Loading…

Cavernous Sinus Invasion in Pituitary Adenomas: Systematic Review and Pooled Data Meta-Analysis of Radiologic Criteria and Comparison of Endoscopic and Microscopic Surgery

Despite the substantial impact of cavernous sinus invasion (CSI) in pituitary adenoma surgery, its radiologic determination has been inconsistent and variable, and the role of endonasal endoscopic surgery has been unclear. This is a systematic review and pooled data meta-analysis of the literature t...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:World neurosurgery 2016-12, Vol.96, p.36-46
Main Authors: Dhandapani, Sivashanmugam, Singh, Harminder, Negm, Hazem M., Cohen, Salomon, Anand, Vijay K., Schwartz, Theodore H.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c422t-51b0b40ef18045e17f54df5d38b9b7def4e16cafd2acae155bc810f535b23bfa3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c422t-51b0b40ef18045e17f54df5d38b9b7def4e16cafd2acae155bc810f535b23bfa3
container_end_page 46
container_issue
container_start_page 36
container_title World neurosurgery
container_volume 96
creator Dhandapani, Sivashanmugam
Singh, Harminder
Negm, Hazem M.
Cohen, Salomon
Anand, Vijay K.
Schwartz, Theodore H.
description Despite the substantial impact of cavernous sinus invasion (CSI) in pituitary adenoma surgery, its radiologic determination has been inconsistent and variable, and the role of endonasal endoscopic surgery has been unclear. This is a systematic review and pooled data meta-analysis of the literature to ascertain the best radiologic criteria for CSI and verify the efficacy and safety of an endonasal endoscopic approach. We searched the MEDLINE database (1993–2015) to identify studies on radiologic criteria for CSI and endonasal surgery. Using PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines, the studies included were reviewed for CSI criteria, gross total resection (GTR), endocrine remission, cranial nerve deficits, carotid injury, and other complications. The prevalence of CSI was 43% radiographically compared with 18% intraoperatively (P < 0.001). The radiologic criteria of inferolateral venous compartment obliteration and Knosp 3–4 had the highest correlation with intraoperative CSI and the lowest correlation with GTR. Microscopy had significantly overestimated intraoperative CSI compared with endoscopy (P 
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.wneu.2016.08.088
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1844606199</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1878875016307719</els_id><sourcerecordid>1844606199</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c422t-51b0b40ef18045e17f54df5d38b9b7def4e16cafd2acae155bc810f535b23bfa3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9UcFu3CAURFWrJkrzAz1UHHvxFmxj46qXlZM2kRI1yrZnhOERsbJhC3ij_ab-ZHE3yTHoCR5iZoAZhD5SsqKENl-2q0cH86rM_YrwXPwNOqW85QVvm-7tS8_ICTqPcUvyqGjN2-o9Oilb1lHS8VP0t5d7CM7PEW-sy_O128tovcPW4TubZptkOOC1BucnGb_izSEmmGSyCt_D3sIjlk7jO-9H0PhCJolvIcli7eR4iDZib_C91NaP_iFT-mATBCv_k3o_7WSwMV-WUZdO-6j8LqOWw1urwvN-M4cHCIcP6J2RY4Tzp_UM_f5--au_Km5-_rju1zeFqssyFYwOZKgJGMpJzYC2htXaMF3xoRtaDaYG2ihpdCmVBMrYoDglhlVsKKvByOoMfT7q7oL_M0NMYrJRwThKB9koQXldN6ShXZeh5RG6PDYGMGIX7JQdE5SIJSexFUtOYslJEJ6LZ9KnJ_15mEC_UJ5TyYBvRwDkX2aPg4jKglOgbQCVhPb2Nf1_AImobQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1844606199</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Cavernous Sinus Invasion in Pituitary Adenomas: Systematic Review and Pooled Data Meta-Analysis of Radiologic Criteria and Comparison of Endoscopic and Microscopic Surgery</title><source>ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Dhandapani, Sivashanmugam ; Singh, Harminder ; Negm, Hazem M. ; Cohen, Salomon ; Anand, Vijay K. ; Schwartz, Theodore H.</creator><creatorcontrib>Dhandapani, Sivashanmugam ; Singh, Harminder ; Negm, Hazem M. ; Cohen, Salomon ; Anand, Vijay K. ; Schwartz, Theodore H.