting General surgery (GS) service at a tertiary care academic institution, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, in Toronto, Ontario, Canada. Participants All pages sent to GS residents over 4 weeks at an academic institution. Timing, training level of receiver and content of pages were captured. Results Communication priority was assigned by 2 independent reviewers—low (121+ min), medium (31-120 min), high (6-30 min), and immediate (0-5 min) priority. Overall, 2 independent reviewers analyzed pages’ content through an inductive process, and generated themes. Of 2025 pages retrieved, 963 (47.5%) contained exclusively a call back number. A median of 74 pages per day (range: 43-116) were received, with median page interval of 9.4 minutes (range: 0-640). Junior residents received 79.5% of pages. Timing of the pages was 43.9% weekday shift, 31.8% weeknight shift, and 24.3% weekend call. Communication priority was deemed low for 35.4% of pages, medium for 32.3%, high for 12.4%, and immediate for 0.7%. Content analysis of 1062 pages generated 5 major themes: nonurgent medical issue (54.0%), administrative (15.3%), communication (13.5%), emergencies (4.8%), and GS consultation requests (4.0%). Priority and content of pages varied according to training level and page timing. Conclusions Pages to GS residents were frequent and most often of low priority. They were seldom related to urgent medical matters. Education and new communication strategies are warranted to reduce low priority pages.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.jsurg.2016.05.004
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1844028988</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1931720416300502</els_id><sourcerecordid>1844028988</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c414t-72140fc51f59702e34b26e3eed652cd214d35731491ccfd6f09f2c6db38282aa3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFUdtqFTEUHUSxtfoFguTRB8-Y28xkBJVy1FooWqg-h5xk55BxJtMmM4UDfe43-H1-iXs8VdAXIZC92Wtf1lpF8ZTRklFWv-zKLs9pW3JMSlqVlMp7xSFTjVo1suL3MW4FWzWcyoPiUc4dpZVsefuwOOCNUnVbq8Pi5h34EEPckvU4DHMM1kxhjOR0uEzjNQwQJ_IJwGUSIjmBCMn05ALXQtq9IscRn-l3OWQyenJutpBf_D0J83MzTZCWyESH1Tjh1B_fb98-Lh5402d4cvcfFV8_vP-y_rg6-3xyuj4-W1nJ5IQMmKTeVsxXbUM5CLnhNQi8qq64dVh1omoEky2z1rva09ZzW7uNUFxxY8RR8Xw_FzldzZAnPYRsoe9NhHHOmikpKVetUggVe6hNY84JvL5MYTBppxnVi-y6079k14vsmlYaZceuZ3cL5s0A7k_Pb50R8HoPAKR5HSDpbANECy4ksJN2Y_jPgjf_9Ns-LBL332AHuRvnhD4gE525pvpicX4xntUCXadc_ATFO6so</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1844028988</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Defining Communication Improvement Needs in General Surgery: An Analysis of Pages, Communications, Patterns, and Content☆?</title><source>ScienceDirect Freedom Collection 2022-2024</source><creator>Hallet, Julie, MD, MSc ; Wallace, David, MSc ; El-Sedfy, Abraham, MD ; Ahmed, Najma, MD, PhD ; Smith, Andrew J., MD, MSc ; Nathens, Avery B., MD, PhD ; Conn, Lesley Gotlib, PhD ; Coburn, Natalie G., MD, MPH</creator><creatorcontrib>Hallet, Julie, MD, MSc ; Wallace, David, MSc ; El-Sedfy, Abraham, MD ; Ahmed, Najma, MD, PhD ; Smith, Andrew J., MD, MSc ; Nathens, Avery B., MD, PhD ; Conn, Lesley Gotlib, PhD ; Coburn, Natalie G., MD, MPH</creatorcontrib><description>Objective To describe patterns of pages communication to general surgery (GS) residents, identify the need for and develop strategies to improve interprofessional communication. Design Retrospective cohort study. Setting General surgery (GS) service at a tertiary care academic institution, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, in Toronto, Ontario, Canada. Participants All pages sent to GS residents over 4 weeks at an academic institution. Timing, training level of receiver and content of pages were captured. Results Communication priority was assigned by 2 independent reviewers—low (121+ min), medium (31-120 min), high (6-30 min), and immediate (0-5 min) priority. Overall, 2 independent reviewers analyzed pages’ content through an inductive process, and generated themes. Of 2025 pages retrieved, 963 (47.5%) contained exclusively a call back number. A median of 74 pages per day (range: 43-116) were received, with median page interval of 9.4 minutes (range: 0-640). Junior residents received 79.5% of pages. Timing of the pages was 43.9% weekday shift, 31.8% weeknight shift, and 24.3% weekend call. Communication priority was deemed low for 35.4% of pages, medium for 32.3%, high for 12.4%, and immediate for 0.7%. Content analysis of 1062 pages generated 5 major themes: nonurgent medical issue (54.0%), administrative (15.3%), communication (13.5%), emergencies (4.8%), and GS consultation requests (4.0%). Priority and content of pages varied according to training level and page timing. Conclusions Pages to GS residents were frequent and most often of low priority. They were seldom related to urgent medical matters. Education and new communication strategies are warranted to reduce low priority pages.