</creatorcontrib><description>Despite the substantial impact of cavernous sinus invasion (CSI) in pituitary adenoma surgery, its radiologic determination has been inconsistent and variable, and the role of endonasal endoscopic surgery has been unclear. This is a systematic review and pooled data meta-analysis of the literature to ascertain the best radiologic criteria for CSI and verify the efficacy and safety of an endonasal endoscopic approach. We searched the MEDLINE database (1993–2015) to identify studies on radiologic criteria for CSI and endonasal surgery. Using PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines, the studies included were reviewed for CSI criteria, gross total resection (GTR), endocrine remission, cranial nerve deficits, carotid injury, and other complications. The prevalence of CSI was 43% radiographically compared with 18% intraoperatively (P &lt; 0.001). The radiologic criteria of inferolateral venous compartment obliteration and Knosp 3–4 had the highest correlation with intraoperative CSI and the lowest correlation with GTR. Microscopy had significantly overestimated intraoperative CSI compared with endoscopy (P &lt; 0.001) for each Knosp grade. Endoscopy had significantly higher GTR than did microscopy particularly for Knosp 3–4 (47% vs. 21%; P = 0.001). Carotid injury and cranial nerve deficits occurred in 0.9% and 5%, respectively, with endoscopy. Among endoscopic series with CSI, GTR% showed significant correlation with number of patients in the series (P ≤ 0.01) but no correlation with complications, indicating the relative safety of endonasal endoscopy in experienced hands for removing tumors with CSI. Knosp 3–4 remains the best objective indicator of CSI. Microscopy tends to overestimate intraoperative CSI compared with endoscopy. Among pituitary adenomas with CSI, GTR in endoscopic series is higher than microscopy and improves with experience without significant additional morbidity.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1878-8750</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1878-8769</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2016.08.088</identifier><identifier>PMID: 27591098</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Adenoma - diagnostic imaging ; Adenoma - pathology ; Adenoma - surgery ; Cavernous Sinus - diagnostic imaging ; Cavernous Sinus - pathology ; Cavernous Sinus - surgery ; Cavernous sinus invasion ; Complications ; Endonasal endoscopy ; GTR ; Humans ; Microsurgery ; Natural Orifice Endoscopic Surgery ; Neoplasm Invasiveness ; Neuroendoscopy ; Neurosurgical Procedures ; Nose ; Pituitary adenoma ; Pituitary Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging ; Pituitary Neoplasms - pathology ; Pituitary Neoplasms - surgery ; Radiological criteria ; Remission ; Systematic review</subject><ispartof>World neurosurgery, 2016-12, Vol.96, p.36-46</ispartof><rights>2016</rights><rights>Published by Elsevier Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c422t-51b0b40ef18045e17f54df5d38b9b7def4e16cafd2acae155bc810f535b23bfa3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c422t-51b0b40ef18045e17f54df5d38b9b7def4e16cafd2acae155bc810f535b23bfa3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27591098$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Dhandapani, Sivashanmugam</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Singh, Harminder</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Negm, Hazem M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cohen, Salomon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Anand, Vijay K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schwartz, Theodore H.</creatorcontrib><title>Cavernous Sinus Invasion in Pituitary Adenomas: Systematic Review and Pooled Data Meta-Analysis of Radiologic Criteria and Comparison of Endoscopic and Microscopic Surgery</title><title>World neurosurgery</title><addtitle>World Neurosurg</addtitle><description>Despite the substantial impact of cavernous sinus invasion (CSI) in pituitary adenoma surgery, its radiologic determination has been inconsistent and variable, and the role of endonasal endoscopic surgery has been unclear. This is a systematic review and pooled data meta-analysis of the literature to ascertain the best radiologic criteria for CSI and verify the efficacy and safety of an endonasal endoscopic approach. We searched the MEDLINE database (1993–2015) to identify studies on radiologic criteria for CSI and endonasal surgery. Using PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines, the studies included were reviewed for CSI criteria, gross total resection (GTR), endocrine remission, cranial nerve deficits, carotid injury, and other complications. The prevalence of CSI was 43% radiographically compared with 18% intraoperatively (P &lt; 0.001). The radiologic criteria of inferolateral venous compartment obliteration and Knosp 3–4 had the highest correlation with intraoperative CSI and the lowest correlation with GTR. Microscopy had significantly overestimated intraoperative CSI compared with endoscopy (P &lt; 0.001) for each Knosp grade. Endoscopy had significantly higher GTR than did microscopy particularly for Knosp 3–4 (47% vs. 21%; P = 0.001). Carotid injury and cranial nerve deficits occurred in 0.9% and 5%, respectively, with endoscopy. Among endoscopic series with CSI, GTR% showed significant correlation with number of patients in the series (P ≤ 0.01) but no correlation with complications, indicating the relative safety of endonasal endoscopy in experienced hands for removing tumors with CSI. Knosp 3–4 remains the best objective indicator of CSI. Microscopy tends to overestimate intraoperative CSI compared with endoscopy. Among pituitary adenomas with CSI, GTR in endoscopic series is higher than microscopy and improves with experience without significant additional morbidity.