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1931-7204</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1878-7452</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2016.05.004</identifier><identifier>PMID: 27886968</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Academic Medical Centers ; Adult ; Cohort Studies ; communication ; education ; Education, Medical, Graduate - methods ; Female ; General Surgery - education ; Humans ; Interdisciplinary Communication ; Internship and Residency - organization &amp; administration ; Interpersonal and Communication Skills ; Male ; Needs Assessment ; Ontario ; page ; Patient Care ; Professionalism ; residents ; Retrospective Studies ; Surgery ; Tertiary Care Centers</subject><ispartof>Journal of surgical education, 2016-11, Vol.73 (6), p.959-967</ispartof><rights>Association of Program Directors in Surgery</rights><rights>2016 Association of Program Directors in Surgery</rights><rights>Copyright © 2016 Association of Program Directors in Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c414t-72140fc51f59702e34b26e3eed652cd214d35731491ccfd6f09f2c6db38282aa3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c414t-72140fc51f59702e34b26e3eed652cd214d35731491ccfd6f09f2c6db38282aa3</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-5108-1072</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27886968$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hallet, Julie, MD, MSc</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wallace, David, MSc</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>El-Sedfy, Abraham, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ahmed, Najma, MD, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smith, Andrew J., MD, MSc</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nathens, Avery B., MD, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Conn, Lesley Gotlib, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Coburn, Natalie G., MD, MPH</creatorcontrib><title>Defining Communication Improvement Needs in General Surgery: An Analysis of Pages, Communications, Patterns, and Content☆?</title><title>Journal of surgical education</title><addtitle>J Surg Educ</addtitle><description>Objective To describe patterns of pages communication to general surgery (GS) residents, identify the need for and develop strategies to improve interprofessional communication. Design Retrospective cohort study. Setting General surgery (GS) service at a tertiary care academic institution, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, in Toronto, Ontario, Canada. Participants All pages sent to GS residents over 4 weeks at an academic institution. Timing, training level of receiver and content of pages were captured. Results Communication priority was assigned by 2 independent reviewers—low (121+ min), medium (31-120 min), high (6-30 min), and immediate (0-5 min) priority. Overall, 2 independent reviewers analyzed pages’ content through an inductive process, and generated themes. Of 2025 pages retrieved, 963 (47.5%) contained exclusively a call back number. A median of 74 pages per day (range: 43-116) were received, with median page interval of 9.4 minutes (range: 0-640). Junior residents received 79.5% of pages. Timing of the pages was 43.9% weekday shift, 31.8% weeknight shift, and 24.3% weekend call. Communication priority was deemed low for 35.4% of pages, medium for 32.3%, high for 12.4%, and immediate for 0.7%. Content analysis of 1062 pages generated 5 major themes: nonurgent medical issue (54.0%), administrative (15.3%), communication (13.5%), emergencies (4.8%), and GS consultation requests (4.0%). Priority and content of pages varied according to training level and page timing. Conclusions Pages to GS residents were frequent and most often of low priority. They were seldom related to urgent medical matters. Education and new communication strategies are warranted to reduce low priority pages.