</description><subject>Adenoma - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Adenoma - pathology</subject><subject>Adenoma - surgery</subject><subject>Cavernous Sinus - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Cavernous Sinus - pathology</subject><subject>Cavernous Sinus - surgery</subject><subject>Cavernous sinus invasion</subject><subject>Complications</subject><subject>Endonasal endoscopy</subject><subject>GTR</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Microsurgery</subject><subject>Natural Orifice Endoscopic Surgery</subject><subject>Neoplasm Invasiveness</subject><subject>Neuroendoscopy</subject><subject>Neurosurgical Procedures</subject><subject>Nose</subject><subject>Pituitary adenoma</subject><subject>Pituitary Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Pituitary Neoplasms - pathology</subject><subject>Pituitary Neoplasms - surgery</subject><subject>Radiological criteria</subject><subject>Remission</subject><subject>Systematic review</subject><issn>1878-8750</issn><issn>1878-8769</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9UcFu3CAURFWrJkrzAz1UHHvxFmxj46qXlZM2kRI1yrZnhOERsbJhC3ij_ab-ZHE3yTHoCR5iZoAZhD5SsqKENl-2q0cH86rM_YrwXPwNOqW85QVvm-7tS8_ICTqPcUvyqGjN2-o9Oilb1lHS8VP0t5d7CM7PEW-sy_O128tovcPW4TubZptkOOC1BucnGb_izSEmmGSyCt_D3sIjlk7jO-9H0PhCJolvIcli7eR4iDZib_C91NaP_iFT-mATBCv_k3o_7WSwMV-WUZdO-6j8LqOWw1urwvN-M4cHCIcP6J2RY4Tzp_UM_f5--au_Km5-_rju1zeFqssyFYwOZKgJGMpJzYC2htXaMF3xoRtaDaYG2ihpdCmVBMrYoDglhlVsKKvByOoMfT7q7oL_M0NMYrJRwThKB9koQXldN6ShXZeh5RG6PDYGMGIX7JQdE5SIJSexFUtOYslJEJ6LZ9KnJ_15mEC_UJ5TyYBvRwDkX2aPg4jKglOgbQCVhPb2Nf1_AImobQ</recordid><startdate>201612</startdate><enddate>201612</enddate><creator>Dhandapani, Sivashanmugam</creator><creator>Singh, Harminder</creator><creator>Negm, Hazem M.</creator><creator>Cohen, Salomon</creator><creator>Anand, Vijay K.</creator><creator>Schwartz, Theodore H.</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201612</creationdate><title>Cavernous Sinus Invasion in Pituitary Adenomas: Systematic Review and Pooled Data Meta-Analysis of Radiologic Criteria and Comparison of Endoscopic and Microscopic Surgery</title><author>Dhandapani, Sivashanmugam ; Singh, Harminder ; Negm, Hazem M. ; Cohen, Salomon ; Anand, Vijay K. ; Schwartz, Theodore H.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c422t-51b0b40ef18045e17f54df5d38b9b7def4e16cafd2acae155bc810f535b23bfa3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Adenoma - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Adenoma - pathology</topic><topic>Adenoma - surgery</topic><topic>Cavernous Sinus - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Cavernous Sinus - pathology</topic><topic>Cavernous Sinus - surgery</topic><topic>Cavernous sinus invasion</topic><topic>Complications</topic><topic>Endonasal endoscopy</topic><topic>GTR</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Microsurgery</topic><topic>Natural Orifice Endoscopic Surgery</topic><topic>Neoplasm Invasiveness</topic><topic>Neuroendoscopy</topic><topic>Neurosurgical Procedures</topic><topic>Nose</topic><topic>Pituitary adenoma</topic><topic>Pituitary Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Pituitary Neoplasms - pathology</topic><topic>Pituitary Neoplasms - surgery</topic><topic>Radiological criteria</topic><topic>Remission</topic><topic>Systematic review</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Dhandapani, Sivashanmugam</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Singh, Harminder</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Negm, Hazem M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cohen, Salomon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Anand, Vijay K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schwartz, Theodore H.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>World neurosurgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Dhandapani, Sivashanmugam</au><au>Singh, Harminder</au><au>Negm, Hazem M.</au><au>Cohen, Salomon</au><au>Anand, Vijay K.</au><au>Schwartz, Theodore H.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Cavernous Sinus Invasion in Pituitary Adenomas: Systematic Review and Pooled Data Meta-Analysis of Radiologic Criteria and Comparison of Endoscopic and Microscopic Surgery</atitle><jtitle>World neurosurgery</jtitle><addtitle>World Neurosurg</addtitle><date>2016-12</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>96</volume><spage>36</spage><epage>46</epage><pages>36-46</pages><issn>1878-8750</issn><eissn>1878-8769</eissn><abstract>Despite the substantial impact of cavernous sinus invasion (CSI) in pituitary adenoma surgery, its radiologic determination has been inconsistent and variable, and the role of endonasal endoscopic surgery has been unclear. This is a systematic review and pooled data meta-analysis of the literature to ascertain the best radiologic criteria for CSI and verify the efficacy and safety of an endonasal endoscopic approach. We searched the MEDLINE database (1993–2015) to identify studies on radiologic criteria for CSI and endonasal surgery. Using PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines, the studies included were reviewed for CSI criteria, gross total resection (GTR), endocrine remission, cranial nerve deficits, carotid injury, and other complications. The prevalence of CSI was 43% radiographically compared with 18% intraoperatively (P &lt; 0.001). The radiologic criteria of inferolateral venous compartment obliteration and Knosp 3–4 had the highest correlation with intraoperative CSI and the lowest correlation with GTR. Microscopy had significantly overestimated intraoperative CSI compared with endoscopy (P &lt; 0.001) for each Knosp grade. Endoscopy had significantly higher GTR than did microscopy particularly for Knosp 3–4 (47% vs. 21%; P = 0.001). Carotid injury and cranial nerve deficits occurred in 0.9% and 5%, respectively, with endoscopy. Among endoscopic series with CSI, GTR% showed significant correlation with number of patients in the series (P ≤ 0.01) but no correlation with complications, indicating the relative safety of endonasal endoscopy in experienced hands for removing tumors with CSI. Knosp 3–4 remains the best objective indicator of CSI. Microscopy tends to overestimate intraoperative CSI compared with endoscopy. Among pituitary adenomas with CSI, GTR in endoscopic series is higher than microscopy and improves with experience without significant additional morbidity.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>27591098</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.wneu.2016.08.088</doi><tpages>11</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1878-8750
ispartof World neurosurgery, 2016-12, Vol.96, p.36-46
issn 1878-8750
1878-8769
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1844606199
source ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Adenoma - diagnostic imaging
Adenoma - pathology
Adenoma - surgery
Cavernous Sinus - diagnostic imaging
Cavernous Sinus - pathology
Cavernous Sinus - surgery
Cavernous sinus invasion
Complications
Endonasal endoscopy
GTR
Humans
Microsurgery
Natural Orifice Endoscopic Surgery
Neoplasm Invasiveness
Neuroendoscopy
Neurosurgical Procedures
Nose
Pituitary adenoma
Pituitary Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging
Pituitary Neoplasms - pathology
Pituitary Neoplasms - surgery
Radiological criteria
Remission
Systematic review
title Cavernous Sinus Invasion in Pituitary Adenomas: Systematic Review and Pooled Data Meta-Analysis of Radiologic Criteria and Comparison of Endoscopic and Microscopic Surgery
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T16%3A41%3A00IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Cavernous%20Sinus%20Invasion%20in%20Pituitary%20Adenomas:%20Systematic%20Review%20and%20Pooled%20Data%20Meta-Analysis%20of%20Radiologic%20Criteria%20and%20Comparison%20of%20Endoscopic%20and%20Microscopic%20Surgery&rft.jtitle=World%20neurosurgery&rft.au=Dhandapani,%20Sivashanmugam&rft.date=2016-12&rft.volume=96&rft.spage=36&rft.epage=46&rft.pages=36-46&rft.issn=1878-8750&rft.eissn=1878-8769&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.wneu.2016.08.088&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1844606199%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c422t-51b0b40ef18045e17f54df5d38b9b7def4e16cafd2acae155bc810f535b23bfa3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1844606199&rft_id=info:pmid/27591098&rfr_iscdi=true