</description><subject>Academic Medical Centers</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Cohort Studies</subject><subject>communication</subject><subject>education</subject><subject>Education, Medical, Graduate - methods</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>General Surgery - education</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Interdisciplinary Communication</subject><subject>Internship and Residency - organization &amp; administration</subject><subject>Interpersonal and Communication Skills</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Needs Assessment</subject><subject>Ontario</subject><subject>page</subject><subject>Patient Care</subject><subject>Professionalism</subject><subject>residents</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>Tertiary Care Centers</subject><issn>1931-7204</issn><issn>1878-7452</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFUdtqFTEUHUSxtfoFguTRB8-Y28xkBJVy1FooWqg-h5xk55BxJtMmM4UDfe43-H1-iXs8VdAXIZC92Wtf1lpF8ZTRklFWv-zKLs9pW3JMSlqVlMp7xSFTjVo1suL3MW4FWzWcyoPiUc4dpZVsefuwOOCNUnVbq8Pi5h34EEPckvU4DHMM1kxhjOR0uEzjNQwQJ_IJwGUSIjmBCMn05ALXQtq9IscRn-l3OWQyenJutpBf_D0J83MzTZCWyESH1Tjh1B_fb98-Lh5402d4cvcfFV8_vP-y_rg6-3xyuj4-W1nJ5IQMmKTeVsxXbUM5CLnhNQi8qq64dVh1omoEky2z1rva09ZzW7uNUFxxY8RR8Xw_FzldzZAnPYRsoe9NhHHOmikpKVetUggVe6hNY84JvL5MYTBppxnVi-y6079k14vsmlYaZceuZ3cL5s0A7k_Pb50R8HoPAKR5HSDpbANECy4ksJN2Y_jPgjf_9Ns-LBL332AHuRvnhD4gE525pvpicX4xntUCXadc_ATFO6so</recordid><startdate>20161101</startdate><enddate>20161101</enddate><creator>Hallet, Julie, MD, MSc</creator><creator>Wallace, David, MSc</creator><creator>El-Sedfy, Abraham, MD</creator><creator>Ahmed, Najma, MD, PhD</creator><creator>Smith, Andrew J., MD, MSc</creator><creator>Nathens, Avery B., MD, PhD</creator><creator>Conn, Lesley Gotlib, PhD</creator><creator>Coburn, Natalie G., MD, MPH</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5108-1072</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20161101</creationdate><title>Defining Communication Improvement Needs in General Surgery: An Analysis of Pages, Communications, Patterns, and Content☆?</title><author>Hallet, Julie, MD, MSc ; Wallace, David, MSc ; El-Sedfy, Abraham, MD ; Ahmed, Najma, MD, PhD ; Smith, Andrew J., MD, MSc ; Nathens, Avery B., MD, PhD ; Conn, Lesley Gotlib, PhD ; Coburn, Natalie G., MD, MPH</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c414t-72140fc51f59702e34b26e3eed652cd214d35731491ccfd6f09f2c6db38282aa3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Academic Medical Centers</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Cohort Studies</topic><topic>communication</topic><topic>education</topic><topic>Education, Medical, Graduate - methods</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>General Surgery - education</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Interdisciplinary Communication</topic><topic>Internship and Residency - organization &amp; administration</topic><topic>Interpersonal and Communication Skills</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Needs Assessment</topic><topic>Ontario</topic><topic>page</topic><topic>Patient Care</topic><topic>Professionalism</topic><topic>residents</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>Tertiary Care Centers</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hallet, Julie, MD, MSc</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wallace, David, MSc</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>El-Sedfy, Abraham, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ahmed, Najma, MD, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smith, Andrew J., MD, MSc</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nathens, Avery B., MD, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Conn, Lesley Gotlib, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Coburn, Natalie G., MD, MPH</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of surgical education</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hallet, Julie, MD, MSc</au><au>Wallace, David, MSc</au><au>El-Sedfy, Abraham, MD</au><au>Ahmed, Najma, MD, PhD</au><au>Smith, Andrew J., MD, MSc</au><au>Nathens, Avery B., MD, PhD</au><au>Conn, Lesley Gotlib, PhD</au><au>Coburn, Natalie G., MD, MPH</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Defining Communication Improvement Needs in General Surgery: An Analysis of Pages, Communications, Patterns, and Content☆?</atitle><jtitle>Journal of surgical education</jtitle><addtitle>J Surg Educ</addtitle><date>2016-11-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>73</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>959</spage><epage>967</epage><pages>959-967</pages><issn>1931-7204</issn><eissn>1878-7452</eissn><abstract>Objective To describe patterns of pages communication to general surgery (GS) residents, identify the need for and develop strategies to improve interprofessional communication. Design Retrospective cohort study. Setting General surgery (GS) service at a tertiary care academic institution, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, in Toronto, Ontario, Canada. Participants All pages sent to GS residents over 4 weeks at an academic institution. Timing, training level of receiver and content of pages were captured. Results Communication priority was assigned by 2 independent reviewers—low (121+ min), medium (31-120 min), high (6-30 min), and immediate (0-5 min) priority. Overall, 2 independent reviewers analyzed pages’ content through an inductive process, and generated themes. Of 2025 pages retrieved, 963 (47.5%) contained exclusively a call back number. A median of 74 pages per day (range: 43-116) were received, with median page interval of 9.4 minutes (range: 0-640). Junior residents received 79.5% of pages. Timing of the pages was 43.9% weekday shift, 31.8% weeknight shift, and 24.3% weekend call. Communication priority was deemed low for 35.4% of pages, medium for 32.3%, high for 12.4%, and immediate for 0.7%. Content analysis of 1062 pages generated 5 major themes: nonurgent medical issue (54.0%), administrative (15.3%), communication (13.5%), emergencies (4.8%), and GS consultation requests (4.0%). Priority and content of pages varied according to training level and page timing. Conclusions Pages to GS residents were frequent and most often of low priority. They were seldom related to urgent medical matters. Education and new communication strategies are warranted to reduce low priority pages.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>27886968</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.jsurg.2016.05.004</doi><tpages>9</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5108-1072</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1931-7204
ispartof Journal of surgical education, 2016-11, Vol.73 (6), p.959-967
issn 1931-7204
1878-7452
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1844028988
source ScienceDirect Freedom Collection 2022-2024
subjects Academic Medical Centers
Adult
Cohort Studies
communication
education
Education, Medical, Graduate - methods
Female
General Surgery - education
Humans
Interdisciplinary Communication
Internship and Residency - organization & administration
Interpersonal and Communication Skills
Male
Needs Assessment
Ontario
page
Patient Care
Professionalism
residents
Retrospective Studies
Surgery
Tertiary Care Centers
title Defining Communication Improvement Needs in General Surgery: An Analysis of Pages, Communications, Patterns, and Content☆?
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-29T20%3A19%3A56IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Defining%20Communication%20Improvement%20Needs%20in%20General%20Surgery:%20An%20Analysis%20of%20Pages,%20Communications,%20Patterns,%20and%20Content%E2%98%86?&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20surgical%20education&rft.au=Hallet,%20Julie,%20MD,%20MSc&rft.date=2016-11-01&rft.volume=73&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=959&rft.epage=967&rft.pages=959-967&rft.issn=1931-7204&rft.eissn=1878-7452&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jsurg.2016.05.004&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1844028988%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c414t-72140fc51f59702e34b26e3eed652cd214d35731491ccfd6f09f2c6db38282aa3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1844028988&rft_id=info:pmid/27886968&rfr_iscdi=true